Se movió una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Talk:Master ES
Se trasladó una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Discusión:Israhel van Meckenem
Se trasladó una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Discusión:Israhel van Meckenem
Se trasladó una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Discusión:Bull Stone House
Se movió una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Discusión:Antiguo Egipto#Artículo antiguo Egipto bajo la sección 20, Artículo antiguo Egipto
Se trasladó una discusión sobre una fotografía de Alice Prin que desapareció el 10 de septiembre de su artículo a user_Talk:TheParanoidOne
Se copió una discusión sobre el artículo Dinosaurio en relación con la popularidad de la exhibición Smithsonian de Jim Gary de 1990 en User talk:Firsfron
Se movió una discusión aquí al artículo que se está discutiendo, Discusión:Deidad
Se trasladó una discusión aquí sobre Alejandro Magno a la página de discusión del usuario Enric Naval y al artículo
Se trasladó una discusión aquí sobre el Mapa de Nearco insertado en Alejandro Magno a la discusión en Alejandro Magno
Se trasladó una discusión aquí sobre imágenes y ediciones para Karl Benz a esa página.
Se movió una discusión iniciada aquí sobre un apodo para Sarasota a su página de discusión
Se trasladó una discusión iniciada aquí sobre el retrato de Chandos y el sitio de Shakespeare Birthplace Trust a la página de discusión del artículo, Discusión:Retrato de Chandos
Se trasladó una discusión iniciada aquí sobre Alfred Lee Loomis a la página de discusión del artículo Discusión: Alfred Lee Loomis
movió una consulta de pdfpdf a esa página de discusión
He eliminado la edición de este usuario en [{Engraving]]. Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que es claramente WP:POV y no proviene de fuentes fiables . Esa edición se hizo hace casi dos meses. Estaré atento al usuario y cualquier otra infracción será bloqueada. En general, es perfectamente permisible eliminar una edición como esa e invitar al usuario a discutir los asuntos en la página de discusión del artículo. Buena suerte, Gwernol 20:49, 29 de noviembre de 2006 (UTC)
Gracias por las excelentes incorporaciones al artículo de Great Trail . Sin embargo, incluiste información que no corresponde a este artículo en particular y tendré que recortarlo en consecuencia. House of Scandal 04:22, 30 de diciembre de 2006 (UTC)
Diosa Isabel, virgen invencible, siempre (por siempre) reina, también (aún más) César(a) de Inglaterra y Francia, y poderosa Emperatriz de España, más fuerte luchadora en defensa de la fe cristiana, más sabia patrona de toda erudición*, más afortunada* vencedora* de los inmensos (anchos) océanos, fundadora del Colegio de Jesús (¿Colegio de Cristo?) en Oxon.
* Literarum debe ser Litterarum; Faelicissima s/b Felicissima; triunfatrix no es latín clásico (bueno)
¡Espero que esto ayude!. Jim 62 sch 23:56, 10 de marzo de 2007 (UTC)
Haga clic en "mostrar" para abrir el contenido.
Ya tenemos un artículo sobre el nacimiento virginal . La partenogénesis no es el lugar para ello. — Viriditas | Discusión 03:21, 18 agosto 2007 (UTC)
Gracias por tus esfuerzos para limpiar el antiguo Egipto . He eliminado una imagen que has puesto en el artículo porque es de muy baja calidad y no refleja realmente el mejor trabajo de Wiki. Me gustaría incluir imágenes en el artículo que ejemplifiquen más de una idea a la vez. Para la sección de arte, estaba pensando en tener una imagen de Hatshepsut, que mostraría la perspectiva 2-D distorsionada y el uso del arte con un propósito político, todo a la vez. Espero que podamos encontrar una imagen de muy buena calidad en Commons para este propósito. Esta misma lógica debería ser válida para otras imágenes del artículo, pero no queremos terminar con demasiadas, o parecerá abarrotado.
Agradezco sus esfuerzos y no dude en hacer preguntas o comentar el contenido. Jeff Dahl 01:53, 27 de septiembre de 2007 (UTC)
Se trasladó la discusión del contenido a la página de discusión del artículo, Discusión:Antiguo Egipto#Artículo antiguo Egipto 83d40m 15:14 29 sep 2007 (UTC)
Hola. Hace bastante que no miro Wikipedia, y mucho menos la edito, así que tendrás que refrescarme la memoria. ¿A qué imagen o artículo te refieres exactamente? Si miro el historial de revisión de los artículos de Alice Prin , nunca he hecho ninguna edición. Por favor, explícame y veré qué puedo hacer.
(A pesar de tu pedido, te respondo aquí ya que parece poco probable que mi página de discusión siga siendo vista más de un mes después de tu comentario allí). -- TheParanoidOne 01:25, 11 de noviembre de 2007 (UTC)
Gracias por subir o contribuir a Image:Howardduck-b.JPG . Observo que la página de la imagen especifica que la imagen se está utilizando de acuerdo con el uso legítimo , pero no hay una explicación adecuada ni una justificación de por qué cada uso específico en Wikipedia constituye un uso legítimo. Vaya a la página de descripción de la imagen y edítela para incluir una justificación del uso legítimo .
Si ha subido otros medios de uso legítimo, considere comprobar que ha especificado la justificación del uso legítimo también en esas páginas. Puede encontrar una lista de las páginas de "imágenes" que ha editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando ha iniciado sesión) y luego seleccionando "Imagen" en el cuadro desplegable. Tenga en cuenta que cualquier medio que no sea libre y que carezca de dicha explicación se eliminará una semana después de que se haya subido, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Si tiene alguna pregunta, hágala en la página de preguntas sobre derechos de autor de medios . Gracias. NOTA: una vez que corrija esto, elimine la etiqueta de la página de la imagen. STBotI ( discusión ) 00:18, 18 de noviembre de 2007 (UTC)
Creo que necesito ayuda con estas dos imágenes. He leído las instrucciones y pensé que estaba siguiendo las indicaciones para un uso legítimo, ya que el artículo en el que las estaba colocando trata sobre la película. Interpreté las instrucciones como que se trataba de un uso legítimo. Hice una declaración en el resumen a tal efecto. Buscaré en las páginas de ayuda. 83d40m (discusión) 00:42 18 nov 2007 (UTC)
Por favor, compruebe si la declaración de uso legítimo de las dos imágenes es adecuada. He insertado una declaración para cada imagen, la página de descripción de la imagen y la página de descripción de la imagen, y he eliminado la etiqueta que se había colocado solo en -b.
Gracias por la ayuda 83d40m (discusión) 18:23 18 nov 2007 (UTC)
Hola 83,
Gracias por sus contribuciones a Dinosaur . Se agradece su aporte al contenido de este artículo. Sin embargo, revertí nuevamente sus cambios a este artículo. Se lee como un anuncio: "El director del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural del Instituto Smithsoniano en Washington, DC , Larry O'Reilly, afirmó que los ingeniosos y atractivos dinosaurios creados por el escultor Jim Gary , exhibidos por el museo durante cuatro meses en 1990, atrajeron la mayor asistencia registrada en el museo". y está respaldado por esta referencia, que no dice nada sobre cuatro meses, o (más importante) la declaración de que "la exhibición atrajo la mayor asistencia registrada en el museo". Esa parte no está citada, y dado que es probablemente la única parte que podría usarse en una sección que analiza la popularidad de los dinosaurios , la he eliminado.
Dinosaur es un artículo destacado , lo que significa que representa lo mejor de los artículos de Wikipedia, con buenas citas de fuentes confiables. Las fuentes deben confirmar lo que decimos en el artículo. El obituario que usaste no lo hace. Saludos, Firsfron of Ronchester 01:43, 18 de noviembre de 2007 (UTC)
Gracias por subir la imagen:Nat geographical world premier edition cover.JPG . Sin embargo, existe la preocupación de que la justificación que ha proporcionado para usar esta imagen bajo "uso justo" pueda no ser válida. Lea atentamente las instrucciones en Wikipedia:Contenido no libre , luego vaya a la página de descripción de la imagen y aclare por qué cree que la imagen califica para uso justo. Usar una de las plantillas en Wikipedia:Guía de justificación del uso justo es una forma sencilla de asegurarse de que su imagen cumple con la política de Wikipedia, pero recuerde que debe completar la plantilla. No inserte simplemente una plantilla en blanco en una página de imagen.
Si se determina que la imagen no cumple con los requisitos de uso legítimo, se eliminará en un par de días según nuestros criterios de eliminación rápida . Si tiene alguna pregunta, hágala en la página de preguntas sobre derechos de autor de los medios . Gracias. BetacommandBot ( discusión ) 14:27 19 nov 2007 (UTC)
Gracias por el aviso. He insertado la justificación en la imagen y espero haber completado correctamente la información requerida. 83d40m (discusión) 23:23 19 nov 2007 (UTC)
Hola, gracias por tu excelente trabajo en la isla de Boa . Si tienes mucha información sobre la figura de Janus, quizás quieras crear un nuevo artículo específicamente sobre ella. Un saludo, Bláthnaid 14:40, 11 de diciembre de 2007 (UTC)
Gracias por tu cumplido. Me gustaría evitar la implicación de "Janis" y enfatizar que se trata de la figura de la Isla Boa... para permitir que esta inusual estatua tenga su propio reconocimiento como figura celta y la investigaré cuando el tiempo lo permita cuando tenga más detalles recopilados sobre ella y las tallas de piedra similares de su período. Hay otras estatuas de dos caras en otras culturas y es una vergüenza relacionar esta con la romana solo porque un poeta estaba familiarizado con esa... Te avisaré cuando la aborde y estoy copiando esta discusión en la página misma para futuras referencias. 83d40m (discusión) 00:52 12 dic 2007 (UTC)
Algunos de los textos que le presentaste a Deity :
"Imágenes tentadoras de lo que pueden ser decenas de miles de años de adoración de deidades que parecen no haber sido cuestionadas y esencialmente inalteradas, lo que sugiere fácilmente que tal vez los humanos creyeron inicialmente en una sola deidad"
Esto parece muy poco neutral ("¿tentador"?) y parece una investigación original. ¿Puedes citarlo? Ilkali ( discusión ) 09:56 19 dic 2007 (UTC)
Muevo esta discusión a la página Discusión:Deidad para mantenerla relacionada con el tema. 83d40m (discusión) 07:36 21 dic 2007 (UTC)
- Carabinieri ( discusión ) 11:23, 17 de enero de 2008 (UTC)
He trabajado mucho últimamente en la edición de De mulieribus claris . También he añadido muchas biografías nuevas de la lista que antes eran enlaces rojos (ahora están todas azules). Encontré la imagen principal en la esquina derecha del artículo y la agregué. También puse todas las imágenes a la derecha junto a los nombres de las biografías. También trabajé mucho en De Casibus Virorum Illustrium . Últimamente, uno de mis artículos también apareció en DYK of Westinghouse Time Capsules . -- Doug talk 16:50, 26 de enero de 2008 (UTC)
Una imagen o archivo multimedia que has subido o modificado, Image:LionChaseZebra-cropped.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Imágenes y multimedia para su eliminación . Consulta la discusión para saber por qué (puede que tengas que buscar el título de la imagen para encontrar su entrada), si te interesa que no se elimine. Gracias. Kla'quot ( discusión | contribuciones ) 06:03 15 feb 2008 (UTC) Kla'quot ( discusión | contribuciones ) 06:03 15 feb 2008 (UTC)
Gracias por subir la imagen:Briggs Cunningham Time magazine cover April 26.1954.JPG . La página de descripción de la imagen actualmente especifica que la imagen no es libre y solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Si ha subido otros archivos multimedia sin licencia, compruebe si se utilizan en algún artículo o no. Puede encontrar una lista de las páginas de "imágenes" que ha editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando ha iniciado sesión) y seleccionando "Imagen" en el cuadro desplegable. Tenga en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. Zginder ( discusión ) ( Contrib ) 22:35, 28 de febrero de 2008 (UTC)
Gracias por subir la imagen:Karl Benz and Bertha Benz gravestone - vdetail2.JPG. Sin embargo, actualmente falta información sobre su estado de derechos de autor. Wikipedia se toma muy en serio los derechos de autor . Es posible que la eliminen pronto, a menos que podamos determinar la licencia y la fuente de la imagen. Si conoce esta información, puede agregar una etiqueta de derechos de autor a la página de descripción de la imagen .
Si tienes alguna pregunta, no dudes en preguntarla en la página de preguntas sobre derechos de autor de los medios . Gracias de nuevo por tu colaboración. NOTA: una vez que hayas corregido esto, elimina la etiqueta de la página de la imagen. STBotI ( discusión ) 14:35 15 mar 2008 (UTC)
insertado y etiqueta eliminada - gracias - 83d40m (discusión) 15:17 15 mar 2008 (UTC)
He trabajado mucho en prácticamente todos los artículos de cada uno de los 566 municipios de Nueva Jersey. La mayoría de los artículos son sencillos en cuanto a título y contenido. Pero hay algunos elementos extraños, y no es solo su existencia sino su solución lo que es problemático. ¿Debería incluirse "Township" en los títulos de municipios que rara vez usan el término de uso común, como acabo de ver sugerido para Springfield Township, Union County, New Jersey , que no usa comúnmente "Township", mientras que Springfield Township, Burlington County, New Jersey ? Hay muchos pares de distritos/municipios (más algunos que no son distritos), y la cuestión de cómo distinguir entre los dos municipios individuales es a menudo un desafío. Para un lugar mítico llamado "Foo", a menudo tenemos pares de "Foo, New Jersey" y "Foo Township, New Jersey", a veces complementados por "The Foos, New Jersey". Hay múltiples pares de "Foo Borough, New Jersey" / "Foo Township, New Jersey". La pregunta es a qué se refiere "Foo, Nueva Jersey", al distrito o al colectivo. Por ejemplo, hay Borough of Princeton, New Jersey / Princeton Township, New Jersey para los dos municipios, con Princeton, New Jersey cubriendo el colectivo. A menudo, las fuentes no son claras en cuanto a si una persona o lugar es de/está en el distrito o en el municipio, lo que hace que el artículo "Princeton, New Jersey" sea útil. En el caso de Chatham, claramente el municipio permanece sin cambios (como casi siempre debería). Estoy de acuerdo en trasladar Chatham, New Jersey a The Chathams o The Chathams, New Jersey (uniendo The Amboys , The Brunswicks , The Caldwells , The Oranges , The Plainfields , The Ridgefields y The Wildwoods ). El ajuste no es perfecto, pero "The Chathams" es un término en uso, como en el título del distrito escolar. Entonces, ¿qué hacer con el distrito? Me ha desconcertado y creo que otras personas se confunden por la ausencia del "distrito" en cuanto a si se hace referencia al municipio generalmente pequeño en el centro del par o al par combinado de distrito/municipio. Incluso el sitio web del distrito se refiere a sí mismo alternativamente como "distrito de Chatham" (en varios lugares del título), "distrito de Chatham" (en las palabras iniciales del primer párrafo) y como "Chatham" (quizás refiriéndose al par). Como dice el sitio, "el distrito de Chatham y el municipio de Chatham comparten una herencia común y a menudo se hace referencia a ambos por su nombre compartido, Chatham". Entiendo sus esfuerzos,Espero que podamos comunicarnos con otros miembros y participantes de WP:NJ para llegar a una conclusión. Gracias por comunicarte. Alansohn (hablar ) 14:36 6 julio 2008 (UTC)
movió la discusión de Chatham a la de continuar en un solo lugar 83d40m (discusión) 18:10 6 jul 2008 (UTC)
Hola,
Revertí tu edición al retrato de Chandos donde eliminaste el enlace a la página de Shakespeare Birthplace Trust sobre " ¿Cómo era Shakespeare? " con el comentario de edición " enlace rmv identificado como un lugar de ataque - hasta que se demuestre lo contrario - ". No tengo idea de qué es un "lugar de ataque", pero juzgaría que tiene connotaciones negativas; y Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, la fundación encargada de mantener los diversos edificios relacionados con Shakespeare en Stratford, difícilmente podría ser más modesta.
¿Podrías explicarme un poco más ese resumen de edición? -- Xover ( discusión ) 05:26 17 jul 2008 (UTC)
Sí, aquí está la advertencia que recibo al hacer un enlace al sitio, http://www.shakespeare.org.uk/content/view/16/16,
Lo encuentro muy curioso porque cuando intenté conectarme desde otro ordenador en otra ubicación, no recibí el aviso. Quizás sea mi software de control de virus... quién sabe. Nunca he recibido ese mensaje durante muchos años de protección por parte del mismo servicio con un historial perfecto para mí... un ordenador está conectado por acceso telefónico, el otro tiene una conexión de banda ancha de alta velocidad.
Eliminé el enlace y puse la anotación para alertar a otros sobre el riesgo que me informaron.
Si tienes alguna idea sobre el aviso que recibí, por favor continúa discutiéndolo aquí --- No suprimiré el enlace nuevamente, aunque sigo recibiéndolo desde esta máquina. -- 83d40m (discusión) 21:49 17 jul 2008 (UTC)
Acabo de volver al enlace y busqué más a fondo las opciones para el bloqueo y recibí esto,
Aviso proporcionado por la página de diagnóstico de navegación segura de Google para www.shakespeare.org.uk/content/view/
¿Cuál es el estado actual del listado de www.shakespeare.org.uk/content/view/?
El sitio está catalogado como sospechoso: visitar este sitio web puede dañar su computadora.
¿Qué pasó cuando Google visitó este sitio?
De las 14 páginas que hemos probado en el sitio durante los últimos 90 días, 5 páginas dieron como resultado la descarga e instalación de software malicioso sin el consentimiento del usuario. La última vez que Google visitó este sitio fue el 17/07/2008 y la última vez que se encontró contenido sospechoso en este sitio fue el 13/07/2008.
El software malicioso incluye 5 troyanos. La infección exitosa generó un promedio de 2 procesos nuevos en la máquina de destino.
El software malicioso está alojado en 1 dominio(s), incluido 61.155.8.0.
¿Este sitio ha actuado como intermediario dando lugar a una mayor distribución de malware?
Durante los últimos 90 días, www.shakespeare.org.uk/content/view/ no pareció funcionar como intermediario para la infección de ningún sitio.
¿Este sitio ha alojado malware?
No, este sitio no ha alojado software malicioso durante los últimos 90 días.
¿Cómo sucedió esto?
En algunos casos, terceros pueden agregar código malicioso a sitios legítimos, lo que provocaría que mostremos el mensaje de advertencia.
Próximos pasos:
- Regresar a la página anterior.
- Si es el propietario de este sitio web, puede solicitar una revisión de su sitio mediante las Herramientas para webmasters de Google. Puede obtener más información sobre el proceso de revisión en el Centro de ayuda para webmasters de Google.
Quizás esto te pueda dar más información --- 83d40m (discusión) 21:58 17 jul 2008 (UTC)
Así que me mantendré alejado del sitio al que te lleva el enlace, y creo que una advertencia a los demás es razonable... es tu elección qué acción tomar. --- 83d40m (discusión) 22:03 17 jul 2008 (UTC)
Gracias. Si vuelvo a hacer esto, utilizaré la página de discusión (también) y leeré las páginas a las que me remitiste. Ten en cuenta a SBT que la advertencia apareció solo en un sistema. No entiendo la dinámica de la diferencia, pero la conexión de banda ancha que utilicé y que no mostró la advertencia cuando la verifiqué dos veces después de tu reversión tiene una conexión altamente segura que podría deshabilitar este tipo de problemas...
He corregido los efectos extraños causados por las sangrías anteriores para que sea más útil para otros. -- 83d40m (discusión) 23:21 18 jul 2008 (UTC)
Moví algunos de los puntos anteriores a esta página para que toda la discusión esté junta. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 17:12 25 sep 2008 (UTC)
He notado que estás haciendo algunas contribuciones interesantes a estos artículos. Sería útil si pudieras agregar referencias a las fuentes que estás utilizando para obtener la información. ike9898 ( discusión ) 00:51 11 ago 2008 (UTC)
¡Hola! Gracias por ayudar a corregir y ampliar el artículo de Nell Newman . Te pediría que cites las fuentes que estás usando para obtener información, de modo que ese problema también pueda solucionarse. Voy a reemplazar la etiqueta {{ orphan }} ya que el límite habitual para el orfanato es de tres o más enlaces entrantes. ¡Gracias nuevamente por tu ayuda! — Ashanda ( discusión ) 23:59 27 sep 2008 (UTC)
Al parecer, incluí la referencia a las dos citas mientras me escribías... llevará tiempo reunir algunas de las otras. ¿Debería conservarse la plantilla hasta que se proporcionen otras o es suficiente para justificar la eliminación de la etiqueta? — 83d40m (discusión) 00:15 28 sep 2008 (UTC)
También se proporcionó otro enlace, por lo que tal vez se pueda eliminar también. Gracias por las notas y si no lo hace pronto, eliminaré la etiqueta de referencia. Realmente no entiendo cómo está utilizando los enlaces de Talkback, pero sigo mi antiguo formato de entradas dobles. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 01:39 28 sep 2008 (UTC)
Hola, soy un usuario de it.wiki, Austroungarika. Estoy traduciendo Bat (diosa) y pensé que "Image:Nagada figure.GIF" podría ser útil, así que quería subirlo a commons. ¿Hay alguna razón por la que no debería subirlo allí? Muchas gracias de antemano por su ayuda. -- Austroungarika regañar o llamar 13:55, 1 octubre 2008 (UTC) —Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Austroungarika ( discusión • contribs )
De nada. Tenga en cuenta que la diosa Murciélago debe ser identificada correctamente para dirigir a los lectores a su artículo. Algunos enlaces en el archivo de imagen no están correctamente vinculados. Por favor, hágame saber si puedo ayudarlo con la traducción. -- 83d40m (discusión) 23:10 11 oct 2008 (UTC)
Sí, a veces se pierde la conexión y no se registra mi inicio de sesión cuando se vuelve a conectar. "Alabanza" está en la cita de RO Faulkner, The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts , Oxford 1969, p. 181, como Enunciado 506 ... Yo soy Alabanza , yo soy Majestad, yo soy B3t (Murciélago) con Sus Dos Caras; Yo soy Aquel que es Salvado, y me he salvado de todas las cosas malas . No sé cuál es el significado y, lamentablemente, no tengo ninguna fuente para que usted pueda comprobarlo. Una búsqueda en Internet podría encontrar información para usted. Intenté buscar en Google RO Faulkner - Enunciado 506 y hay muchas discusiones sobre esa parte de la poesía, como http://thepyramidtexts.blogspot.com/2007/09/famous-pyramid-texts-herein-translated.html - parece probable que sea un término religioso especial para la deidad, como "Hosanna en las alturas" en los textos hebreos y cristianos. A menudo, esas cosas se traducen literalmente, sin ninguna comprensión de cuál era el significado contemporáneo en los rituales religiosos. Por lo general, los nombres religiosos son crípticos, destinados a ocultar el verdadero nombre de la deidad a aquellos que no pertenecen al culto o, tabú, por lo tanto, está prohibido su uso y siempre se representan con otros nombres y títulos. Un sitio tiene una cita, 288: La Serpiente de Alabanza está en su cetro Da(m), la Tefnut de Unas, la que sostiene a Shu, ella hace que su asiento sea amplio en Busiris (Ddw), en Mendes (Dd.t), en la necrópolis de Heliópolis. Ella erige sus dos soportes (jA.tj) frente al Grande. en http://www.pyramidtextsonline.com/translation.html. Otras son, Enunciado 282, 423: Decir las palabras: "Oh este país (xAs.t) Boca-del-Río, este es el lugar de mi derrocamiento. Este país, Boca-del-Río me pertenece, el Oro de la Alabanza, es xaj-tA.w de la alabanza, este tu buey, el renombrado, contra quien esto ha sido hecho". y 454: para que brilles así entre las [deidades], en este tu nombre de Aquello-que-brilla (THn.t), para que puedas estar complacido con él en su nombre de Aceite-de-Alabanza. La diosa rnnwt.t te amará.
Mi mejor suposición es que Praise sería un aspecto dorado brillante de la diosa, que el hablante (el rey) quiere "ser" ahora que está muerto y está pasando a convertirse en una deidad o reemplazar al rey anterior como hijo de la diosa y, por lo tanto, en una deidad. El rey a menudo era considerado el ternero de la gran diosa vaca, y cuando era hombre, se convertía en un toro (por supuesto, al principio, lo más probable es que el rey fuera sacrificado en un ritual sagrado que finalmente dejó de incluir el sacrificio, pero quedaron vestigios en las ceremonias religiosas). Esa es mi mejor suposición. El tema es intrigante y podría valer la pena investigar mucho para ver si alguien intenta aclarar el significado. Quizás estos resultados de la búsqueda de Google puedan llevar a una explicación. Copiaré esto para tu otra ubicación. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 00:33, 17 de octubre de 2008 (UTC)
20230702 agregando imagen preferida de commons para poder demostrar la figura
y que se le notifique también si se inicia la eliminación. Se coloca al principio de este tema en lugar de al final actual para facilitar la economía de espacio. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 12:56 2 jul 2023 (UTC)
20230702 También se agregó una imagen del artículo sobre jeroglíficos egipcios (izquierda) que muestra una figura similar en cerámica que incluye un análisis de los posibles orígenes de los jeroglíficos; es posible que hayan evolucionado hasta convertirse en el ankh. Esta imagen parece ser la imagen más antigua de una deidad entre las culturas del período predinástico de la prehistoria egipcia.
La misma imagen aparece en la parte inferior izquierda del mural egipcio prehistórico pintado en la pared de una tumba de Nekhen alrededor del 3500 a. C., con aspectos del estilo de la cultura Gerzeh que también se analiza más adelante en otro tema.
_ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 13:31 2 jul 2023 (UTC)
Image:Nagada figure.gif está ahora disponible en Wikimedia Commons como Commons:Image:Nagada figure.gif. Este es un repositorio de contenido multimedia gratuito que puede utilizarse en todos los wikis de Wikimedia. La imagen será eliminada de Wikipedia, pero esto no significa que ya no pueda utilizarse. Puedes incrustar una imagen cargada en Commons como lo harías con una imagen cargada en Wikipedia, en este caso: [[Image:Nagada figure.gif]]. Ten en cuenta que este es un mensaje automático para informarte sobre el traslado. Este robot no copió la imagen en sí. -- Erwin85Bot ( discusión ) 12:18 19 oct 2008 (UTC)
La imagen ahora está perdida.
Fue eliminado del archivo común y no está disponible para nadie.
Hay otra imagen disponible que no había visto antes.
Estoy publicando aquí para poder localizarlo.
Al menos me avisarían que está previsto eliminarlo, si eso vuelve a suceder.
Es una buena imagen de esta escultura de una época temprana del Antiguo Egipto y digna de un artículo propio para mostrar la investigación sobre su importancia.
Mantener las imágenes locales en WP no evita que se ingresen en los archivos comunes, pero garantiza que quien las cargó se mantenga informado si hay un movimiento para eliminarlas. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 23:50, 27 de junio de 2020 (UTC)
Parece que estás en medio de una guerra de ediciones . Ten en cuenta que la regla de las tres reversiones prohíbe hacer más de tres reversiones en una sola página en un período de 24 horas. Además, los usuarios que realicen una gran cantidad de reversiones en disputas de contenido pueden ser bloqueados por guerra de ediciones, incluso si técnicamente no violan la regla de las tres reversiones . Si continúas, es posible que se te bloquee la edición . No reviertas ediciones repetidamente, sino que utiliza la página de discusión para trabajar en la redacción y el contenido que obtengan un consenso entre los editores. Si es necesario, busca la resolución de la disputa . -- ¡Mais oui! ( discusión ) 19:12, 6 de diciembre de 2008 (UTC)
Publicado en retrospectiva el 11 de diciembre: El aviso anterior fue reubicado por mí en la ubicación vinculada en el encabezado creado por el editor que emitió el aviso. También se insertó una anotación al comienzo de esta página para indicarlo.
Además de mi discusión en cada resumen de edición, se proporcionó lo siguiente al editor para indicar el razonamiento involucrado: El editor anterior parece haber puesto el zapato en el pie equivocado y, desafortunadamente, declino la invitación a entrar en una guerra de ediciones sobre la edición que hice a St. Kilda, Scotland - el nombre Saint Kilda ha sido utilizado desde el siglo XVI aparentemente y los holandeses pueden haberse equivocado al publicar el nombre como existe en el siglo XVII, pero muchos nombres tienen errores de ese tipo en sus orígenes. Ya existe una discusión extensa del tema en el artículo y como las discusiones anteriores indican, hay consenso con respecto al nombre de Saint Kilda, que comúnmente, se abrevia como St. Kilda. 83d40m (discusión) 20:29, 6 de diciembre de 2008 (UTC)
Más tarde, mis intentos de discutir el tema fueron eliminados por el editor que emitió la advertencia estampada a las 19:12, 6 de diciembre de 2008 y la advertencia fue reinsertada en su ubicación original en la cronología de esta página, haciendo que el registro aquí parezca como si la advertencia hubiera sido ignorada.
En un esfuerzo por dejar constancia de forma clara y precisa, inserto la información eliminada en esta discusión para que esté disponible para cualquier persona interesada en la cronología. Afortunadamente, el editor que aparece a continuación inició una discusión que existe en su página y en esta, en la que se exploró el tema y se logró un entendimiento mutuo sobre mis entradas en St Kilda, Escocia .
Aunque es aceptable como notación cartográfica, sigo creyendo que la creación de una nueva palabra inglesa, St , en Wikipedia es un error que podría ser corregido o al menos explicado a nuestros lectores, sin embargo, soy reacio a volver a entrar en la contienda en este momento. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 20:56 11 dic 2008 (UTC)
Actualmente parece que estás involucrado en una guerra de ediciones según las reversiones que has hecho en St Kilda, Scotland . Ten en cuenta que la regla de las tres reversiones prohíbe hacer más de tres reversiones en una sola página en un período de 24 horas. Además, los usuarios que realicen una gran cantidad de reversiones en disputas de contenido pueden ser bloqueados por guerra de ediciones, incluso si técnicamente no violan la regla de las tres reversiones . Si continúas, es posible que se te bloquee la edición . No reviertas ediciones repetidamente, sino que usa la página de discusión para trabajar en la redacción y el contenido que obtengan un consenso entre los editores. Si es necesario, busca la resolución de la disputa . Ruhrfisch ><> ° ° 21:08, 6 de diciembre de 2008 (UTC) Tenga en cuenta el título que el editor utilizó originalmente, Edit warring at St Kilda . Se encontró que contenía una discusión extensa que parecía apropiada para que ese editor aprendiera más sobre el tema. El tema planteado se había tratado con bastante detalle en esa página. Es por eso que la discusión se trasladó a la página citada por ese editor.
Cuando editores con una larga trayectoria, que figuran en las listas de editores “seguros”, se toman el tiempo de señalar a otro editor cierta información que debería ayudarlo a convertirse en mejores editores, ¿por qué lo abordan como lo han hecho?
El objetivo equivocado del editor fue incluso analizado en profundidad y explicado como inexacto en el artículo original bajo el título de origen de los nombres . ¿Por qué apoyan un intento de revertir ediciones que coinciden con todas las referencias citadas en el artículo?
Después de haber realizado una edición extensa y que me llevó mucho tiempo de todo el artículo, ese editor revirtió toda mi edición debido a un solo problema ya resuelto: la negación de que St. significa santo , cuando ese nombre también se usa en todas las enciclopedias de tapa dura, como Britannica. La parte completa del artículo analiza la exactitud de lo que edité, pero mi edición completa fue revertida porque un editor no está de acuerdo, sin ninguna base en los hechos ni ninguna referencia para citar.
Cuando los esfuerzos sinceros de alguien por hacer ediciones largas y productivas son desechados para apoyar a editores imprecisos y obtusos por otros editores como tú, empiezo a preocuparme por nuestros administradores. ¿Por qué existe una preocupación reaccionaria por las políticas citadas por editores imprecisos, sin preocuparse por los problemas y la precisión de las ediciones que ellos revierten? ¡Yo soy el que debería haber publicado una advertencia! No tengo ningún interés en estas guerras... Tengo demasiadas cosas que quiero mejorar como para perder mi tiempo en guerras de edición por el dominio de opiniones personales que no tienen nada que ver con la precisión.
¿Por qué no examinas cuestiones con el objetivo de promover el beneficio de la enciclopedia? Un poco más de atención al tema y a las discusiones involucradas en la misma página a la que se transfirió la respuesta podría haberte guiado a reaccionar de manera diferente y en beneficio de Wikipedia. Esa fue la única razón por la que respondí en lugar de pasar a otro tema en el que podía hacer una contribución positiva, dejando que el error avergonzara a la publicación.
Voy a poner esto en tu página de discusión también, porque lo voy a quitar después de ver si respondes. En mi opinión, el problema fue remitido al editor, que dio una falsa alarma. Ahora me resulta obvio que al editor no le interesan las entradas correctas, el error sigue ahí. 83d40m (discusión) 00:57 7 dic 2008 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Al Loomis on Tuxedo Park cover 83d40m p2croped.JPG. Has indicado que la imagen se está utilizando bajo una reivindicación de uso legítimo , pero no has proporcionado una explicación adecuada de por qué cumple con los requisitos de Wikipedia para este tipo de imágenes . En particular, para cada página en la que se utiliza la imagen, la imagen debe tener una explicación que enlace a esa página y que explique por qué debe utilizarse en esa página. ¿Puedes comprobarlo?
Este es un aviso automatizado de FairuseBot . Para obtener ayuda sobre la política de uso de imágenes, consulte Wikipedia:Preguntas sobre derechos de autor de los medios . -- FairuseBot ( discusión ) 11:59, 2 enero 2009 (UTC)
Gracias tardías por la "edición ligera" del artículo. Una mejora definitiva. Es una lástima que no se conozca mejor la cultura del África histórica situada debajo de Egipto. Saludos Victuallers ( discusión ) 20:41 15 ene 2009 (UTC)
Lindos mosaicos. Y bien formateados en el artículo. Y bien subtitulados también. Todo esto es más raro de lo que uno se imagina... ¡Gracias! -- Wetman ( discusión ) 19:00 5 febrero 2009 (UTC)
Así que agradezco a los extraterrestres por mostrarme cómo reincorporar culturas antiguas a la sociedad moderna de una manera moralmente correcta.
Gracias, yo también escribo constituciones por el bien de la ley y el orden.
Por favor, no te opongas a mí porque también creo en la Serpiente Draconiana con 7 cabezas.
Proteger esta información: "¿Sabías que Tetis es un aspecto del calendario nativo americano? También era venerada en la cultura marítima fenicia. He añadido nueva información sobre Tetis, como: Señora de la lluvia, los ríos y la navegación marítima; Tetis calma las aguas o las hace agitarse; hace que lo navegable no sea navegable, cuando así lo decide".
Por favor no borres más de mi trabajo, porque soy tu jefe así que no me confrontes con la desobediencia.
Gracias. Phalanxpursos ( discusión ) 12:49 1 mar 2009 (UTC)
Phalanxpursos ( discusión ) 13:15 1 mar 2009 (UTC)
Antes de realizar cualquier modificación a este artículo, deberías echar un vistazo a su página de discusión, si es que aún no lo has hecho. DreamGuy ( discusión ) 01:38, 1 de marzo de 2009 (UTC)
No lo hice, le echaré un vistazo mañana y te responderé. 83d40m (discusión) 01:45 1 mar 2009 (UTC)
¿Qué es eso? 85.74.232.130 (discusión) 13:38 1 mar 2009 (UTC)
Debería ser Philipopolis (mal escrito en la etiqueta de la imagen). Gracias por el aviso. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 07:21 2 mar 2009 (UTC)
La imagen es genial y he echado un vistazo a tus ediciones, realmente buenas. Volveré a las referencias que insertaste y las reharé para que encajen en el formato de las otras referencias dentro del artículo, pero quería darte las gracias. ¿Tienes un interés especial en la historia de la moda estadounidense? Mabalu ( discusión ) 22:24 15 mar 2009 (UTC)
Hace poco tiempo hiciste una pequeña edición de este artículo. Acabo de volver a una versión anterior a OR, agregando todo el material de referencia que pude (el editor de OR ahora está bloqueado indefinidamente para OR). Me pregunto si te gustaría volver a verlo. Gracias. Dougweller ( discusión ) 11:37, 5 de mayo de 2009 (UTC)
A veces se utiliza la imagen de los machos, incluso cuando se refiere a la hembra, porque la melena distintiva diferencia a la especie de otras especies de felinos grandes.
83d40m, si puedes encontrar referencias académicas para este material, te lo agradecería mucho. Nunca encontré ninguna cuando estaba preparando este artículo para que fuera destacado, y WP:OR es algo que lleva un tiempo asimilar. Lo mismo digo de la nota de Singapur. Saludos, Casliber ( discusión · contribuciones ) 01:10, 16 de mayo de 2009 (UTC)
La asociación de editores establecidos será una especie de unión de quienes hayan hecho contribuciones sustanciales y duraderas a la enciclopedia durante un período de tiempo (digamos, dos años o más). Los estatutos propuestos para la asociación se encuentran aquí; se aceptan sugerencias.
Si desea ser elegido, notifíquelo aquí. Si conoce a otra persona que pueda ser elegible, nómbrela aquí
El debate está aquí. Peter Damian ( discusión ) 17:24 13 jun 2009 (UTC)
Discusión sobre los objetivos aquí. Peter Damian ( discusión ) 20:05 18 jun 2009 (UTC)
En una edición reciente de la página Roundabout , cambiaste una o más palabras de una variedad internacional del inglés a otra. Como Wikipedia tiene lectores de todo el mundo, nuestra política es respetar las variedades nacionales del inglés en los artículos de Wikipedia.
Para temas relacionados exclusivamente con Gran Bretaña (por ejemplo, una persona británica famosa), utilice inglés británico. Para algo relacionado con los Estados Unidos de la misma manera, utilice inglés estadounidense. Para algo relacionado con otros países de habla inglesa, como Canadá, Australia o Nueva Zelanda, utilice la variedad de inglés que se utilice allí. Si se trata de un tema internacional, utilice la misma forma de inglés que utilizó el autor original .
En vista de esto, por favor no cambies los artículos de una versión en inglés a otra, incluso si no usas normalmente la versión en la que está escrito el artículo. Respeta las versiones en inglés de otras personas. Ellos a su vez deberían respetar las tuyas. Otras pautas generales sobre cómo se escriben los artículos de Wikipedia se pueden encontrar en Wikipedia:Manual de estilo . Si tienes alguna pregunta sobre todo esto, puedes preguntarme en mi página de discusión o puedes visitar el servicio de asistencia . Gracias. Jenuk1985 | Discusión 05:23, 2 de julio de 2009 (UTC)
Por favor, vea esto . Gracias. -- Hoary ( discusión ) 02:31 23 ago 2009 (UTC)
He publicado una nueva respuesta aquí para seguir discutiendo. No estoy seguro de si la viste y buscaré tu respuesta allí. Preferiría mantener la discusión en vj talk, pero vi instrucciones en tu página que podrían interpretarse como una nota aquí. Solo para asegurarme... ---- 83d40m (discusión) 22:29, 23 de agosto de 2009 (UTC)
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Kafi Benz - 83d40m - ccc newsletter 2004.JPG, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Skier Dude ( discusión ) 02:55, 27 de noviembre de 2009 (UTC)
He respondido a tu comentario sobre el mapa de Sarasota en mi página de discusión. Sher eth 14:19, 7 de diciembre de 2009 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Howardduck-a.JPG . La página de descripción de la imagen especifica actualmente que la imagen no es libre y que solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Si has subido otros archivos multimedia sin licencia, comprueba si se utilizan en algún artículo o no. Puedes encontrar una lista de las páginas de "archivo" que has editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando estás conectado) y seleccionando "Archivo" en el cuadro desplegable. Ten en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. Skier Dude ( discusión ) 00:41 13 dic 2009 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Howardduck-b.JPG . La página de descripción de la imagen especifica actualmente que la imagen no es libre y que solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Si has subido otros archivos multimedia sin licencia, comprueba si se utilizan en algún artículo o no. Puedes encontrar una lista de las páginas de "archivo" que has editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando estás conectado) y seleccionando "Archivo" en el cuadro desplegable. Ten en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. Skier Dude ( discusión ) 00:41 13 dic 2009 (UTC)
Hola, como ya habías expresado tu preocupación sobre la calidad del mapa generado por script que se utiliza en Sarasota, Florida, me gustaría mantenerte al tanto del estado del próximo lote de reemplazo. Hay una comparación visual de la versión anterior con la nueva versión en User:Shereth/2009_Mapping_Project#Image_comparisons . Ten en cuenta que la versión "nueva" es una imagen sin procesar y no se ha editado para eliminar algunas imperfecciones menores (como las líneas perdidas en el agua) y no es un producto final. Sher eth 17:53, 4 de enero de 2010 (UTC)
Hola 83d40m. Recientemente has movido Bastet a Bast (mitología) simplemente copiando y pegando su contenido. No sé si eres nuevo en este tipo de cosas, pero realizar un movimiento de copiar/pegar no se hace por aquí porque estropea el historial de edición. Puedes leer más consejos en Ayuda:Mover una página . Además, puede que no sepas que la página se ha movido recientemente de Bastet (mitología) a Bastet , tras una solicitud y una discusión en su página de discusión . He revertido tus ediciones, pero si tienes la impresión de que Bast es el nombre comúnmente preferido en fuentes fiables , eres libre de proponer un movimiento en la misma página de discusión. Gracias, Cavila ( discusión ) 14:10, 17 de febrero de 2010 (UTC)
Hola 83d40m, en relación con esta edición [1], te agradecería mucho que te pusieras a trabajar de nuevo; si hay errores en la página, me gustaría mucho saberlo. Supongo que cualquier reversión parcial de tus ediciones anteriores [2] [3] fue un descuido y no intencional. En su momento me impresionó y, probablemente, al volver a revisar la página, restablecí declaraciones anteriores que podrían haber tenido un fundamento débil. Ceoil ( discusión ) 20:13 27 mar 2010 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Nat geographical world premier edition cover.JPG . La página de descripción de la imagen actualmente especifica que la imagen no es libre y solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
TENGA EN CUENTA:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}a su página de discusión.
Gracias. DASHBot ( discusión ) 00:29 29 mar 2010 (UTC)
Se ha colocado una etiqueta en el archivo:Luxor Sekhmet New Kingdom.JPG solicitando que se elimine rápidamente de Wikipedia. Esto se ha hecho de conformidad con la sección I2 de los criterios para la eliminación rápida , porque se trata de una página de imagen para una imagen faltante o dañada o una página de descripción de imagen vacía para una imagen alojada en Commons.
Si cree que este aviso se ha colocado aquí por error, puede impugnar la eliminación añadiendo al principio de la página que ha sido nominada para su eliminación (justo debajo de la etiqueta de eliminación rápida o "db"), junto con añadir una nota en la página de discusión explicando su posición, pero tenga en cuenta que una vez etiquetada para eliminación rápida , si la página cumple con el criterio, puede ser eliminada sin demora. No elimine usted mismo la etiqueta de eliminación rápida, pero no dude en añadir información a la página que la haga más conforme con las políticas y directrices de Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG ( discusión ) 19:20, 3 de mayo de 2010 (UTC) {{hangon}}
Dos notas sobre sus recientes resúmenes de edición para estos artículos.
En primer lugar, el código para los comentarios ocultos sigue estando ahí, pero se encuentra en el menú "wikimarkup" debajo del cuadro de resumen de edición. Se ve así:<!-- -->
En segundo lugar, en cuanto al contenido, decir categóricamente que los "alcaldes" en los sistemas de consejo-administrador nunca son elegidos es incorrecto. Montclair, NJ, por ejemplo, tiene un alcalde que es elegido específicamente para ese cargo. (En la práctica, se desempeña como miembro general del consejo y presidente del mismo). Eso es casi tan común como una alcaldía rotativa. Como no hay dos estados que tengan exactamente las mismas leyes en materia de gobierno local, establecer categorías absolutas es problemático. oknazevad ( discusión ) 17:36 14 may 2010 (UTC)
¿Qué estadísticas no puedes ver? Kevin Rutherford ( discusión ) 16:44 21 may 2010 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Ruby Woodson - 83d40m - poster - Florida Acacemy of African American Culture.jpg. Sin embargo, actualmente falta información sobre su estado de derechos de autor. Wikipedia se toma muy en serio los derechos de autor . Es posible que se elimine pronto, a menos que podamos determinar la licencia y la fuente del archivo. Si conoce esta información, puede agregar una etiqueta de derechos de autor a la página de descripción de la imagen .
Si ha subido otros archivos, considere verificar que haya especificado su licencia y los haya etiquetado también. Puede encontrar una lista de los archivos que ha creado en su registro de carga.
Si tiene alguna pregunta, no dude en preguntarla en la página de preguntas sobre derechos de autor de los medios . Gracias nuevamente por su cooperación. Sfan00 IMG ( discusión ) 12:56 5 jun 2010 (UTC)
83d40m (discusión) 13:34 6 jun 2010 (UTC) actualizado ---- 83d40m (discusión) 14:06 6 jun 2010 (UTC)
Te escribí en Talk:Kitsch#Rechazar_la_propuesta_para_fusionarla_en_un_nuevo_artículo . Goochelaar ( discusión ) 15:53 11 jun 2010 (UTC)
Hola. A su cuenta se le ha otorgado el derecho de usuario " revisor ", lo que le permite revisar las ediciones de otros usuarios en determinadas páginas marcadas. La protección de cambios pendientes, también conocida como protección de páginas marcadas, se encuentra actualmente en un período de prueba de dos meses que finalizará el 15 de agosto de 2010.
Los revisores pueden revisar las ediciones realizadas por usuarios que no están confirmados automáticamente en los artículos que se encuentran en la categoría de cambios pendientes. Los cambios pendientes se aplican solo a una pequeña cantidad de artículos , de manera similar a cómo se aplica la semiprotección, pero de una manera más controlada para la versión de prueba. La lista de artículos con cambios pendientes que esperan revisión se encuentra en Special:OldReviewedPages .
Al revisar, se deben aceptar las modificaciones que no sean vandalismo evidente o violaciones de la BLP , y que no sean claramente problemáticas a la luz del motivo dado para la protección (ver Wikipedia:Proceso de revisión ). Se puede encontrar documentación y pautas más detalladas aquí .
Si no desea este derecho de usuario, puede pedirle a cualquier administrador que lo elimine en cualquier momento. Courcelles ( discusión ) 02:13 18 jun 2010 (UTC)
Encontré tres problemas huérfanos en mi galería de cargas de usuarios. Este es el único para el que no pude encontrar una solución: eliminar el estado de huérfano. Todas las imágenes están en uso en artículos. Otro editor cambió la extensión de esta y se había quedado flotando sobre Wikipedia. Al menos está aquí para evitar impulsos de eliminarla. ---- 83d40m (discusión) 02:01, 3 de julio de 2010 (UTC)
Hola, ¿te interesa esto? ¿Ya sea de forma remota o en persona? Wikipedia:¿Desafío GLAM/BM/Hoxne ? Lo siento por la edición1 Johnbod ( discusión ) 00:10 21 jun 2010 (UTC)
Hola 83, vi que restauraste la sección de críticas. No cumple con las políticas tal como está, por lo que realmente debería eliminarse hasta que puedas encontrar buenas fuentes secundarias para ello. Te dejé una nota en la página de discusión. Saludos, SlimVirgin discusión| contribuciones 01:50, 7 de julio de 2010 (UTC)
¿Podrías proporcionarme una referencia de tu reciente incorporación al artículo de Briggs Cunningham? ¡Gracias! Writegeist ( discusión ) 03:11 12 jul 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de la respuesta - Gracias por tu respuesta. Soy un editor establecido aquí. No tengo expectativas de "propiedad" y no tengo ningún problema con la evolución, sólo con la devolución. Hay que buscar mejoras, los vaqueros que se van a cambiar las cosas sin tomarse el tiempo de entenderlas, normalmente resultan en caos, y así es como veo lo que ha sucedido. El artículo se ha convertido en una discusión sobre una versión de una estatua, no como un aspecto de un debate kitsch en la cultura contemporánea en una ciudad bien conocida por su estatus en las bellas artes, como se pretendía. El artículo actual también se ha vuelto inconexo y ahora incluso se está lanzando a discusiones sobre otras versiones en otros estados. 83d40m (discusión) 21:15 30 jul 2010 (UTC)
Realmente útil -- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83d40m/Commons:Deletion_guidelines -- mantener aquí para referencia ---- 83d40m (discusión) 15:47 6 ago 2010 (UTC)
Continuar desde la Horda de Hoxne AgTigress ( discusión ) ---- 83d40m (discusión) 02:59 9 ago 2010 (UTC)
Es una foto muy bonita la que has subido del edificio de Basilea. He visto una muy similar que se utilizó en un sitio web comercial http://www.inpharm.com/pharma_company/novartis , pero ese sitio no le daba ningún crédito. ¿Es también tu foto? Saludos, Easchiff ( discusión ) 21:18 17 ago 2010 (UTC)
thumb|080px Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Jim Gary 83d40m Triceratops NJ200911postrztnminusm.JPG, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:35 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados para restauración en caso necesario:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Owen Burns Week 83d40m Sarasota city commission proclamation 2010.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:39 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Lillian Burns 1913-2003 83d40m aboard her sailboat on Sarasota Bay.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:43 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Owen Burns 83d40m Sarasota Florida.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:43 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Gracias por subir el archivo:New College 2005 campus master plan 83d40m day 1 - Stefanos Polyzoides et al.jpg . Observé que, si bien proporcionaste una etiqueta de licencia de derechos de autor válida, no hay ninguna prueba de que el creador del archivo haya aceptado licenciarlo bajo la licencia indicada.
Si usted creó este medio completamente usted mismo pero lo ha publicado previamente en otro lugar (especialmente en línea), por favor
wikimedia.org , indicando que es el propietario del material y su intención de publicarlo bajo una licencia libre. Puede encontrar un modelo de carta de permiso aquí . Si realiza este paso, agregue {{ OTRS pending }} a la página de descripción del archivo para evitar una eliminación prematura.Si no lo creó usted mismo en su totalidad, pídale a la persona que creó el archivo que realice uno de los dos pasos enumerados anteriormente o, si el propietario del archivo ya le dio su permiso por correo electrónico, reenvíe ese correo electrónico a permissions-en wikimedia.org .
Si cree que el medio cumple con los criterios de Wikipedia:Contenido no libre , utilice una etiqueta como {{ non-free fair use in |nombre del artículo}} o una de las otras etiquetas que aparecen en Wikipedia:Etiquetas de derechos de autor de imágenes#Uso justo y agregue una justificación para el uso del archivo en el artículo o los artículos donde se incluye. Consulte Wikipedia:Etiquetas de derechos de autor de imágenes para obtener la lista completa de etiquetas de derechos de autor que puede utilizar.
Si has subido otros archivos, considera comprobar que has proporcionado pruebas de que los propietarios de los derechos de autor también han aceptado licenciar sus obras bajo las etiquetas que has proporcionado. Puedes encontrar una lista de los archivos que has creado en tu registro de subidas. Los archivos que no tengan pruebas de permiso pueden eliminarse una semana después de haber sido etiquetados , como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Si tienes alguna pregunta, pregúntala en la página de preguntas sobre derechos de autor de medios . Gracias. Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:44 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
La segunda subida es
Resumen guardado en caso de eliminación Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Map Seagate campus 83d40m University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:45 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, Archivo:Sarasota Municipal Auditorium - 83d40m - postales inclasid.JPG, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:47 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Sarasota municipal auditorium 83d40m - dance 1950s truss system shown.JPG , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:47 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Municipal auditorium 83d40m recreation entrance 2.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:48 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Municipal auditorium 83d40m art show.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:49, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:MunAudImageHP 83d40m ciWeb capes.gif , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:49 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Municipal auditorium 83d40m social.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:50, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:ThomasReedMartin 83d40m 2ndfromRight shc.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:50 23 ago 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Municipal-Auditorium-Townsend 83d40m shc.jpg , ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo . Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:50, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Iron Tail - 83d40m - model for indian head nickel SarasotaHistoryCenter crop.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:54, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Lake Underwood driving 83d40m Porsche 904 Sebring 12 Hours 1964 2psharp.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:55, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Clare Potter 83d40m fgi founder 1939.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres porque su estado de copyright no está claro o está en disputa. Si no se puede verificar el estado de copyright del archivo, se puede eliminar. Puedes encontrar más información en la página de descripción del archivo. Puedes añadir comentarios a su entrada en la discusión si estás interesado en que no se elimine. Gracias. -- Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 21:55, 23 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Resumen de datos aparcados en caso de necesidad de restauración:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83d40m/Wikipedia:Possively_unfree_files/2010_August_23
Wikipedia:Archivos posiblemente no libres/23 de agosto de 2010
Archivo:Mapa del campus de Seagate 83d40m Universidad del Sur de Florida Sarasota-Manatee.jpg
Posibles subidas derivadas por Usuario:83d40m
He trasladado tu pregunta de la sección Discusión de usuario:AnomieBOT a mi propia página de discusión. Anomie ⚔ 18:26, 31 de agosto de 2010 (UTC)
Sigue adelante y vuelve a subir ese archivo y lo agregaré a nuestra discusión actual. Gracias. Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 23:17 31 ago 2010 (UTC)
Hola 83d40m , ................ (Duplicado usando el mismo título en User talk:For7thGen .)
Estoy seguro de que los lectores y espectadores de WP aprecian mucho su excelente trabajo, y yo también. Pero tanto ellos como yo necesitamos ahora mucho más su experiencia sobre la siguiente cita del artículo Faraón :
"El linaje real se trazaba a través de sus mujeres y un faraón tenía que ser de ese linaje o estar casado con una de ellas si provenía de fuera de ese linaje. Esta era la razón de todos los matrimonios mixtos en las familias reales de Egipto".
Puede que tu contribución (16Sep07) sea demasiado antigua para que la recuerdes, pero yo y otros lectores necesitamos cualquier ayuda que puedas darnos para encontrar una referencia de la fuente de la primera oración citada. No creo que debamos preocuparnos por la segunda oración. Aquí, en la sección de Talk:Matrilineality llamada Referencias de fuentes sobre el Antiguo Egipto , puedes ver cómo me involucré en esto y ver otras cosas buenas que se pueden hacer en WP, si se encuentra e inserta una referencia de fuente para la primera oración en Pharaoh .
Los usuarios de WP esperan que usted (o sus compañeros de trabajo del Antiguo Egipto ) puedan encontrar e insertar una fuente que satisfaga las necesidades de WP, y todos estamos preparados para esperar un buen tiempo por esa información útil.
Por favor, avísame en mi página de discusión para avisarme (si tienes éxito), For7thGen ( discusión ) 19:12 4 sep 2010 (UTC)
Si es necesario, esto se puede usar como reemplazo del mapa del cuadro de información y para evitar que se elimine de la galería por ser huérfano.
He iniciado una discusión sobre los cambios en Sarasota, Florida , un artículo al que has contribuido sustancialmente aquí . Cualquier comentario, sugerencia o crítica que puedas tener será bienvenida. Gracias, VictorianMutant ( discusión ) 05:33 11 oct 2010 (UTC)
Hola. Este mensaje se envía para informarle de que actualmente hay una discusión en Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de administradores/Incidentes sobre un problema en el que usted puede haber estado involucrado. El hilo es Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de administradores/Incidentes#Amenaza_legal_en_Talk:Jim_Gary . La discusión es sobre el tema Tema . Gracias. — Gavia immer ( discusión ) 22:55 20 nov 2010 (UTC)
Gracias. Ya decidí que dejarlo en manos de los administradores era el mejor curso de acción y he estado esperando a que aparezca la caballería. - - - - 83d40m (discusión) 01:48, 21 de noviembre de 2010 (UTC)
Hola, he visto que has estado editando algunos de los artículos sobre saltos de caballo últimamente. Si este es un tema de tu interés, me gustaría invitarte a unirte a WikiProject Equine . Hemos perdido a nuestro especialista en el tema de saltos de caballo (tengo algo de experiencia, pero también tengo más de 1500 artículos de WPEQ en la lista de seguimiento, por lo que me he metido en un rincón de generalista), así que si este es tu tema, ¡únete! Montanabw (discusión) 23:30 5 ene 2011 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Michaelvanbeurenretrospective poster 83d40m franzmayermuseum.jpg . La página de descripción de la imagen especifica actualmente que la imagen no es libre y solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Si ha subido otros archivos multimedia sin licencia, compruebe si se utilizan en algún artículo o no. Puede encontrar una lista de las páginas de "archivo" que ha editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando ha iniciado sesión) y luego seleccionando "Archivo" en el cuadro desplegable. Tenga en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. Armbrust Discusión Contribs 01:17, 31 de enero de 2011 (UTC)
Oh, Dios mío, parece que hemos tenido una reunión extracurricular. Pero ya terminé. ¡Lo siento! Johnbod ( discusión ) 15:49 1 febrero 2011 (UTC)
Se está debatiendo si el artículo Frederick T. van Beuren, Jr., MD es adecuado para su inclusión como artículo según las políticas y pautas de Wikipedia o si debería eliminarse .
El artículo se analizará en Wikipedia:Artículos para eliminar/Frederick T. van Beuren, Jr., MD hasta que se llegue a un consenso y cualquiera puede contribuir a la discusión. La nominación explicará las políticas y pautas que son motivo de preocupación. La discusión se centra en la evidencia de buena calidad y en nuestras políticas y pautas.
Los usuarios pueden editar el artículo durante la discusión, incluso para mejorarlo y abordar las inquietudes planteadas en la discusión. Sin embargo, no elimine la plantilla de artículo para eliminar de la parte superior del artículo. TheRealFennShysa ( discusión ) 18:42 1 feb 2011 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo:Michaelvanbeurenretrospective poster 83d40m franzmayermuseum.jpg . La página de descripción de la imagen especifica actualmente que la imagen no es libre y solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo un reclamo de uso justo . Sin embargo, la imagen actualmente está huérfana , lo que significa que no se usa en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen estaba anteriormente en un artículo, vaya al artículo y vea por qué se eliminó. Puede agregarla nuevamente si cree que será útil. Sin embargo, tenga en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulte nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Si ha subido otros archivos multimedia sin licencia, compruebe si se utilizan en algún artículo o no. Puede encontrar una lista de las páginas de "archivo" que ha editado haciendo clic en el enlace " mis contribuciones " (se encuentra en la parte superior de cualquier página de Wikipedia cuando ha iniciado sesión) y luego seleccionando "Archivo" en el cuadro desplegable. Tenga en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. Armbrust Discusión Contribs 21:44, 2 de febrero de 2011 (UTC)
Tenemos una situación complicada, porque lo que estás editando ahí es el resultado de un movimiento de cortar y pegar que ha perdido el historial de edición. La licencia nos exige que lo conservemos. He restaurado Frederick T. van Beuren, Jr. completo con historial, a pedido de Novangelis ( discusión · contribs ), y puedo volver a juntarlos, pero ¿podemos acordar qué título usar? Por favor, responde en mi página de discusión en Usuario discusión:JohnCD#Acerca de una eliminación rápida . JohnCD ( discusión ) 15:24 19 feb 2011 (UTC)
De antemano pido disculpas por lo divagatorio de este mensaje. Parece que soy aún menos capaz de escribir mensajes concisos y coherentes en la era de Twitter. No estoy tratando de poner en duda ni de insultar, así que por favor, perdónenme si parece que así es. El verdadero problema que tiene Internet para mí es que estoy más acostumbrado a discutir cara a cara.
El verbo "titular" significa exactamente lo mismo que el verbo "titular" en el uso pertinente del artículo "Recuerdos personales de Juana de Arco". No me gustan las guerras de edición y no entraré en ellas, pero creo que su insistencia en el uso de "titular" en lugar del verbo "titular" es innecesaria.
Usted cree que esto es una mejora; yo creo que es sólo un cambio, y que no hay ninguna referencia citada que demuestre que "entitled" es preferible. De hecho, este último ha surgido en la última generación debido a su mal uso. Los diccionarios no prescriben el uso. Simplemente describen lo que se utiliza, y el cambio se ha producido en una generación. El uso de "entitled" no sólo era considerado incorrecto por los profesores de inglés, sino que se mencionaba específicamente como incorrecto en mis días de estudiante (1970), en la misma lista que los usos incorrectos de "comprese", la mayoría de los cuales se han vuelto aceptables. Así es la evolución de nuestro idioma, pero el hecho de que ahora un uso sea aceptable porque el mal uso se ha convertido en uso, no significa que el uso correcto anterior se haya vuelto incorrecto.
Si desea utilizar aquí "con derecho", hágalo, pero comprenda que creo que su afirmación de que se trata de una "mejora" no es correcta. Es simplemente un cambio, y no hacemos que las cosas sean más correctas insistiendo en un gusto personal en la fraseología. Creo que las razones que dio para el cambio huelen más bien a excusas para hacerlo. Cualquiera de las dos palabras es correcta según el estándar reducido de hoy, y no había otra razón que el gusto personal para hacer el cambio, y ninguna razón para insistir en que tal cambio sea de alguna manera necesario.
Creo que tu nueva redacción de la frase que ahora comienza con "Porque los derechos de autor han expirado" es más que un poco redundante, ya que la mayoría de las obras literarias que son de dominio público lo son simplemente por el motivo de la expiración de los derechos de autor. Habría sido más pertinente indicar el motivo por el que forman parte del dominio público si hubiera habido un motivo diferente. Es como decir: "porque tuvo la mayoría de los votos, fue elegido".
Sin embargo, no lucharé contra esto, si realmente quieres insistir en ello. -- Couillaud ( discusión ) 01:41 7 mar 2011 (UTC)
. . . .
No es necesario que te disculpes por la extensión de tu nota, a menudo la considero esencial para la claridad. Perdona la demora en responder, he estado absorto en otros asuntos. Yo también evito las guerras de edición, al igual que tú, sin embargo, defenderé mi argumento (y participaré en idas y venidas) con otra persona razonable cuando crea que tengo razón, siempre y cuando la discusión siga siendo una exploración racional de nuestras diferencias. Si simplemente hubieras revertido mi acción sin una investigación, no habría seguido tu ejemplo. Gracias por iniciar un diálogo.
No creo que sea beneficioso para nuestros lectores (muchos de los cuales no son hablantes nativos del inglés ni leen traducciones de nuestras obras, pero todos buscan aprender) escribir nuestros artículos utilizando el "estándar reducido actual" (su término). Esa es la base de mi comentario: "el uso correcto del idioma mejora la enciclopedia y beneficia a nuestros lectores", e intentaré explicar mi razonamiento.
El verbo entitle (titular) data del siglo XIV como verbo que significa dar un título a algo , se deriva (en última instancia) de un verbo latino que tiene exactamente el mismo significado. Merriam Webster indica: Origen de ENTITLE (titular): inglés medio, del anglofrancés entitler , del latín tardío intitulare , del latín in- + titulus (título) y su primer uso conocido fue en el siglo XIV, por lo que no es de origen reciente como insinúas.
Se debe elegir la mejor palabra en inglés para escribir. En nuestro ejemplo, " is titled " es una forma de ese verbo, lo que significa que su objeto es el título que el autor le dio a una obra (Twain le dio el título a la obra).
Para mayor claridad, se deben utilizar palabras que tengan como significado primario lo que se pretende expresar. Es el caso del verbo “titular”, que significa dar un título a algo (no a una persona) y, por lo general, lo da la persona que crea la obra.
Las personas que prefieren omitir la primera sílaba derivada del latín en o in , caen en la categoría que incluye a quienes usan inflamable en lugar de inflamable porque no entienden el latín y la raíz de la palabra correcta, que significa capaz de estallar en llamas ; tal vez eso se debió a un fracaso en la educación y a personas cuya comprensión limitada de in como significado no .
Título , por otro lado, tiene tres definiciones: 1) sustantivo 2) verbo 3) adjetivo.
El título del sustantivo significa, 1 a obsoleto : inscripción b : material escrito introducido en una película o programa de televisión para dar créditos, explicar una acción o representar un diálogo —usualmente usado en plural 2 a : todos los elementos que constituyen la propiedad legal b : una causa legalmente justa de posesión exclusiva c : el instrumento (como una escritura) que es evidencia de un derecho 3 a : algo que justifica o fundamenta un reclamo b : un derecho alegado o reconocido 4 a : un encabezado descriptivo o general (como el de un capítulo de un libro) b : el encabezado que nombra un acto o estatuto c : el encabezado de una acción o procedimiento legal 5 a : el nombre distintivo de una producción escrita, impresa o filmada b : un nombre distintivo similar de una composición musical o una obra de arte 6 : un nombre descriptivo : denominación 7 : una división de un instrumento, libro o factura; especialmente: uno más grande que una sección o artículo 8 a: una denominación de dignidad, honor, distinción o preeminencia asignada a una persona o familia en virtud de rango, cargo, precedente, privilegio, logro o tierras b: una persona que posee un título especialmente de nobleza 9: una obra publicada habitualmente, a diferencia de una copia particular <títulos nuevos publicados> 10: campeonato.
El origen del título como sustantivo es del inglés medio, del anglofrancés, del latín titulus, que significa inscripción o título. Su primer uso conocido fue en el siglo XIV también. Ya no tiene ese significado singular.
Como significado secundario , title es un verbo que se deriva del sustantivo title. No hay raíz verbal en otro idioma como precedente para este uso, pero es un acto común dar un título a las obras. Esta es una pista importante. Este uso como verbo se asemeja a la creación contemporánea de transitioning desde el lenguaje de los medios de comunicación eliminando algunas palabras con un neologismo en lugar de decir making a transition . Otros ejemplos contemporáneos de este proceso son phone ( sonido ) en lugar de telephone ( transmite sonido ) o photo ( luz ) en lugar de photograph ( crear una imagen a través de la exposición a la luz ), cuyas abreviaturas dejan fuera la comprensión esencial del significado de las palabras.
Creo que la riqueza de nuestra lengua se pierde a medida que abandonamos nuestras raíces lingüísticas y creo que gran parte de lo que está ocurriendo últimamente es la sustitución de palabras inteligibles por jerga, debido a la influencia de los medios de comunicación masivos y los usos publicitarios que surgen de quienes carecen de una educación adecuada. Esas disminuciones en las habilidades lingüísticas han llevado a una repetición generalizada que puede estar ocurriendo con frecuencia en el uso "popular", pero eso no significa que se abandonen los estándares entre los más educados. Le recordaré su concesión de que la corrección de las formas anteriores no se invalida por los cambios contemporáneos en el uso. Además, el uso "popular" no necesariamente persiste. Creo que una enciclopedia es un lugar apropiado para mantener los estándares. ¿No estamos tratando de educar? Los diccionarios establecen el significado y, a menudo, sí analizan el uso. Los manuales de estilo suelen tener una lógica que se basa en datos derivados de esas fuentes.
Por eso, mi cambio de se titula por se titula no es meramente una preferencia personal , como sospechas. Admito que el título de la obra es— , es correcto. Afirmo, sin embargo, que la obra se titula— , es una forma verbal más correcta para elegir que la que existía en el artículo y, por lo tanto, es un mejor uso del lenguaje. No es de gran importancia, pero es uno de esos puntos conflictivos que encuentran los escritores cuando les gusta el lenguaje y sus orígenes culturales. Aunque no voy a "luchar" por ello en un escrito que no lleve mi nombre como autor, seguiré haciéndolo como una corrección mientras edito aquí para la educación pública y defenderé su uso, si es necesario. Tal vez esto te permita entender mejor mi resumen de edición. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 22:51 10 mar 2011 (UTC)
. . . .
--- Couillaud ( discusión ) 16:06 13 mar 2011 (UTC)
Si no tienes ningún problema con que se elimine esa imagen, puedes marcarla con {{ db-g7 }} . No estoy seguro de qué problemas técnicos tenías antes, pero la imagen debería mostrarse correctamente y no estar huérfana. Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 15:48 6 jul 2011 (UTC)
Gracias por la consulta, pero no, gracias. No subo mis imágenes al fondo común de Wikimedia y prefiero que no se saquen del lugar donde las subo, ya que muchas de mis imágenes han estado allí sin mi consentimiento. Si quisiera que estuvieran allí, habría elegido esa opción. Considero que la eliminación de imágenes de mi galería y la ubicación elegida por mí es una pérdida del reconocimiento que los usuarios, supuestamente, tienen garantizado por Wikipedia y nunca he entendido por qué ocurre ese descuido. Preferiría que devolvieras a mi galería todas las imágenes transferidas de esta manera al fondo común.
Ya que estamos en este tema, una de mis imágenes de Tetis (diferente del tema sobre el que preguntaste) fue renombrada, aparentemente, por otro usuario y ha desaparecido sin aparecer en el archivo común como mi carga. Ahora lleva el reconocimiento del usuario que la tomó de mi galería. Me gustaría una rectificación de eso también.
¿Puedes ayudarme con estas solicitudes? - - - - 83d40m (discusión) 21:58 6 jul 2011 (UTC)
Ese descuido se debe a WP:CSD#F8 . Si no quieres que tus imágenes se eliminen después de que se hayan movido a Commons, puedes marcarlas con {{ KeepLocal }} . Mientras tanto, déjame aclararte: ¿quieres que todas tus imágenes que están en Commons se recuperen localmente también? Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 03:44 7 jul 2011 (UTC)
Está bien, lo he logrado. Miré tus dos imágenes de Tetis y ambas están atribuidas a ti en Commons. Magog el Ogro ( discusión ) 04:03 7 jul 2011 (UTC)
Gracias. Voy a mirar el Commons y mi galería y, sí, me gustaría que todas las imágenes que he subido permanezcan visibles en la galería de mis subidas, así que supongo que eso significa "no borradas localmente". Voy a empezar a usar esa etiqueta, ¿dónde va en la plantilla cuando se cargan imágenes para que funcione correctamente? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 01:37 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
Al mirar mi galería, puedo decir que algunos otros en el área común no han regresado a mi galería. Tan pronto como tenga tiempo, anotaré sus títulos y te daré una lista. Una vez que los devuelvan, seguiré tus instrucciones para modificar mis archivos cargados a fin de insertar la etiqueta necesaria para mantenerlos locales. Tal vez dentro de la próxima semana pueda hacer la comparación. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 02:01 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
No sé a qué te refieres con tu galería . Magog el Ogro ( discusión ) 13:51 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
Si uno mira "mis contribuciones" y selecciona "subidas", se presenta una galería de todas las imágenes subidas por ese editor en orden cronológico. Hice la comparación anoche y mis imágenes en el commons que también necesitan ser devueltas a "local" después de ser eliminadas son:
Aunque no estoy seguro de por qué, el resto de mis imágenes en el fondo común permanecen en mi galería.
Una vez que me devuelvas estas seis, colocaré la etiqueta "mantener local" en todas mis imágenes (anoche experimenté con una y parece ser una etiqueta simple sobre "Resumen" en el archivo). La usaré rutinariamente para nuevas cargas. Nunca supe de esto y, como sabes, me molestaban las eliminaciones que nunca autoricé. Ahora tengo una nueva herramienta para evitarlo porque fuiste lo suficientemente educado como para preguntar sobre la eliminación en lugar de simplemente hacerlo (como me pasó anteriormente), gracias de nuevo. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 16:03 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
Bien, abordaré los temas uno por uno:
Una cosa que muchos usuarios hacen para almacenar una lista de sus archivos en un solo lugar es crear una subpágina. Por ejemplo, podrías crear User:83d40m/gallery, y esta incluiría todos tus archivos subidos a Wikipedia en inglés, y también podrías incluir tu commons. Además, podrías evitar la molestia de no permitir que se muevan a commons, y seguirían apareciendo en tu subpágina (siempre que el administrador que los elimine haga su trabajo correctamente; la mayoría de los administradores son bastante buenos en eso; e incluso en el improbable caso de que no lo hiciera, entonces podrías simplemente arreglar el enlace y estaría bien nuevamente). Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 16:39 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
En cuanto a los árboles, el archivo en sí mismo indica: "Autor: Árboles_para_transplantar_de_Punt_a_Egipto_-_Templo_mortuorio_de_Hatshepsut.JPG: 83d40m (discusión) 00:02, 2 de febrero de 2008 (UTC). El autor original de la subida fue 83d40m en en.wikipedia" y los muestro con sus respectivas fechas. JMCC1 indica claramente que su subida es un derivado del mío en el que un ajuste de color fue la única edición. Debo señalar que los egipcios no fueron representados en su arte con tonos de piel tan oscuros como los que muestra el derivado; reservaron la representación de ese tono de piel oscuro para los grupos culturales (más al sur) y el ajuste hace que su pelo parezca verde.
Revisaré mis registros de carga en el otro y te responderé más tarde hoy... _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 23:34 9 jul 2011 (UTC)
Satis adorada por Sobekhotep III - 83d40m - Brooklyn Museum.JPG fue cargado por mí en 2008 - ese es el nombre correcto del archivo eliminado que debería invertirse - lo siento, no sé por qué el otro nombre de archivo aparece en mi galería además del mío (excepto que el tema es el mismo).
¿Podrás mover los archivos que no se subieron a Commons de nuevo, como hiciste con el primero? Procederé a etiquetarlos para mantenerlos locales. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 00:39 10 jul 2011 (UTC)
En cuanto al archivo:Trees to transplant from Punt to Egypt - Hatshepsut Mortuary Temple c.jpg , originalmente subiste el archivo:Trees to transplant from Punt to Egypt - Hatshepsut Mortuary Temple.JPG , que es un archivo completamente diferente. El último aparece en el historial de carga automática de la galería en la Wikipedia en inglés, pero en el caso del primero: el software no tiene forma de identificar que es un derivado (simplemente no está programado de esa manera), por lo que tendrías que agregarlo manualmente a una página de galería como mencioné anteriormente.
Ya he recuperado el archivo:Satis worshiped by Sobekhotep III - 83d40m - Brooklyn Museum.JPG el jueves [5], por lo que también ha aparecido en tu galería de carga automática. Magog the Ogre ( discusión ) 19:29 10 jul 2011 (UTC)
A la izquierda se encuentra el archivo Thutmosis I-83d40m-highContrast, que fue subido a Wikimedia Commons como una versión editada de otra imagen allí. Muestra al faraón Tutmosis I de la dinastía XVIII del Antiguo Egipto, con su esposa real, la reina Ahmose, y su hija Neferubity . Eran el padre, la madre y la hermana de Hatshepsut . Ella se convirtió en uno de los faraones más exitosos de Egipto.
A la derecha se encuentra el archivo GorgonShield3p de Mourning of Akhilleus Louvre e643, que fue subido a Wikimedia Commons. La Gorgona fue una de las primeras deidades griegas cuya importancia siempre se mantuvo en el cambiante panteón.
En la segunda fila, la imagen de la izquierda es la número 10 del Museo de Luxor - Mut - fechada en la dinastía XIX (c. 1279-1213 a. C.), que fue cargada en Wikimedia Commons.
A la derecha se encuentra Patentmotorwagen mit Karl und Bertha Benz, que es un primer plano editado de una fotografía histórica tomada a la pareja en una celebración para el inventor del automóvil, Karl Benz , y su atrevida esposa, Bertha Benz, quien mejoró el invento mediante sugerencias, haciendo adaptaciones y convirtiéndose en la primera persona en conducir un automóvil en un viaje por carretera (con la intención deliberada de comercializar el invento y demostrar su seguridad). Es posible que haya subido esta imagen sin darme cuenta a Wikimedia Commons mientras editaba un artículo en la Wikipedia en alemán, pero también puede haber sido mi única opción lógica si la introduje allí antes en la Wikipedia en inglés.
Debido a la ubicación original de la subida, estos archivos deben permanecer allí. Magog el Ogro sugirió en la discusión de la imagen de Tetis que aparece más arriba que sólo creando una página de galería especial se podrían fusionar las imágenes de 83d40m en la Wikipedia en inglés y en Wikimedia Commons para formar un directorio completo. Esta documentación en mi página de discusión parece suficiente por el momento. Mientras los originales se mantengan donde los subí (y los busque como referencias) y la atribución sea correcta, crear duplicados en Wikimedia Commons conservando esa atribución debería facilitar su uso en otras Wikipedias, si fuera necesario. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 02:32 14 jul 2011 (UTC)
Hola. Tu foto aérea es simplemente espectacular. Me preguntaba si por casualidad habría una versión en alta definición disponible para imprimir para uso personal. Como miembro del escuadrón de navegación de Sarasota que vive en el norte, estoy buscando un gran marco que me recuerde lo hermosa que es esta zona. Hay varias fotografías aéreas muy bonitas de la bahía, pero esta es la más bonita de todas en mi opinión. Gracias, Erik Enicefield ( discusión ) 18:39 9 septiembre 2011 (UTC)
Gracias por el cumplido. He publicado esta versión de baja resolución en el dominio público para uso no comercial, como se puede ver en los archivos aquí, pero no tengo intención de publicar los originales de mi trabajo. Lamento que esta versión no sea útil para una ampliación. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (discusión) 17:43 12 sep 2011 (UTC)
He planteado una cuestión que creo que te ha afectado aquí. Parada de autobús ( discusión ) 16:53 28 septiembre 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate your willingness to reconsider and especially for your patience to explore further with an open mind. I was going to drop the objection to the elimination of the sentence... just to avoid conflict. Figured that since the sentence had stood for so long, it would be foolish to try a rewrite. I will if it doesn't sit well... _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know, I presume that I may join in if I feel it is needed. BTW I am posting today about the listing that Gary's fine art garnered for him in Who Was Who in American Art, 1564-1975. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 19:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the addition of Jim Gary's sculpture. Can you possibly include the location. Is it on permanent display? Or is it privately owned? Amandajm (talk) 03:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Jim Gary's life-sized figures entirely of stained glass are all in private collections, so I did not include a location. For the same reason, I also didn't want to include a full view. There are Gary sculptures on public display that include stained glass, but the glass is incidental to the larger metal sculpture in those works (such as his centerpiece of the Colts Neck memorial garden). I consider these life-sized figures by Gary as among his finest works. Being free-standing works so well executed that they may be displayed in the round and as beautiful from any view, they are exquisite examples for the use of stained glass (and his well-lauded skills). Some day this one may go to a museum collection, then a full image would be appropriate. Will expand the caption. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 15:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Already expanded it, too much? Feel free to chop. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Love it! Go to sleep and I'll look for some more examples tonight or tomorrow... on my way off-line right now. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit]
The article Signature artwork has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I backed out your edits to Cincinnatus. Please see the manual of style for dates and for abbreviations. In summary, CE, BC, etc should not have periods while US and U.S. are both acceptable and therefore articles should not be edited to flip-flop between one acceptable style and another.
Cheers, Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 13:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know -- do not understand why you reversed all of the other edits, however, along with the abbreviations. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
It takes less than one minute to do a search on "organic canola" and see that it is available (including from major manufacturers). Please stop adding the unsourced false information.Novangelis (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed this edit of yours where you inserted some spaces in front of reference tags. I have removed the spaces per WP:REFSPACE. Cheers and keep up the good work! - DVdm (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neil deGrasseTyson quote 83d40m need for science literacy 2.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your direction to the format and templates, that is all that would have been necessary in the initial notice, since the image was created in order to create a graphic design device that would set the quote off to the side of text. I'll create a quote box to replace the image. I'll let you know if I need help. Suggest inclusion of such helpful guidance as a part of the official notice process when a simple solution is available, it would save time for several people at the same time. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm confused, are you saying that having a comma before a conjunction is incorrect? or that you are making the article consistent? MOS:SERIAL states that the usage of "serial commas" is acceptable, as long as it is used consistently in the article, not across Wikipedia. Just curious.--UnQuébécois (talk) 03:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
I think that this article should only address the direct influence of the Osiris myth itself, and not the worship of the deities related to the myth. The two subjects are closely linked, of course, but in the "Influence" section I thought it best to describe in broad terms the effects of the Osiris myth on the worship of the gods involved. Otherwise, the section would come perilously close to duplicating the articles about those gods. References to specific practices and images, I think, should be limited to things directly tied to the Osris myth. For example, the magical healing texts are specifically based on the episode of the myth in which Isis heals Horus.
Osiride statues, in contrast, make no direct reference to the myth, except perhaps in the mummy wrappings that Osiris wears—which are a standard part of his iconography. Therefore, if the image you keep adding belongs anywhere other than at Deir el-Bahri, it belongs in the article on Osiris. It really isn't that relevant to the myth. A. Parrot (talk) 03:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Gerald Massey 1856.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
The media file you uploaded as File:Gerald Massey 1856.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
{{subst:usernameexpand|83d40m}} will produce an appropriate expansion,Hello, Sfan -- Regarding your note to me: ...Why are you challenging the copyright status of an image that was taken in 1865 and threatening to remove it from WP? Since he died in 1907, any image of him should be copyright free. Please note that this is the lead image on the article on the man. Although I am listed as a user of the image, I do not find the image on my upload file, however, it is noted as a duplicate, "File:Gerald Massey 1856.jpg from Wikimedia Commons". _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
_by_Ron.jpg/1280px-Kitten_(06)_by_Ron.jpg)
they are so cute
Stylishsummer123 (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the generous expressions of appreciation. Is Wikilove a new WP policy? _ _ _ _83d40m (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions. Please note that numbers over ten are written as figures, not written out in figures. See WP:NUMERAL. Also common words are not linked. See WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Span (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I have deleted this file since it was an obvious violation of copyright. The content of that website is copyrighted and they have a disclaimer that fair use of logos and banners is excluded with prior permission. You should know by now that we cannot simply take screenshots of other websites and publish them under a free license. De728631 (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, will await further information from you and can post the image again if it is allowed. _ _ _ _83d40m (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
The article The Sarasota News Leader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 69.228.170.132 (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarasota News Leader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarasota News Leader until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Bushranger One ping only 20:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I disagree with your edit here and I have explained why on that article's Talk page here. Bus stop (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing up the meaning of your note to me. I am aware that we disagree, I think that was explored in 2011. I rely upon the immediate international coverage of Gary's death to indicate his status as a sculptor and believe it qualifies him for recognition for our readers. He was memorialized by the NYT, Time, ABC-TV, and most other prominent media. The numbers of people who attended exhibitions of his work while he was alive, could exceed some of the sculptors you list readily. His fine art is privately held internationally and never is cast off and sent to auction.
Without a doubt, he is the best example I have seen for the use of diverse materials in his work, so I have placed him among those being discussed in that vein. I suspect that you focus too closely on his whimsical works for a value judgment that might just be very personal. That is like focusing on Calder's circus and disqualifying him from discussion as a serious sculptor. The subject matter of dinosaurs was followed by Calder when he created a Stegosaurus after he met Gary and saw his. Chamberlain worked with automobile parts. Picasso often chose animal subjects in his sculpture. Gary's works are a thousand times more complex than Picasso's Bull head, yet are easily as effective a use of unchanged existing materials to create another image and they are created with the highest of skills. Our readers deserve to see not merely academic judgments, but works identified as notable in their lifetimes by everyday sources. As a fellow editor here, I will persist in placing entries where I see this as fitting and I would hope that you do not take that personally, as I respect your skills even though we do disagree on this point. I would prefer that the entry not be deleted. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your light-editing of field research. It was a mess that really needed clean up. danielkueh (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
It is not "Lioness" but "Lion" and the name was sourced to the Museum site itself. Please do not change the name again, especially since it was sourced. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
In addition "Lioness of Menecrates" yields zero ghits. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the courteous notice of your reversal of my edit. Please clarify in the caption that "lion" is a part of a title that you can cite with a reference. If you mean to imply a formal title, please use a format, such as italics or initial caps, which makes that clear. I am comfortable with that formality. Many museums catalogues have items that are misidentified in long-standing titles. While recognizing the title, clearly, clarification is within our mission of providing correct information to our readers.
Beyond that, I see no logical reason for any of the other edits that were reversed (seemingly because of the one word in a caption not identified as a formal title). I will repeat the other edits which point out the presence of lionesses where misidentified as lions and the inclusion of that information for the reader, if missing.
The lioness has some distinctive physical characteristics that ancient artists were explicit in portraying no matter the ignorance of modern collectors, who often misidentified the subjects. Perpetuating such an error ignores potential cultural ramifications that may be quite relevant to understanding past cultures. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2011 cathy gallatin 83d40m SarasotaChalkFestival.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Entry made at discussion _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2011 kobraMural 83d40m SarasotaChalkFestival.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Entry made at discussion including note that a correction of the entry on the upload form had been corrected and was reversed by editor challenging the images _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 23:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2007 lori escalera 83d40m SarasotaChalkFestival.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Entry made at discussion _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Please see File:"Forever Tall" CITYarts, Inc. mural.jpg which also is public art and the article on Public Art. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Please do not introduce spaces before refs, unless there is a compelling reason to do so. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for uploading File:Queen Tiye - cropped - probably with her husband Amenhotep III - 34 louvre - egyptarchive.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
sfab00 img -- Not sure what you are asking for, but this is a stab at what I think you mean...
This is pasted from discussion at the talk page of sfab00 img:
Please confirm that what you requested has been followed correctly. If not, please clarify what you want me to do. _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 02:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Slate isn't valid a reference for that? You deleted the reference. --occono (talk) 11:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, it should be in the previous versions, let me look. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benjamin R. Jacobs - March 15 1954 - 83d40m - 75 years old.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your recent contributions. Just to flag that numbers under 11 are written in letters (nine, four, one etc). Above ten are written as digits - 20th, 15, 44th, 1941. It would be appreciated if you could make the minor alterations needed to the articles you have edited where the format was changed. Thanks very much. Span (talk) 18:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Not Chatham Borough, New Jersey again. I've waited a while, but it seems to be deteriorating. I have been formulating a poll in advance of a move request that will standardize all of the paired municipalities, the Chanthams, Boontons and such. After reviewing the Encyclopedia of New Jersey and the naming convention it uses for articles, the titles of "Chatham Borough" and "Chatham Township" would be the model for other such municipalities. I don't see any justification for any other scheme, but this can be discussed further. Alansohn (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have reach consensus with Wondering55 regarding the info box. It involves a compromise by both, but is a reasonable solution for the time being. Thank you, editor Wondering55.
My apologies to editor Alansohn for raising this issue again, however, it has remained unresolved and considered in error by me all along. Because I have a passion for making the article correct, I believe I am justified in pursuing that objective, as tedious as it may be to other editors. I have researched for many aspects of articles of communities in this area and biographies of people born in this area. None of the subjects of biographies who were born in Chatham ever list their birth place as "Chatham borough", drivers licenses, birth and death certificates list the place as "Chatham", historical markers list the place as "Chatham". The basis of my argument is the difference between a place name and the type of government (which may change over time as in this case). There is a reason that maps do not list City of Summit, Borough of Madison, Borough of Florham Park, or Borough of Chatham on maps, they are giving the place names people seek and which reflect common use. When they do, one may take that as common usage.
Maps of this area identify Madison, Chatham, and Summit along the southwestern line of route 24 and farther to the southwest is Chatham Township.
There is a reason that the 'officials' asked about official names identify the government in which they function, create the signs mentioned, and sign the governmental papers. Regarding signs found in the town, note that the railroad is identified as "Chatham" the fire station is identified as "Chatham", the post office address is "Chatham". From the website are the following, "Living in Chatham", "Chatham Emergency Squad", "Chatham Joint Recreation", "Chatham Senior Center", "Explore Chatham", "The Minsi group of Lenni Lenape occupied the northern section of New Jersey, including the area of present-day Chatham.", "The trail became known as the Minisink Trail and followed a route that includes what is now Main Street in Chatham.", "In 1680 Sir George Carteret paid the Minsi the equivalent of $55 for land that included the present area of Chatham.", "Names associated with Chatham appear: Samuel Lum, Nathaniel Bonnell (also spelled “Bonnel”), and David Vanderpoel. These men settled in the area by the time of the Revolutionary War and made substantial contributions to Chatham’s early history.", "On November 23, 1773, the following notice appeared in the New York Journal or Advertiser: “Whereas the inhabitants of a certain village, situated at Passaic River, on the main road that leads from Elizabeth-Town to Morris-Town, found themselves under a considerable disadvantage from the place’s not having a particular name....the principal freeholders and inhabitants assembled together on Friday, the 19th inst., and unanimously agreed to call it Chatham.”, "Chatham’s citizens proved to be staunch revolutionaries and joined with leaders from other villages to form committees of observation and correspondence. Chatham citizens erected a liberty pole at what is now the corner of Main Street and University Avenue.", "Throughout the war Chatham was the scene of much troop movement. For two long winters Chatham served as a buffer...", "Shepard Kollock, an artillery soldier with a newspaper background, started the New Jersey Journal in Chatham...", "The army quietly left Chatham, heading south for Yorktown, Virginia.", "The trains that brought vacationers to Chatham also transported residents to city jobs. The “Chatham Accommodation” left at 7:15 a.m. and returned at 6:00 p.m.", "John T. Cunningham, in his preface to Chatham: At the Crossing of the Fishawack, states “I doubt that any other community of Chatham’s size in this country has ever taken such a detailed look at its history.” More information about the history of the Chathams can be found in the following books, available at the Library of the Chathams or the Chatham Historical Society.", and it lists the following books,
1. History of Chatham, New Jersey. Ambrose Ely Vanderpoel. 1959 Detailed, scholarly work, dwelling heavily on the War of Independence.
2. Chatham: At the Crossing of the Fishawack. John T. Cunningham. 1967. The story of Chatham from its beginnings through 1966.
3. Shepard Kollock: Editor for Freedom. John R. Anderson. 1975. The story of the New-Jersey Journal and its publisher in Chatham, 1779-83.
4. A Village at War. Donald Wallace White. 1979. A story of the people of Chatham, New Jersey, at the time of the American Revolution.
5 Memories Entwined with Roses. Ruth Pierson Churchill. 1984. Pamphlet “Washington’s Ruse de Guerre.” Ambrose Ely Vanderpoel. Reprint of Chapter XVI of History of Chatham.
For more information: Chatham Historical Society
On the website the address of Borough of Chatham is listed as, 54 Fairmount Avenue, Chatham, NJ 07928
"Explore Chatham is aimed at providing trails and descriptions that residents and non-residents can use to experience Chatham's natural beauty and historical importance."
Note the location stated in the published works of Shepard Kollock. While his press was located there, his books, pamphlets, and newspapers were printed in "Chatham, New Jersey"
Two historical markers displayed in the town identify it as "Chatham", including the "Chatham Historical District". If any group hones in on "the place" being designated, it is during historical designation.
What is the name of the community garden, "Chatham Community Garden"
I will quote from one of the first discussions raised on this topic,
:The point that the name of the government is not the name of the town is well made. In fact, I believe we confuse city governments with cities in Wikipedia, and, actually, all kinds of governments with places. As to how to find out the real name of the town, it's common usage. Normally, they are the same as "official usage", so it's not much of a practical problem. --Serge 04:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Common usage regarding Chatham since 1773 has been Chatham, New Jersey (except for the activities of its government, which is to be expected).
I'm afraid that I must sign off until tomorrow, but will continue my discussion then. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 02:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I have requested the renaming of the article on "The Chathams" (in which a joint school district and a sharing of the Chatham library with the residents of Chatham Township are discussed) to just that "The Chathams, New Jersey" and returning the title of "Chatham, New Jersey" to the article we are discussing that has been identified as Chatham, New Jersey for hundreds of years. "The Chathams" article was created by short time resident who for personal reasons wanted to be identified as a resident of Chatham, New Jersey when he lived in an apartment and attended secondary school in Chatham Township, New Jersey (after the creation of the joint school district and the expansion of library services that responded to the explosion of population in the township following WWII when open lands and large farms were converted to housing developments without any 'town' being developed—this was purely, classical suburban sprawl) and he created a new article on "The Chathams" and switched the title from the original "Chatham, New Jersey" article to his new article—renaming the original article as "Chatham Borough, New Jersey". He usurped all of the history related to the village that existed for hundreds of years and applied it to the article on the adjacent township where he lived. That township was a distinct rural region that was a remnant of the initial governmental organization efforts made after the revolution. It had few residents until the 1960s and only a small grammar school for the children who lived on the farms and in remote houses. By the time he became a resident the population explosion of the township had precipitated an increase that exceeded that of Chatham. The changes to the school and library system were in place by the time he resided there and it is obvious that he had no idea that the histories of the two communities were so different. He did not follow any suggestion I made about his incorrect assumptions. He striped the article on the original settlement down to nominal discussion. This editor was not a native of the country and his family had no history of residence in the community whose article he chose to alter for personal reasons that are complicated, and perhaps unnecessary to explicate. He had no sense of the local history. As I opposed the changes he made things escalated and by the time other editors became involved, it was no longer possible to understand readily the ramifications of his edits, nor was it an issue that other editors were want to plumb. Some of his changes were intended simply to muddy the waters enough that other editors might merely consider it a petty edit war. The changes he made have never been corrected adequately.
Residents of "Chatham, New Jersey" are passionate about their history. The number of houses displaying the date of their construction in the 1700s is remarkable. One author stated that "Chatham,, New Jersey" had studied its own history more than any other community in the country. Having to avoid articles in Wikipedia that often are driven to use the borough title to link to an incorrectly titled WP article is untenable to me as an editor with deep historical appreciation of subjects. The borough and township pairs that exist in New Jersey municipal governments compounded the entire issue. They had become problematic in a scheme chosen by WP that confused governments with the places they govern, introducing the subjects by defining them as the governmental name. Reaching a uniform resolution of that and making all of the corrections needed could entail a lot of work. That may dampen any enthusiasm for resolving the issue with three articles.
The common usage of "Chatham Township" as displayed on the map given above for an example is as a place name as well as a government organization of the place. The map displayed on an Internet Google search for "Chatham Township" clearly identifies the boundaries if it at [6]
Likewise, the map displayed on an Internet Google search for "Chatham, New Jersey" clearly identifies the boundaries of it and shows its relationship to Chatham Township [7]. The argument for common usage is rather clear showing that the two places are commonly recognized by those names.
As requested, continuing documentation of common usage in media of note that supports my argument includes the following,
This is how natives of the town identify themselves. That is common usage.
The post card displayed in the article, clearly declaring the location as Chatham, N.J. dates from 1911 and confirms common usage.
I list these because they are all from long after the borough form of government was adopted.
The notice at the top of the WP articles for the township and the town clearly direct readers to the WP articles on Chatham Township, The Chathams, and Chatham in New Jersey. Although I consider it an expendable article, if the title of the article on The Chathams were corrected to "The Chathams, New Jersey" and if the title of the article on Chatham, New Jersey were reverted to its original title the existing notices would clarify the differences for our readers and accurately reflect common usage. I am, however, amazed by the reluctance to adopt common usage in WP and the insistence on allowing an ill-advised change to stand for an article that merely covers a joint school system and a library service extension that easily could be covered as a paragraph in the articles on each of the real communities.
I have a long history as an editor in highly technical areas that require an understanding of very detailed nomenclature and precise use of language and, in contrast, this is so fundamental an issue that has such a simple solution, following the common use that has prevailed in language and geography for hundreds of years. Does WP identify an article on Paris or Toykyo to identify the name of its current form of government as the title of the article? They have changed governments dramatically in the last century, yet the place name is the same. Although I consider it less than professional editing and confounding a simple reality of having articles that are entitled with the place names. I could even accept the compromise I suggested of "Chatham (borough), New Jersey" as long as borough is not capitalized. It would be closer to an accurate title for the article.
The curious reality is, that an article entitled, "Borough of Chatham", could be written to discuss the government of that place in great detail. Of course, such an article would be better focused upon a very complex government, but the principle is evident.
I repeat this entry by another editor, who was asked to comment on my assertion of the inaccuracy of the title of the article during the heated debate in 2006.
My motivation is to make WP the best it can be. My primary objective is correcting one article. Secondarily, I would like to corrections to all three articles. Perhaps, we can thrash this out enough to reach a use that does not make WP seem stupid and peculiar. At the moment, Chatham, New Jersey is a borough. Its government form has changed several times without the place name changing in common use. It might be time, however, for WP to wake up to its shortsightedness on this and begin to make inroads in its established standard format that is confused and incorrect—and most misleading for its readers. I would be willing to assist. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Map identifying ChathamTownship and Chatham 83d40m.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Do you have a reference for sunset policy you added with this edit?
As long as you have reliable sources, relevant information can of course be added. Manxruler (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Methane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Atmospheric methane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, just for the record, since the genus Hadrosaurus contains only a single valid species, there is no information about either genus or species that isn't exactly the same. Therefore the articles should not be split. FunkMonk (talk) 07:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Sarasota Chalk Festival, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
I strongly disagree with the deletion on the basis of #8 Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This is an annual visual arts event and representation of its graphic details is most informative, and failing to provide examples of its contents is like having articles on artists without a gallery of their works. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
It is a simile, not an assertion of intent for this article. Please do not twist my words as you avoid discussion of the basis for my objection. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
I would prefer to appeal this to administrators in the area of images. Unfortunately, you are an editor with a short history and your track record is patchy, showing other valid complaints about your decisions as well. Boldness is admirable, I exercise it as I edit, but your attempt to intimidate me with a threat to block me while I was in the process of making edits to eliminate the one image (Rosie) that I believe could be eliminated because of failing to qualify within our guidelines along with clarifying relevance to the text for others and your avoidance of the topic I put to you is of concern to me however. I sensed that you were hovering to exercise your preference, to exercise blind authority, or to justify your actions rather than allowing dialogue to ensue among peer editors arguing their points of difference. That motivates me to appeal rather than to continue the argument with you.
Save the one I did delete because a link to another article would suffice, the images you have deleted are not of the same types, they are from varied sources external to WP and therefore without potential for links, and they are quite helpful in showing our readers what is being described in the article about a complex performing visual arts festival spanning several days that is held by a nonprofit and attended, without fee, by the public.
The images posted to the article over the years are appropriate uses of non-free media materials. We are a publisher also and images make our articles more appealing to our readers. Counting the number of non-free images used in an article is not analyzing how those images available for the topic are effective educational tools offered to our readers. Few images of the works created in the festival are eligible because of copyright limitations so taking advantage of the non-free images available is one of the ways to overcome that in this article.
One of the images you have removed is the cover of a guide to the ten days of the 2012 festival that was donated as a public service by a local publisher. How more specific to a section of the article can an image be? It provided forty pages of details about the history of the festival, the artists invited to it that year, and the educational programs presented at the festival that year. That depth could not be covered in our article, but certainly provides our readers with a handy avenue to much greater educational information about the topic.
Guidance by our editors was given to the poster of another one of the images, after they sought our help regarding proper posting procedures and followed that guidance to post it, now you have decided to delete it.
The posters, which were published by the organization and disseminated freely as promotional materials, are prime candidates for us to use in our articles.
Rather than to belabor this with you, I appeal to higher authorized editors specializing in images. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:2013 Sarasota chalk festival 83d40m official poster .png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Stefan2 (talk) 01:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
transcribing discussion for continuity:
Stefan, this poster was part of the article,Sarasota Chalk Festival, and was among images deleted from that article by a new image editor. There is an unresolved discussion about the images. Should this image be retained until the differences are settled? If not, if found useful for another article or section of the initial article may it be reintroduced after a deletion? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I made time to take the discussion further at the talk page for the festival and placed a copy of the images under discussion there so that they are visible, albeit very small. That also should prevent someone else from issuing another deletion warning. Thank you for your agreement on the need to retain this one image that could wind up without an article, until the discussion is completed. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 05:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greenland's Grand Canyon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi 83d40m. Your recent edit at Athena reverted some of my edits there. Was this an unintentional edit conflict? Regards, Paul August ☎ 12:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Transcribed:
The edit I was working on wrote over yours, sorry. It was not intentional and last night I corrected the image relocation. Right now I am logged in with the intention to reinstate your other edits. No need for you to do it again. I have the history up and will fix it. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
I assumed they were unintended, but I wanted to make sure before I redid them. Thanks for doing that. Paul August ☎ 16:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
from Paul August Talk for record. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
NCurse— Thank you for the reversal of the link I inadvertently left behind in Medicine. Can you help me with the problem I encountered at this article while attempting to make a link to Félix Martí-Ibáñez (a new article I have started), who is the author noted in the footnote to his book A Prelude to Medical History?
I do not see a way to make a link to the new article in the Martí-Ibáñez footnote that exists in the section, Ancient World of Medicine, however I see that other footnotes in the same format do have links to the articles on the authors. When I examine those footnotes in the edit window, I do not see evidence of a link, yet it is there. The link must be in the original source for the book somewhere in WP.
Here is the citation, <ref name=mart90>{{Cite book| last=Martí-Ibáñez | first=Félix | year = 1961 | title = A Prelude to Medical History | publisher = MD Publications, Inc. | place = [[New York]] |id = Library of Congress ID: 61-11617|page=90}}</ref>
it reads, ... name=mart90>Martí-Ibáñez, Félix (1961). A Prelude to Medical History. New York: MD Publications, Inc. p. 90. Library of Congress ID: 61-11617.
Where does this citation originate? I am hoping that I can access that citation in its original location so I may make a link to Félix Martí-Ibáñez there, that will be presented automatically with each citation of his book.
I am including a copy of my note to you on the talk page of the new article as well as on my own talk page. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
I created a redirect for Félix Martí-Ibáñez that will route inquiries to Félix Martí Ibáñez, however, the article ought to bear the correct spelling of his name.
When I created the new article, the title came up without the hyphen and I can not find a device to correct the title. Any help will be appreciated. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
GoingBatty— Thanks for adding categories to the article, Félix Martí-Ibáñez. Not being familiar with the guidelines for them nor all of the categories, I was reluctant to try more than a few. I do wonder, however, why you have changed some categories I had added and noted his affiliation only as Spanish for all significant categories for him. He emigrated to the U.S. at the age of thirty and became an American citizen. Although he is notable for Spanish culture, he is even more notable for American culture. His contributions to medical literature and history was international, being read by physicians, other professionals, and a world-wide audience among other groups. All of his books were published in English and through the publishing house he founded in Manhattan, where he lived until he died at the age of sixty. His command of English was remarkable. His most important writings were in English and authored after he had emigrated to his new county of citizenship. The vast majority of his professional work was in his adopted country and his clinical writings were in English. Can we reflect this by adding categories related to the thirty years of his professional work after changing citizenship? Or would it be better to revert to my categories regarding his professional work and merely create categories for his birth citizenship and location and also for his adopted citizenship and location? What are your thoughts on this? (Copied to my talk page also) _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
In John Kenneth Galbraith you made some corrections (under the edit summary "A light edit of the article ..."), but along with that changed some styles and spellings that were already acceptable. I have undone some of these: spelling, switching to em dashes, and numerals to spelled-out numbers. "Titled" is acceptable in American English (the variety in which Galbraith wrote); Merriam-Webster defines the transitive verb 'title' as "to designate or call by a title". Please see WP:RETAIN. Spaced en dashes and unspaced em dashes are equivalent, but one should not be changed to another in an article where one is used consistently. WP:DATE says "Centuries and millennia not in quotes or titles should be either spelled out (eighth century) or in Arabic numeral(s) (8th century). The same style should be used throughout any article". Again, wholesale switching from one style to the other is unwarranted and unhelpful. Notice the phrase "not in quotes or titles"; your edit even changed the style in the title of a book.
I don't intend this to discourage you from making constructive edits to WP articles. There is plenty of work to be done fixing misspellings, miscapitalization, bad grammar, missing punctuation and non-WP styles, but imposing your own personal taste on every aspect of an article should be avoided. If you have any questions about this, please visit my talk page. Chris the speller yack 15:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
I may be misinterpreting your comments, but find them both condescending and a rationalization for replacing my consistent and acceptable edits with those of your personal tastes—while ironically, accusing me of having inserted my personal taste.
Except for one spelling correction—where I had inserted an apostrophe into "its" in error—the items you changed from my edit of the entire article contain no errors. Furthermore, I consistently changed the items required to be consistent throughout an article, if they were not, as required.
Reverting typography, as you have, to the limited range available to a typewriter—rather than that available to typesetting used professionally in publishing (and now enabled in composition on computers)—fails to present WP as a professional-looking publication, which always is my objective.
At least you consult the dictionary I consider authoritative, but one ought to compare the differences in use of alternative spellings thoroughly before expressing disdain for another editor's choice between what you consider perfectly acceptable—when you justify what you think is a correction.
The first definition of entitle is as a transitive verb to give a title to something and its origin follows a consistent transition from Latin (Middle English, from Anglo-French entitler, from Late Latin intitulare, from Latin in- + titulus title); to the contrary with your choice, the first definition of title is as a noun describing that which has been given and only its second definition is as a transitive verb without pure linguistic credentials and, there is reason to look upon it simply as a corruption of the noun.
When writing, best practices are to choose a word when its first definition is intended rather than choosing words with other primary meanings. Better to use the full rich vocabulary of a language than to muddy it through reduction, as if to a lowest common denominator.
I shall leave your edits even though I believe they diminish the quality of the article that I tried to advance to a higher caliber than it was before my efforts. Time may be wasted so easily by engaging in futile arguments, so I reserve my challenges for things of greater significance to me.
Thank you for catching that spelling error. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to De rerum natura may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
You know File:Trees to transplant from Punt to Egypt - Hatshepsut Mortuary Temple.JPG? It is rotated top-to-right so it is unusable. At Hatshepsut I switched to the version from Commons. Why keep it here? trespassers william (talk) 00:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
This is a curious mess, my 2006 original uploaded and displayed correctly in the article, Hatshepsut, the date indicated is 2008. Later it was added to the commons and I am guessing that it skewed in the process and was rotated and renamed, because now it is listed as,
.
At one time a 2011 version, Trees_to_transplant_from_Punt_to_Egypt_-_Hatshepsut_Mortuary_Temple_c.jpg, (which I can see today when accessed from your file as another version—no matter that here it is displayed as a non-existent file) was derived from my original by User:JMCC1 I objected to the use of this because of the distortion of the color. At that file there is a reference to my original file. Perhaps this is when the file was rotated, but I do not recall it skewing in the article then.
Don't know whether it is possible to determine an accurate chronology for all of this.
Now these images are used in five articles, however, with file names that were not created by me and without annotation at the original file or being cross referenced to my gallery.
It should have been tagged "KeepLocal" so I have corrected the file today and although I do not mind the file being in the commons, I still would like a copy of the correctly-oriented image that now is in the article to be kept local so that I may view it in my gallery. I do not see an option to edit the new commons file with a "keep local" tag. What options are available to achieve that? Can you help me with that? ____83d40m (talk) 01:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fungus gnat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Allen Toussaint may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Allen Toussaint may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Goucher College may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
This is a keeper file with no known article.
Found at Gerda Arendt (talk) ff researched compliment.
A nice compliment, a nice image.
____83d40m (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
That works, thanks._ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 02:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
There isn't a huge amount of independent coverage on the JSTOR/Wikipedia partnership, but there this short piece in the School Library Journal blog. Not the best, but School Library Journal is considered an RS, I believe. The Interior (Talk) 02:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Glad to see someone taking the trouble to do some copy editing. I have one query where I think the sense may have been amended slightly - you'll see it in the page history v. soon if you are curious. Ben MacDui 17:30, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83d40m/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Aegirocassis#Aegirocassis
This is the link to nomination for DYK. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 22:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim gary 83d40m 2011.09.17appE13-14.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 01:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
conversation at nomination for deletion:
File:Jim gary 83d40m 2011.09.17appE13-14.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 83d40m (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). Scan of a newspaper article used in two biographical articles about people whose actions are discussed in the article. I'm unclear how having a picture of the article better helps understand either topic. (WP:NFCC#8) B(talk) 01:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thumb|095px - image was uploaded and inserted into subject articles on 2011.09.19 I believe this image contributes significantly to an understanding of both topics. First, it is useful because the subject sculpture is represented, and often, visual references can communicate more effectively than words, especially to show the range in size and subject matter. Second, because the artist is represented with his work, and being dead, that cannot ever occur again. Third, direct quotes exist in the article. Fourth, this publication frequently deletes files of previous articles, leaving no other access to the article other than such a graphic. Fifth, it demonstrates the importance locally of the subject and the artist, to be given a full page spread with many photographs. Sixth, the editor, who prepared the image and added it to the articles, carefully chose images to accompany the articles to make both an appealing article for our readers. Seventh, it is one of few images that can tie the subjects of the two articles to one another. This image has stood the test of time in articles that see regular traffic from readers. Fulfilling the guidelines for images, and not being in violation of any fair use criteria, it should be retained. Deletion should not hinge on the taste of one editor when no other issue exists (for it merely is a difference between two editors, not regulations). I fail to find how that difference could be determined as a valid criteria for deletion and object strongly to the nomination for deletion. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC) _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 13:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Meeting the criteria for fair use, the image was uploaded and inserted into the subject articles on 2011.09.19 and has been a feature of both articles continuously for four years. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 14:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Reinserted a tiny thumbnail of the image for references. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1940s advertisement 83d40m w Crosley image .png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Inserting tiny thumbnail of the image for reference re the following,
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim gary universal woman 83d40m lores sevcrop.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Neil deGrasseTyson quote 83d40m need for science literacy.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim gary 83d40m r2x.lores27k stained glass woman detail302r.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 05:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ruby Woodson quote - 83d40m - i believe.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ruby Garrard Woodson -83d40m- founder Cromwell Academy and FAAC.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. B (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ruby Woodson - 83d40m - poster - Florida Academy of African American Culture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 11:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bat atop Narmer Palette.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hathor Menkaure Bat triad fourth dynasty Cairo Museum.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nagada figure.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two ladies - Nekhbet right Wadjet or Uto left crown king - 83d40m temple of Horus at Edfu.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two Ladies on Tutankhamun viscera-coffin-front - Cairo Museum.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aegis of Isis - Sudan 300s bc - British Museum - 83d40m.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 12:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1935 Morris and Essex dog show at polo fields of Marcellus Hartley Dodge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 13:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarasota Florida - 83d40m - from mainland across bay front to Gulf of Mexico - new bridge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarasota Florida - 83d40m - from Gulf of Mexico across her keys and Sarasota Bay to downtown and mainland.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karl Benz and Bertha Benz gravestone - vdetail2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. B (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Novartis building - 83d40m - basel - frank-gehry p2z.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarasota Municipal Auditorium - 83d40m - post cards inclasid.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lake Underwood driving 83d40m Porsche 904 Sebring 12 Hours 1964 2psharp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1986 stamp 83d40m Athena .png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goddess ntrt simple.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:English style 83d40m WEG 2010 - Dressage v2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:English style 83d40m WEG 2010 - Dressage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 17:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lillian Burns 1913-2003 83d40m aboard her sailboat on Sarasota Bay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. B (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PeggyLee tageDoorCanteen83d40m StageDoorCanteen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
User B, Stefan2, et al — Please let me know when you have run out your exercise with the images I have uploaded. Obviously you are devoting a great deal of time in this effort even though presumption seems to be driving most of your judgments and your personal comments. When you have finished, I will begin to respond to each as time allows. Not having the luxury of free time that you seem to have, it will take time, but I will go through my records for each and reply. Please note the correct classifications for those classified incorrectly so that changes may be made. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Not ignoring you, am very busy at the moment, will have some time about the middle of next week to begin to engage on these issues. Quickly, however, regarding the photograph of the stamp, the photograph I uploaded was self made and the description states that it is of a postage stamp. It seems a stretch to presume that given the description, I was claiming that I had drawn the stamp. Regarding your other item, although I consider my image of the aegis of Isis much superior to one on the web site of the museum I clearly acknowledged as its location (I think the difference in the two images is apparent), they do allow free upload for educational use and I could do that, but would lose my anonymity because they require extensive disclosure at registration. If there is a WP id that may be used, I would be glad to upload the lesser quality image, if you insist. Sorry for the delay, but will have some time next week. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
An still without the time to reply adequately to this number of images and I expect that it may be impossible to find time to begin much before weeks from now. That being the case, it may be futile to pursue reinstatement of the images, for which I believe there are rational arguments against removal. It therefore, not being a personal issue to me, I may just move on and, in the future, attempt to avoid the types of issues raised regarding them (which I respect even if I consider particulars ill-founded), to provide more complete details in image data submitted, and, even though I consider it acceptable, to edit my own images—at whatever degree of sophistication I consider necessary for the particular application—into ones bearing other titles. Retaining access to the images removed, I believe that only our readers will suffer what I consider a loss of additional insights into the subjects of the articles. Time available to me, undoubtedly, will be used more beneficially in edits without such controversy or especially, without need for protracted defense of so many in one fell swoop, and the absorption of the precious time available to several good editors. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The Observer 83d40m chalkfestival2012 guide cover.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. On initiation of User:B, a contributor copyright investigation has been opened to review your image uploads and ensure that images comply with our licensing policies. Based on this, three images have been flagged specifically for review - the one of which you received notice immediately above and two images now listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 May 11: File:ThomasReedMartin 83d40m 2ndfromRight shc.jpg and File:Kids paintings sarasota chalk festival.PNG. You are welcome to contribute your thoughts at the Possibly unfree files listing as to why these images are free for us to retain.
As a general rule of thumb, we request that users not give individual notices to people of issues found at CCI to avoid flooding talk pages with notices of issues that contributors now understand. Because of that, you may or may not receive notice of problems found. It's a good idea to watchlist the CCI page itself: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/83d40m.
There was question of text contributions as well, in light of B's finding in this edit that you had closely followed your source. While I did find some copying issues in Municipal Auditorium-Recreation Club, with material taken from the Sarasota County Government website, my spot-check has not disclosed routine issues. Nevertheless, I need to be sure you realize that text content you add to Wikipedia must in almost all cases be written in your own words, except for brief and clearly marked quotations. If a source is demonstrably public domain or compatibly licensed, you may copy from it more liberally but are required to follow the processes set out at Wikipedia:Plagiarism by noting that you are not just taking information but creative content from your sources.
If you have any questions about the CCI process, please let me know. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. As noted above, I am without the time necessary to address the particulars, but appreciate the professional quality of your notice. Perhaps at a later date I will be able to address the items you have noted, especially, the copyright-free status of governmental publications, and the difference of approach withing text regarding notable cover images. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Noting url for future reference - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83d40m/Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/83d40m - reply made there for entry in history. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I am unsure of when 'city' should be capitalised in this instance (although the text does say City of London is used to distinguish from city of London ie the metropolis, which has no formal status and is not legally a city). However part of your revert was 'municipal governing body of London,', this is clearly wrong, very few users ever use 'London' to mean 'the City of'. One of the main purposes of the passage is to clarify the difference between 'the City of' and 'the city commonly known as'. The 'City of' has few/no powers over 'the city called'(ie 'London'). Please name/ping if replying.Pincrete (talk) 08:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC) … … ps the distinction between the various uses of 'city' and 'London' is puzzling, even to those of us who have lived there! Unfortunately that's history.Pincrete (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim Gary - Colts Neck 9-11 Memorial Garden - 83d40m - 2p.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipal auditorium 83d40m art show.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seshat - papyrus headdress - bent rod - Karnak Temple.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jim Gary - Twentieth Century Dinosaurs - 83d40m poster - tour of Japan.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Notice profundity of reason for diminishing the article for readers
(cur | prev) 16:24, 17 September 2015 Calliopejen1 (talk | contribs) . . (36,532 bytes) (-249) . . (→International traveling exhibition launched: rm unneeded nonfree image) (undo)
in this spree documentation.
_ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Decided to restore the image and provide rationale.
(cur | prev) 04:28, 21 September 2015 83d40m (talk | contribs) . . (36,781 bytes) (+249) . . (Undid revision 681503327 by Calliopejen1 (talk) poster is—allowed—and is useful for readers to see the reception in another country - better understanding of its recognition) (undo)
_ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Image should be kept local — but put into the Wiki where it may be shared with other Wikipedias, in process of creating one in the Japanese Wikipedia — but not sure how to transfer the image. Need help with that. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 06:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Regarding comment by editor that the image was unneeded note text related to the poster:
"The exhibition was booked for a tour of Japan that began in April 1984. The poster displayed to the right was for the opening exhibition at a national museum in Tokyo that lasted through May, before making a six-month tour to museums in other Japanese cities. Posters were distributed in the cities that were included in the tour and they were displayed in buses, trains, and other public places to announce the exhibition in each museum."
What museums in USA would be analogous to those to which this exhibition went as a solo show? What museums in Britain would be analogous to those in this tour?
Where is the rule being used by this editor? Is this editor qualified to judge the subject of art and its professional standards? Is a national tour to the major museums in Japan of the works of an artist from the USA—unneeded information? Are the posters produced by the Japanese not a significant indicator of the esteem for the artist in Japan?
..................
Taking one image at a time allows discussion—a deviation from the spree initiated against images posted by this user—who now is being disparaged by the editor on the spree in edit summaries. I find this spree and the related behavior quite contrary to Wikipedia standards, as I know them, and suspect a personal agenda. Now a personal judgment by that editor of an image that cannot be taken down "for (presumed) causes" (that remain allegations) being unneeded is used for justification... This deserves examination (? bullying ?)
_ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jim Gary - Twentieth Century Dinosaurs - 83d40m poster - tour of Japan.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luigi Chinetti - apres LeMans - 83d40m.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Who took this photo originally? Why are you the copyright holder? Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
The first file records indicates quite clearly that the photograph was inherited. Why would you ask me to divulge information that would expose my identity?
The status of the second is a similar situation, with the photograph being an autographed promotional photograph (distributed and published widely) given to the person who gave it to me.
Clearly, they were my possession to do with as I chose and I created edits of them that I released to creative commons attribution. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
What is the source of this logo? Benz & Cie appears to have existed until 1926. If the logo was published before 1923 (which seems likely) the image would be free. But we need a source confirming the date the logo was used. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
==computer crawling - will try logging on on Friday 83d40m (talk) 00:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
The source for the logo is the company itself. This version dates to before 1909. A photograph taken at a museum was uploaded from my camera into Picasa and edited for upload to WP, which was given to creative commons attribution in 2008.
_ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
You seem to be in contact with Jim Gary's studio director. Would it be possible to discuss with him the possibility of having a few images released under a free license, following the process at commons:Commons:Email templates? It would probably be ideal to have a photo of Gary himself, a photo or two of his dinosaur sculptures, and maybe a photo or two of his other artworks. This would eliminate all issues with the use of nonfree images in Gary's article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Hatshepsut-SmallSphinx MetropolitanMuseum.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jim gary 83d40m stegosaurus illuminated 2p.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jim Gary abstract 83d40m painted metal lores.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dudley S DeGroot 83d40m circa 1949.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clare Potter 83d40m fgi founder 1939.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Will mcLean paul champion 1985 White.Springs 83d40m state.archives Florida.Memory.items.show.110412.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:New College 2005 campus master plan 83d40m day 1 - Stefanos Polyzoides et al.2ndupload.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jim Gary 83d40m Triceratops NJ200911postrztnminusm.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Map Seagate campus 83d40m University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 05:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Since when has USF been in the business of publishing "copyright free" documents? Never, to my knowledge. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
A state university falls under the same laws because it is an institution that is an arm of the state. Since it is in Florida, it must conform to the freedom of information laws of the state. All of the documents and images it releases, publishes, or broadcasts are openly accessible by the public following the state laws and, by her own laws, the state has no legal right to proscribe how they are used.
While I appreciate your earnestness, I think you have to realize the implications of what you're saying. Does every professor who does work for USF have to release that work into the public domain? How about students who work for said professors? I really don't think that argument would hold up in court. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Map_Seagate_campus_83d40m_University_of_South_Florida_Sarasota-Manatee.jpg&oldid=699140107 and I point out again that the image is in the public domain and the details of the template note that
83d40m (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Please also see, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:Map_Seagate_campus_83d40m_University_of_South_Florida_Sarasota-Manatee.jpg&oldid=699158044 83d40m (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
+
User:Steel1943, I added a new image to take the place of the one discussed above. The new one is,
. I am hoping that this will solve the OTRS tag issue noted above. It looks as if attention is needed to make sure the image file is adequate, please advise. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Julia Drusilla may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
On 02:37, 22 May 2012 you copied text from Mary Anning to Louis Agassiz diff. If you make such internal copies you must a attribute it. See WP:Copying within Wikipedia. -- PBS (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
An edit made to Romanos IV Diogenes at 05:39, 1 November 2010 by user:Oatley2112. On 18:14, 1 January 2013 you copied some of that text to Eudokia Makrembolitissa in your edit summary you wrote "a light edit of the article", but you copied some of the text from Romanos IV Diogenes. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia you have to attribute such copies otherwise it is a breach of copyright. Also in this case not providing attribution meant that you also cause a secondary problem because with your copy you copied a short inline citation without the corresponding source from the References section. This is a problem highlighted in WP:Copying within Wikipedia#Other reasons for attributing text:
If text with one or more short citations is copied from one or more parent articles into a child article, but the corresponding full reference in the parent's references section are not copied across, without appropriate attribution as specified below, it can be difficult to identify the full reference needed to support the short citations (see here for an example).
-- PBS (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I still have no idea of the exact nature of your issue with the content of the article. Please edit the article to correct the issue that concerns you. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
copied text from [[article name]]" -- as described the guideline copying within Wikipedia. If you do not do this then you are creating a copyright violation. -- PBS (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Thank you, for the code and making the correction. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 23:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Acropolis of Athens may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, the correction had been made in the next edit, which followed closely. 83d40m (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
testing change _ _ _ _ 83d40m 18:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks—whenever available, I do. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded this file, but it has been quite some time since the last one, the form seemed different and am not sure whether it was completed correctly -- please advise if there is a problem -- and I will do whatever is necessary to correct any errors. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:MEDMOS generally Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi 83d40m - -I'm confused, in your edit you seem to have reverted my many changes for the past editing session -- was this deliberate? Or did we just have some sort of peculiar edit conflict? Espresso Addict ([[User talk:Espresso Add ict|talk]]) 04:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Tethys 83d40m AntakyaMuseum Turkey-fix2.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your overall "light editing" of the article. However, please note this sentence from Note 2 at the very beginning of the article, on his bold-face full name:
Please restore the capital "V" throughout. (Also, even if it were properly lowercase in the name, English spelling rules dictate that it should be capitalized at the beginning of a sentence. The Wikipedia policies for article names, e.g. "iPhone", are irrelevant here.)
By the way, there is something very strange about the indentation here. Somewhere in the section just above this one, the indentation for everything moves rather far to the right and never returns, affecting even this section. I looked at the wikicode but was unable to see what might be happening. --Thnidu (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
::::{{PD-FLGov}}THIS IS A TEST
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BECOMES NECESSARY
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BECOMES NECESSARY
(THIS LINE HAS NO COLONS.)
Thank you, Thnidu! Looks as if you have discovered the indentation source and let's hope we see a reversal because of your efforts.
I will repost my second edit in order to overcome the recent reversal -- and will direct editors to our discussion and the Wikipedia page I noted to you. I'll let you know when a correction is implemented. Thanks again. ____ 83d40m (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
I was reading the gelatin article and I noticed that you reunited the split auxiliaries in the article in this edit. I'm curious as to why you felt the need, split auxiliaries are often considered more (or just as) natural sounding in English, and well, if it ain't broke...
Sorry, I'm a bit behind with my watchlist. Tomásdearg92 (talk) 00:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
These are editorial choices and WP is open to all editors. Edits that are not errors are supposed to be welcome. Constructive criticism is welcome, petulance and bulling should be avoided at WP. You justify your reversals and rebuke on your personal preference for a spoken and colloquial convention that differs from constructions used in formal writing; "split" constructions are defined as splitting a structure with something that breaks the structure. When correction of that break is achieved by minimal rewriting to restore the broken structure, such edits are restoring the structure. Often that is achieved simply, by relocating an adverb by one space, to the other side of the verb it modifies, equally as acceptable in English. Sometimes, a better solution involves other positions in a sentence, sometimes a rewrite produces the best result. I edit to take WP articles to their highest level, avoiding colloquial and slang constructions facilitates understanding for all of our readers (who may not understand such) and to facilitate translation by those with limited understanding of colloquial and slang constructions, as well as, across platforms in WP. You may change my well-intended edits following the philosophy of WP, but I find your insistence that I conform to your personally-preferred editorial style as rather despotic and indefensible. Equally offensive is wholesale reversal of an entire edit in order to dominate the process that is open to all -- often reversing clear corrections of spelling, punctuation, and other errors, or, obliterating enhancements to the article (occasionally noted in the edit description of the reversing editor, as astounding as that may seem). This is a lazy and despotic exercise that seems to be wielded by certain editors who assume a proprietary relationship over what is supposed to be collaborative work. Now, if this obsession were pursued consistently -- editors concerned with this issue have enough material in WP to keep them entertained for their lifetimes -- rebuking me for that ignored in the work of others and, stalking my work, rings another bell if it only is pursued in articles for which a proprietary relationship seems to exist. Certain editors will reverse an edit of an entire article for such petty issues and seeing their ID becomes a clue to consistent behavior. This may not apply to you personally, but you have brought up an issue regularly encountered, my apologies if the shoe does not fit, I have found the majority of WP editors willing to be collaborative and value their work. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signature artwork is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signature artwork until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bus stop (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
83d40m—can you tell me why you are inserting your vote in between other editor's votes at the deletion discussion pertaining to the article Signature artwork? I think you should be posting your vote beneath the last vote at the time that you are voting. Wouldn't that represent a more correct chronological order? I am referring to this post. Bus stop (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for copyediting pavement light, you caught a lot of stupid errors I'd made. Especial thanks for correcting my excessively interchangable use of "that" and "which". I'm learning, but it does not come automatically to me. Could I ask why you are worried about adverb-verb ordering ("also were" vs. "were also", "often taken" vs. "taken often" and so on)? I think I may be missing something here. HLHJ (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:2011bk1cover 83d40m SarasotaChalkFestival.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, many thanks for the corrections in the article above. You give the following article as further reference: Zivie, Alain, Pharaoh's Man, Abdiel, the vizier with a Semitic name, Biblical Archaeology Review, July-August 2018, page 23,ff Is that correct? From the title of the article I would assume it is about: the tomb of Aperel. In the title there is nothing to assume that is about the tomb of Thutmose. best wishes -- Udimu (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
The WP article and the references used from the archaeologist working on the tomb are about the same Thutmose, not Aper-El, "...particularly Bubasteion I.19 of the artist Thutmes (or Thutmose), who painted and engraved his own tomb and who was found to be the creator of the famous bust of Queen Nefertiti, presently kept in Berlin,* and of Maïa (Bubasteion I.20), the foster mother of Tutankhamun, who was found to be the princess Merytaten, the elder daughter of Akhenaten and sister of the king, who sat briefly on the throne and functioned as a kind of regent before her brother was crowned." are quotes. You should read the article. 83d40m (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
As you saw, at first I thought they were the same person, but after your note, read again and found that the article is about both. So I have learned from your note! Luckily, my edits do not need correction. Thanks for the heads-up. 83d40m (talk) 19:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your edits to the Vincent van Gogh page. A consensus was reached on the Van Gogh talk page to use the capitalized "Van Gogh" over "van Gogh". The Van Gogh Museum also uses upper case. - HappyWaldo (talk) 03:26, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Temple of Artemis, Corfu. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 00:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Temple of Artemis, Corfu. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 00:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of hospitals in New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morris County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ron Faucheux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iron Tail - 83d40m - model for indian head nickel SarasotaHistoryCenter crop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello! You added material to the Donald Trump article about the whistleblower situation. You added it in good faith, but I have reverted because the subject is under discussion at the talk page and consensus is not to put it in that article at this time. However, there is a whole article under development at 2019 Trump-Ukraine controversy that you may wish to contribute to. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John M. Dowd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
User:Bearian I would like help restoring my page so that it no longer indents automatically. The problem has endured since 2016, when another editor somehow reset the margin of this page to a deep indent. A good deal of space is wasted in the process. Can this be brought to the attention of editors who might be able to fix it? I do not know where to inquire about such an issue. It is not of great consequence, but annoying. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
User:Bearian I am so grateful! Thank you, I do not know how to give merit awards, but you certainly deserve one! I'll be very careful regarding the spaces. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
FYI, I have reverted your (good faith) change to Milton Keynes per WP:BRD and opened a discussion at talk:Milton Keynes#Midsummer Boulevard, astronomical alignment adjustment. If you disagree, please explain there. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hatshepsut barque - 83d40m - Punt expedition - Karnak.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wizardman 01:24, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Merneith on Den list of pharaohs - 83d40m - repeated on Abydos seal.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wizardman 01:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iusaaset - 83d40m - 4wki.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wizardman 01:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Don't you need to cite a source for the date of 400? I do not have easy access to the existing cited source (book by Mann), but apparently it gives a date of 800. It is strange to give a data of 400, and cite a source that says 800.
If you have a source you can cite, you might consider making an analogous modification to the article Marajoara culture. Thanks. Bruce leverett (talk) 04:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Good idea -- I will follow up on both. Thanks. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Please be aware of Wikipedia's Manual of Style for hyphens, which says "Avoid using a hyphen after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) ...". In particular, on Watercress. Chris the speller yack 03:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
It's a very small thing, but that you for taking a non-religious approach to punctuation. --Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Image was removed from the trump campaign 2020 page by User:UpdateNerd. Sent inquiry, "Please explain your justification for removing this image from the article. The standing of the image has not been challenged and should be eligible for use. I would like to restore it to the article." _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20201007 michael pence 83d40m vp debate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with the wording, neutrality, or reliability of the sources you used for this edit, but I ask you to consider whether it's too soon to start discussing that, especially with just a short sentence like that. I'm not going to revert you, and if you choose not to self-revert I won't take it any further, but I believe it may be better to wait until the election passes and actually have a multiple sentence paragraph discussing this rather than just have a vague "non-information" sentence like this. (I am watching this page, so please reply here.) Regards -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 01:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Want to keep a record of the better image, Túmulo 100 jpg, here since there are several being used. This one has higher contrast and color quality. It should be used in Nekhen and related Ancient Egyptian articles:Ancient Egypt, Gerzeh culture, Mural, Nekhen, Prehistoric Egypt, Portal:Ancient Egypt, Portal:Egypt, Portal:Egypt/Selected picture. Other resolutions provide manageable subjects for additional images. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Jacobs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Moreno.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
(Moved from my talk. Please discuss here.)
Hi X4n6
I noted an edit you made following one of mine and appreciated your work. Rarely am I moved to look up an editor, but seeing some similarities in our user names and editing styles, I came to have a look at your page. I saw the long list of Wikipedia Library options you have exercised. Previously unaware of the availability of this, there is great promise in the partnerships. I am most interested in your experience with it. I know that I would like access to things such as JSTOR, scientific sites, literary journals, newspaper archives, and such that I do not have. Would you have time to and be willing to "chat" about this? I have some questions I would like to explore before applying. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 01:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
X4n6 - Thanks, does it entail having to disclose personal details other than the name chosen as editor here and an e-mail address? I looked at some of the information and could not determine whether that was the case for all of the partnerships, or just for some of them. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 18:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
X4n6 - Thanks. I have an email for my editor identity so that would not be a concern, but having an association of my personal name with the editor identity would be a concern for me. Perhaps a nom de plume would suffice? _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 22:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
transcription for future reference:
thanks, multiple errors re Mary V. Ahern
Stumbling through a mistaken attempt that resulted in the creation of the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was a second error while attempting to correct a mistake in an article entitled Virginia V. Ahern because the name was incorrect. This article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was created in the second mistake and used for a cut and paste attempt to make the correction of name.
The final correction resulted in an article entitled Mary V. Ahern (producer), which should be the only correctly created article for this biography.
My apologies for the two errors of title. I never had learned how to move in order to correct an error in title! Will note all of this at the multiple articles. Lesson learned!
A notation at the directions about "moving to correct title" indicated that a bot would clean up this dreadful mess I made. Here's hoping that is correct, because the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer) was created incorrectly, is redundant, and should be deleted. As Annie Oakley declared, "I'll never do it again!" You placed a tag on this incorrect article that should be deleted. so I will remove the tag and make note of the complicated history. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! I was concerned because of having used cut and paste for the one you tagged and having seen warnings that using that process messed up the history carried with an article — again, my apologies. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
All's well that ends well! _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
History of discussion with John B123 for personal resource:
Stumbling through a mistaken attempt that resulted in the creation of the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was a second error while attempting to correct a mistake in an article entitled Virginia V. Ahern because the name was incorrect. This article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was created in the second mistake and used for a cut and paste attempt to make the correction of name.
The final correction resulted in an article entitled Mary V. Ahern (producer), which should be the only correctly created article for this biography.
My apologies for the two errors of title. I never had learned how to move in order to correct an error in title! Will note all of this at the multiple articles. Lesson learned!
A notation at the directions about "moving to correct title" indicated that a bot would clean up this dreadful mess I made. Here's hoping that is correct, because the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer) was created incorrectly, is redundant, and should be deleted. As Annie Oakley declared, "I'll never do it again!" You placed a tag on this incorrect article that should be deleted. so I will remove the tag and make note of the complicated history. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! I was concerned because of having used cut and paste for the one you tagged and having seen warnings that using that process messed up the history carried with an article — again, my apologies. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
John B123, perhaps there are residual errors. Mary V. Ahern (producer) has "DEFAULTSORT:Ahern, Virginia V." above her categories. Should that be changed to "Ahern, Mary V."? Also, should there be a way for a search for "Mary V. Ahern" to offer an option for "Mary V. Ahern (producer)"? I do not see that offered and am concerned that readers must know to call for the "producer" in order to be given a selection in the search box. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Looks as if a final move to Mary V. Ahern put to rest the comedy of errors! _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mary V. Ahern at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi! 83d40m in response to your corrections on the subject, i have tried to fix the things. Kindly check if they are ok now. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 02:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I guess you've got a lot of work to do. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Memo of record of note left on the description page for the file at Wikimedia Commons:
Please note: The image presented in this file is a detail taken from
Cappella brancacci, Resurrezione del figlio di Teofilo e San Pietro in cattedra (restaurato), Masaccio.jpg
or
Masacc15.jpg
-- Resurrection of the Son of Theophilus of Antioch -- at the Brancacci Chapel not from the painting noted in the current summary as its source, Virgin and Child — even though the correct source is identified in the Notes of this summary. The detail is the head of the third figure from the right in the images I have provided here, of the correct painting. I do not see an author listed for this summary, so am unable to alert that editor about the error. The image is used used in many files, so should be retained, please do not delete the file. If necessary, contact me and, with agreement of other editors, I will make the corrections. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
history entry:
15:54, 25 September 2021 83d40m talk contribs 2,452 bytes +1,069 →Summary: noting the error in the summary of this file -- the image is a detail taken from Resurrection of the Son of Theophilus of Antioch in the Brancacci Chapel -- not the Virgin and Child as indicated i--- the data needs to be corrected; no author is identified for the summary, if necessary, with agreement of other editors, I will edit the summary - the file is used on many pages, please do not delete it. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Condor and The Eagle (2019 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
We don't link to self-published blogs like the Taibbi bit you recently added at Julian Assange. Please review our PAGs relating to such links at WP:EL and WP:Further reading. Please self-revert that further reading link. Note that further reading links should provide access to the document being linked. It is not a bibliography. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 17:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 03:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Condor and The Eagle".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Norte Chico civilization for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 04:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
buidhe, if your intent is to remove the article from the status of a featured article, I wonder whether that is an acceptable procedure in this case.
It appears that it has been a featured article, perhaps ten years ago. If that is correct, a status change would be a misleading deviation from a historical record. Perhaps, I am misunderstanding the process you are initiating.
Nonetheless, problems exist with the article that need to be resolved.
The title is inaccurate no matter which side of the naming issue one espouses. I object to the reintroduction in November and December 2021 of the incongruous name "Norte Chico civilization" and it seems you are one of the editors who reversed that from "Caral-Supe civilization" and "Caral civilization". The name 'norte chico', "a little north of here", is a contemporary, Spanish-language direction relative to another location in Peru. Using the term as the title of the article seems as incongruous to me as entitling an article about New York City as "The City" because taxi drivers in Long Island refer to it as such. Your defending that reintroduction because the article is written in English, a language different from the current one being spoken in the country of its location—makes even less sense to me. That relative location is unrelated to the ancient culture being discussed, much less what they called themselves.
I believe that the article should be renamed and the use of the identification used by the federal government of the country in which the site is located be used until the anthropological identification of the culture reflects a more professional description of the culture than using contemporary slang ("a little north of here"). At least the official government name describes the geographical area in the country and needs no explanation for our readers to understand the location and its use to identify the ancient culture. Once that is resolved, the historical nature of the evolution of the professional name for the site would be resolved and become a minor fact that may be stated briefly in the article—without a need for a separate article to discuss the supposed debate.
The article currently fails to meet standards for a feature article. So I will vote to keep it from being published again as a featured article, but am unsure whether that is your intent. Are you calling for a vote on whether the article be published again as a feature article? I would vote no about that because it is entitled incorrectly due to an unresolved polarity among our editors about the confused reporting about the site. I do not support obscuring the historical fact that the article has been a featured article, however. WP should attempt to maintain accurate records of its development.
So a vote about reinstatement of the more relevant title and identification of the culture ought to be asked instead—and I would support dropping the "norte chico, a little north of here" after a brief explanation in favor of using Caral or Caral-Supe for the culture to reflect the contemporary geographical locations of the sites found.
If you proceed with the proposed vote, please let me know the link to the vote, so I may participate. Once that is no longer in play, we should resolve the issue regarding a more accurate title and I would be glad to participate in that process instead of making another edit of the article that would protract the unresolved issue. Then the status issue should not arise again. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:38, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
buidhe, thank you. Again, when you have set it, please provide me with the link to the vote so I may participate. In the meantime, I may see whether I can resolve any of the issues that are driving consideration. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
it say either here[10] or here[11] the words secret service? Yet you have it referencing a paragraph reading 'that warranted investigation by the U.S. Secret Service and other federal agencies.' Garbage referencing like this in BLPs is a major problem around WP and I have been saying this[12] for a long time. Oh and how about that section on good referencing you have on this page that says- A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Collaboration to produce better articles ought to be the objective of WP editors. That was being sought. The restored post was conceded by WilliamJE as "fine" and the references restored also were conceded as "fine", yet in less than two minutes after my restoring these two elements in a new section of the article, a scolding summary by Drmies seems to imply that another wholesale deletion was made without critical analysis. I will leave the deletion because I have no interest in pursuing some editorial confrontation, but I must note that the purpose of WP is to educate readers of an encyclopedia and to provide the information our readers may rely upon as relevant to the subject. The deleted information garnered attention from national media, but this trigger-happy deletion removes it completely from the WP article. Quick exercise of personal authority that is ubiquitous at WP rather than joining in collaboration to build better articles is a disservice to WP and a failure to fulfill what ought to be the objectives of each WP editor. WP and its readers would benefit more if "editors" would "edit" and not be dedicated "delete-rs" simply seeking deconstruction alone. Writing to correct or enhance is so much more constructive, I recommend learning how to collaborate. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 03:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, you are mixing subjects. Collaboration already was in progress with WilliamJE. That was fully visible in the discussion above (that you referenced) before you overrode the collaboration process. The logical next step I took was display for review by WilliamJE and yet you deleted the entire section. During my experience at WP, referring one to a discussion on the talk page of an article has never been synonymous with wholesale deletion of what supposedly is being referred for collaboration, much less—when a collaboration already is in progress. Your mixing the subjects seems a stretch to turn the table on an editor responding to the "lecture" given one, by you, in the first place. Regarding BLP, WilliamJE's concern about it arose out of the edits that followed the original post being restored. That would be eliminated by restoration to my original post and WilliamJE then addressed his concern about the sources. The restoration of the post was accompanied with additional resources provided in response during the chain of edits, noted by WilliamJE as "fine". Review was expected in case further concerns would be raised by WilliamJE and your wholesale deletion at that time seems incongruous. Regarding your further comment here suggesting my failure to take BLP into consideration while composing posts, I would like to note that on one hand, you cite BLP concerns and on the other, you cite wording expressly designed to avoid infringement of that principle as problematic. This is another incongruity. It also is another opportunity where you might have made a constructive edit to resolve your concern. These are reasons why I suggested learning to be more collaborative to you alone. WilliamJE already was engaged in collaboration. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, 83d40m
Thank you for creating Respiratory airway secretory cell.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, User:North8000, Thank you, positive feedback is a rarity here unfortunately, which makes it greatly appreciated. A quick pass through images you have posted on your page reveals your awareness of the frequent tenor. I just posted another new page, Florida Right To Clean Water. I do not know how to see all of the categories that may be attached to articles, and have posted some that might be relevant. Is there a list that I could explore for appropriate ones? I'd like to facilitate cross reference to the article. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
You have made what you call "a light edit of the entire article" on Victor Henri. Light, maybe, but pointless in many cases, and at least once creating an error. Some people like a comma before "and"; others don't. Either is OK, and there is no justification for adding a comma because that's what you prefer. "over" → "more than" OK; your version may be better. Delete "but" from "but if born in France would be a French citizen" introduces an error, as now you have two sentences with only a comma separating them. If you must eliminate "decided to travel" you need "travelled", as the article is not written in American English. Clearly you don't like "mothers" in the plural, but why? Henri had a biological mother and an adoptive mother, so what's wrong with "mothers"? (It was that change that alerted me to the need to check the whole History, as I was sure it didn't say "the two women" previously.) "Henri was graduated": ugh! that's American, but the article isn't written in American. Why have you reversed the order of Michaelis and Menten? They used that order in their paper. "as they collaborated" confuses more than it clarifies: who did they collaborate with? If you really think it matters you can put "Henri's work was taken up by German biochemist Leonor Michaelis and his collaborator the Canadian physician Maud Menten." What's wrong with "et al."? Can anyone tell by looking if . is italicized or not? Can you? Athel cb (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dawn Burrell fxt 83d40m 2000 Olympics Sydney.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dawn Burrell fxt 83d40m before the competition.JPEG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palazzo del Te, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fenestration.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ai-Khanoum into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks for creating the page - I will be adding to it shortly. I would recommend taking out those references which aren't directly relevant, as they might just confuse the reader. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You must surely have a citation for the change you made? Would you add it please? (If you haven't got time to format it nicely, feel free to do a rough version here and I will happily format it for you.) -- 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Hello, 83d40m. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of members of Congress who voted to invalidate the electoral college vote count of the 2020 presidential election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ca' d'Zan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Owen Burns.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 462.8 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. 92.1.169.32 (talk) 19:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi 83d40m! Thank you for your edits to Filippino Lippi. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Sandro Botticelli into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 18:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi 83d40m. I'm letting you know that this edit has been reverted. While I originally disagreed with the revert, I now believe the claim's inclusion to be inappropriate, as outlined in the summary. Please discuss if you'd like to reinclude. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 03:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Please be careful to respect WP:ENGVAR, and not introduce American English into British English articles. Johnbod (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
JohnbodI never changed "colour" and see no others to be included in your "etc." It is a stretch to imply that one or two words establish a dictate. Your vitriolic tenor, theats, and bullying serve as further examples. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Saint Helena (Christianity) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Inadequate disambiguated title redirect
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. dxneo (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Craig Mokhiber has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Hi, comments like this one should not be placed in edit summaries but on Talk pages. Thanks. — kashmīrī TALK 22:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
El Comité de Arbitraje es el panel de editores responsable de llevar a cabo el proceso de arbitraje de Wikipedia . Tiene la autoridad de imponer soluciones vinculantes a las disputas entre editores, principalmente en el caso de disputas de conducta graves que la comunidad no ha podido resolver. Esto incluye la autoridad para imponer prohibiciones de sitios , prohibiciones de temas , restricciones de edición y otras medidas necesarias para mantener nuestro entorno de edición. La política de arbitraje describe las funciones y responsabilidades del Comité con mayor detalle.
Si desea participar en las elecciones de 2023, revise los candidatos y envíe sus opciones en la página de votación . Si ya no desea recibir estos mensajes, puede agregarlos a su página de discusión de usuario. Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 00:31 28 nov 2023 (UTC) {{NoACEMM}}
Hola, 83d40m. Este es un mensaje enviado por un bot que te informa que Borrador: Santa Elena (Cristianismo) , una página que creaste, no se ha editado en al menos 5 meses. Los borradores que no se hayan editado durante seis meses pueden eliminarse , por lo que si deseas conservar la página, edítala nuevamente o solicita que se mueva a tu espacio de usuario.
Si la página ya ha sido eliminada, puedes solicitar que se recupere para poder seguir trabajando en ella.
Gracias por tu contribución a Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( discusión ) 16:06 16 mar 2024 (UTC)
Hola,
La Fundación Wikimedia está realizando una encuesta entre wikipedistas para comprender mejor qué es lo que lleva a los administradores a contribuir a Wikipedia y qué afecta a la retención de administradores. Utilizaremos esta investigación para mejorar las experiencias de los wikipedistas y abordar problemas y necesidades comunes. Lo hemos identificado como un buen candidato para esta investigación y agradeceríamos enormemente su participación en esta encuesta anónima .
No es necesario ser administrador para participar.
La encuesta debería tardar entre 10 y 15 minutos en completarse. Puede leer más sobre el estudio en su página Meta y consultar su declaración de privacidad.
Si tiene alguna pregunta o inquietud, encuentre nuestro contacto en la página Meta del proyecto.
Atentamente,
Equipo de investigación de WMF
BGerdemann (WMF) ( discusión ) 19:28 23 oct 2024 (UTC)
.jpg/1280px-Christmas_card_from_the_Duke_and_Duchess_of_Windsor_(46318774022).jpg)
