ESTOY SEMI-RETIRADO DE WIKIPEDIA Y NO NECESARIAMENTE RESPONDERÉ CON PRONTITUD.
¿Está trabajando en noticias de última hora? Siga estas sugerencias:
Desarrolle una imagen precisa de lo que está sucediendo y no se deje influenciar por los consejos contradictorios y los rumores de "expertos" con sus propias agendas. No se convierta en un conducto para todos los rumores y acusaciones. Y una vez que tenga una imagen precisa, compártala con el público para que puedan tomar una decisión sobre qué hacer. http://www.npr.org/2011/03/16/134573800/nuclear-information-gap-spreads-doubt-fear
El verdadero secreto de dar un consejo es, después de haberlo dado honestamente, ser completamente indiferente a si lo aceptan o no, y nunca insistir en tratar de hacer que la gente se entienda bien . - Hannah Whitall Smith
Discusión del usuario:Geofferybard/ArchiveIMGIssues
Discusión del usuario:Geofferybard/Archive1NLS
Discusión del usuario:Geofferybard/ArchiveSBot
http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/SoftSecurity
http://www.worldcat.org
[RESUMEN - El aviso para mover contenido fue enviado por ]
Ravendrop 08:31 15 mar 2011 (UTC)
Puedo vivir con tu edición de "La operación combinada Estados Unidos-Reino Unido está programada para funcionar en la prefectura de Miyagi" debido a un error ortográfico y la mayoría de los lectores no necesitarán saber ese nivel de detalle en este artículo.
en
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humanitarian_response_to_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami&action=historysubmit&diff=419203425&oldid=41920274
Pero, con el tiempo, necesitaremos más detalles. Por favor, opine sobre la propuesta de la página de discusión en http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Talk:Humanitarian_response_to_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami#Proposed_sectional_organization:_Major_Responders.2C_or_Large_entries_intermingled.3F
[1] [2] [3]
Bueno aquí:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humanitarian_response_to_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami&action=historysubmit&diff=419203425&oldid=419202744
Muy buena captura, ésta.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humanitarian_response_to_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami&diff=next&oldid=419203425
Huele a POV POV como si... un guiño a WWWG.
Geofferybard (discusión) 01:03 17 mar 2011 (UTC)
<--- Uno nuevo
¡Propietario de una cuenta TUSC!
Tal vez el "flujo" esté interrumpido, pero el GLIDENumber: EQ-2011-000028-JPN es una fuente de información importante. ¿Quizás pueda reubicar el enlace en lugar de seguir el procedimiento estándar de eliminación de información importante, válida y citada por cuestiones estéticas personales?
Lo arreglaré esta vez, pero veo que tu página de discusión se está llenando rápidamente de quejas y debo admitir que es mejor interrumpir un poco el "flujo" que privar a la comunidad mundial de información importante. Geofferybard (discusión) 22:34 17 mar 2011 (UTC)
Sí, estoy de acuerdo en que el servidor se atascó y ya me había ocupado de solucionarlo. Geofferybard (discusión) 22:59 17 mar 2011 (UTC)
)
Gracias por modificar la línea de recuperación de desastres asiáticos. Si sigues las referencias y los enlaces, verás que es bastante importante. Hola, acabo de enterarme de que la columna radiactiva se dirige hacia mí... Geofferybard (discusión) 00:01 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
(¿Inundado?)
Estoy de acuerdo con su concepto original de un artículo sobre "Terremoto" y creo que eventualmente deberíamos separar también un artículo sobre "Tsunami", con un artículo o artículos de resumen combinados restantes que incluyan también el incidente de Fukushima.
El hecho es que un terremoto y un tsunami son dos fenómenos diferentes. Geofferybard (discusión) 00:54 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
Añadiste algunos elementos a la página de discusión. No estoy seguro de qué significa exactamente. Como tema secundario, la sección de la marina tiene un pequeño error tipográfico y algunas referencias están numeradas pero no incluidas. ¿Podrías explicarlo mejor? Gracias. MartinezMD ( discusión ) 01:25 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humanitarian_response_to_the_2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami&action=historysubmit&diff=418955003&oldid=418926643
Esto es un problema. Estoy aparcando el texto en Talk porque es laborioso recuperar incluso el texto debido a un comportamiento extraño del software wiki que divide el texto e impide que se publique en grandes cantidades. Escribí el texto yo mismo a partir de las citas, pero no quiero ponerlo en el archivo principal hasta que pueda recuperar al menos citas generales utilizables. De hecho, escuché el MP3 de una sesión informativa y sin la cita no sabría exactamente en qué hora, minuto y segundo se hicieron los comentarios relevantes.
Siéntete libre de hacer WP:REFACTOR después de ver todo lo que se agregó al espacio principal, si no lo hago yo primero. Saludos. Geofferybard (discusión) 01:27 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
Por favor, vota en http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Talk:Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents#Question_on_title Tienes razón, pero no está claro lo que tú mismo crees. Geofferybard (discusión) 02:00 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Talk:Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents#Question_on_title ¿Consideró la panoplia completa? (Emergencias y desastres)
Creé E.ON Kernkraft GmbH . Fue eliminada. ¿Cómo se puede detener la eliminación de este tipo de contenido? NuclearEnergy ( discusión ) 16:38 18 mar 2011 (UTC)
El artículo Young Conservatives of Texas ha sido propuesto para su eliminación en AfD . Se agradecen sus comentarios sobre si este artículo cumple o no con los estándares de notabilidad . Gracias. Carrite ( discusión ) 17:00, 9 abril 2011 (UTC)
Parece que estás haciendo modificaciones extrañas que sugieren que podrías necesitar ayuda con algo que no conoces. Si necesitas ayuda para hacer algo, no dudes en preguntar. MrKIA11 ( discusión ) 03:57 30 abr 2011 (UTC)
[[User:Geofferybard|Bard गीता]]. MrKIA11 ( discusión ) 04:00 30 abr 2011 (UTC) 
Se ha publicado el número de mayo de 2011 del boletín de WikiProject Estados Unidos . Puedes leer el boletín, cambiar el formato en el que se te enviarán los próximos números o cancelar la suscripción a esta notificación siguiendo el enlace. Gracias.
.-- Kumioko ( discusión ) 02:13 6 may 2011 (UTC)
John, siempre aprecio una buena discusión, y la discusión de políticas puede ser particularmente interesante. Aprecio que hayas incluido los puntos 1 a 4 en nuestra discusión en la página de discusión sobre vandalismo, pero como principio operativo más general y a medida que el tema desarrolla matices, me gustaría evitar mezclar cuestiones. Parece que con tu última edición estás incluyendo como punto (3) una discusión del trabajo de un día anterior y eso está bien. Pero de ahora en adelante, por el bien de la claridad y para minimizar el desorden, sugiero que se desarrolle ese tema en el siguiente enlace.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Wikipedia_talk:Vandalism#John.27s_Point_.283.29:_Is_administrative_action_ever_.22vandalism.22_2
http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Wikiversity_open_letter_project/WMF_Board_March_2010
Gracias de antemano por su consideración. No dude en responder aquí o en el enlace anterior, según le resulte conveniente. Bard गीता 22:38, 9 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
Usuario:Geofferybard/Vandalism_typology La política actual los enumera en orden alfabético y propongo dividir la sección en grupos de tipos según cómo se creó el tipo. Por ejemplo, por objetivo, por método, etcétera.
Otros ensayos en proceso:
Usuario:Geofferybard/Hacia una definición de vandalismo wiki Eventualmente habrá litigios civiles y penales sobre el tema; también podríamos aplicar las herramientas cognitivas de la profesión legal.
Usuario:Geofferybard/Vandalism_is_a_bad_word
Aboga por reemplazar el término "vandalismo" por algo que no sea peyorativo para la tribu y que refleje una comprensión científica del fenómeno.
Nota: Aquí hay evidencia de que supuestamente ocurre: http://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Wikiversity:Babel#Emergency_block.2C_deadmin.2C_decrat
Bardo 00:20, 10 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)Enviado en nombre del Gremio de Editores de Textos mediante AWB el 15 de mayo de 2011 a las 06:55 (UTC)
Si te interesa divertirte mucho y trabajar con grandes editores, haz clic aquí y haz historia. Ahora estamos aceptando nominaciones. Lionelt ( discusión ) 01:25 26 may 2011 (UTC)
He movido el borrador del artículo de tu página de discusión a Usuario:Geofferybard/Monastic silence ; una página de discusión sirve principalmente para comunicarse con otros usuarios. - Mike Rosoft ( discusión ) 15:47 26 may 2011 (UTC)
Hola, solo quería informarte que he restaurado el artículo de cómics de Dark Circle y he añadido una nota para señalar el documental. En casos como este, se aplica WP:TWODABS : si solo hay dos desambiguaciones y una es principal sobre la otra, la desambiguación debería resolverse con notas en lugar de una página de desambiguación. -- Ja Ga talk 18:26, 27 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
. Bard गीता 19:40, 28 de mayo de 2011 (UTC) El título del artículo es una elección editorial. Hay muchas posibilidades de que tu postura sea la correcta; todo depende de la importancia del documental. Si puedes demostrar que el documental tiene una cobertura significativa de muchas fuentes independientes, tal vez puedas revocar la reclamación a WP:TWODABS . (Pero yo trabajaría primero en la redacción del artículo: más fuentes, señalar que finalmente se emitió en otras cadenas). -- Ja Ga talk 19:27, 29 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
Seguí la sugerencia de JaGa de revisar RM y, desde simple.wiki, noté que tenía un borrador antiguo de ensayo sobre lo malo que pensaba que era que WP titulase los artículos con jerga despectiva. 1+1=2, así que, ¡voilá! Seguí adelante y presenté un RM sobre una palabra o título de artículo insultante contra los chinos. Ahora me interesa recibir consejos sobre cómo proceder para llevar la discusión a un RM "abierto". ¿Debería simplemente esperar y dejar que se peleen y, cuando se calme el polvo, dejar que surja algo? ¿O debería intervenir? Además, ¿cuál es la forma técnica de cambiar a abierto: empezar de nuevo, modificar el texto vinculado a la plantilla? Tal vez, después de Lao Tzu, wu wei sea la mejor estrategia. Bard गीता 01:02, 29 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
Aprecio tu contribución a la página, pero como quizás hayas visto o no en la página de discusión, hay algunas mejoras necesarias (las he marcado). Te faltan muchas citas para citas, uso ibid, citas faltantes al final del párrafo y las que colocaste no están formateadas correctamente para una calificación de clase GA. Puedes cortar y pegar las citas con nuestro estilo que usamos en este artículo (hay un tutorial en la sección de referencias, o también puedo ayudarte). Solo debería llevarte unos 30 minutos y estaría feliz de hacer algunas cosas de formato, pero primero necesito asegurarme de que todas las citas estén ahí. Lo enviaremos para la calificación de GA muy pronto y se eliminará con el estado actual en esa sección. De todos modos, espero que hagas las pequeñas limpiezas porque he revisado las fuentes que proporcionaste y, además de mi aversión a usar YouTube por varias razones, es toda información sólida y odiaría que se eliminara algo debido a citas incorrectas. Saludos, amigo, y sigue con el buen trabajo. Kayz911 ( discusión ) 19:29 29 may 2011 (UTC)
Adrignola,
Parece que tienes experiencia en este ámbito. Al realizar modificaciones recientes en http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Hazel_Dickens, se hizo evidente que no hay ninguna foto. Ella era música y hay muchas fotos promocionales de ella en toda la web, pero parece que todas están en páginas que tienen un aviso de derechos de autor o quizás también en páginas sin información sobre derechos de autor. ¿Está permitido utilizar una foto que se usa ampliamente en la web o que está en la página web de un músico profesional u otras clases de uso sin un correo electrónico de consentimiento o es necesario esperar hasta que se haya enviado un formulario de consentimiento por correo electrónico antes de utilizar cualquiera de esas imágenes? Si es así, es de esperar que el formulario de consentimiento aparezca al buscar "Ayuda: consentimiento de fotos". Además, ¿todas las imágenes están vinculadas desde wikicommons o hay repositorios de imágenes en esta u otras páginas del proyecto WMF cuyo uso está permitido? Bard गीता 21:31, 29 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
Hola. He notado que has añadido la plantilla {{ nfd }} a este artículo, lo que parece indicar que estabas intentando nominarlo para su eliminación. ¿Es correcto? Si es así, lo estabas haciendo mal: la plantilla correcta para utilizarla es {{ afd }} , ya que se trata de un artículo. El procedimiento a seguir para nominar un artículo para su eliminación se puede encontrar en WP:AFDHOWTO . Puedo ayudarte con ello si tienes dificultades; por favor, házmelo saber en mi página de discusión. Por otro lado, si no estabas intentando nominar este artículo para su eliminación, entonces no deberías haber utilizado esa plantilla. Espero que haya quedado claro. Robofish ( discusión ) 01:02, 30 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)
Gracias
¡Lo puse aquí yo mismo! 
Gracias por tus contribuciones a Wikipedia . Antes de guardar los cambios que hayas hecho en un artículo, incluye un resumen de tus modificaciones. De esta manera, todos podrán entender la intención de tu edición (y evitarás que las ediciones legítimas se confundan con actos de vandalismo ). También es útil para los usuarios que leen el historial de edición de la página. Gracias.
Esta plantilla fue colocada por este usuario.
¿El nombre de la página base se rellena automáticamente? No parece que funcione bien. Bard गीता 23:23, 30 de mayo de 2011 (UTC)===
23:41, 30 de mayo de 2011 AnomieBOT (discusión | contribuciones) m (41,466 bytes) (Sustituir plantillas:Gracias por tus contribuciones a Wikipedia . Antes de guardar tus cambios en un artículo, proporciona un resumen de tus ediciones. Hacerlo ayuda a que todos comprendan la intención de tu edición (y evita que ediciones legítimas se confundan con vandalismo ). También es útil para los usuarios leer el historial de ediciones de la página. Gracias.(Ver Usuario:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster para obtener información.) (deshacer)
Entiendo tu dolor. Yo también propuse un CAMBIO DE NOMBRE, lo que la mayoría de la gente llama un CAMBIO, y me encontré sujeto a menosprecio por aceptar críticas y comentarios. Realmente se me fue de las manos. Alguien que probablemente no suele estar tan alterado por las cosas parece haber tomado un interés especial en encontrar fallas en todo lo que propongo ahora. Establecieron un desacuerdo conmigo en un hilo completamente no relacionado, en el que no parece que tuviera ningún interés previo. Etcétera. Es como si te estuvieran acosando. Así que no te sientas tan mal por que Jg te haya atacado. Todo vale en el amor y en la guerra, ¿no? Esto agudiza el intelecto, en mi humilde opinión. A largo plazo, tratos como ese te afinan para el mundo real y recuerdas esas interacciones como interacciones con profesores universitarios que en ese momento no eran tu profesor favorito, pero que a la larga tal vez te enseñen más. Mientras tanto, me ayuda a no responder a WP:BAITING . :)
¡Esto me hizo reír! Sí, parece que es una costumbre en Wikipedia, pero no me preocupo demasiado por ello. Agradezco las sugerencias y el tiempo que has dedicado a la discusión. Creo que es un razonamiento sensato bifurcar el contenido en algún momento, un cambio de nombre sería simplemente una solución provisoria. Night w 09:39, 31 de mayo de 2011 (UTC) Solo quería agradecerles por respetar mi plantilla en uso anteriormente. En mi humilde opinión, el mundo no se acabará si no logramos nombrar con precisión cada artículo de WP en un día, pero a juzgar por la ferocidad de los comentarios, uno pensaría lo contrario. Para mayor claridad, pido que la gente publique al final del hilo siempre que sea posible para que podamos ver quién publicó cuándo. La propuesta original tenía fallas, pero los dos problemas subyacentes parecen estar pendientes. Por lo tanto, la solicitud de movimiento modificada enumera dos objetivos alternativos, cualquiera de los cuales sería una mejora clara. Gracias por ayudarnos a mantener un tono civilizado mientras solucionamos esta discusión de movimiento algo confusa. Bard también
-- papageno ( discusión ) 15:19, 31 de mayo de 2011 (UTC) No estoy de acuerdo con las propuestas de cambio de dirección. "Chink" tiene una historia lo suficientemente larga y fea como para merecer su propio artículo. Según WP:CENSOR, ""ser objetable" no es generalmente motivo suficiente para la eliminación de contenido". Citas WP:NOTFREESPEECH arriba, pero no lo leo como una licencia para censurar en función del contenido, sino más bien para dejar en claro que Wikipedia está aquí para crear una enciclopedia, no un terreno para hacer propaganda: "Wikipedia es libre y abierta, pero restringe tanto la libertad como la apertura cuando interfieren con la creación de una enciclopedia". No veo que "Chink" cumpla con ese criterio. Khazar (discusión) 07:07 28 may 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predice que disfrutarás editando algunos de estos artículos. ¡Diviértete!
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. Gracias por su ayuda.
Si tienes comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, cuéntamelo en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . Gracias de parte de Nettrom ( discusión ), el encargado de SuggestBot.
PD: Recibiste estas sugerencias porque tu nombre figuraba en la página de solicitudes de SuggestBot . Si esto fue un error, disculpa la confusión. -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 01:18 1 jun 2011 (UTC)
(Buena página de usuario, particularmente las fuentes.) Aprecio que hayas bloqueado la discusión para archivarla, ya que uno de los comentaristas estaba publicando en lo alto de la página en otro hilo en un esfuerzo por influir en la "votación".
Es de suponer que sus comentarios indican que no prevé que se produzca un cambio de nombre autorizado de ese artículo en un futuro próximo. Eso ya lo teníamos claro, pero fue bueno congelar la discusión en la medida en que algunas personas responden más arriba en la página de discusión de tal manera que sus comentarios tienden a pasarse por alto. Un usuario que comentó aquí me siguió más o menos durante un tiempo y, al parecer, deliberadamente publicó más arriba en la página de discusión para presentar un punto de vista. Con respecto a sus comentarios, parece que está tratando de ayudar a que la discusión avance y eso se agradece.
No voy a compartir mis pensamientos sobre tu resumen, pero ten en cuenta que tal vez lo haga en otro momento. Pero no te preocupes, nadie esperaba un cambio rápido en la política. Por un lado, el debate ha ayudado a centrar la atención en el tema y cualquier concepto nuevo sobre cómo abordar los temas expresados se beneficiará enormemente, en particular de algunos de los comentarios de los oponentes más enérgicos a cualquier cambio. Desafortunadamente, muchos comentaristas se vieron envueltos en una reiteración robótica de NOTCENSORED sin comprender el punto de que las pautas editoriales, de las que WP tiene muchas, no son "censura" en ningún sentido, y ciertamente no en el sentido orwelliano con el que a menudo se las asocia. Aunque las pautas editoriales pueden ser objeto de abuso para crear una forma de censura, en cualquier caso, la discusión colaborativa es algo bueno, no malo, y es bueno saber que había tanta gente al menos interesada en considerar el asunto. Bardo 21:43, 1 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Hola Geoffrey, vi que estabas reabriendo la discusión en Chink . Me parece bien y me mantendré al margen esta vez, ya que ya he dicho lo que tenía que decir. Y lamento oír que te sientes censurado; sé lo frustrante que puede ser tener un consenso de editores que está del otro lado de lo que crees que es correcto, ya que me ha pasado a mí también. Para que conste, el mejor consejo que he recibido de otro editor en WP es que cuando empiezas a sentirte acalorado en un área, a menudo es mejor editar otra por un tiempo; siempre hay más trabajo por hacer casi en cualquier lugar que mires. Espero que no te parezca una experiencia particularmente desalentadora. Saludos, Khazar ( discusión ) 21:47, 1 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Tu reciente cambio de nombre fue 100% acertado y correcto y se debió haber hecho hace tiempo. Este mensaje confirma que tú y yo no hemos tenido contacto previo. No te sorprendas si encuentras oposición. En mi humilde opinión, es importante defender ese cambio, no solo es lógico sino esencial. También ten en cuenta esta página de desambiguación que respaldaré aquí en caso de que alguien la toque. Curiosamente, aunque en tu página de usuario afirmas que eres de centro-izquierda, a menudo son personas de izquierda las que confunden y combinan la política de energía nuclear con la política de armas nucleares. Así que eso ayuda a tus credenciales de NPOV porque estás trascendiendo tu trasfondo personal. El verdadero problema en general es que la gente realmente confunde las dos. El problema local de Wikipedia es que el artículo está relacionado con una nominación de Buen Artículo y con el trabajo académico de uno de sus editores anteriores y, lamentablemente, hay cierta susceptibilidad comprensible con respecto al artículo con el que debemos trabajar. Además, en mi humilde opinión, no hay forma de que haya paz en ese artículo sin un artículo separado debido a la inevitable batalla territorial. Bardo 22:04, 1 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
¿Hay algo que creas que es urgente escribir? -- Guerillero | Mi charla 23:05, 1 junio 2011 (UTC) Sí, muchas. Pero para empezar, G., ¿podríamos elegir un gráfico mejor para el esbozo? El que elegiste es brillante desde el punto de vista fotoperiodístico, pero desafortunadamente no es típico ni útil para personas en esa situación. Estoy seguro de que lo entiendes: la obesidad severa, el desaliño esquizofreniforme y la falta de higiene ocurren entre una subpoblación, pero la mayoría de las personas en esa posición no están tan mal como el pobre tipo de ese barrio pobre parisino. Tengo algunas fotos que tomé y que iba a agregar a Wikicommons. ¿Quizás te gustaría elegir una? Si me envías un correo electrónico, te enviaré algunas fotos (c) para que las examines, hay algunas buenas o si encuentro enlaces... No quiero dejar que mis buenas fotos vayan a CCL porque tengo miedo de que si pierdo el control estén sujetas a un uso abusivo, pero una estaría bien. También pedí y recibí permiso para usar las fotos, que es más de lo que hacen la mayoría de los fotógrafos. Ah, podríamos usar un artículo sobre el Continuum of Care. Discriminación y prejuicio. Planificación de desastres y planificación de emergencias, no, eso sería O. ¡Dame un día para pensar en esto!
Yo tomé y soy dueño (c)
http://homelessinsb.org/wikis_view.cfm?id=170
http://homelessinsb.org/wikis_view.cfm?id=168
El tipo de azul dio permiso específico para el uso generalizado. El otro tipo también sabía que sería "famoso". Usa cualquiera de los dos y lo certificaré, pero quiero la licencia más estricta disponible en Wiki Commons para que la imagen no se use para dañar la dignidad humana. La del baterista no es un problema, se ve muy feliz. Recomendaría usar esa. Sí, colócalas en el talón de Homeless, por favor. Si tienes inquietudes técnicas o legales, Adrignola sabe mucho sobre este tema, es muy amable al ayudar con las respuestas a las preguntas. Además, podríamos decidir si hacer un proyecto o un grupo de trabajo o un libro o exactamente qué. Hay una gran cantidad de escritos realmente interesantes sobre el tema en WP. BCYSAD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Geofferybard/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Homebeing#Support_the_Project:_ Please_List_Your_Name_Here.21
Pienso que un Portal es una gran idea.
No sé si entiendo muy bien el sentido de http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warming_center&action=historysubmit&diff=432082215&oldid=431726321 sólo me pregunto si es mejor o no...
Bardo 23:19, 1 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
¡GRACIAS! Sería bueno que un administrador pudiera cerrar la discusión inexistente de una fusión forzada de Silencio monástico que tiene 35 referencias en Votos de silencio , en la que nadie está interesado. La plantilla de fusión es una molestia y desalienta el trabajo en el artículo. La única persona que ha comentado sobre la fusión soy yo, en oposición. El artículo de votos está subdesarrollado y no es más relevante para la práctica del silencio monástico que el juramento del cargo de los policías o el presidente para el desempeño de sus obligaciones. Es como mover la cola del perro para sugerir que el voto de hacer algo debería convertirse en el tema superordinado y que el silencio monástico lo practican los laicos no consagrados y los invitados monásticos no consagrados. El silencio consagrado ocurre fuera de los monasterios. Los temas no están en absoluto conectados, simplemente tienen cierta superposición. Esto es un fastidio porque el administrador que colocó el encabezado de fusión había eliminado la página sin discusión, mientras que tenía plantillas EN CONSTRUCCIÓN y EN USO. Tuve que ponerme en contacto y pedir la restauración, y la propuesta de FUSIÓN se llevó a cabo de inmediato, sin ninguna consideración. La eliminación no se debió a una falta de contenido, sino a que supuestamente el artículo de Vows, muy mal escrito, ya cubría el tema, en su opinión. Como señalé, parecía que había un cierto sesgo de punto de vista contra los artículos sobre religión y espiritualidad. De todos modos, es un factor estresante y sería bueno que se respetara el hecho de la existencia del artículo en lugar de estar bajo esta espada que pende aparentemente de forma permanente... Bard गीता 17:37, 2 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
No puedo entender si estás solicitando o no la eliminación rápida de esta página. Si es así, la etiqueta de eliminación rápida debería indicar el motivo de la eliminación rápida. Si no, simplemente elimina la etiqueta de eliminación rápida, porque fuiste tú quien la colocó en primer lugar, y restaura el contenido. En este momento tienes la página en blanco y una etiqueta de eliminación rápida que dice que la página no debe eliminarse. Gracias. -- Metropolitan90 (discusión) 04:20 3 jun 2011 (UTC)
Aprecio tu sincera discusión sobre el cebo. Aquí se habla mucho de eso. Mantén la cabeza en alto, amigo. Hay mucha gente buena aquí. 08:33, 7 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
¿Sabes de algún javascript o algo que me permita deswikificar? Lo que hago ahora es copiar y pegar en editores de texto y reemplazar los corchetes con un espacio en blanco. Esto arruina el archivo de imagen: imae.jpg, por lo que necesito agregar manualmente los [[ nuevamente o hacer el trabajo en secciones. Estoy trabajando en una serie de libros enorme y agradecería cualquier cosa que me permita agilizar el trabajo. Además, ¿hay algo que codifique por colores las citas cuando trabajo en páginas de Wikipedia? Apenas puedo leer algunas de estas páginas. 08:32, 7 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
¿La sección sobre cultura popular no trivializa todo el asunto? 08:32, 7 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Versión: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
hQIMA+DblIy497DOARAAk8c7K8X40tEViofczVlZv69cNz0assG5i6hvrEAwiz/w vSCO7e64k+DPNfUctS/G7V1kbEQZhi0+NsZ/MnIfdT58gsnIf/KDNZfsCFUi0qky 19dINq/AzQDYKmSOkEcd gi2p6tTuymFHEPbKPTtaUK8hJbh9iolPf3LHWGkyS3QQ EbNGgKstUXG0e50pTv+VY+9u4DUDhRFKw8HW5EZT7TADRqnD+XACH4j1tchVoQtH oKXEzf1m5/PtMGXNI76/YG5Vfoq5UbkpKYCpTswnWPyVXJT01aG8CYwkeEWc8Dd0Q KVLuDl1PqwiDCoNV34RJjFqJUpzr2r1L//V49RSh4EkK0s9JDZFlsthcmO5b7dw4 wv8HaRV/oXyJCKU9A2ZUVX54vAcrW/CxRPc+NoYgc1pEMiqpM54uaSiumPphMSbW 4b7oH0sQFWCg4umV0yhxartXj3OFlfb7N5jXTCxidCAC6WozJNwxLLT1GFMBYiWx Español iDWaMaSLBgT5w/0JoT/jTvy2CB9dOC8XiF8oRex1RQQjt2Y7hAlmCy96pXLhovDp ivtcKrZvy8h/4yEfIQG+lK6VQne9I/EXWmrWP5lljOYUsFnEsb+90Muo/Xi1cAUD LEEcPdHE36Jwja063OAySLfPkgrW+Jr4jPBLPtKDL9TZcbL7OIotyWbLOJHOC//S 6gEEXW50s1nPZN7CsqNSlZirFlWmztMqIhbBXfjV5jsXAbEBEe2Z5bdZ1henNCaYI c2xP7l0DqCD/7gNZAAVwrtQj8a/HF0bWB1caWmgSfwdDFPvDkFvSwVyUX/Wn85UE nQxIqipcDLey9Uyhk1eEtNq+2ealMJx3rm8CL21UXbHh152HHsVN3ABA8IPmDOg7 JYc9CVvcUta1ymm/0Vtb 0Gs9BTwGNPKPVhcF7D4MBahMDDfE1sY54xcrPlOm1cYP eDGIQAedzW9+/Np8T07HgrcmRfCsBCM+Kj0lL+dvjBDXJl1ah/gZ/muUOxKjXHyJ k5CIyVqyW85EZGcOLzd2jJlZRoCMEU6S6VQU79Ds351lpOTqYWw8B+Uz0etJVhZR ovYVbKnCjxOjr9jReRZe+RU5XllY9tkKo+hk+Od9zR4fb0ITB0lwfMm866IT3B3/ fDKg4S13By4 I2yNWVjezWu8/AvYpwaxtkYGZSZ/wXPuQug7rbPsE1nJoj/3AYfjr kaqtWcsBV4f8YSp7LBzOfvW0DvykrlxuO5zAaiW2QoCaBF5SXTO2vyqfhF4CXJAs 07a3j8GAig+TiuhExW54aNMtLPvoSusjTwiNhXgLpBFjuhpsLqS+nTOe38+tEHaq /PKvZQnFvzxFkSgNcsz2NThGaYDBcUYFBifm5PIfgAJqwwfS8KyYx1tnPK3ljRNI vve/KuDpNDCbpJz5 k/qPM876yZYJGLNTkM/ng385/P1WMpQEhx6DqkKRDdUHsAQ2 UiP5gDuk3mzD+qVOYqKlzWS0oNy9vN/duscV5Fj+eAJpWXIjflonY+eYI3ZAtzlL xAjrBPuxI/ZcnBRhDl1/KtNjX3/nZ8ND7UlPXTiplcyS3ph91agjT177qSnwO91A dDmGJ4NgWjd/orXQV6I1Xr+/5iftHaXCV5FtQKs8mDDqaO/hnH4OgDgsb4HZmuD9 i3vMIOzefAVcViL QPc47OY6jpigGEfF6JRNA0LVU26MuT1ZOlmkJ65FCym+jo1Dz ytrkA7GODQ0igTDwBcXyGsQHQNp7/8C6UHwMqeNcZ4wh9PbUs7iyPMPw8U8utBJb A4hF2Hz+n3gYaK4y73v7uDspqXN41rRufoB9vZxq/9fayYOTsZbP0Q3yYibFmIJM XxJMiIATD4kRTubBslyCwKn10x1VAtfaYVzp/XwOXvTc56qvj/5eSCeMuNtKBUcu H3fMUgOHCyR5Ow2yKjA27f7fihCOeNacUBGbJKChTZKP0jitkgQ0mAN2Pyb9dwW+ g8gGQRXwxcqzHQuYxTAE+M6wPXHR4uR6JwMz9OsImaKQVDsEsmXZT+56Jg+7Ze9a X5gAVTlebbB+HRkx9iXSLkmzoAIvqul+6YKlTUwv+AfjBBd3z7kfa5QF7nUfysWr Q0Ay1+NkZmYbM2uCLGKVpQGCFyBVKGGBcFUbZS1cNKg1IsbhWoDDMRLzQVA5ybo4 +9dPK/pvO7iR/UPqwzzF0bdmOg25Pf8CNVPyajMhcvwIJEWNv2Dhd3mPKNxvwbTY 3Yh+9RMCqKJG7g7DHXFXNSzEjHQLuDpvaKHnLFC6S5U/CjR+MXuSsGySxUo7wC2d OVdK5V8= =WHl8
Se ha publicado el número de junio de 2011 del boletín de WikiProject Estados Unidos . Puedes leer el boletín, cambiar el formato en el que se te enviarán los próximos números o cancelar la suscripción a esta notificación siguiendo el enlace. Gracias.
-- Kumioko ( discusión ) 18:46 12 jun 2011 (UTC)
Según el mensaje del usuario anónimo que borró la página, dicen que actúan en nombre de San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace. Después de escribir varios artículos sobre Diablo, pensé que alguien diría que SLOMFP estaba siendo injustamente excluida de la cobertura de Wikipedia. Parece que ninguna buena acción queda sin castigo. De todos modos, no sería sorprendente que surgieran más casos de esa conducta poco ética. ¿Tal vez debería ponerse en contacto con Charter Communications o bloquear la publicación por parte de Wikipedia? ¿Sería útil enviar una carta de cese y desistimiento a Mothers for Peace?
ESTADOS UNIDOS CALIFORNIA ATASCADERO 35.489417 -120.670725 93422 -08:00 Velocidad Neta ISP Dominio DSL CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER.NET 23:04, 15 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
No lo olvides. WP:DTR El problema con esa plantilla es que probablemente no haya todavía un equivalente internacional. El concepto "de la prisión al canal" es un concepto político de los EE.UU. No hay necesariamente un desarrollo del concepto a nivel internacional. Será necesario investigar el asunto. Si de hecho hay un desarrollo internacional del concepto, se podría informar aquí. Si no hay desarrollo internacional, parecería que las opciones son (1) escribirlo en otro sitio, como OR, y luego informarlo en este artículo o (2) eliminar la plantilla. No hay ninguna prohibición en WP de artículos relacionados con eventos intelectuales y de otro tipo que estén ocurriendo en los EE.UU., en el Reino Unido o en cualquier otro lugar. ¿Tienes información en el sentido de que el canal de la prisión a la escuela es un concepto desarrollado fuera de los EE.UU.? Si es así, la plantilla es apropiada. Si no, la plantilla no es apropiada. Geo Bard Rap 02:01, 17 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Si este es el primer artículo que ha creado, es posible que desee leer la guía para escribir su primer artículo .
Quizás quieras considerar usar el Asistente de artículos para ayudarte a crear artículos.
Hola, veo que recientemente has creado una nueva página: Control de la contaminación del agua . En primer lugar, gracias por tu contribución; Wikipedia depende únicamente de los esfuerzos de voluntarios como tú. Lamentablemente, la página que has creado cubre un tema sobre el que ya tenemos una página: Junta Regional de Control de la Calidad del Agua . Debido a la duplicación, tu artículo ha sido etiquetado para una eliminación rápida . Ten en cuenta que este no es un comentario sobre ti personalmente y esperamos que sigas ayudando a mejorar Wikipedia. Si el tema del artículo que has creado es uno que te interesa, entonces quizás te gustaría ayudar en Junta Regional de Control de la Calidad del Agua ; tal vez te gustaría discutir nueva información en la página de discusión del artículo.
Si cree que el artículo que ha creado debería permanecer separado, impugne la eliminación haciendo clic en el botón que dice "Haga clic aquí para impugnar esta eliminación rápida", que aparece dentro de la {{db-...}}etiqueta de eliminación rápida ( ) (si no existe dicha etiqueta, la página ya no es candidata a la eliminación rápida). Al hacerlo, accederá a la página de discusión, donde encontrará un espacio preformateado para que explique por qué cree que la página no debería eliminarse. También puede visitar la página de discusión de la página directamente para dar sus razones, pero tenga en cuenta que una vez que se haya etiquetado para la eliminación rápida , si la página cumple con el criterio, puede eliminarse sin demora. No elimine usted mismo la etiqueta de eliminación rápida, pero no dude en agregar información a la página que la haga más conforme con las políticas y pautas de Wikipedia. Si se elimina la página, puede ponerse en contacto con uno de estos administradores para solicitarle que la modifique como usuario o que le envíe una copia por correo electrónico. Además, si quieres que alguien revise los artículos que creas antes de que se publiquen para que no se eliminen poco después de que los publiques, permíteme sugerirte el proceso de creación de artículos y el uso de nuestra función de búsqueda para encontrar información relacionada que ya tenemos en la enciclopedia. Intenta no desanimarte. Wikipedia espera con ansias tus futuras contribuciones. ¡Saludos! Scapler ( discusión ) 02:48 21 jun 2011 (UTC)
==Eliminación de Speedy en Control de la contaminación del agua == Bienvenido a Wikipedia. Puede que no haya sido tu intención, pero has eliminado una etiqueta de eliminación rápida de Control de la contaminación del agua, una página que has creado tú mismo. Si no crees que la página debería eliminarse, puedes impugnar la eliminación haciendo clic en el botón que dice: Haga clic aquí para impugnar esta eliminación rápida y que aparece dentro del aviso de eliminación rápida. Esto te permitirá exponer tu caso en la página de discusión de la página . Los administradores analizarán tu razonamiento antes de decidir qué hacer con la página. Gracias. - SDPatrolBot ( discusión ) 02:50 21 jun 2011 (UTC)
A quien corresponda: el artículo se encuentra en Política de recursos hídricos . Geo Bard Rap 02:19 13 jul 2011 (UTC)
Por favor, explica qué estás haciendo al duplicar la misma página una y otra vez en diferentes títulos y redirigir los artículos del espacio principal a las páginas de los usuarios. No sé qué estás intentando lograr. ¡Gracias! Scapler ( discusión ) 03:01 21 jun 2011 (UTC)
Gracias Geofferybard por tu aportación a Crisis del agua de Política de recursos hídricos . 99.190.86.133 (discusión) 05:02 23 jun 2011 (UTC)
Pregunta #1:
Entiendo que, en su opinión, tomar las cuatro afirmaciones del sitio web del demandante no es una fuente "fiable", por lo que buscaré la cita a la ASLB, donde he leído la demanda y sé que, en realidad, el sitio web de SLOMFP no está tergiversando la naturaleza de las "cuatro afirmaciones" que están presentando ante la ASLB. Sin embargo, también eliminó los comentarios de un destacado profesor de Stanford. Me pregunto si eso fue quizás involuntario. Por favor, avíseme.
Eliminado:
Según el profesor Burton Richter, director emérito del Laboratorio Nacional de Aceleradores SLAC, la mayoría de las medidas de seguridad relativas a las piscinas de los reactores de combustible gastado son clasificadas. - [4]
Pregunta n.° 2: ¿Por qué se considera que Mothers for Peace es "poco confiable"? ¿No es responsabilidad del lector decidir si se cita correctamente? Como dije, buscaré el enlace de ASLB, que es una cita superior, pero no sé si es del todo exacto caracterizar al demandante como "poco confiable" si es una organización 501(c)3 que existe desde hace décadas. Entiendo que las personas que son directores de corporaciones a menudo copian textos de sus sitios web para autopromocionarse, pero ese no es el caso aquí. Y verifiqué la información en ASLB, que es un enlace difícil de encontrar debido a una configuración extraña en la NRC. Parece que una plantilla de solicitud de mejora de citas sería mejor que una reversión directa, en mi humilde opinión.
Pregunta nº 3: Borrar la información de seguimiento en la página de discusión de Madres por la Paz, que se refería al vandalismo, parece estar cubriendo las huellas de un evento que ocurrió públicamente en WP. Me pregunto dónde estaría el repositorio adecuado para esos datos, si no es la página de discusión. ¿Hay algún registro de vandalismo en otro lugar? ¿Existe una política específica sobre este asunto? Tal como sucedió, ese usuario fue bloqueado durante una semana y luego un día en otro proyecto de WP, pero me comuniqué con ese individuo fuera de línea y el vandalismo no volverá a repetirse. Pero parece que ocultar o borrar podría dar la impresión de encubrir una mala conducta y quizás a largo plazo dé la impresión de encubrir el vandalismo, a pesar del aparente sesgo en la otra dirección en el punto nº 2. Geo Bard Rap 17:31, 29 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
#3 La página de discusión del artículo es para discutir el artículo; eliminar la información de esa página de discusión no ha borrado ninguno de los registros habituales de Wikipedia/Wikisource: todas las ediciones permanecen en los historiales de la página y las cuentas también tienen registros de bloqueo.
Espero que esto ayude a responder tus preguntas; si no, por favor, házmelo saber. Pondré tu página de discusión en mi lista de seguimiento. Shell babelfish 17:52, 29 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Número 1: Referencias en vídeo
En realidad, he investigado un poco y hay material impreso sobre la música de violín canadiense en Boston, así que lo añadiré siguiendo tu sugerencia. Pero también está pendiente un artículo independiente sobre el violín quebequense. No creo que sea necesariamente el autor más calificado. Geo Bard Rap 21:24, 29 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Hola Geofferybard,
Al menos una de las nuevas plantillas de stub que has propuesto ya existe con un nombre que cumple con las convenciones de nomenclatura de stubs: {{ Nuclear-energy-stub }} . Grutness ... ¿qué? 00:34, 30 de junio de 2011 (UTC)
Frecuencia=30
|alinear=arriba|
|}
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan trabajo. Apreciamos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias regularmente; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por ayudarnos!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, infórmenos en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . Saludos de Nettrom ( discusión ), el encargado de SuggestBot. -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:48, 1 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
WW: He creado páginas relacionadas y un libro sobre DCPP y ahora estoy tan agotado que necesito tomarme un descanso y trabajar en temas relacionados con la música. Agradezco mucho que hayas mejorado esa página, el tema merece una gran expansión. Sería un honor para mí si colaboraras en cualquiera de las otras entidades de energía nuclear de WMF que he creado aquí y en WB, así que, por favor, ¡edita con valentía! Gracias de nuevo. Geo Bard Rap 23:38, 1 julio 2011 (UTC)
Enviado en nombre del Gremio de Editores de Textos mediante AWB el 3 de julio de 2011 a las 09:01 (UTC)
Nunca dije que no fueras de buena fe, solo tengo un problema con el borrado de contenido en general. Estaré fuera de línea en treinta segundos y no estaré disponible en línea hasta mañana. Estoy seguro de que cualquier edición importante puede esperar hasta que tengamos la oportunidad de discutirla en ese momento, gracias. Geo Bard Rap 03:10, 13 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Hola, realmente aprecio tus ediciones en la página de Eido Tai Shimano , que han estado en su lugar durante más de dos meses. Sin embargo, hoy noté que el editor Tao2911 ha hecho algunos cambios importantes allí nuevamente, lo que hace que esta página sea parcial. Incluso se cambió la parte superior de la página. Revertí la página a tu versión agregando solo información nueva y referencia reciente que también usó. Ahora veo que revirtió esto nuevamente. Muchos editores en el pasado han discutido con Tao291. Está conectado con el grupo de personas que dañaron a Shimano en blogs y, a lo largo de meses, agregó fuentes no aceptadas y con sus propias interpretaciones. No quiero participar más en discusiones con él, pero no podemos permitir que esta página sea suya y, como está ahora, no creo que refleje la verdad. ¿Existe alguna posibilidad de que usted, como editor senior, pueda ayudar a detener esto? ¿Debería permitírsele editar esta página después de su historial de acciones en Wikipedia? Por favor, ayuda. Gracias. Spt51 ( discusión ) 15:53 13 jul 2011 (UTC)
Tenga en cuenta que en el caso de los BLP existen normas independientes que permiten una intervención rápida, ya que los BLP pueden convertirse en un caso de difamación procesable. Esta es una vía independiente de
Recuerde que las RFC forman parte de la resolución de disputas y, en ocasiones, pueden tener lugar en un ambiente acalorado. Eche un vistazo a la página de RFC correspondiente antes de responder y asegúrese de estar dispuesto y ser capaz de participar en ese entorno y contribuir a que la discusión sea tranquila y productiva, centrada en el contenido del tema en cuestión. Consulte también Wikipedia:Solicitudes de comentarios#Sugerencias para responder .
¡Saludos! Has sido seleccionado al azar para recibir una invitación para participar en la solicitud de comentarios sobre Talk:Militant atheism . Si deseas responder a la invitación, ¡tu contribución a esta discusión será muy apreciada! Sin embargo, ten en cuenta que tu aporte no tendrá mayor peso que el de cualquier otra persona: recuerda que una RFC tiene como objetivo alcanzar una posición de consenso razonada y no es una votación . Para respaldar eso, tu contribución debe centrarse en una evaluación reflexiva de los problemas y la evidencia disponible, y proporcionar evidencia relevante adicional si es posible.
Has recibido este aviso porque tu nombre aparece en Wikipedia:Servicio de solicitud de comentarios . Si no deseas recibir este tipo de avisos, elimina tu nombre de esa página. RFC bot ( discusión ) 07:00, 16 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Al principio me reí, ahora me río a carcajadas. Sí, este no es el lugar para "disertaciones hagiográficas" ni para "pulir la imagen"... de... y aquí estoy de nuevo riéndome a carcajadas... "queridos gurús". Ingenioso. No tengo ningún problema con la sugerencia de que mis comentarios irónicos se hayan tomado como tendenciosos, y si pareces un poco combativo con otros editores, puede ser porque estás corrigiendo con valentía los errores de los holgazanes. Haz que hagan su tarea. Pero ¿de verdad quieres descartarme como un potencial mediador "neutral" [?]? WP no es el lugar para la investigación original, pero es un lugar para la colaboración y un tono de colegialidad es generalmente más productivo que la argumentación adversaria. Tal vez sea mejor no quemar ningún puente.
Para su información, soy un admirador de las traducciones de Basho de Aitken y también del taoísmo en general, hacia el que me he ido inclinando constantemente a medida que varias sectas budistas decepcionan en la práctica a pesar de las teorías de la compasión y la conducta correcta. En el Tao Te Ching, aprecio especialmente el consejo de que a menudo la mejor acción es la no acción.
Saludos. 23:52, 17 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Gracias por el comienzo de Foghorn Stringband. Sí, es un poco poco convencional.
00:17 18 jul 2011 (UTC) El texto que aparece a continuación fue copiado de la página de usuario de GeoBard para mi conveniencia.
Gracias por el comienzo en Foghorn Stringband.
Tenga en cuenta que, si bien ha proporcionado referencias sobre Foghorn Stringband , todavía no hay nada que demuestre por qué son notables , y dos de las referencias son de agentes de reservas y probablemente deberían reemplazarse en algún momento. Valfontis ( discusión ) 00:28 18 jul 2011 (UTC)
Little Mountain 5 04:45 18 jul 2011 (UTC)
En realidad no toco mucho OT, pero gracias por preguntar. En los últimos tiempos he probado un poco de ADAE (Boatmen Row, si no recuerdo mal) y algo de GDAD (Bonaparte's Retreat), pero el 99,9 % de las veces estoy en el viejo y querido GDAE. Los Prims, ya sean de calibre medio o pesado, tienen buena fama y tienen fama de tolerar muchas afinaciones cruzadas. Toqué un juego de esos durante un tiempo y eran aceptables. Tu experiencia puede variar. Mucho depende del violín en particular y del estilo del ejecutante. Últimamente me he quedado con Tonica o Zyex en el violín y Zyex o Helicore en la viola. A algunos les encantan los Helicores y a otros no les gustan.
Mi propio puente tiene una curva estándar. Algunas personas realmente usan un CD como plantilla, para un radio de 60 mm. Eso es terriblemente plano. Mi plantilla de puente "de violín" tiene un radio de aproximadamente 53 mm, pero realmente depende de lo que le guste al músico. Hay muchas cosas sucediendo con un puente de violín; hacer un cambio en la curva superior significa que deben ocurrir muchos otros cambios, especialmente alrededor del perfil de grosor cerca de la parte superior.
Un colega me enseñó un truco una vez: colocas una carta pequeña y plana sobre las cuerdas exteriores y debajo de las dos del medio, justo delante del puente, y otra carta encima de las dos del medio. Las cartas deben estar paralelas. Si no lo están, puedes limar una muesca hacia abajo o construir otra hacia arriba hasta que lo estén. El verdadero truco es saber cuándo parar. __ Simplemente Bill ( discusión ) 03:03 18 jul 2011 (UTC)
Por favor, consiga un consenso sobre esto antes de añadirlo. — Discusión de Andrew 03:30, 18 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Hola GB
En Talk:Dick Campbell (cantante y compositor) , te sorprendiste de que Allmusic pudiera usarse como una fuente confiable de WP .
Allmusic no es un blog, sino una serie de artículos editados adecuadamente encargados a escritores conocidos como Roxanne Blanford, Stephen Thomas Erlewine , Ned Raggett y Richie Unterberger , quienes son lo suficientemente notables como para tener sus propios artículos en Wikipedia. Para más detalles sobre los escritores de Allmusic, incluidos sus escritores de música clásica, consulta [1].
Una cosa a tener en cuenta es que Allmusic rara vez, o nunca, aparece en las búsquedas de Google; supongo que han optado por no participar o usan etiquetas "no-follow".
Arjayay ( discusión ) 08:09, 18 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Se ha publicado el primer boletín informativo de WikiProject National Archives . ¡Siga leyendo para descubrir qué estamos haciendo y cómo ayudar! Hay muchas oportunidades para participar más. Dominic · t 21:24, 20 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Esta página trata sobre geología. El otro trata sobre una planta. Habla más sobre ello si quieres, pero la plantilla es una monstruosidad y no es útil. Yo hablo español y estudio historia de Chile mucho. Pero, en la UE el tema es muy controvertido. Por favor, hablas conmogo primero, pero no más plantilla. Muchas gracias amigo. Rap Geo Bardo
Se ha publicado el número de julio de 2011 del boletín de WikiProject Estados Unidos . Puedes leer el boletín, cambiar el formato en el que se te enviarán los próximos números o cancelar la suscripción a esta notificación siguiendo el enlace. Gracias.
-- Kumioko ( discusión ) 00:53 24 jul 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predice que disfrutarás editando algunos de estos artículos. ¡Diviértete!
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan trabajo. Apreciamos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias regularmente; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por ayudarnos!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, infórmenos en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . Saludos de Nettrom ( discusión ), el encargado de SuggestBot. -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:30, 29 de julio de 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for creating this interesting article. When you create beyond-stub articles with inline references, like Klezmer fiddle, please consider nominating your work for front page exposure at T:TDYK. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
The article List of wilderness medical emergencies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rabbitfang 07:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I know that there are plenty of people who have all the time in the world to WikiLawyer, so I am curtailing my contributions at WP. I am no longer particularly interested in providing new contributions of the sort which I have provided in the past, at least, not at this time. Cheers, my friends.GeoBardSemi-retired 00:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Backstage projects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backstage projects until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
See afd disc thanks GeoBardSemi-retired 00:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Buff up any up my pages I really appreciate your style - no wreckage, just subtle improvements. Much appreciated, and a cut above the typical juandiced, hyper critical WP editor.GeoBardSemi-retired 00:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Stop by anytime. Coffee's brewin'....01:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
By Lionelt
Welcome to the inaugural issue of The Right Stuff, the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. The Project has developed at a breakneck speed since it was created on February 12, 2011 with the edit summary, "Let's roll!" With over 50 members the need for a project newsletter is enormous. With over 3000 articles to watch, an active talk page and numerous critical discussions spread over various noticeboards, it has become increasingly difficult to manage the information overload. The goal of The Right Stuff is to help you keep up with the changing landscape.
The Right Stuff is a newsletter consisting of original reporting. Writers will use a byline to "sign" their contributions. Just as with The Signpost, "guidelines such as 'no ownership of articles', and particularly 'no original research', will not necessarily apply."
WikiProject Conservatism has a bright future ahead: this newsletter will allow us tell the story. All that's left to say is: "Let's roll!"
By Lionelt
A new style guide to help standardize editing was rolled out. It focuses on concepts, people and organizations from a conservatism perspective. The guide features detailed article layouts for several types of articles. You can help improve it here. The Project's Article Collaboration currently has two nominations, but they don't appear to be generating much interest. You can get involved with the Collaboration here.
I am pleased to report that we have two new members: Rjensen and Soonersfan168. Rjensen is a professional historian and has access to JSTOR. Soonersfan168 says he is a "young conservative who desires to improve Wikipedia!" Unfortunately we will be seeing less of Geofferybard, as he has announced his semi-retirement. We wish him well. Be sure to stop by their talk pages and drop off some Wikilove.
By Lionelt
On August 3rd Peter Oborne, a British journalist, became the Project's 3,000th tagged article. It is a tribute to the membership that we have come this far this quickly. The latest Featured Article is Richard Nixon. Our congratulations to Wehwalt for a job well done. The article with the most page views was Rick Perry with 887,389 views, not surprising considering he announced he was running for president on August 11th. Follwing Perry were Michele Bachmann and Tea Party movement. The Project was ranked 75th based on total edits, which is up from 105th in July. The article with the most edits was Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012 with 374 edits. An RFC regarding candidate inclusion criteria generated much interest on the talk page.
Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 18:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Objectivism (Ayn Rand). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astrology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 14:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of new religious movements. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pregnancy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 18:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buddhism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
By Lionelt
The Right Stuff caught up with Dank, the recently elected Lead Coordinator of WikiProject Military History. MILHIST is considered by many to be one of the most successful projects in the English Wikipedia.
Q: Tell us a little about yourself.
A: I'm Dan, a Wikipedian since 2007, from North Carolina. I started out with an interest in history, robotics, style guidelines, and copyediting. These days, I'm the lead coordinator for the Military History Project and a reviewer of Featured Article Candidates. I've been an administrator and maintained WP:Update, a summary of policy changes, since 2008.
Q: What is your experience with WikiProjects?
A: I guess I'm most familiar with WP:MILHIST and WP:SHIPS, and I'm trying to get up to speed at WP:AVIATION. I've probably talked with members of most of the wikiprojects at one time or another.
Q: What makes a WikiProject successful?
A: A lot of occasional contributors who think of the project as fun rather than work, a fair number of people willing to write or review articles, a small core of like-minded people who are dedicated to building and maintaining the project, and access to at least a few people who are familiar with reviewing standards and with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
Q: Do you have any tips for increasing membership?
A: Aim for a consistent, helpful and professional image. Let people know what the project is doing and what they could be doing, but don't push.
If you've got a core group interested in building a wikiproject, it helps if they do more listening than talking at first ... find out what people are trying to do, and offer them help with whatever it is. Some wikiprojects build membership by helping people get articles through the review processes.
By Lionelt
The arbitration request submitted by Steven Zhang moved into its second month. The case, which evaluates user conduct, arose from contentious discussions regarding the naming of the Pro-life and Pro-choice articles, and a related issue pertaining to the inclusion of "death" in the lede of Abortion. A number of members are involved. On the Evidence page ArtifexMahem posted a table indicating that DMSBel made the most edits to the Abortion article. DMSBel has announced their semi-retirement. Fact finding regarding individual editor behavior has begun in earnest on theWorkshop page.
Last month it was decided that due to the success of the new Dispute Resolution Noticeboard the Content Noticeboard would be shut down. Wikiquette Assistance will remain active. The DRN is primarily intended to resolve content disputes.
By Lionelt
Was your article deleted in spite of your best efforts to save it? You should consider having a copy restored to the Incubator where project members can help improve it. Upon meeting content criteria, articles are graduated to mainspace. The Incubator is also ideal for collaborating on new article drafts. Star Parker is the first addition to the incubator. The article was deleted per WP:POLITICIAN.
WikiProject Conservatism is expanding. We now have a satellite on Commons. Any help in categorizing images or in getting the fledgling project off the ground is appreciated.
We have a few new members who joined the project in September. Please give a hearty welcome to Conservative Philosopher, Screwball23 and Regushee by showing them some Wikilove. Screwball23 has been on WikiPedia for five years and has made major improvements to Linda McMahon. Regushee is not one for idle chit chat: an amazing 93% of their edits are in article space.
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pray the Gay Away?. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genesis creation narrative. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astrology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Southern Baptist Convention. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eschatology of Jehovah's Witnesses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mythology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ram Dass. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astrology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jupiter (mythology). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
By Lionelt
On October 7, WikiProject Conservatism was nominated for deletion by member Binksternet. He based his rationale on what he described as an undefinable scope, stating that the project is "at its root undesirable". Of the 40 participants in the discussion, some agreed that the scope was problematic; however, they felt it did not justify deletion of the project. A number of participants suggested moving the project to "WikiProject American conservatism". The overwhelming sentiment was expressed by Guerillero who wrote: "A project is a group of people. This particular group does great work in their topic area[,] why prevent them from doing this[?]" In the end there was negligible opposition to the project and the result of the discussion was "Keep". The proceedings of the deletion discussion were picked up by The Signpost, calling the unfolding drama "the first MfD of its kind". The Signpost observed that attempting to delete an active project was unprecedented. The story itself became a source of controversy which played out at the Discuss This Story section, and also at the author's talk page.
Two days after the project was nominated, the Conservatism Portal was also nominated for deletion as "too US-biased". There was no support for deletion amongst the 10 participants, with one suggestion to rename the portal.
In other news, a new portal focusing on conservatism has been created at WikiSource. Wikisource is an online library of free content publications with 254,051 accessible texts. One highlight of the portal's content is Reflections on the Revolution in France by Edmund Burke.
October saw a 6.4% increase in new members, bringing the total membership to 58. Seven of the eight new members joined after October 12; the deletion discussions may have played a role in the membership spike. Mwhite148 is a member of the UK Conservative Party. Stating that he is not a conservative, Kleinzach noted his "lifetime interest in British, European and international politics." Let's all make an effort to welcome the new members with an outpouring of Wikilove.
Click here to keep up to date on all the happenings at WikiProject Conservatism.
By Lionelt
Timeline of conservatism, a Top-importance list, was nominated for deletion on October 3. The nominator stated that since conservatism in an "ambiguous concept", the timeline suffers from original research. There were a number of "Delete", as well as "Keep" votes. The closing administrator reasoned that consensus dictated that the list be renamed. The current title is Timeline of modern American conservatism.
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and congregational discipline. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thanksgiving. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ariel A. Roth. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John of Damascus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 01:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christmas Eve. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Secular humanism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of early Christian thought on abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Calvary Chapel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joseph Smith. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Religion in Africa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christianity in India. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kingdom of God. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Secular humanism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
By Lionelt
On January 21, The Conservatism Portal was promoted to Featured Portal (FP) due largely to the contributions of Lionelt. This is the first Featured content produced by WikiProject Conservatism. The road to Featured class was rocky. An earlier nomination for FP failed, and in October the portal was "Kept" after being nominated for deletion.
Member Eisfbnore significantly contributed to the successful Good Article nomination of Norwegian journalist and newspaper editor Nils Vogt in December. Eisfbnore also created the article. In January another Project article was promoted to Featured Article. Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias, a president of Brazil, attained Featured class with significant effort by Lecen. The Article Incubator saw its first graduation in November. A collaboration spearheaded by Mzk1 and Trackerseal successfully developed Star Parker to pass the notability guideline.
By Lionelt
Another discussion addressing the project scope began in December. Nine alternatives were presented in the contentious, sometimes heated discussion. Support was divided between keeping the exitsing scope, or adopting a scope with more specificity. Some opponents of the specific scope were concerned that it was too limiting and would adversely affect project size. About twenty editors participated in the discussion.
Inclusion of the article Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was debated. Supporters for inclusion cited sources describing the KKK as "conservative." The article was excluded with more than 10 editors participating.
Project membership continues to grow. There are currently 73 members. Member Goldblooded (pictured) volunteers for the UK Conservative Party and JohnChrysostom is a Christian Democrat. North8000 is interested in libertarianism. We won't tell WikiProject Libertarianism he's slumming. Let's stop by their talkpages and share some Wikilove.
Click here to keep up to date on all the happenings at WikiProject Conservatism.
By Lionelt
Articles about the GOP presidential candidate and staunch traditional marriage supporter have seen an explosion of discussion. On January 8 an RFC was opened (here) to determine if Dan Savage's website link should be included in Campaign for "santorum" neologism. The next day the Rick Santorum article itself was the subject of an RFC (here) to determine if including the Savage neologism was a violation of the BLP policy. Soon after a third was opened (here) at Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality. This RFC proposes merging the neologism article into the controversy article.
The Abortion case closed in November after 15 weeks of contentious arbitration. The remedies include semi-protection of all abortion articles (numbering 1,500), sanctions for some editors including members of this Project, and a provision for a discussion to determine the names of what are colloquially known as the pro-life and pro-choice articles. The Committee endorsed the "1 revert rule" for abortion articles.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ethereal being. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Troll. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard Feynman. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Heart Sutra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genesis creation narrative. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard Dawkins. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Intelligent design. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big Bang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dave Camp. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Bosco. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rajneesh movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Universal Life Church. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nation of Islam. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Easter. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tirumala Venkateswara Temple. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic–Jewish relations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Atheism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Atheism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Lucidity Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coachella and Lucidity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big Bang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Secular humanism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Category:Songs with lyrics by Robert Burns, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 23:30, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Category:Songs written in style of folk traditional songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Category:Pages with links to audio, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 23:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated the above for deletion. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom (talk) 22:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, WikiProject US National Archives member!
We are seeking a coordinator to help reboot the project and work on new initiatives! The role is modeled after other Wikiproject coordinators, like the WikiProject Military History coordinators. The coordinator will work with the Wikipedian in Residence to organize and increase participation in the WikiProject, with the goal that the WikiProject is an active space for collaboration maintained by and for the Wikipedia editors, rather than the National Archives.
Please see the full information at Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Coordinator and contact me is you have any questions. Feel free to pass this note along to any interested parties. Thanks! Dominic·t 21:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
de:Benutzer:Dudenfreund/Dudenfreund’s Law
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Christian sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of vegans. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamophobia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipaediae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipaediae until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheChampionMan1234 00:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lord of the Dance (hymn). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:MassResistance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Public policy and citizen participation in California, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi
I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.
Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.
Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:La Luz del Mundo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Portal talk:Judaism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Effective method. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucidity (festival) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucidity (festival) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Geofferybard. Just curious, what may be so controversial about Bluegrass fiddle? (In the meantime you might wanna consider a talk page archive)
Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 07:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard Dawkins. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pope Francis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Baptists. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Folk music of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ''bodhisattva''. Since you had some involvement with the 'bodhisattva' redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
The article School-to-prison pipeline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 22:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article School-to-prison pipeline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School-to-prison pipeline until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DSCrowned(talk) 08:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Noise Khanyile, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
The article Lucidity (festival) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Rv blatant promotion (much of it in we-form!) Would need blowing up and starting over to have any chance of becoming an encyclopedia article. No significant coverage in reliable third-party sources offered.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 01:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
By Lionelt
Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.
Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.
Editors who faced Enforcement action include SPECIFICO (no action), Factchecker atyourservice (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), Netoholic (no action) and Anythingyouwant (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
There are several open discussions at the Project:Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
By Lionelt
WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.
Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by Zarasophos
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.
(Discuss this story)Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
