¡Hola!
Si se pregunta quién soy, soy Twofortnights y he trabajado en artículos sobre requisitos y políticas de visas desde septiembre de 2013. Los he mejorado mucho (sin falsa modestia, solo revise el historial de esos artículos) desde un estado horrendo de falta de referencias, plaga de enlaces de spam, información incompleta e información desactualizada por varios años y violaciones de derechos de autor, y advertí a los administradores con éxito sobre numerosos casos de vandalismo que resultaron en al menos una docena de acciones de administración.
Aquí está la lista de artículos en los que he trabajado.
Lamento cualquier posible error en la tabla anterior, he hecho lo mejor que he podido.
Además, he creado todos los mapas respectivos y también los mapas de todos los demás artículos.
Todos estos artículos tienen miles de lectores cada mes, como lo confirman las estadísticas de tráfico de artículos de Wikipedia. Muchos de estos artículos no fueron fáciles de escribir, ya que muchos países del tercer mundo no publican sus políticas de visas ni notifican los cambios a las organizaciones internacionales. A menudo tienen políticas confusas o información inconsistente. Pero aún así, he logrado escribirlos y, como he notado, muchos de ellos se están traduciendo recientemente a otros idiomas, como el turco o el chino.
¿Y qué pasó? Primero, eche un vistazo a La insoportable burocracia de Wikipedia, el último artículo sobre algo de lo que se habla en Internet desde hace tiempo. Y lo más irónico es que yo he seguido esta burocracia casi al pie de la letra, pero no ha sido suficiente.
Ahora un poco sobre el caso específico que desencadenó esto (para todos aquellos a quienes no les gusta la vaguedad y el enfoque filosófico sino las historias concretas). Como dije, he luchado contra el vandalismo en muchas páginas (por ejemplo, los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos de Singapur experimentaron un vandalismo tan persistente que estará bloqueado durante los próximos 6 meses) y este fue solo otro caso. O eso pensé. Un vándalo apuntó a la política de visas de China y a los mapas de requisitos de visas para ciudadanos chinos. Sus acciones pueden describirse como el llamado vandalismo furtivo o jugar con el sistema . Editó los mapas de Wikimedia Commons con resúmenes de edición que explicaban cómo la fuente de sus ediciones está en Wikipedia. Obviamente esas eran mentiras, su versión del mapa alteraría tanto las imágenes que ni siquiera corresponderían a la leyenda del archivo, y mucho menos al contenido del artículo. Después de no poder evitar que vandalizara esos archivos de imagen, cargué archivos alternativos con nombres muy claros y detallados, pero eso no ayudó mucho.
Bueno, ya basta de detalles del caso. ¿Qué pasó después?
Hice todo según el libro, hice todas estas cosas tratando la situación como una mera edición disruptiva sin jamás emitirle al vándalo una advertencia real de vandalismo:
¿Cuál fue la respuesta del administrador a mi informe? Decidieron bloquearme a mí y al vándalo por igual tiempo. En una especie de respuesta perezosa, inexplicable y retorcida. La que plantea una pregunta si no quieres involucrarte en los méritos del caso: ¿por qué te involucras o por qué eres un administrador en primer lugar? ¿Pueden esos administradores responder a una pregunta simple: qué beneficio obtiene Wikipedia de sus acciones? Sin mencionar los otros giros donde la eliminación de plantillas de mantenimiento se etiquetó como "disputa de contenido". La plantilla de mantenimiento que fue eliminada por el vándalo era exactamente la plantilla que señalaba que hay una disputa en el artículo y llamaba a una discusión en la página de discusión. Deshacer un vándalo que estaba eliminando esas plantillas (y agregando un archivo de imagen vandalizado) fue todo empaquetado como una "disputa de contenido". Mhm.
Un administrador incluso intentó hacer que el cumplimiento de la burocracia de resolución de disputas fuera un error en sí mismo. Me regañaron por ser yo quien agregó la plantilla de mantenimiento. No me explicaron cómo era posible que fuera un error. En realidad, no me explicaron nada, nunca se abordó ninguno de los problemas planteados, en lugar de eso, siempre me encontré con lugares comunes repetitivos una y otra vez.
Sin embargo, traté de mantener la calma y presenté una solicitud oficial de desbloqueo presentando la situación claramente, esperando que alguien se molestara en investigarla.
Pero aquí es donde entra en juego la burocracia. Mi solicitud fue rechazada porque, bueno, era una "disputa de contenido". Sí, hay una plantilla con la que puedes advertir a otro usuario que podría ser bloqueado por eliminar plantillas de mantenimiento, pero si realmente le pides a un administrador que lo haga, te bloquean y eso está bien porque es una "disputa de contenido". Debes buscar una resolución a través de la página de discusión y la comunicación con otro usuario. Pero cuando haces eso y el vándalo lo ignora, te bloquean y eso está bien porque es una "disputa de contenido".
¿Y qué significa "disputa de contenido"? ¿Incluso si fuera el caso? ¿Se pueden vandalizar archivos de imagen con un resumen de edición falso y eso no es vandalismo sino una "disputa de contenido"? No, no lo es. Dejemos los eufemismos y llamemos a las cosas por su nombre. "Disputa de contenido" es una excusa para los administradores vagos. He hecho todo lo posible para resolverlo como una disputa de contenido aunque no lo fuera, desde advertencias hasta plantillas de mantenimiento e intentos de discutir cosas en la página de discusión. Y me bloquearon como si no hubiera hecho nada de eso, de la misma manera que bloquearon al vándalo que ignoró todas mis acciones para la resolución de la disputa.
Ya basta de hablar del caso.
Wikipedia no tiene medidas efectivas para luchar contra el vandalismo. Ninguna en absoluto. Los administradores perezosos pueden descartar cualquier cosa como "disputa de contenido" sin siquiera molestarse en leer más allá de las primeras letras. Tratar de resolver los problemas según las reglas no tendrá ningún valor al final. Serás castigado de la misma manera que alguien que no hizo nada de eso. No te molestes en resolver disputas, no, en serio, no te molestes en hacerlo. Te quitará mucha energía y no servirá de nada. Nadie lo apreciará y, no solo eso, incluso te insultarán.
Al parecer, es más fácil silenciar a los usuarios que han invertido cientos de horas en mejorar Wikipedia. ¿A dónde nos lleva esto? Basta con buscar Wikipedia en Google para conocer las últimas noticias. Esto conduce al declive de este gran sitio web. La calidad de los aportes disminuye cada día. Es la triste realidad y hay que hacer algo al respecto rápidamente.
El objetivo de los administradores, las reglas y los burócratas debería ser mejorar Wikipedia y no imponer una igualdad retorcida entre editores dedicados y trolls. Su papel también debería ser el de ayudar a gente como yo. No soy un gran mediador o diplomático, lo admito. Vine aquí para actualizar esos artículos y eso es todo. No se puede esperar que haga su trabajo al mismo tiempo. Cuando les pregunto algo, espero una respuesta que no sea "disputa de contenido, pásalo". Y les pregunté qué más esperaban de mí, aparte de las acciones mencionadas anteriormente. Pero me dieron una bofetada con un "disputa de contenido" sordo al tono.
Otro artículo interesante de hace unos meses, Decline of Wikipedia, afirma que el número de editores activos en la Wikipedia en inglés alcanzó su punto máximo en 2007 con más de 51.000 y ha ido disminuyendo desde entonces, hasta llegar a sólo 31.000 personas el verano pasado. Gracias al sistema obsoleto y a los administradores desinteresados que aún se aferran a sus puestos, el número seguramente bajará a niveles insostenibles en el próximo año o dos.
No tengo intención de permitir que alguien sentado cómodamente en su silla y sufriendo un torrente de poder en el cerebro manche mi nombre y disminuya mis esfuerzos tanto en el pasado, cuando mi arduo trabajo se encuentre con el ridículo, como en el futuro, donde no podré luchar contra el vandalismo de manera efectiva con "previamente bloqueado" en los registros.
He decidido limitar mi actividad gracias a esos administradores y su enfoque superficial. No me verán de nuevo revisando 42 artículos y actualizándolos y luego revisando 42 mapas y actualizándolos como cuando Mongolia cambió recientemente su política de visas solo para ser bloqueado el mismo día por alguien que piensa que el puesto de administrador no rinde cuentas y que no está obligado a molestarse en tratar los detalles del caso que está tratando y que todo lo que se le pide que haga es escribir una o dos oraciones con la excusa de la burocracia.
Definitivamente no voy a deshacer ningún vandalismo más. No quiero correr el riesgo de que me bloqueen por manejar mal una "disputa de contenido". Sin embargo, haré un seguimiento de todo el spam, vandalismo, borrado, adición intencional de información incorrecta - todo ello y especialmente el vandalismo furtivo. Y llevaré un registro público para que podamos ver qué acciones sirven mejor a Wikipedia, las de los vándalos y burócratas (en el sentido real y negativo de la palabra) entre los administradores o los usuarios que trabajan duro.
A estos administradores no les importa que Wikipedia esté llena de información falsa mientras la burocracia esté satisfecha. Literalmente, sólo les importan los asuntos de procedimiento.
Y, por supuesto, permítanme terminar con una nota: hay administradores excelentes y dedicados por ahí. Expliqué que en mis informes se tomaron muchas medidas. Y los felicito por su dedicación en tal atmósfera. ¡He revertido las ediciones de un vándalo en otro artículo, no tres veces, sino treinta y tres veces! Pero hubo un administrador que realmente investigó el asunto y no solo contó el número de ediciones. El resultado fue el bloqueo del otro usuario y una protección de 6 meses para el artículo. No pensó en bloquearme por cruzar matemáticamente la línea o por una guerra de ediciones cuando, de hecho, mis ediciones solo estaban deshaciendo un tipo muy similar de vandalismo furtivo. Pero para eso, un administrador no necesita ser perezoso y realmente investigar los hechos del asunto en lugar de repetir las mismas perogrulladas burocráticas vacías una y otra vez.
Gracias por leer, -- Twofortnights (discusión) 21:38 30 jun 2014 (UTC)
Hola Twoforfire, fue un placer hablar contigo. Hace unos días edité información sobre los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos libaneses y tú la eliminaste. Ahora son 42 los países a los que los ciudadanos libaneses pueden viajar sin visa o visa a la llegada, en lugar de 39. ¿Puedes editarlo, por favor? Además, si puedes editar el mapa, muchas gracias y te deseo un buen día.
Entiendo a qué intentas referirte. Seguramente, el cambio de esquema de colores que intenté no es lo suficientemente importante como para resultar o equipararse al esfuerzo requerido para la implementación de tales modificaciones en todos los "Wikiproyectos". De todas formas, no estoy seguro de lo que quieres decir con "esquemas de colores basados en banderas". Sin embargo, cuando revisé el historial de edición de los mapas en Wikimedia Commons, noté algunas "reversiones" de esquemas de colores, que percibí como el resultado de una pérdida de consenso o, simplemente, un error. Gracias. Whatshouldichoose ( discusión ) 13:30 19 ago 2016 (UTC)
Como he explicado anteriormente, no tengo intención de corregir las diversas ediciones vandálicas o la información errónea que se ha añadido a los artículos sobre visas por cualquier motivo (falta de conocimientos de inglés, uso de fuentes obsoletas, etc.). Sin embargo, haré un seguimiento de ello.
¿No debería alguien solucionar esos problemas?-- Twofortnights (discusión) 21:54 30 jun 2014 (UTC)
Seguramente se está acumulando y ya hace una semana que no deshago la adición de información sin fuentes o simplemente errónea, enlaces spam y violaciones de derechos de autor. Parece que tenía razón cuando dije que es completamente irrelevante para algunos de los administradores que Wikipedia esté llena de este tipo de problemas mientras se cumplan las exigencias burocráticas. No he notado ni una sola edición de este tipo que no haya atendido yo y que haya sido corregida por uno de los administradores que estaban tan preocupados por mí. Su preocupación por lo anterior parece ser inexistente. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 14:31 7 jul 2014 (UTC)
Entonces, como no se está haciendo nada y los problemas se acumulan, tengo que etiquetarlos abiertamente: Usuario:Jpgordon y Usuario:Lord Roem ¿tienen la intención de hacer su trabajo y limpiar todo el vandalismo acumulado, el spam, la investigación original y la información errónea? Porque déjenme recordarles, las reglas de Wikipedia también prohíben el vandalismo, el spam, la investigación original y agregar deliberadamente información errónea tanto como revertir la cantidad incorrecta de veces y se espera que los administradores resuelvan problemas como esos y no solo aquellos en los que se necesitan dos clics para satisfacer la burocracia. Permítanme repetirlo una vez más: yo mismo habría eliminado todas estas tonterías como lo he estado haciendo durante meses, pero como me encontré con cero aprecio y máximo rechazo y ridículo, no tengo intención de hacerlo, sin embargo, espero que los administradores lo hagan. Considere esto como un envío personalizado a WP:RVAN , WP:NORN , WP:CP , WT:WPSPAM y WP:ELN . Gracias por su servicio.-- Twofortnights (discusión) 00:14 11 jul 2014 (UTC)
Usuario:Jpgordon y Usuario:Lord Roem - ahora que hemos dejado atrás los problemas personales, ¿se puede hacer algo finalmente con el spam acumulado, los derechos de autor y los errores factuales deliberados mencionados anteriormente? Si no te importa, al menos dame una respuesta concreta que no me deje colgado. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 17:04 13 jul 2014 (UTC)
Vale, no me vas a responder. Es muy TRISTE que un administrador lo ignore y que el otro sea tan incapaz de aceptar las críticas que decide dañar a toda Wikipedia para demostrar su punto de vista y mostrar lo ofendido que está de que a alguien no le entusiasme su enfoque burocrático de tratar a los trolls y a los colaboradores de la misma manera. Mi punto de vista está demostrado más allá de toda duda. En mi crítica (que fue escrita antes de todo) la frase clave era: A esos administradores no les importa si Wikipedia está llena de información falsa mientras la burocracia loca esté satisfecha. Literalmente, solo les importan los asuntos de procedimiento. - Y mira, tenía razón, qué sorpresa. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 11:04 15 jul 2014 (UTC)
Hola, ¿podrías actualizar el mapa para que muestre a India en amarillo como país que solicita visas en línea? No sé cómo hacerlo, pero sería una gran mejora. Muchas gracias. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 168.235.178.82 (discusión) 17:23, 3 de marzo de 2016 (UTC)
Para evitar una guerra de ediciones, he venido a tu página de discusión. Pido disculpas por cualquier inconveniente, pero: mi copia fue alterada antes de pegar. Básicamente, lo que hice fue tomar el HTML de la página de requisitos de visa alemana y usar la información de los requisitos de visa antiguos para ciudadanos rumanos (aquellos que sigues deshaciendo) insertándolos MANUALMENTE en el HTML y luego subiéndolos a la página de requisitos de visa. Esto llevó casi 3 horas de trabajo manual en Microsoft Word. Whatshouldichoose ( discusión ) 14:00, 20 de febrero de 2016 (UTC)
Hola, el mapa de requisitos de visa necesita una actualización: Angola debería actualizarse según el último cambio en la visa a la llegada, Tanzania debería estar en verde oscuro (sin visa), al igual que Papúa Nueva Guinea (visa gratuita a la llegada). No sé cómo hacerlo, así que agradezco tu ayuda. ¡Gracias y sigue con el buen trabajo! 2601:14D:8580:370:549C:5BFE:D27A:C856 (discusión) 13:48 30 mar 2018 (UTC)
Gracias por tu buen trabajo sobre las visas, pero especialmente sobre Tailandia. Estoy harto de toda la información errónea que circula, como puedes ver, y recientemente me interesé en intentar agregar información allí.
Ayer encontré la página del gobierno tailandés sobre los requisitos de visado en el sitio del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores. Tenía fecha de 2012 y estaba llena de errores. Busqué una versión posterior y la encontré en el sitio de la Embajada de Tailandia en Moscú, con fecha de abril de 2014. También estaba llena de errores. Hoy volví al sitio del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y descubrí que ahora tiene una versión de julio de 2014, considerablemente mejorada.
Como vivo aquí, tengo la intención de intentar mantenerme al tanto de la página de visas tailandesas y espero que esto esté bien dado todo el gran trabajo que has hecho.
Mencionas a la IATA como fuente de información sobre visados. Es un gran consejo, aunque visitar su sitio no resultó muy útil. No pude encontrar información completa y concisa, solo una especie de "planificador de viajes" que requiere mucho tiempo de uso.
Gracias de nuevo, Seligne ( discusión ) 12:07 11 jul 2014 (UTC)
¡Gracias por el enlace de la IATA! Me sorprende un poco tu observación sobre los derechos de autor. Como no pude encontrar una descripción coherente de los tipos de visa tailandesa, lo que escribí es una parodia de muchos sitios diferentes, la mayoría de dominio público (es decir, sitios de embajadas tailandesas). ¿Crees que lo he copiado de Thaivisa? Saludos, Seligne ( discusión ) 23:27 11 jul 2014 (UTC)
Espero no haberte abierto una caja de Pandora: ¡podrías pasar otro año o más actualizando la información sobre visas allí! Es bueno tener en cuenta Virginia Occidental para los enlaces en línea, etc., cuando sea apropiado. Saludos, Seligne ( discusión ) 00:12 13 jul 2014 (UTC)
Hola. Gracias por tus recientes modificaciones. Wikipedia agradece tu ayuda. Sin embargo, hemos notado que cuando editaste Naturalization , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación Macedonia . Estos enlaces casi siempre son involuntarios, ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de títulos de artículos del tipo "¿Quiso decir…?". Lee las preguntas frecuentes • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject de DPL .
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:02, 15 de julio de 2014 (UTC)
Supongo que podría interesarle Wikipedia:Bomba de agua de la aldea (política)/Archivo 114#enlaces a TimaticWeb . -- Joy [schallot] ( discusión ) 11:36 20 jul 2014 (UTC)
Hola. Creo que las mejoras que has hecho en la página sobre los requisitos de visado para los ciudadanos británicos son excelentes. Sin embargo, he notado que has deshecho mi cambio para incluir a Taiwán como país. Sin querer entrar en demasiados detalles sobre los detalles de la cuestión de Taiwán, no creo que sea apropiado incluir a Taiwán como una "región en disputa" o "dependencia de China", etc., porque Taiwán es un destino al que van muchos viajeros internacionales y es una importante economía mundial. Además, a nivel técnico, Taiwán es la República de China , mientras que China continental es la República Popular China . Tiene vínculos diplomáticos informales con la mayoría de los países y mantiene vínculos diplomáticos formales con unos pocos. En pocas palabras, la cuestión de Taiwán no está resuelta y no creo que sea muy poco realista relegarlo a una posición inferior como una dependencia de la República Popular China. Por estas tres razones, espero que estés de acuerdo conmigo en que Taiwán debería figurar junto con los demás países. -- Île flottante ( charla ) 14:34, 20 de julio de 2014 (UTC)
Taiwán solicita visa de 30 días para aterrizar en el aeropuerto a los ciudadanos turcos. La información que proporcionaste es incorrecta. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 60.53.226.152 (discusión) 01:36, 1 julio 2015 (UTC)
No creo que me haya topado con ese problema todavía. ¿Puedes darme un par de ejemplos en los que exista esa distinción? -- Joy [schallot] ( discusión ) 20:16 22 jul 2014 (UTC)
Hola, soy BracketBot . He detectado automáticamente que tu edición de la política de visas de Egipto puede haber dañado la sintaxis al modificar 1 "[]". Si es así, no te preocupes: simplemente edita la página nuevamente para corregirlo. Si no entendí bien lo que sucedió o si tienes alguna pregunta, puedes dejar un mensaje en la página de discusión de mi operador.
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, BracketBot ( discusión ) 12:35 18 ago 2014 (UTC)
Hola, soy BracketBot . He detectado automáticamente que tu edición de Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos israelíes puede haber dañado la sintaxis al modificar 1 "[]". Si es así, no te preocupes: simplemente edita la página nuevamente para corregirlo. Si no entendí bien lo que sucedió o si tienes alguna pregunta, puedes dejar un mensaje en la página de discusión de mi operador.
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, BracketBot ( discusión ) 12:40 18 ago 2014 (UTC)
Estoy de acuerdo con lo que dijiste. Saqué el cuadro de información e hice una sección separada para el mapa. También agregué una leyenda. (No estoy seguro si quieres continuar la conversación en mi página de discusión, en tu página de discusión o como está ahora).— Michael Jester ( discusión · contribuciones ) 22:43, 26 de agosto de 2014 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights. Cuando miro las políticas y requisitos de visado de los países, me llaman la atención los mapas que has subido y actualizado. En primer lugar, tengo que decir que el mapa que estás usando está preparado de forma muy amateur. Según un mapa erróneo, Islandia y Groenlandia pertenecen a Noruega , Cerdeña a Francia , Chipre a Grecia , Malta a Italia , Dinamarca a Suecia , Reino Unido a Francia :) , ¿las Islas Malvinas a Argentina ? Además, la Unión Europea no debería utilizarse como un único país, ya que todos los países no son miembros de Schengen. ¿Qué opinas de esto? Maurice Flesier ( discusión ) 23:50 6 septiembre 2014 (UTC)
Justifica tus continuas reversiones.-- Zyzzzzzy ( discusión ) 11:12 9 sep 2014 (UTC)
Tu historial de edición reciente en Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos israelíes muestra que actualmente estás involucrado en una guerra de edición . Para resolver la disputa de contenido, en lugar de volver atrás, considera usar la página de discusión del artículo para trabajar hacia la creación de una versión que represente el consenso entre los editores. Consulta BRD para saber cómo se hace esto. Si las discusiones llegan a un punto muerto, puedes publicar una solicitud de ayuda en un tablón de anuncios relevante o buscar una resolución de disputas . En algunos casos, es posible que desees solicitar la protección temporal de la página .
Si participas en una guerra de ediciones, es posible que te bloqueen para editar , especialmente si violas la regla de las tres reversiones , que establece que un editor no debe realizar más de tres reversiones en una sola página en un período de 24 horas. Deshacer el trabajo de otro editor, ya sea en su totalidad o en parte, ya sea que involucre el mismo material o uno diferente cada vez, cuenta como una reversión. También ten en cuenta que, si bien violar la regla de las tres reversiones a menudo conduce a un bloqueo, aún puedes ser bloqueado por guerra de ediciones, incluso si no violas la regla de las tres reversiones , si tu comportamiento indica que tienes la intención de continuar revirtiendo repetidamente. Dreadstar ☥ 20:51, 23 de octubre de 2014 (UTC)
Sí, gracias por hacérmelo saber. Gracias por la sugerencia de usar la página de discusión del artículo, pero si quisieras echar un vistazo a Talk:Visa requirements for Israeli citizens (Discusión: Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos israelíes) , verías una discusión bastante larga e infructuosa. En cuanto a pedir ayuda después de que la discusión llega a un punto muerto, lo siento, pero por experiencia personal la mayoría de las personas involucradas en esos tablones de anuncios no están interesadas en ayudar en absoluto. He tenido algunas experiencias realmente malas en las que he expuesto todos los problemas solo para que una persona que se suponía que debía invertir más de un minuto de su tiempo en ese asunto, lo que claramente era demasiado, me haya desestimado. De todos modos, si estás dispuesto a actuar de manera diferente, por favor participa, he puesto un enlace a la página de discusión. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 20:56, 23 de octubre de 2014 (UTC)
Esta es una cita tuya , Dreadstar, de la página de discusión del otro usuario que estaba eliminando contenido.
Entonces, ¿cuál es?
No hace falta mencionar que el otro usuario es manipulador al máximo, usa todas las políticas equivocadas de Wikipedia al azar para justificar sus acciones y miente sobre los demás sin un arrepentimiento. Pero supongo que las palabras dulces te llevan mucho más lejos que las palabras duras por aquí. Lamento no ser muy bueno en la primera categoría, y lamento estar muy a menudo en la segunda, pero no debería ser una excusa para estar en esta ridícula situación.
Podría haber escrito este mensaje de otra manera, podría haber escrito lo mucho que lo siento, que nunca volvería a hacer algo así, pero para eso tendría que tener un incentivo en forma de "escucha, la próxima vez que alguien elimine contenido fuente lo trataremos de esta manera>>>", pero no he visto eso. No hay ni una sola pista de que haya algún plan para el futuro. Lamento haber violado las 3RR, pero no simplemente por violarlas, sino por estar en la situación en la que esa era la única opción. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 11:49 24 oct 2014 (UTC)
Hola Twofortnights. Sé que actualizaste el archivo File:Visa free map for Colombian citizens.png , ¿podrías incorporar esta información en File:Requerimientos de visa para colombianos.svg ? porque ambos son el mismo mapa, y el segundo mapa fue creado primero. Así que este se mantendrá y los demás se eliminarán. Gracias -- Luisfege ( discusión ) 19:25 24 oct 2014 (UTC)
¡Hola! Sé que tienes experiencia en la elaboración de mapas para las páginas de políticas y requisitos de visas y me preguntaba si me harías un favor y crearías uno para los requisitos de visas para los ciudadanos de Zambia . Por favor, hazlo. €smost πк 11:49, 25 de noviembre de 2014 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights. Creo que deberíamos crear una página aparte para "Schengen de Sudáfrica". Visa universal Kavango-Zambezi. En mayo de 2015, habrá una visa única para cinco países. http://www.kazavisa.info/index.php/about/overview Ahora está la sección sobre la política de visados para Zambia y Zimbabwe. ¿Qué opinas al respecto? Norvikk ( discusión ) 16:14 6 dic 2014 (UTC)
Me gustaría hablar sobre el tema del artículo Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos argelinos . La IP que revertiste me llegó a través de una de las fuentes, pero cuando hice clic en la fuente, me llevó a una página en blanco. En el sitio web original noté que requiere el inicio de sesión de un miembro para continuar. Si simplemente pongo esto en mi barra de direcciones, dice que no tengo permiso para acceder al servidor. Eso está bien si puedes ver lo que hay del otro lado, así que solo tú puedes tratar con esa IP porque no puedo ver nada del otro lado. Si quieres puedes responderle aquí en mi página de discusión . Gracias.-- ¡ Aparece una Abigail salvaje! Captúrame. Se mueve. 00:28, 7 de diciembre de 2014 (UTC)
Hola. Gracias por tus recientes modificaciones. Wikipedia agradece tu ayuda. Sin embargo, hemos notado que cuando editaste Visa policy of Qatar , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación Georgia . Estos enlaces casi siempre son involuntarios, ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de títulos de artículos del tipo "¿Quiso decir…?". Lee las preguntas frecuentes • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject de DPL .
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:58, 15 de diciembre de 2014 (UTC)
Gracias, Ridwan Jazz Arifin. Es extraño, sin embargo, que Indonesia le haya prometido esto a Japón, por lo que Japón también ha abolido las visas para los ciudadanos indonesios. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 19:41 9 ene 2015 (UTC)
¿Cómo se llama el administrador que te bloqueó a ti y al vándalo?
¿Qué otro administrador te bloqueó erróneamente?
Quiero ayudar a Wikipedia y librarla de la corrupción. Es probable que el administrador que te bloqueó sea un vándalo que ascendió y quiere lastimar a personas inocentes. Es como un violador o asesino en serie.
Wowee Zowee público ( discusión ) 20:32 31 ene 2015 (UTC)
Tienes un error enorme en todos tus artículos. No especificas qué tipo de visa. Alguien podría asumir que es una visa de turista, pero no lo especificas. Wowee Zowee público ( discusión ) 20:33 31 ene 2015 (UTC)
Hola, noté que editaste la política de visas de Nepal para usar un mapa PNG en lugar del mapa SVG existente que incluí allí. Realizaste el cambio el 26 de abril de 2014. No proporcionaste un resumen de la edición, así que me pregunto por qué hiciste este cambio. El mapa PNG no parece ser una mejora, porque a diferencia del mapa SVG no es escalable. Además, tiene líneas que van desde Islandia hasta los continentes. Sin embargo, estoy muy agradecido por tu eliminación del spam y el vandalismo en este artículo. -- AlexanderVanLoon ( discusión ) 07:17, 4 de febrero de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights , me he dado cuenta de tu edición y tu comentario. Si echas un vistazo a la herramienta de rellenado, verás que no se han podido rellenar estas referencias. En mi opinión, es mejor convertir estas referencias en enlaces simples. ¿No? Lotje ( discusión ) 12:54 3 mar 2015 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights ! En primer lugar, ¡felicidades por tu trabajo! Sólo tengo una observación. En cuanto a la política de Visas de Mozambique y sus correcciones, parece que la Visa a la Llegada sigue siendo válida para los países que albergan una embajada. La diferencia es que si no solicitas con anticipación estarás pagando un 25% más por la tarifa. Cfr. [7]. En portugués: Visto de fronteira (extranjero proveniente de países donde no haja embaixada ou representación consular moçambicana, ou, havendo aquelas, será concedido mediante o pago adicional de 25% sobre a taxa a pagar . Válido por 30 días, prorrogáveis até 60 días) . Si buscas en timaticweb los países que albergan una embajada de Mozambique, dice (en el caso de Brasil, por ejemplo [8]): Emisión de visa: Se requiere visa, excepto que los nacionales de Brasil pueden obtener una visa a la llegada por un máximo de 10 días. Estancia de 30 días en Beira (BEW), Nampula (APL), Maputo (MPM), Pemba (POL), Tete (TET) y Vilankulo (VNX). Por favor, tenedlo en cuenta. ¡Muchas gracias! --Quodagis
Quodagis, he buscado información al respecto y he encontrado que la página web de la embajada de Mozambique en Washington tiene esta advertencia: "NOTA. SE DEBE OBTENER UNA VISA ANTES DEL VIAJE EN LOS SERVICIOS CONSULARES YA QUE NO SE PUEDE EMITIR UNA VISA AL LLEGAR A CUALQUIERA DE LOS PUNTOS DE ENTRADA DE MOZAMBIQUE. SI USTED NECESITA UNA VISA PARA LA FRONTERA, DEBE SOLICITAR UNA AUTORIZACIÓN PREVIA DE LA Direcção Nacional de Migração". - http://www.embamoc-usa.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=89&Itemid=64 ¿Es posible que [9] esté desactualizado y no refleje los últimos cambios?-- Twofortnights (discusión) 17:42 7 mar 2015 (UTC)
-- Twofortnights , gracias por tu respuesta! Parece que las últimas noticias tienden a decir que el Gobierno quiere reforzar la seguridad y aplicar de manera absoluta la obligación de visado para aquellos países que albergan una embajada de Mozambique. Véase por ejemplo: [10]; [11]. En cualquier caso, yo no me arriesgaría... Esperemos un poco para ver qué pasa. Quodagis 18:39, 7 de marzo de 2015 (UTC)
Con el debido respeto, mi edición no fue disruptiva en absoluto. Simplemente restauré la imagen original (que reemplazaste en junio de 2014). En los artículos sobre requisitos de visa, normalmente usamos el color verde o azul para la visa electrónica. Un tono naranja es confuso porque normalmente asociamos el color con una política restrictiva. 152.3.43.196 ( discusión ) 16:16 14 mar 2015 (UTC)
Hola, ya que parece que tienes mucho tiempo para estos artículos, ¿podrías corregir la política de visados de Moldavia para que indique que se aceptan los documentos de identidad biométricos europeos? En Francia, por ejemplo, no se aceptan, por lo que se necesita un pasaporte, pero yo, como sueco, puedo utilizar perfectamente el mío (ya he realizado la corrección para Suecia, como ya sabes).
Al utilizar este sitio se pueden buscar todas las naciones europeas una por una y ver cuáles pueden utilizar sus tarjetas de identificación.
¡Hola Twofortnights! Hablo muy poco inglés. ¡Debo decir que el mapa de la Política de visados de Turquía es incorrecto! Si miras esta página, podrás ver que los ciudadanos iraquíes que tengan un pasaporte ordinario deben obtener un visado en la dirección www.evisa.gov.tr. Solo se aceptarán visados para los titulares de pasaportes diplomáticos y de servicio iraquíes. Por lo tanto, el mapa de la Política de visados de Turquía es incorrecto. Emresunay ( discusión ) 12:11 29 mar 2015 (UTC)
Una vez que en un pasaporte ordinario aparece la indicación "para asuntos públicos", significa que el viajero viaja por asuntos públicos, ya no es "ordinario", por lo que es bueno combinarlo con el pasaporte diplomático, de servicio, etc. -- Susurro del corazón 20:34, 4 de abril de 2015 (UTC)
Actualmente, parece que estás involucrado en una guerra de ediciones según las devoluciones que has hecho sobre la política de visas de China . Se espera que los usuarios colaboren con otros, que eviten realizar ediciones que generen disrupciones y que intenten llegar a un consenso en lugar de deshacer repetidamente las ediciones de otros usuarios una vez que se sabe que hay un desacuerdo.
Tenga en cuenta especialmente que la política de Wikipedia sobre conflictos de edición establece lo siguiente:
En particular, los editores deben tener en cuenta la regla de las tres reversiones , que dice que un editor no debe realizar más de tres reversiones en una sola página en un período de 24 horas. Si bien las guerras de ediciones en Wikipedia no son aceptables en ninguna cantidad y pueden llevar a un bloqueo, es muy probable que romper la regla de las tres reversiones lleve a un bloqueo . Si se encuentra en una disputa de edición, use la página de discusión del artículo para discutir los cambios controvertidos; trabaje hacia una versión que represente el consenso entre los editores. Puede publicar una solicitud de ayuda en un tablón de anuncios apropiado o buscar la resolución de la disputa . En algunos casos puede ser apropiado solicitar la protección temporal de la página . L iz ¡Lee! ¡Discute! 14:42, 5 de abril de 2015 (UTC)
Hola. Gracias por tus recientes modificaciones. Wikipedia agradece tu ayuda. Sin embargo, notamos que cuando editaste Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos rusos , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación San Andrés, Colombia . Estos enlaces casi siempre son involuntarios, ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de títulos de artículos del tipo "¿Quiso decir…?". Lee las preguntas frecuentes • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject de DPL .
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:22, 7 de abril de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, gracias por el aviso. Quise actualizar Paraguay y terminé modificando Perú. Gracias por la rectificación. Podrías hacer otro cambio de solo quitar toda la sección de reciprocidad para la política de visas de India ya que India ya no da más visas a la llegada o más bien actualizar la VOA como visa e-Tourist en toda la tabla y agregar los países como Senegal en la tabla. Saludos.... — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 46.193.64.19 ( discusión ) 18:12, 30 de abril de 2015 (UTC)
¿Por qué se niegan a aceptar el recuento actualizado y quieren cumplir con el informe que tiene un año? Puedo ver otras páginas de requisitos de visa de otros países que usted actualizó casi hasta el día de hoy, sin dar cuenta a Henley & Partners. Por ejemplo, el recuento de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos se actualizó ayer, Qatar, Jordania y Egipto se actualizaron según los últimos cambios en las restricciones de visa. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 31.209.107.137 ( discusión ) 16:38, 7 de mayo de 2015 (UTC)
Bueno, intenta contar los países y territorios que otorgan acceso sin visa/a la llegada según la tabla en la que ambos estamos de acuerdo (con las referencias proporcionadas) y obtendrás un 44. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 31.209.107.137 ( discusión ) 20:07, 7 de mayo de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, tengo un problema con la referencia que haces de Henley & Partners. (Requisitos de visado para ciudadanos checos y requisitos de visado para ciudadanos de la Unión Europea). Gracias. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por JanPodany ( discusión • contribuciones ) 05:52, 8 may 2015 (UTC)
¿Podrías mostrarme entonces el informe que indica que los ciudadanos qataríes tienen acceso sin visado a 75 países? Ya que he consultado el informe, te estarás ateniendo a él (Henley & Partners 2014) y dice 71. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 31.209.107.137 ( discusión ) 16:43 8 may 2015 (UTC)
Parece que nuestro editor de IP prohibido ha vuelto con un nuevo host. [14] Eliminando material citado y añadiendo material no citado. W C M correo electrónico 22:02, 16 de mayo de 2015 (UTC)
Gracias por tu consejo, he modificado el mapa original que subí. Intenté varias veces usarlo como la versión actual, pero resultó que se revirtió y se archivó. ¡Echa un vistazo al historial del MAPA y observa los ajustes y luego, si puedes, haz que el que hice aparezca en la página principal! Muchas gracias fidelovkurt 20:13, 17 de mayo de 2015 (UTC)
En relación con el reciente acuerdo recíproco entre Schengen y los Estados vicentinos, como usted ha señalado en el caso de Islandia, en los sitios web islandeses se dice que los ciudadanos vicentinos ya no necesitan visados, pero la IATA dice que sí. En estas circunstancias, ¿sabe qué ocurrirá si un ciudadano vicentino intenta subir a un avión con destino a Islandia sin un visado Schengen? ~ Hairouna ( discusión ) 13:25 29 may 2015 (UTC)
Señor Two Fortnights, nos gustaría informarle que la página de Jamaica ha sido editada en base a la información proporcionada por la embajada de Jamaica en Kuwait. Por lo tanto, no intente cambiar la información que es correcta. Lo único que se puede cambiar es el mapa para mostrar los países actualizados. De lo contrario, todos los datos sobre qué países otorgan Evisa o Visa a la llegada, etc. son correctos. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por Lifeboarddubai ( discusión • contribuciones ) 06:59, 2 de junio de 2015 (UTC)
Bueno, he proporcionado los enlaces con los que he verificado los detalles que he publicado. Entonces, si he proporcionado los enlaces con pruebas, ¿por qué los cambias? — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Lifeboarddubai ( discusión • contribuciones ) 13:48, 2 de junio de 2015 (UTC)
He ejecutado los cambios que me pediste. ¿Puedes proporcionarme un mapa actualizado porque no sé cómo crear mapas? — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por Lifeboarddubai ( discusión • contribuciones ) 07:30, 3 de junio de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, soy ReferenceBot . He detectado automáticamente que algunas ediciones que has realizado pueden haber introducido errores en las referencias. Son los siguientes:
Por favor, revise estas páginas y corrija los errores resaltados. Si cree que se trata de un falso positivo , puede informarlo a mi operador. Gracias, ReferenceBot ( discusión ) 00:32 4 jun 2015 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights ,
¿puedes revisar las ediciones recientes de esta página y ver si son correctas? Algunas de las ediciones parecen deshacer ediciones anteriores de esta IP, pero es muy probable que estés familiarizado con esta página y puedas evaluar si la nueva información es verdadera. ¡Gracias! L iz ¡Lee! ¡Habla! 12:59, 5 de junio de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, Twofortnights .
¿Hay alguna razón específica por la que se haya revertido una pequeña edición que hice [16]? Solo estaba intentando mantener la coherencia de esa columna porque ayuda a la hora de buscar qué países han abierto la visa electrónica. Esa celda era la que no encajaba. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Ratheesh.pisharody (discusión • contribuciones ) 03:13, 12 de noviembre de 2018 (UTC)
Hola, ¿podría modificar el mapa de la política de visados de Irán para que ya no diga que hay condiciones para la visa a la llegada? He descubierto que el código de preaprobación no es necesario y se lo he comunicado a Timatic, que ha corregido su información. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 13:37 29 jun 2015 (UTC)
==Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos tunecinos==Primero, estimado colaborador de Wikipedia, no sé si es la página de discusión y si estoy escribiendo en el lugar verdadero. Bueno, sobre los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos tunecinos, gracias por agregar a Irán en verde para mostrar que es un país con VOA, pero, por favor, ¿le gustaría agregar Bengladesh también? Y para el Líbano, los ciudadanos tunecinos no requieren visa, es una visa de entrada que requiere solo los tres documentos. Los nacionales de los países árabes pero no del CCG (Argelia, Isla Comers, Yibuti, Egipto, Irak, Libia, Marruecos, Mauritania, Somalia, Sudán, Túnez, Yemen) pueden obtener su visa en el aeropuerto siempre que estén en posesión de lo siguiente: - Un boleto de ida y vuelta no reembolsable - Una reserva de hotel o dirección de residencia - 2000 USD en efectivo o un cheque de un banco reconocido y le proporcionaré 2 recursos oficiales la oficina de turismo del Líbano http://www.lebanontourism.com/TravelerTools/visa.asp en árabe intente leer la parte 8 para ahttp://www.general-security.gov.lb/Entry_visa/visa.aspx Dirección General de Seguridad General del Líbano aunque puedes comprobar un problema en inglés en el sitio web intentaré hacerlo en otros idiomas pero me dijo lo mismo que la oficina de turismo en francéshttp://www.general-security.gov.lb/Entry_visa/sub3-(1).aspx dice en francés copiaré y pegaré Los residentes de los países árabes que no son miembros del Golfo que llegan por razones puramente turísticas:
Una visa gratuita de un mes, prorrogable solo 3 meses a petición del interesado, para los recursos disponibles en procedencia de los siguientes países:
Algérie, Djibouti, Egypte, îles Comores, Iraq, Jordanie, Libye, Maroc, Mauritanie, Somalia, Sudán, Tunisie, Yémen- Un Billet d'avion Aller-Retour no reembolsable
- Una reserva de hotel o dirección clara y nette de un lugar de alojamiento fijo, además de un número de teléfono
Entonces, ¿te gustaría cambiarlo a visa de entrada y agregarlo también en el mapa? Gracias.
- Un somme d'argent liquide, un montante equivalente a 2.000 dólares americanos, o un cheque bancario de este montante, certificado por la banca correspondiente.
Hola, tengo un dilema con respecto a la aceptación de documentos de identidad franceses en Santa Lucía. Envié un correo electrónico directamente al aeropuerto de Hewanorra diciendo que soy un ciudadano francés que planea un viaje de 10 días. Dijeron que no se aceptaría un documento de identidad francés. Luego reenvié la respuesta a la IATA, que se puso en contacto con sus fuentes. Aparentemente, me respondieron que, después de todo, los franceses pueden usar sus documentos de identidad durante un máximo de 14 días.
No sé qué pensar. ¿En serio el propio aeropuerto me dio información errónea? Lo pregunto porque quiero modificar la información de Wikipedia según lo que sea correcto.
A continuación se muestra mi correspondencia con el aeropuerto y la IATA [17] [18] André Devecserii ( discusión ) 15:04 2 jul 2015 (UTC)
He tenido conocimiento de que, según Timatic, Turquía exige que los pasaportes de Georgia, Holanda, Italia, Chipre del Norte, Liechtenstein, Malta y Grecia sean válidos, a la llegada, durante el período de exención de visado o visado electrónico más otros 60 días (es decir, normalmente 150 días). Sin embargo, los documentos de identidad de esos países solo deben ser válidos a la llegada.
Al leer esto, tengo la impresión de que, de hecho, la exención del límite de validez no solo se aplica a los documentos de identidad, sino a los documentos de viaje en general para aquellos ciudadanos que sí tienen la opción de utilizar un documento de identidad.
¿Crees que sería una buena idea ponerte en contacto con el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y preguntar? Definitivamente, parece que se trata de un posible error de comunicación con la IATA.
De manera similar, para Dominica, se establece que los pasaportes franceses deben ser válidos al llegar, mientras que los documentos de identidad pueden tener una validez máxima de 5 años si fueron emitidos entre el 1 de enero de 2004 y el 31 de diciembre de 2013, siempre que el titular del documento fuera mayor de 17 años en la fecha de emisión.
Recibí una respuesta vaga de Dominica en la que se indicaba que se podían utilizar los documentos de identidad franceses, pero no me dijeron nada sobre su validez, a pesar de que pregunté. ¿Es normal este fenómeno (más flexibilidad con los documentos de identidad que con los pasaportes)? André Devecserii ( discusión ) 21:39 3 jul 2015 (UTC)
Según sus mapas, los ciudadanos de la UE tienen derecho a permanecer indefinidamente en la Guayana Francesa y Nueva Caledonia, pero no en otros territorios franceses. ¿Es realmente así? Pensé que todos los ciudadanos del EEE, andorranos, monegascos, sanmarinenses y suizos podían quedarse indefinidamente en todos los territorios de Francia, y la información que he encontrado parece coincidir. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 22:41 4 jul 2015 (UTC)
Tengo dos problemas. En primer lugar, el sitio web del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores (cuya fecha no se puede determinar con certeza) dice que, para obtener un visado a la llegada para un Iraq no kurdo , uno simplemente tiene que convencer al funcionario de inmigración de que no tuvo la oportunidad de obtener un visado con antelación. Sin embargo, Timatic dice que se debe presentar "una carta firmada y sellada emitida por el Ministerio del Interior de Iraq".
¿Conoce alguna fuente que confirme alguna de las dos versiones? ¿Qué tal son los iraquíes a la hora de actualizar sus sitios web?
En segundo lugar, no encuentro absolutamente nada que sugiera que los titulares de pasaportes del Vaticano puedan visitar el Kurdistán sin visado (o sea, con "visado a la llegada") durante 15 días. ¿Hay alguna fuente de esto? ¿O debería enviar un correo electrónico y preguntar?
Finalmente recibí tu mensaje y te enviaré un correo electrónico. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 23:05 4 jul 2015 (UTC)
¡Hola! Me encontré con este artículo sobre que Kazajstán ha eliminado los requisitos de visado para los estados miembros de la OCDE a partir del 1 de julio de 2015: ([22]) Vi en la página del artículo de Wikipedia que Kazajstán efectivamente va a eliminar los requisitos de visado para los miembros de la organización, sin embargo, no se ha establecido un cronograma. No puedo encontrar ningún sitio web oficial que confirme la información mencionada anteriormente. ¿Ha visto alguna otra información al respecto? Gracias y saludos. Aquintero82 ( discusión ), 16:58 5 jul 2015 (UTC)
No sé por qué siempre se habla de ello, cuando en realidad se trata de una visita sin visado. Incluso el gobierno se refiere a ello como tal. [24]
A menos que tenga una opinión diferente, ¿podría eliminar todas las referencias a esto como "visa a la llegada" en Wikipedia?
Por cierto, mira la lista que aparece en el enlace: no es la misma que la información de la IATA y el sitio me da una buena impresión. Creo que voy a enviar un correo electrónico al gobierno kurdo para preguntar. Si confirman que su lista está actualizada, esto se enviará directamente a la IATA. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 09:51 6 jul 2015 (UTC)
Hola. Gracias por tus recientes modificaciones. Wikipedia agradece tu ayuda. Sin embargo, hemos notado que cuando editaste Visa policy of Gabon , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación Congo . Estos enlaces casi siempre son involuntarios, ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de títulos de artículos del tipo "¿Quiso decir…?". Lee las preguntas frecuentes • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject de DPL .
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:30, 15 de julio de 2015 (UTC)
¡Hola Twofortnights!
Solo quería felicitarte por el excelente trabajo que has estado haciendo hasta ahora con todos los artículos sobre visas. Estoy aquí solo para ayudar y espero que mis aportes te resulten útiles. Espero trabajar contigo para que las páginas sean lo más completas posible.
Mejor — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2404:E800:E61C:9BA:909C:45DB:4298:E0AB (discusión) 15:29 21 jul 2015 (UTC)
Por favor, actualice el mapa de países sin visado de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos. Exodusvisafree ( discusión ) 15:34 22 jul 2015 (UTC)
Hola, hace poco vi que cambiaste el artículo que dice que los titulares de pasaportes mexicanos no necesitan visa para Túnez, sin embargo, el enlace que proporcionaste (así como varios otros enlaces que descubrí) dice lo contrario. [25] La única excepción son los titulares de pasaportes oficiales y diplomáticos. ¿Puedes proporcionarme un enlace que diga lo contrario? Gracias y saludos. Aquintero82 , ( discusión ), 23 julio 2015, 11:19 (UTC)
A diferencia de lo que ocurría antes, no es válido solo por 360 días, sino por un año. Así lo dice la IATA y el aeropuerto de Tbilisi me lo confirmó por teléfono. Por lo tanto, la política de visados necesita un pequeño cambio. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 13:20 3 ago 2015 (UTC)
==Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos tunecinos==Primero, estimado colaborador de Wikipedia, no sé si es la página de discusión y si estoy escribiendo en el lugar verdadero. Bueno, sobre los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos tunecinos, gracias por agregar a Irán en verde para mostrar que es un país con VOA, pero, por favor, ¿le gustaría agregar Bengladesh también? Y para el Líbano, los ciudadanos tunecinos no requieren visa, es una visa de entrada que requiere solo los tres documentos. Los nacionales de los países árabes pero no del CCG (Argelia, Isla Comers, Yibuti, Egipto, Irak, Libia, Marruecos, Mauritania, Somalia, Sudán, Túnez, Yemen) pueden obtener su visa en el aeropuerto siempre que estén en posesión de lo siguiente: - Un boleto de ida y vuelta no reembolsable - Una reserva de hotel o dirección de residencia - 2000 USD en efectivo o un cheque de un banco reconocido y le proporcionaré 2 recursos oficiales la oficina de turismo del Líbano http://www.lebanontourism.com/TravelerTools/visa.asp en árabe intente leer la parte 8 para ahttp://www.general-security.gov.lb/Entry_visa/visa.aspx Dirección General de Seguridad General del Líbano aunque puedes comprobar un problema en inglés en el sitio web intentaré hacerlo en otros idiomas pero me dijo lo mismo que la oficina de turismo en francéshttp://www.general-security.gov.lb/Entry_visa/sub3-(1).aspx dice en francés copiaré y pegaré Los residentes de los países árabes que no son miembros del Golfo que llegan por razones puramente turísticas:
Una visa gratuita de un mes, prorrogable solo 3 meses a petición del interesado, para los recursos disponibles en procedencia de los siguientes países:
Algérie, Djibouti, Egypte, îles Comores, Iraq, Jordanie, Libye, Maroc, Mauritanie, Somalia, Sudán, Tunisie, Yémen- Un Billet d'avion Aller-Retour no reembolsable
- Una reserva de hotel o dirección clara y nette de un lugar de alojamiento fijo, además de un número de teléfono
Entonces, ¿te gustaría cambiarlo a visa de entrada y agregarlo también en el mapa? Gracias.
- Un somme d'argent liquide, un montante equivalente a 2.000 dólares americanos, o un cheque bancario de este montante, certificado por la banca correspondiente.
NS: Estimado colaborador de Wikipedia, ya te escribí esto antes, pero parece que no lo leíste o actuaste así. No lo copié de ningún otro sitio web, solo hice una copia y pegué de la fuente indicada o tal vez no estés actualizado. Intenta abrirlo y leerlo. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por Dr.Majdiii ( discusión • contribuciones ) 23:20, 5 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Por su gran contribución a la redacción de artículos sobre visados para todos los países del mundo.
Por la edición, por su ayuda en la edición de los artículos "Política de visados de Rusia" y "Requisitos de visados para ciudadanos rusos"
. Muchas gracias. Norvikk ( discusión ) 19:31 7 ago 2015 (UTC)
¡Hola! Gracias por hacer estos maravillosos mapas de visas. Sin embargo, me gustaría señalar dos cosas incorrectas en el mapa para los ciudadanos filipinos. El mapa indica que Omán y Jordania permiten la visa a la llegada para los filipinos. Esto es incorrecto, según Timatic/IATA. Además, Surinam y Costa Rica permiten el acceso sin visa a los filipinos, pero el mapa no lo refleja. ¡Gracias! — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 95.90.241.50 (discusión) 11:03, 15 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Respecto a las ediciones realizadas, ¿qué parte de la información has visto que es falsa?
- No deshagas todo. Elimina simplemente aquellos que no te satisfacen, ya sea que se mencionen o no. — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por LibanoGerman ( discusión • contribuciones ) 00:23, 19 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, acabo de escribir el siguiente correo a IATA http://oi61.tinypic.com/5dtff6.jpg
¿Escribí algo que no debía? Se negaron a responderme durante una semana (solían responder en un plazo máximo de 3 días), al igual que no han respondido a ninguno de mis correos desde principios de julio.
Tampoco han hecho ningún cambio al respecto (y siempre me lo hacían saber incluso si resultaba que su información actual era correcta)
Parece que ya no podré extraerles información :/ ¿Crees que podrías intentarlo, dado el tiempo (tanto con el asunto de Mozambique como con otros problemas que has encontrado)? Su dirección de correo principal es [email protected] André Devecserii ( discusión ) 17:19 19 ago 2015 (UTC)
Hola Twofortnights
Saludos una vez más. He estado revisando los artículos sobre visas en los que has trabajado y, en primer lugar, me gustaría felicitarte por el excelente trabajo que has hecho. Sin embargo, una cosa que creo que necesita mejorarse es que deberíamos tener un código de colores estandarizado para todos los requisitos de visa mediante mapas de pasaportes. La mejor combinación de colores es el mapa que utilizas para la mayoría de los pasaportes, por ejemplo, los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos de EE. UU., Reino Unido, Dinamarca y Suecia. La razón por la que digo que este es el mejor código de colores es que nos permite diferenciar de manera efectiva entre países que no requieren visa, ofrecen visa a la llegada, necesitan una visa por adelantado Y permiten que se recoja una visa preestablecida a la llegada. Esta combinación de colores de verde oscuro, verde claro, gris y gris rojizo (para países que permiten una visa preaprobada a la llegada) es agradable a la vista y agradable a la vista.
Sin embargo, este excelente sistema de codificación por colores no se aplica a todas las páginas de requisitos de visado. Por ejemplo, en las páginas de requisitos de visado para ciudadanos croatas y singapurenses, el código de colores que se utiliza es verde oscuro, verde claro y rojo (para los países que requieren visado). Sin embargo, estos dos mapas no distinguen entre los países que requieren visado antes de llegar y los países que permiten un visado preaprobado a la llegada. Por eso me gustaría sugerir que el código de colores que ha utilizado para las otras páginas de requisitos de visado (ciudadanos estadounidenses, ciudadanos daneses y ciudadanos del Reino Unido) se aplique a estas dos páginas. De esa manera, también podemos diferenciar entre los países que requieren visado antes de llegar y los países que permiten un visado preaprobado a la llegada.
No hace falta decir que has hecho un excelente trabajo cuidando estas páginas y estoy seguro de que seguirás haciéndolo. ¡No dudes en escribirme si tienes más comentarios o sugerencias!
Mejor,
Basanth — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:1CDB:95A3:E530:2DAE:54B7 (discusión) 10:07 22 ago 2015 (UTC)
Sí, he echado un vistazo a los artículos sobre los requisitos de visado que, según usted, tienen un código diferente y tampoco distinguen entre los países que exigen un visado antes de llegar y los países que permiten obtener un visado preaprobado a la llegada. De hecho, muchos países sí permiten obtener visados preaprobados a la llegada y, por eso, personalmente, creo que esto debería hacerse diferenciable lo antes posible para mejorar aún más la precisión de nuestros mapas. Una vez hecho esto, podemos preocuparnos por las posibles anomalías que ha mencionado que existen (Asuntos públicos de China, grupo turístico de Bielorrusia, etc.) y hacer los ajustes necesarios a partir de ahí. Sin embargo, por ahora, debería darse prioridad a la distinción entre los países que exigen un visado preaprobados a la llegada y los países que exigen un visado antes de la llegada, ya que se aplicará a bastantes países. En este momento, el mapa cuyo código de colores debería utilizarse como modelo para los demás será "Requisitos de visado para ciudadanos británicos". No solo los países que requieren visa sin visa, visa a la llegada, visa E y visa a la llegada preaprobada están bien codificados por colores, el mapa también es muy agradable a la vista y no es tan llamativo como algunos de los otros (por ejemplo, el rojo en la página de requisitos de visa para ciudadanos de Singapur o el amarillo en Requisitos de visa para ciudadanos suizos ". ¡Felicitaciones por su gran trabajo una vez más, y espero trabajar con usted para mejorar la calidad de los artículos! - Basanth — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por 2401:7400:6000:210A:40E8:8B47:45E3:321F (discusión) 19:43, 22 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, los países que permiten obtener un visado preaprobado a la llegada son aquellos que establecen la posibilidad de obtenerlo según los datos de la IATA. Por ejemplo, Burundi te permite obtener un visado a la llegada si tienes una carta emitida por inmigración de Burundi o Camerún que te permite obtener uno a la llegada si tienes una carta de Le Delegue General de la Surete. No colorees los países que te permiten obtener un visado a la llegada si eres de origen de ese país. Los países que ofrecen visados preaprobados a la llegada como norma general son Azerbaiyán, Bielorrusia, Bután, Burundi, Camerún, Eritrea, Ghana, Liberia, Libia, Nauru, Nigeria, Pakistán, Sierra Leona, Sudán, Turkmenistán y Uzbekistán.
En cuanto a la visa a la llegada vs. la visa electrónica, creo que será una gran idea porque el azul es un color mucho más acogedor y amigable que el incierto color amarillo y será más aplicable para un proceso como la visa a la llegada.
¡Espero que esto ayude!
Basanth — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:210A:40E8:8B47:45E3:321F (discusión) 20:11 22 ago 2015 (UTC)
Creo que podemos incluirlos, porque en el caso de los tres, siempre que la parte que te invita envíe los documentos antes de la llegada, podrás retirar la visa. Es como en Bielorrusia, donde la parte que te invita envía los documentos 3 días antes de la llegada y tú retiras la visa en el aeropuerto. ¡Espero que esto te ayude! - Basanth — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:354C:2007:F420:526E:5BB9 (discusión) 05:18, 23 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Lo entiendo. Creo que deberíamos darle prioridad a los que tienen un aspecto realmente feo (Singapur y Croacia) por el momento y, a partir de ahí, podemos ir resolviendo el resto poco a poco. Si hay alguna forma en que pueda ayudar con los mapas, ¡háganmelo saber! — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:394E:BD55:43D:4077:A1F8 ( discusión ) 05:00, 29 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Hola. En el caso de Singapur, parece que se ha corregido la leyenda, pero el mapa sigue siendo el mismo. Deberías consultarlo cuando puedas. Gracias. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:394E:BD55:43D:4077:A1F8 ( discusión ) 19:55, 29 de agosto de 2015 (UTC)
Mis disculpas, ya lo veo. ¡Excelente trabajo como siempre! — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por 2401:7400:6000:394E:BD55:43D:4077:A1F8 ( discusión ) 20:42 29 ago 2015 (UTC)
Por fin una respuesta sobre Irán :D http://oi59.tinypic.com/slk39h.jpg André Devecserii ( discusión ) 07:37 24 ago 2015 (UTC)
Hola, he realizado adiciones y mejoras a esta página wiki y me he asegurado de proporcionar el enlace de referencia adecuado para cada bit de información posible. Revísalos y siéntete libre de eliminar aquello con lo que no estés de acuerdo, pero no deshagas todo. Saludos,
109.68.191.35 ( discusión ) 07:22 27 ago 2015 (UTC) LibanoGerman
Hola, ¿dónde se indica que los ciudadanos de, por ejemplo, Afganistán o Somalia deben tener un visado o permiso de residencia de la OCDE/Schengen para poder optar a un visado electrónico? Cuando intento introducir los datos de estas nacionalidades y especificar que no tengo visado o permiso de residencia en un país de la OCDE/Schengen, sigue apareciendo que se me puede conceder un visado de entradas múltiples de 30 días si solo cargo una foto y el pasaporte.
Dado que usted tenía una referencia a esto, supongo que solía aplicarse, pero ya no.
Por otro lado, cuando introduzco las nacionalidades que no cumplen los requisitos (Nauru, etc.), rechazan la solicitud de inmediato, a menos que tenga un visado/permiso de residencia en uno de los 50 países "de los buenos", en cuyo caso puedo entrar sin visado durante 90 días en un período de 180 días. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 10:21 12 septiembre 2015 (UTC)
Hola,
En cuanto a los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos colombianos, creo que podrían ser más objetivos y neutrales con respecto a Colombia y hacer un mejor artículo, como el de Chile o Argentina, que incluya diferentes colores para la libre circulación dentro de los países sudamericanos y un mejor mapa e información actualizada.
¿Dijo que mi fuente no era confiable? La obtuve del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Colombia. ¿Entonces sus fuentes son más confiables? Podemos permanecer en Georgia 365 días. No necesitamos visa para ir a Cuba. Trate a los colombianos con objetividad, es mi pedido.
Un cordial saludo, — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Noirdesir1 ( discusión • contribs ) 08:34, 26 de septiembre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola,
En cuanto a los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos colombianos, creo que podrían ser más objetivos y neutrales con respecto a Colombia y hacer un mejor artículo, como el de Chile o Argentina, que incluya diferentes colores para la libre circulación dentro de los países sudamericanos y un mejor mapa e información actualizada.
¿Dijo que mi fuente no era confiable? La obtuve del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Colombia. ¿Entonces sus fuentes son más confiables? Podemos permanecer en Georgia 365 días. No necesitamos visa para ir a Cuba. Los colombianos tampoco necesitan visa para ir a Guyana o Surinam. Traten a los colombianos con objetividad, es mi pedido.
Un cordial saludo, — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Noirdesir1 ( discusión • contribs ) 08:37 26 sep 2015 (UTC)
Está bien, parece que he encontrado una fuente sobre este tema que realmente responde a los correos: un funcionario de inmigración en el aeropuerto de Sulaimaniyah llamado Handren Hiwa. Le pregunté antes si las visitas sin visa todavía eran posibles (porque había oído rumores de lo contrario). Ahora le he pedido que especifique exactamente qué países pueden visitar los ciudadanos sin visa (esperemos que sea preciso al enumerarlos). André Devecserii ( discusión ) 06:06 28 sep 2015 (UTC)
Esto es un poco confuso. Recomiendo no incluir información que se recibió por correo electrónico porque según las reglas de Wikipedia no podemos usar material no publicado como fuentes. En cuanto a los otros dos, se pueden incluir, ya lo hice con la política de visas de Uganda, por ejemplo, o con Bangladesh, Tanzania también. Intentaré hacerlo aquí también. -- Twofortnights (discusión) 17:49 6 oct 2015 (UTC)
No hay aeropuerto en San Marino, por lo que, en teoría, un ciudadano chino no puede acceder a San Marino sin una visa Schengen (debe transitar por Italia). ¿Debería agregarse esto en la página? — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por Ueutyi ( discusión • contribuciones ) 02:04, 6 de octubre de 2015 (UTC)
Nunca supe esto antes, gracias. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Ueutyi ( discusión • contribs ) 00:56, 7 octubre 2015 (UTC)
Vale, pero ¿puedo hacer una pregunta? ¿Por qué hay que cambiar los nombres de los países por otros más pequeños cuando están relacionados con pasaportes diplomáticos, de servicio y oficiales? ¿Por qué no se pueden mantener igual que el nombre original? — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por Jasonwu889 ( discusión • contribuciones ) 00:05, 29 de octubre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, en el mapa de visas para Macedonia dice que los serbios pueden visitar el país sin visa durante 90 días, pero Timatic dice 60 días.
He estado tratando de encontrar información oficial que confirme esto, pero sin éxito (no confío en la IATA en este caso porque sé de un par de errores en su información). André Devecserii ( discusión ) 15:06 1 nov 2015 (UTC)
Hola, me di cuenta de tu comentario sobre la sección de ciudadanos indios que viajan a Macedonia. La base de datos Timatic mencionó la política de exención de visa para ciudadanos indios que viajan a Macedonia tanto en "información de visa de Macedonia" como en "requisitos de visa para ciudadanos indios", aunque no se menciona esto en el sitio web oficial de política de visas de Macedonia. ¿Podría ser un error de la base de datos Timatic o quizás el sitio web oficial de política de visas de Macedonia aún no se ha actualizado? Charlies280590 —Comentario anterior sin fecha agregado a las 13:46, 28 de mayo de 2017 (UTC)
Hola, se ha dicho que los pasaportes de EE. UU. y Francia están entre los pasaportes "más fuertes" del mundo (es decir, permiten ingresar a un número máximo de países sin visa). Intenté estudiar los países sin visa entre EE. UU. y Francia para ver dónde se encuentran y creo que es relevante que los franceses sepan dónde necesitan una visa a diferencia de los ciudadanos estadounidenses. ¿Por qué cree que no es relevante? — Comentario anterior sin firmar agregado por Bouzinac ( discusión • contribuciones ) 06:52, 2 de noviembre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola, tengo un problema con esto. El otro día viajé en tren nocturno de Bucarest a Chisinau y descubrí que al menos en la frontera terrestre de Ungheni (por donde pasa el tren), parece que siguen en vigor las antiguas normas para los documentos de identidad, según las cuales deben ser biométricos.
Yo compartía litera con un ciudadano francés y ambos teníamos únicamente documentos de identidad. El mío (sueco) es biométrico (también tiene el logotipo), mientras que el suyo no.
Los guardias moldavos se mostraron muy escépticos con nuestras dos tarjetas y se las llevaron para examinarlas y escanearlas. Cuando volvieron 30 minutos después, me dijeron que podía continuar, mientras que el francés fue arrestado (con esposas y todo) y arrojado del tren. Cuando les pregunté en mi rumano mediocre (no hablaban nada de inglés) qué estaba pasando, respondieron que habían comprobado y que su documento de identidad francés no era válido porque no era biométrico y que había infringido la ley de inmigración (unas cuantas cosas).
Les mostré el documento oficial en PDF, a lo que asintieron (reconociendo que el documento era genuino) pero dijeron que "actualmente no se aplica aquí" (supongo que se referían a ese cruce fronterizo).
No volví a ver al ciudadano francés.
Al salir del aeropuerto de Chisinau, nadie mostró escepticismo hacia mi tarjeta, aunque el controlador la examinó con mucho cuidado. No vi ningún caso en el que se utilizara un documento de identidad no biométrico, por lo que no puedo decir nada.
¿Crees que esto debería afectar a la información de Wikipedia? Está claro que, si las nuevas normas se han aplicado, no parecen aplicarse en las fronteras terrestres (al menos no en Ungheni). André Devecserii ( discusión ) 11:58 6 nov 2015 (UTC)
Han notificado a la IATA el nuevo régimen de visados :) [34] André Devecserii ( discusión ) 16:40 9 nov 2015 (UTC)
¿Entonces tienes un problema con mi edición sobre los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos rumanos ? Adelante, responde si no te gusta lo que hice. Daybreak Jobbo ( discusión ) 22:55 15 nov 2015 (UTC)
Básicamente tienes dos opciones: 1) Guardar esta revisión para eliminar mi última contribución o 2) Dejarla como está y mantener esa boca cerrada. Daybreak Jobbo ( discusión ) 22:58 15 nov 2015 (UTC)
Hola, ¿podrías echarle un vistazo al mapa de políticas para viajes con documento de identidad para rumanos? Contiene un par de errores (por ejemplo, dice que exigen pasaporte para Groenlandia e Islandia (!!!)) André Devecserii ( discusión ) 14:37 17 nov 2015 (UTC)
Hola, en los mapas de requisitos de visa para los ciudadanos de *insertar país* que necesitan una visa para la RDC, la RDC está marcada en gris, lo que indica que las visas deben obtenerse en las embajadas pase lo que pase.
De hecho, los viajeros que llegan de países sin embajada de la República Democrática del Congo pueden obtener un visado a su llegada siempre que obtengan una confirmación por adelantado, que yo mismo agregué al artículo sobre la política de visados de la República Democrática del Congo. La IATA no lo reconoce, pero lo dice claramente en el sitio web oficial e incluso les envié un correo para preguntarles y recibí una confirmación de que la información estaba actualizada.
Por lo tanto, la República Democrática del Congo debería estar marcada como "rojo-gris" y no como gris en los mapas de requisitos para los ciudadanos extranjeros que necesitan una visa para la República Democrática del Congo. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 12:02 21 nov 2015 (UTC)
Hola,
parece que cumples los requisitos para votar en las elecciones actuales del Comité de Arbitraje . El Comité de Arbitraje es el panel de editores responsable de llevar a cabo el proceso de arbitraje de Wikipedia . Tiene la autoridad de promulgar soluciones vinculantes para las disputas entre editores, principalmente relacionadas con problemas graves de comportamiento que la comunidad no ha podido resolver. Esto incluye la capacidad de imponer prohibiciones de sitios , prohibiciones de temas , restricciones de edición y otras medidas necesarias para mantener nuestro entorno de edición. La política de arbitraje describe las funciones y responsabilidades del Comité con mayor detalle. Si deseas participar, puedes revisar las declaraciones de los candidatos y enviar tus elecciones en la página de votación . Para el Comité de Elecciones, MediaWiki message delivery ( discusión ) 17:03, 24 de noviembre de 2015 (UTC)
Un archivo que usted cargó o modificó, Archivo:Pasaporte de San Cristóbal y Nieves.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Archivos para discusión . Por favor, lea la discusión para ver por qué ha sido incluido (es posible que tenga que buscar el título de la imagen para encontrar su entrada). Siéntase libre de agregar su opinión sobre el asunto debajo de la nominación. Gracias. Marchjuly ( discusión ) 04:32 29 nov 2015 (UTC) -- Marchjuly ( discusión ) 04:32 29 nov 2015 (UTC)
Hola Twofortnights,
Me encontré con muchos artículos que categorizan a algunos países como "VOA limitada". ¿Qué criterios deben cumplir las condiciones de entrada para que se considere a su respectivo país como "VOA limitada"? ¿Grupos de edad? ¿Aprobación? ¿Carta de invitación? ¿Permiso de residencia en otros países? ¿Visas sustitutivas? ¿Grupos de edad? Exactamente...
Espero su respuesta, Saludos, Joseph Sakr JoeSakr1980 (discusión) 17:24 30 nov 2015 (UTC)
En el artículo Visa Waiver Program , hay banderas para Omán, Argentina, .... -- Omda4wady ( discusión ) 07:29 2 dic 2015 (UTC)
Hagan algo con ese tipo que sigue revirtiendo nuestras ediciones. Saludos. — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por JoeSakr1980 (discusión • contribuciones ) 21:31, 4 de diciembre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola,
¿Cómo se puede denunciar una dirección IP por vandalismo?
Saludos, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (discusión) 20:10 7 dic 2015 (UTC)
Hola, el cambio más reciente se refiere a Palau, pero se refiere a la relación y el acuerdo entre la UE y Tonga. Que tengas un buen día. Jan — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por JanPodany ( discusión • contribuciones ) 15:49, 9 de diciembre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola,
En cuanto a tu publicación, eliminé la sección "VoA eliminada gradualmente" porque solo dice que ya no está disponible y que se reemplaza por la visa electrónica. Por otro lado, incluí el punto de que los visitantes de ciertos países que cumplen los requisitos para obtener visas electrónicas pueden obtenerlas a su llegada a través de quioscos. Visité Turquía el verano pasado (julio) en un viaje desde Dubai, donde mi compañero emiratí pudo obtener una visa electrónica en los quioscos disponibles en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Estambul por una tarifa determinada que definitivamente era más de $ 20, pero no recuerdo la cantidad exacta, además, el personal del aeropuerto no fue muy amable y dijo que deberíamos haberla obtenido de antemano. No estoy seguro de si los quioscos todavía están disponibles en este momento, pero supongamos que lo están hasta que haya una prueba/referencia de que ya no lo están.
En cuanto a la sección "A partir de la derecha", tienes razón en el punto de que cada ciudadano normalmente tendría derecho a residir en su país, pero para señalar que los ciudadanos de la TRNC (que desde el punto de vista de Turquía es un país autosuficiente) también disfrutan de la libertad de residencia/trabajo tanto como los ciudadanos turcos. Todos los nacionales de la TRNC, ya sean ciudadanos o nacionales naturalizados, son elegibles y pueden solicitar y obtener un pasaporte turco. Sin embargo, a los ciudadanos turcos solo se les conceden 90 días a partir de la entrada a la TRNC a través del aeropuerto de Ercan, al que solo se puede acceder a través de las aerolíneas turcas (THY, Atlas Global, Peagasus, Onur Air y Borajet) a través de los puertos turcos.
No dudes en contactarme en cualquier momento, Joseph Sakr — Comentario anterior sin firmar añadido por JoeSakr1980 (discusión • contribuciones ) 22:41, 12 de diciembre de 2015 (UTC)
Hola. A su cuenta se le ha otorgado el derecho de usuario " revisor de cambios pendientes ", lo que le permite revisar las ediciones de otros usuarios en páginas protegidas por cambios pendientes. La lista de artículos que esperan revisión se encuentra en Special:PendingChanges , mientras que la lista de artículos que tienen activada la protección de cambios pendientes se encuentra en Special:StablePages .
El hecho de que se le concedan derechos de revisor no le otorga estatus ni cambia la forma en que puede editar artículos. Si no desea este derecho de usuario, puede pedirle a cualquier administrador que lo elimine en cualquier momento.
Ver también:
Hola,
¿Podrías revisar este artículo? Parece haber una discrepancia entre el recuento informado por Henley y el número de países indicados en el mapa/tabla.
Saludos cordiales, Joseph Saker JoeSakr1980 (discusión) 00:17 22 dic 2015 (UTC)
Hola, no sabía que el texto tenía derechos de autor. Pensé que la información debería coincidir con la de la referencia para mayor precisión. Ahora sé más.
Saludos cordiales, J.Sakr 31.209.107.137 ( discusión ) 00:29 27 dic 2015 (UTC)
¡Mis más sinceros deseos de esperanza, felicidad y paz durante estas fiestas y durante todo el 2016! Norvikk ( discusión ) 15:27 2 enero 2016 (UTC)
Hola. Gracias por tus recientes modificaciones. Wikipedia agradece tu ayuda. Sin embargo, hemos notado que cuando editaste Visa policy of Ethiopia , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación Somali . Estos enlaces casi siempre son involuntarios, ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de títulos de artículos del tipo "¿Quiso decir…?". Lee las preguntas frecuentes • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject de DPL .
Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:02, 3 de enero de 2016 (UTC)
Hola,
En cuanto a los informes de los medios de comunicación que sugieren que Qatar y Turquía han abolido mutuamente las visas, ¿se mencionó algo sobre la implementación? Timatic no ha actualizado sus registros. Además, los ciudadanos qataríes aún pueden obtener una visa electrónica en línea pagando un total de 28 USD.
En cuanto al cambio del régimen de visados para los ciudadanos sirios, ¿debería Siria ser un país exento o un país cuyos ciudadanos se beneficien del régimen sin visado bajo ciertas condiciones? Dado que la mayoría de las principales ciudades sirias no tienen fronteras con Turquía y la gran mayoría de los sirios residen en el extranjero de todos modos.
Saludos, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (discusión) 22:28 4 ene 2016 (UTC)
Recientemente revirtió un cambio en los requisitos de visa para ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos que fue realizado por un usuario de IP. No incluyó un resumen de la edición, por lo que no sé por qué revirtió al usuario. Quiero informarle que el material agregado (que Burundi ya no permite "Visa al llegar") era correcto. Revertí la edición y agregaré una cita en breve. (Por favor, haga ping cuando haya alguna respuesta) Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 15:08, 5 de enero de 2016 (UTC)
Hola, gracias por tus modificaciones. ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Me preguntaba de dónde eres y por qué te interesan tanto los artículos sobre visas.
Hola, solo quería informar que la "visa a la llegada" para los Emiratos Árabes Unidos es en realidad una exención de visa. A pesar de lo que dice Timatic, las visas para los Emiratos Árabes Unidos no se emiten en los puertos de entrada. Es solo que los ciudadanos de la UE/AELC (excepto el Reino Unido/Irlanda) están exentos durante 90 días dentro de 180 días, y los demás durante 30 días.
Por lo tanto, la leyenda dorada en el mapa de políticas debería eliminarse y reemplazarse con la leyenda azul existente. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 02:09 10 enero 2016 (UTC)
Hola, Albania tiene una política bastante extraña: aceptan documentos de identidad nacionales de ciudadanos de Australia, Canadá, Hong Kong, Kazajstán, Nueva Zelanda, Singapur y Corea del Sur. Estoy tratando de averiguar cuáles de estos países tienen documentos de identidad con información sobre la nacionalidad. Australia y Nueva Zelanda no, pero Kazajstán sí.
¿Qué pasa con Canadá, Hong Kong, Singapur y Corea del Sur? En Canadá, lo más parecido que se me ocurre es el permiso de conducir mejorado. André Devecserii ( discusión ) 10:05 11 ene 2016 (UTC)
Hola,
¿Podrías volver a evaluar los países que figuran en la sección "Países exentos de visa"? Por alguna razón, Timatic afirma que algunos ciudadanos de los países incluidos en esa sección deben obtener la visa de turista, como Uruguay, Brasil y algunos otros.
Gracias. Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (discusión) 15:05 19 ene 2016 (UTC)
Hola,
Acabo de enviar un informe a un moderador de Wikipedia llamado "Berean Hunter" sobre el Dr. Majdiii, que rompió la regla de las 3 ediciones y se involucró en una guerra de ediciones. He mencionado tu nombre un par de veces cuando fue apropiado. Puedes consultar el informe en la página de discusión.
Continúe con su arduo trabajo. Saludos, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (discusión) 15:34 22 ene 2016 (UTC)
Muchas gracias por tus ediciones. [44] ¿Puedo saber si hay alguna razón en particular por la que i. los países que son territorios dependientes deben estar listados por separado, ii. por lo general no aparecen en la mayoría de las listas similares, y iii. hubo varios usuarios que estaban tan ansiosos por eliminarlos sin ninguna explicación? 116.48.155.127 16:33, 22 de enero de 2016 (UTC)
Estoy sinceramente desconcertado de que sigas recurriendo a una versión que tiene un inglés destrozado.
Tal vez alguien más pueda explicar por qué sus versiones en inglés destrozadas son mejores: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Visa_policy_of_the_United_States&oldid=701340964#Mangled_English.3F BushelCandle ( discusión ) 23:50 23 ene 2016 (UTC)
Sigh, not to be "that guy", but nothing is gained by being hostile towards each other. There was a misunderstanding, such things happen. All of us want to improve information, so let's stick to doing that. André Devecserii (talk) 01:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to ask if it is allowed, according to Wikipedia's guidelines, to add that an unaccompanied minor travelling to South Africa with no one to receive him/her needs to produce a return ticket, hotel reservation and proof of funds at the port of entry. Found this out via e-mail from an immigration officer at Cape Town Airport André Devecserii (talk) 01:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
[46] Thought this would be of interest to you. ILBobby (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Nom, not that I'm aware off. But they they took those actions shortly after the Arab League placed that boycott on Israel. I got to beleive that their foreign policy is influenced by the Arab League's ones in such case Pakistan and Bangladesh offered sending troops to Yemen following the start of the ongoing conflict in Yemen.
Going out of topic, check this article out: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/visa-programme-restrictions-decried-hatuqa-160122194210349.html. If it's implemented already then probably the Visa waiver article should be updated as per appropriate.
Hi Twofortnights,
I noticed that you removed the photographs of the Kazakh passport stamps due to the fact that those were old ones. Yes, that is correct. I just visited Kazakhstan and have arrival and departure stamps in my passport! Would you like me to send those to you so that you can update the Kazakhstan page? Do advise on how I should send it to you if you are interested
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 19:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. The link to the image is here http://imgur.com/Kwv1Uq5
You are free to use it and modify it for any purpose and the name of the copyright holder is Basanth Sadasivan. Also, I thought you should know that those stamps were issued at Almaty International Airport to a citizen of Singapore. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Looks very good- great job on your excellent work- I give you mad props for everything you've done for Wikipedia!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
You forgot to leave an edit summary saying why you didn't like the Visa on arrival section as a multicol list instead of a table. Kendall-K1 (talk) 14:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Well at first, I saw a user editing the visa requirements on the Visa requirements for Mauritian citizens yesterday. I've checked Timatic and it confirms that a visa is no longer needed. Having seen that an agreement have been signed earlier between the two parties made me thing that it's effective as of yesterday. So I went on to the Visa policy of Russia's article and included Mauritius in the visa exempt countries. I have no source stating ratification but Timatic should be enough as a source. I didn't know about the false report exct.. But do you think that ratification is needed? UAE citizens had visa free access to the Schengen region since signing the agreement on May 6 before it's ratification on December 2015.
By the way, do you work for IATA? How do you keep up with all the changes in visa policies of all the countries in real-time?
Have a nice day & regards, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Remember when we discussed the media reports about Qatar and Turkey bilaterally abolishing visa requirements while Timatic maintains the voa/eVisa requirements for Qataris? Check out this tweet by the Qatari embassy in reply to a citizen's inquiry. It's in Arabic but you could translate it on Google. It states that a visa is required but could be obtained online at at Turkish airports.
https://twitter.com/QatarEmbTurkey/status/690630318227873792?s=09
Regards, Joseph Sakr JoeSakr1980 (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, i've made an incomplete visa requirements map for kosovo citizens, it's here: http://s11.postimg.org/42c4taq6r/Visa_requirements_for_Kosovo_citizens.png do you mind fixing it and uploading it? Thanks in advance// Albatalab (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello TwoFortNights,
Thanks for the barnstar you left on my talk page, much respect and regards. Keep up your good work
Joseph Sakr — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeSakr1980 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights,
I was taking a look at your article for Visa policy of Mozambique and would like to point out one factor that you might want to consider- I notice that Mozambique offers nationals of certain countries (Those without a Moz embassy) visa on arrival, while nationals of countries with a Moz embassy must get their visas beforehand.
You might want to make this difference known in the map for Visa policy of Mozambique (Perhaps shade the visa on arrival eligible countries in blue, non visa on arrival countries in red and visa free countries in green?) Doing this will make your fantastic page even more constructive
Great job on all your hard work once again, and thank you for everything you have done for Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just so you know, I just found this. I assume due to Iran having done the same for Georgians André Devecserii (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights
I was looking at your page on the Visa policy of Egypt and noticed that 2 countries (Brunei and Singapore) are shaded in grey (N/A). Upon looking at the IATA data, it seems as though both countries are eligible for visa on arrival for up to 30 days (they should be shaded in light green on the map). Also, I found a more comprehensive list of which countries can obtain a visa on arrival via the Egyptian embassy in Vienna, Austria http://www.egyptembassyvienna.at/visas.htm And you might want to refer to this for more up-to-date information
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Agreed- you have done a fantastic job managing things though so keep it up!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights,
I just wanted to keep you in the loop of a slight change I made to your otherwise fantastically well-managed page on Visa Requirements for U.S citizens! With regards to travel to Cuba, the U.S State department has been explicitly clear that travel to Cuba for U.S citizens is prohibited which is why I have changed to color code for cuba to black (I have included the U.S State department source about this) This black code is following the code we use for all other travel restrictions (E.g. Malaysians going to Israel and Vice Versa) or Israelis travelling to Saudi Arabia and Vice Versa. It is imperative that we make all travel bans known on this page to prevent people from getting false impressions about travel to Cuba. The map for Visa requirements for U.S citizens should also be shaded black where Cuba is for the time being
Hope this helps!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 03:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights! The regular flights are for certain business people who have authorization to visit Cuba. However, as of right now, tourist travel is still prohibited with the exception of those who have a license- until that is lifted, Cuba has to be shaded in black for the time being — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 03:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Yeah I seems a bit funny if that's to why this users feel the need to vanladize.
Probably, in your spare time, I would appreciate it if you would check this page out Visa requirements for Taiwanese citizens and take appropriate action. There seem to be a high amount of vandalism and and unsupported info.
Regards, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi twofortnights, I recently travelled to both countries and have updated visas and passport stamps for both countries. Would you like me to send them to you to be used in the wikipedia article for both visa policies? I notice that the visa on display for Visa Policy of Tajikistan is from 2012 and is outdated, while there is no picture whatsoever for Turkmenistan
Let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I have uploaded both images here! http://imgur.com/a/qO6JM As always, both are in a Singapore passport and you have the freedom to use it in whatever way necessary. Copyright holder is Basanth Sadasivan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't mean to disturb you: but what software/website/etc. do you use regarding the makings of the "visa policy maps" and the "visa requirements map". I intend to use this information to make my own maps for different purposes. Thank you for taking the time to read this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatshouldichoose (talk • contribs) 20:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I apologize for disturbing you at the given moment, but: What software/website/etc. (something of that sort) do you use to make the "visa policy maps" and the "visa requirements maps" on the respective Wikipedia pages? Thank you for taking the time to read this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatshouldichoose (talk • contribs) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Singapore is not shaded in red even though it is visa exempt- please clarify. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi twofortnights, I noticed that visa requirements for Malagasy citizens does not have a map, so I have created one in accordance with the data from IATA http://imgur.com/sRI5FUa Hope this helps! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights- thanks for the tip-off- which software in particular do you use to make the maps under the right license? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.53.78.52 (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC) You can use literally any graphics program.--Twofortnights (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello
This user (192.43.227.18) is on 3 reverts now. I hereby request you to take appropriate measures to deal with the issue by protecting the page or blocking the offensive user if need be.
Thanks & Continue doing your great job. Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the most current update on visa requirements for Malaysian citizens. Can't thank you enough. Having read through some of the threads in here, it is sad to say that the Malaysian authority has not updated its list of visa requirements for Malaysian citizens traveling to other countries. Pittedprunestravel (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, First I'd like to say that I appreciate ur job! So, could you please update the map? At the Visa requirements section u can see that Malawi is actually Visa on arrival[118], but on the map is coloured grey, as if it was Visa Required. Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.235.52.228 (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello there. As much as I appreciate your work, I do hope to point out that correcting your mistake is not vandalism. Your claim to the passport for public affairs being a normal passport is simply wrong, and the discussions have proven to be useless.
http://cs.mfa.gov.cn/zggmcg/hz/hzjj_660445/t1200748.shtml
This is the official source released by the Chinese government. Read the section on Service Passport. It clearly states that PPA is a variant of the Service Passport and its machine readable zone starts with PPCHN rather than POCHN. I do hope you can be reasonable and see for yourself. Use Google Translate if you have to. If you are still inconvenienced, have others translate it for you. Being a senior editor, it's important to get the facts from the official sources to maintain accuracy, rather than "figuring out" them when the real answer is right there. Many Chinese Wikipedia editors have repeatedly tried to correct your mistake with no avail and I guess you just to need to see some proof from the Chinese government.
If you need more references, the page Chinese passport has been updated as well. I dedicated a section regarding the differences between the "old" PPA and the current PPA. The PPA you mentioned was indeed a variant of the ordinary passport, but the government discontinued it in 2006. The current PPA is completely different from the old one with different issuing authorities and everything.
Once again, no disrespect here, just hoping you would come to your senses and correct this. I just hope you and the Chinese editors can settle this for once and all so we don't have to waste time on this subject.
By the way, Visa requirements for Taiwanese citizens has been overhauled, so feel free to look into it and make improvements.
C-GAUN (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry too but let me be absolutely clear: the CHINESE GOVERNMENT has declared it as a Service Passport, not you, not me, no any one else in the discussion. The first sentence of the Service Passport part on the webpage I gave you is an OFFICIAL PUBLICATION, which states "其中公务护照又分为公务、公务普通两个类别", which translates to "the service passports are divided into two types: the Service Passport and the PPA". End of story here. Your evidence clearly cannot triumph over the decision of Chinese Government. I am simply following the accuracy rule, and please don't credit a decision made by the government as "my original research". Passport types are irreverent to what the government says.C-GAUN (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Here's more proof: Article 4 of the Passport Law:
http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/ywzn/lsyw/vpna/faq/t710009.htm
Read the biodata page of PPA again: it was issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which means it's NOT considered as an Ordinary passport.
Again, I have hoped you can open your mind to listen to some voices of reason, I've posted official documents and laws, NONE OF WHICH are my original research, but a decision taken by the Chinese government.C-GAUN (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Good evening. I did changes in article Visa policy of Russia recently. We spoke about Mauritius. You ignore me after that. I have offended you something?
Hi again.
You have been using the term "original research" a lot recently, and now it's just getting offensive. To be clear I only follow IATA and other officially published data in my editing, and TIMATIC was indeed updated earlier this month. Under Wikipedia guidelines, only materials with "no reliable, published sources exist" can be concluded as original research. I would appreciate you using terms like "unreliable data" or "unverified source" instead of crediting me repeatedly for information on IATA.C-GAUN (talk) 19:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I know your first language is not English but this stance is simply absurd. READ THE DEFINITION FOR ORIGINAL RESEARCH AGAIN, AND TRANSLATE TO YOUR MOTHER TONGUE. Has by edits not backed by the IATA? Only edits with "no reliable, published sources exist" can be classified as original research. Now ask yourself this: is IATA really a unreliable and unpublished source?
IATA rules are updated periodically and proving a previous version of the rule is simply NOT possible for anyone who works outside the specific branch of the government. You have stated that the IATA remained static in nearly 2 years is simply nonsense since airlines can face steep fines up to US$10,000 if they do not follow the latest government guidelines. In this case, not only you have refused to acknowledge the latest change on IATA, but you also claimed IATA as inaccurate. Now THAT'S ORIGINAL RESEARCH.
The Mozambican one is not the first time you call my well-documented edits as "original research" like the last time I proved that the Chinese "passport for public affairs" is NOT A TYPE OF NORMAL PASSPORT. Seriously, I really have no idea what your problem is with Chinese-language editors but this has got to stop.C-GAUN (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I have a dilemma here, and was hoping you could give me some advice on how to proceed.
Timatic clearly states the fact that Swedish immigration does not accept Swedish ID cards for travelling directly to a non-EU/EFTA state.
I now found out Finland has a similar policy for Finnish citizens.
I then wrote the following e-mail
The reply I got was this (down in blue)
What the hell? If it's "out of scope", why do they mention it for Sweden, as well as for Estonians and Greeks when flying directly from their own countries to Georgia?
My question is: should I bother sending the response above? Feels like the lower text was just an extremely poor excuse for some reason. I mean, if they didn't include this sort of info in the first place, that would be one thing, but including it for one country and not another is just damn inconsistent, or what do you say? André Devecserii (talk) 10:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Twofortnights,
Regarding the Wikipedia article mentioned above, I would like you to solve the dispute between you and that user who keeps udoing your edits concerning the map. Either have a discussion on the wikipage or apply protection against any unverified edits, because the number of undo-s and the nature of the edits fall beyond wikipedia's terms and conditions and this page should be no exception. Discuss it with the user or take action with fellow mediators. Thank you and may you have a nice day. Regards, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi
I do not understand why you canceled the editing article visa requirements for Russian citizens. See article for Indian citizens. Same rules. where the information is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.237.163.71 (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
for example. I have a French Schengen visa.I can enter in Holland with it and then to France. For Holland I need a French Schengen visa. the information was correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.237.163.71 (talk) 21:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
example. my trip. French Schengen Visa. Russia - Finland (2 days) - Norway (2 days) - Denmark (2 days) - Germany (3 days) - France (4 days) - Russia. I can say that I have been in these countries on the basis of the Schengen visa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.237.163.71 (talk) 21:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I thank you for creation of maps for visa articles and for maintaining relevance of visa maps.
For work on clarification from vandalism of visa maps. Norvikk (talk) 00:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I browsed thoroughly through the MFA and the Tunisian Custom's websites without a clue on entry formalities and guidelines, in such case we should stick to Timatic unless a Tunisian official board states otherwise. Have a nice day.JoeSakr1980 (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Twofortnights! How are you?
Could you possibly change some maps?
+Benin and Equatorial Guinea for visa policy of Chad.
+Russia for visa requirements for Guyanese.
-Moldova. VP of Japan
+Uruguay. VP of Costa Rica
May be better to change colors as national flag?
-Macau +Mongolia, Bangladesh(?), Malawi for Laotian
change the color. Libya for visa policy of Tajikistan. Done. Thank you, Twofortnights.
Visa policy of Ghana. for all AU visa on arrival. Singapore is dark green.
Visa policy of Taiwan. Israel. Thank you.
VP of Rwanda. Burundi, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.
P.S. Great work with statistics! Thank you. Norvikk (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Norvikk thanks for the notice. I have now added Mongolia and Malawi on the Laotian flag. Macau has a visa on arrival policy - Visa_policy_of_Macau#Entry_procedures_for_visa_nationals and I am not sure about Bangladesh myself. It doesn't mention Laos one way or the other.--Twofortnights (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Could you change some maps?
VP of Russia. the map2 +Bahrain, Qatar (only dip.), Oman, Vanuatu.
Russia-Bolivia visa-free (90 days) - 4 maps.
VP of Belarus. Please change it again. Only Israel without Gaza and West Bank.
VP of Ukraine. +China
VP of Singapore. Kosovo (black)
VP of Brunei. Indonesia, Papua province, some pixels are green.
Belarus-Macau visa-free (30 days)
VP of Israel. -South Sudan, Eritrea.
VR for Chinese. +Costa Rica (public affairs)
VP of Palau, VP of Samoa, Solomon Is(?) -Timatic - Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Iceland.
VP of Vanuatu -Iceland(?) Timatic
VP of Marshall Is. -Liechtenstein
VP of Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan 60 days
VP of Belarus +El Salvador
VP of Ukraine, VP of Belarus Belarus-Ukraine unlimited
VP of Uganda -Ghana, +Ireland
VR for Ghanaian Uganda
VR for Vanuatuan, for Estonian non-citizens +Belarus.
VP of Russia map-2 +Bangladesh +Senegal.
VP of the UK +East Timor
VR for Nigerian citizens +Barbados
VR for Taiwanese citizens -Burundi
VP of Ghana +Morocco (part of the AU again from 30 Jan 2017)
St.Kitts and Nevis - Ukraine visa-free
VP of Israel. Palau (different blue)
VR for Russian Sri Lanka (eVisa)
VP of India map2 +Tanzania +Slovenia (dip. only)
VR for Russian Guinea-Bissau visa on arrival
VR for Andorran, San Marino: Australia (green)
VP of Australia -China
this map perhaps contains several mistakes. Senegal, Cameroon, Somalia, Cabo Verde, Malawi.
VR for South African -Andorra
VR for EU citizens the Bahamas (different green)
VP of Ireland East Timor
Please examine an ability to change the red color to grey color on maps for Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Thanks. Norvikk (talk) 18:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
VP of The Schengen North Cyprus pink(?)
VP of Singapore Switzerland (now other green)
VP of Angola +Brazil
VP of DR Congo +R Congo; VR of R Congo +DR Congo
VR of Eritrea -Kenya. VR for Kenyan
VR for Moroccan -Nigeria; VP of Nigeria
VR for Georgian -New Caledonia +Australia
VR for Emirati +New Caledonia +Moldova
VP of Belarus Macao other green
VR for Kazakh Samoa visa free
VP of China third map green for Serbia, Tuvalu, Ecuador
VP of São Tomé and Príncipe -Guinea
VR for Hong Kong +Benin
VP of China second map +Greenland, Iceland and Iraq (dip); Ghana and Mauritania (dip/ser)
VP of Israel +Botswana and VR for citizens of Botswana
VP of Ivory Coast +Philippines
VR for Ukrainian Singapore and Guinea-Bissau (other color); +New Caledonia and Mauritius
VR for British Dominican Republic (other color)
VP of NZ +Puerto Rico
VP of Malaysia Seyshells <=> Maldives
VP of Tunisia Belarus, Kazakhstan (yellow) VR for KZ BY -Tunisia
VP of Malawi Libya (brown); Morocco, Niger, Algeria, Angola, Cuba, Djibouti, Eritrea, India, Ghana, Liberia, Mauritania, Nepal, Oman, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Togo, Turkmenistan (grey)
VR for Uzbekistan. Second map. Seychells, Timor.
VP of Taiwan. Russia (Kaliningrad region).
VR for Bolivian. +Belize, Egypt (VOA).
VP of Uzbekistan +France visa free for 30 days; VR for French
VP of Solomon Is. +Israel visa free under visa exemption agreement from 2017; VR for Israeli
VP of Bahrain +Georgia VoA/evisa; VR for Georgian
VP of Indonesia the second map +Peru — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.45.204 (talk) 17:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
VP of Serbia Malta other green
VP of India dip/ser +Panama, Jordan and St.Kitts and Nevis
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.45.173 (talk) 23:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Norvikk (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I saw a few broken pixels on this map (Russia: where is the Caucasus and Vladivostok (Far East). Could you help to fill pixels? --Norvikk (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC). Thanks. --Norvikk (talk) 19:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I found the application for my device. I can edit maps. Thank you very much for your help. --Norvikk (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
Is it Colombia eVisa? https://tramitesmre.cancilleria.gov.co/tramites/enlinea/solicitarVisa.xhtml
Is it right? Colombia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Visa_requirements_for_Angolan_citizens#Visa_requirements --Norvikk (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, I´ve been following your work and it´s outstanding. Congratulation and keep it up!
I´m a Spanish native speaker, and I´ll be working on creating the Spanish pages with the information. Already have the 1st one: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Requerimientos_de_visado_para_ciudadanos_de_Costa_Rica
As you might also have seen, I´ve been updating the Costa Rica map and keeping it up to date. I also want to volunteer with the standarization of color codes for the maps. I read a previous comment from another editor, and you expose the challenges that each country has. I'll get around it and provide you couple of proposals for different countries.
Here's the link to my sandbox. I'd appreciate your feedback: Luiscotiquicia's sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luiscotiquicia (talk • contribs) 22:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Again, great work!
Cheers, Luiscotiquicia (talk) 20:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Maybe time to change colors on the Visa requirements for Russian has come? To change the "flag palette" on the"classic green palette".
I really feel it will be better. What do you think? --Norvikk (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
May be the colors of the Russian flag would be appropriate on the map for Visa Policy of Russia?
What do you think?--Norvikk (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have a friend who had edited your pages (The other - “Visa requirements for Icelandic citizens”), both twice anonymously. Sorry to trouble you to undo the changes twice. He is working as an immigration officer and he recently realises that Icelandic citizens are to enter Singapore for 90-days visa free with effect from 1st May 2016. May I know how update should be made since you've stated that you know that Icelandic citizens are given 30 days? Now it's after 1st May 2016. Is there any special requirements to approve the changes? -- Nicholas Theodore (talk) 22:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC+8)
Hi. What about Gabon visa system https://evisa.dgdi.ga? Is it
or
? Which is right?
Hi Twofortnights.
Articles contain different information. What information is correct?
Guinea-Bissau. Pre-arranged visa can be picked up on arrival. OR Visa on arrival. May apply online. OR e-Visa? Visa Application System
Rwanda. E-visa for all? [51] "In case where we don’t have a Diplomatic Mission/ consulate, foreign nationals request for a visa acceptance letter online, which will be presented on arrival to obtain a visa upon payment of visa fee ($30)"
Hi.
U.K. statistics. Now maximum information.
How is it better?
1. Top-10, 20, 30?
2. With/without 
?
3. years. 2015/2014 or 2015/2011 or other?
-- Norvikk (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Why are you removing Western Sahara from the visa maps and portraying it as a part of Morocco? No country recognizes Western Sahara as belonging to Morocco and most maps show it as separate, so why are you changing them? I object to the erasure of Western Sahara from the maps you edited. - ILBobby (talk) 05:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Which is format correct?
Timatic|nationality=BB|destination=AL|accessdate=6 July 2014 Or Timatic|nationality=BB|destination=AL?
Date no update in many articles. It information is needed? --Norvikk (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Please, View visa requiments for Russian - ststistics.
The three versions.
1. Main year 2015. In the footnotes 2014 and 2013
2. All the years in the footnotes
3. all year in the table.
Which version is best?
I returned the old version. Statistics in all the articles in the same style. You looked Portuguese statistics? --Norvikk (talk) 14:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
If you can, Please add e-Visa section for above map. Thank you. --112.134.2.171 (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The canadian immigration website. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/visit/apply-how.asp This "May apply "online" for all? --Norvikk (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
This is a mistake?
I think so, because only one part of application can be done online. If you just say "May apply online." it sounds like you can finish the process online like with Australia but you can't.--Twofortnights (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. We will not enter to confuse readers. --Norvikk (talk) 21:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Visitors statistics of UruguayI made a request on the website of the Ministry of tourism of Uruguay on the general mail. User talk:Norvikk#Missing countries
They replied that publish statistics for the MERCOSUR countries. But offered to make a request through the mail Department of statistics.
first answer Spanish Buen día a quien corresponda:
La razón por la cual aparecen individualizadas algunas nacionalidades es porque las mismas pertenecen al Mercosur y forman parte de la información básica que proporciona la Dirección Nacional de Migración.
No obstante nosotros publicamos información más detallada que la que usted comenta; de precisar alguna otra información a la que aparece en nuestra web: /mintur.gub.uy/index.php/es/estadistica le pido nos lo haga saber y le enviamos lo que tengamos disponible
Cordial saludo
I did it. I requested the visitor statistics for Australia, Canada, China, New Zealand, Russia, United Kingdom, United States. They sent statistics .odt file. (I've never encountered this format) I managed to unzip it.
second answer Spanish Estimado:
La información que le brindamos es el total de pasajeros ingresados a Uruguay por todos los puntos de ingreso, son datos proporcionados por Migración, cualquier otra consulta a sus órdenes.
odt Los números corresponden a pasajeros ingresados al país por nacionalidad
This can be considered a reliable source and make edits to articles based on this source? --Norvikk (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
What do you think?
They replied that they publish only to MERCOSUR, the rest on request. Apparently this policy of the statistical agencie. I do not understand why.
Hi. Treasure for you. Can you help with editing statistics?
--Norvikk (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Norvikk, just to map it out what we have missing:
--Twofortnights (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. What type of statistics is more priority? Number of Foreign Visitor Arrivals by Country of Residence / International visitors arrivals by nationality Norvikk (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Two sources- [61] and [62]. Information is different. Which source is correct?
I couldn't find statistics for all the Emirates. We know the statistics for the two Emirates- Abu Dhabi, Dubai. Total.14,200,000+4,105,846=18,105,846 But the total for 2015 by World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) -14,837,000.[63] I think we can use it. What do you think? I made a test edit. [64] --Norvikk (talk) 17:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights!
I would like to thank you for visa map for Bosnia and Herzegovina. I have added one more category which is visa free "on business" (China) but I do not know how to update the image. Could you do that if you have time?
Hello,
You reverted my removal of the Israel section on the Visa Policy of Iran page. I believe there are two reason to remove the Israel section from the page:
I'm not sure whether it's true, but whatever we put in the Wikipedia page, lets at least have at least one credible source (not the Magic Carpet website) to serve as a basis.
I welcome your thoughts
Amin wordie (talk) 03:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Dear Twofortnights
Thank you for all the hard work you've been doing on Wikipedia. I'm from Kuwait and its important for me that the information is up to date and simple to follow. I saw your reversed everything that i've been working on. I found that for example Marshall Islands don't give Kuwaiti citizens Visa on Arrival. Australia has a eVisa. some other countries Like Mexico allow Kuwaiti citizens to visit if they hold a US Visa for example. I tired to make things more clear and also double and triple checked before submitting.
I would like to help make this page easy to follow and up to date with all relevant information.
All your help is much appreciated.
TaB TaB AiE — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaB TaB AiE (talk • contribs) 20:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Twofortnights
I understand that copying copyrighted materials is forbidden, but the information I added on the notes are policies of governments regarding entry to their borders and are not copy righted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaB TaB AiE (talk • contribs) 14:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello there,
http://www.qaiairport.com/en/content/visa-requirements
According to Timatic, citizens of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Lebanon, Turkey, Egypt, and Palestine can visit Jordan without a visa for a certain period of time. However on Queen Alia's International Airport website it states that all nationalities should obtain a visa on arrival which costs 40 Jordanian Dinars valid for 2 months. (Some nationalities should obtain it from the diplomatic mission though most can get it at the airport).
Where does that fall ont? Should we change the info based on the airport's website or stick to timatic?
Have a nice dayJoeSakr1980 (talk) 13:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello there, I've been to Istanbul-Turkey on a business trip on Saturday, right after disembarking the aircraft, going up the stairs there's a banner stating the countries whos citizens are required to obtain an e-Visa on arrival. Suprisingly Qatar is on the list. I've taken a photo and uploaded it here https://postimg.org/image/ws3y1683l , Should we again stick with what Timatic states? or is what the airport states is superior to Timatic? Have a nice day. Feel free tell me if I should upload it to Wiki-commons. Regards, Joseph SakrJoeSakr1980 (talk) 10:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights! Thanks for the very good work at Wikipedia regarding visa policies of different countries all over the world. Generally it seems like most of your changes are correct and trustworthy. Changes from other users are more so so... However, your last changes of the Visa requirements for Norwegian citizens (July 1st 2016) seems to be wrong. You changed Kiribati, Marshall Islands and Tuvalu with references to Timatic. However, when I check the Timatic references, they clearly agree with the old revision of this wiki, i.e. "Visa required" on Kiribati, and "visa on arrival" in Marshall Islands and Tuvalu (not "Visa not required" on any of them). Do you know anything that Timatic does not know? Espen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Espenlok (talk • contribs) 16:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
May I politely confess that I have done some graphical changes to that map? That is not a personal insult to your great work, but a little discontent with the graphical outcome. In my humble opinion, it is easier to discuss about a graphical work that is already visible. However, some people have asked me whether I am a vandal. Feel free to join the discussion on Talk:Visa_requirements_for_Russian_citizens --Benutzer:Kapitän Nemo (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a question at the Teahouse regarding your revert at Visa requirements for Egyptian citizens. It is tremendously helpful to new editors if you provide an edit summary when reverting their contributions, especially if they can plausibly interpreted as good faith. From WP:ES:
The two seconds it would take you to provide one both helps editor retention and reduces the burden on the Teahouse and similar forums. Thanks. Joe Roe (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Heyyyy buddy !
Did you read the text and had the feeling that it was personal analysis, Then your logic and feelings are totally messed up !
I am writing facts and you keep deleting them. What's your problem? Are you OK?
You can ask anyone who has gone to mexico international airport, the arrangement is different from all other international airports and that causes problem for people who need visa to mexico.
You don't ask for evidence. you just keep deleting my text. You really have problems ! I bet you won't even read this ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moskovitskaya (talk • contribs) 23:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Saint Kitts and Nevis passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
This is a tricky issue - I asked IATA to look into this last summer and their sources apparetly said only French cards were accepted.
However, I mailed the Dominican head of immigration im March this year, asking specifically about French, Swedish and German cards (also attaching images). He then said all of these were OK.
Correspondance
When asking if this applied to all EU citizens, I got no reply.
I then went to Dominica by ferry, and getting in was completely painless.
I've sent my IATA contact guy another mail, attaching the correspondence with the head of immigration. This needs to be clarified.
André Devecserii (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, It says on the Visa Policy of Canada article that US permenent residents are exempt from holding an ETA.
This is false - although a national who normally needs a visa for Canada but holds a US permenent resident card don't need a Canadian visa, they do need an ETA.
Consequently, once the leniency period ends, a passport (or US Refugee travel document/I-571, or US permit to re-enter/I-327) will be required to fly to Canada (as opposed to only bringing the green card, which will now only be possible when entering by land or sea)
Source here
André Devecserii (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to let you know that there are two significantly different versions of Serbia's visa policy, and both should be mentioned in the article, similar to how it's done in the one about Bangladesh.
I will contact the Serbian MFA about this and ask for an explanation, and if they insist their info is the correct one, I'll write to my IATA contact guy. André Devecserii (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
IATA list:
Indefinitely: Monaco, Montenegro
90 days: South Korea
90 days in a 6-month period:
60 days: Macedonia
30 days: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia
30 days in a 2-month period: Ukraine
14 days: Hong Kong
MFA list
Indefinitely: Albania, Monaco
90 days: Andorra, Argentina (tourism only), Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macau, Macedonia, Malta, Mexico, Moldova (biometric passport), Mongolia, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, San Marino, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Vatican City.
90 days in a 6-month period:
30 days: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia
30 days in a 60-day period: Ukraine
14 days: Hong Kong
André Devecserii (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Just went on an experimental trip (next-day return) to Maputo, to find out once and for all about VOA.
The US embassy in Maputo claims nationals of countries without a visa (such as me) cannot obtain a visa on arrival.
Timatic says all nationals can.
I can reveal that IATA's version is correct. Absolutely painless - paid 66 dollars and got it pasted in straight away. Passport control stamped me in within 10 seconds.
I don't know anything about the "many Americans" who got refused entry and deported, but to be frank, if this rule was ever implemented, it must have been reverted. Unless you have another explanation? André Devecserii (talk) 23:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Firstly, apologies if I've taken the wrong approach in talking with you; this is my first time doing so on Wikipedia.
Secondly, thanks for all your work on the visa pages; it's nice to 'meet' one of the people putting so much effort into making Wikipedia my first go to reference.
As to why I'm talking now... I updated the page "Visa requirements for New Zealand citizens" roughly this time last year following my experiences as a New Zealander travelling to India*. Shortly after my edits, you reverted my changes with - as far as I can tell - no explanation. If you feel that I was vandalising the page, I assure you I was not. Unless something has changed since last year, I still believe my understanding of India's policy for New Zealand travellers is accurate.
I've changed the content back to my original edit. My original edit had a link to India's policy for New Zealand. I am not, however, looking for an editing war. If you feel that my change was wrong in some way, do let me know.
Kwutchak (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
I realised I made a mistake in the ref tag on my original edit. Perhaps that was what your reversion was correcting?
Kwutchak (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello there sir, it's been quite a long time, please update the article concerning the visa requirements of citizens of Micronesia as the schengen waiver came into force earlier today. It also applies to Romania Bulgaria and Cyprus too.
Hi. Which format is better from the point of view of grammar and sense in English?
60 days, up to 90 days within 180
60 days, 90 days in any 180-days
60 days, 90 days in a 180-day period
60 days, a max. stay of 90 days within any 180 day period
60 days, a max. stay of 90 days within any 180 day period is granted
Or other? --Norvikk (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, could you please read what I wrote at the bottom of this talk page, and make the relevant adjustments (possibly after looking into the Georgian e-visa system yourself, which I already did) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Talk:Visa_policy_of_Georgia#Conditional_EVISA_for_certain_countries André Devecserii (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Alright Twofortnights, here it is: the list of all nationals who are eligible for e-visa. (note that anyone with a visa or residence permit in EU/EFTA/GCC countries, overseas territories of EU countries (except Anguilla, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea or the United States is visa-exempt for 90 days in a 180-day period.)
90 days in a 180-day period:
Bolivia
Cuba
Dominica
East Timor
Grenada
Guatemala
Kiribati
Macedonia
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Palau
Paraguay
Peru
St Kitts & Nevis
St Lucia
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Suriname
Trinidad & Tobago
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
30 days in a 120-day period
Angola
Benin
Bhutan
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
China
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
India
Indonesia
Jamaica
Jordan
Laos
Lesotho
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mongolia
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
North Korea
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Rwanda
Sao Tome e Principe
Swaziland
Togo
Tonga
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
André Devecserii (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Nice work on all of your articles! Please note that Vanuatu don’t need visa for Iceland neither Iceland need visa for Vanuatu (Schengen agreement). Visa requirements for Iceland citizens needs to be updated. Thanks! Ugnius — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ugniushervar (talk • contribs) 02:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, could you just re-update the map? I adjusted the text pisition slightly - looks much more even André Devecserii (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, thank you for your explanation in your most recent edit on Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens. However, may I know on earth is USA reciprocal with Singapore when Americans travelers need no further travel documents other than their personal passport when they enter Singapore? Singaporean tourists can be denied entry in the USA if they do not process a valid ESTA with them. Singapore doesn't ask American tourists to make any payments for their online registration but why is the reverse happening? Hope to hear you clarify on that.
Ivanacurtis reverted my edit on Visa requirements for Venezuelan citizens but he/she didn't remove the "Reciprocity" column on Visa requirements for Serbian citizens & Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens. I wonder what was he/she thinking.
Also, do u edit any articles on Diplomatic Missions? Xinyang Aliciabritney (talk) 05:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, would you mind sharing how you edit world maps? I'd be interested in also contributing to visa policy maps and could use some guidance. Thanks! —Wingedbeaver (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, in the Visa policy of Brazil article it states that Belize is on the list of countries with a visa exemption (and shows this on the map as well). This is not true, we have Belize passports and need to get a visa to travel to Brazil for tourism and business. I made this edit but you undid the edit, can you please change it back?
Source: Brazil embassy in San Francisco - https://sistemas.mre.gov.br/kitweb/datafiles/SaoFrancisco/en-us/file/visa_exception_list.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanaloria (talk • contribs) 16:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Wow, thanks so much you saved me such a headache of trying to get a visa! There is so much conflicting info about this on the internet, it's crazy. Here is another good source to verify that a visa is not required, from the Brazilian embassy in Belize: http://belmopan.itamaraty.gov.br/en-us/visa_to_brazil.xml — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanaloria (talk • contribs) 19:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Twofortnights. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You have reverted changes that I have made to Visa Requirements for Guyanese Citizens for Vietnam and UAE.
[1] Vietnam: On the reference that is cited, it says: 'Visa required, except for Nationals of Guyana arriving at Phu Quoc (PQC) for a maximum stay of 30 days. Visa required, except for Nationals of Guyana arriving at Hanoi (HAN) or Ho Chi Minh City (SGN) with onward tickets for a connecting flight, on the same day, to Phu Quoc (PQC). THUS, VISA NOT REQUIRED.
[2] UAE: Again, 'Visa required, except for Passengers with a normal passport and a confirmation that a visa has been approved before departure can obtain a visa on arrival for a maximum stay of 96 hours, 30 days or 90 days.' THUS, it was changed to e-VISA.
I have made further changes, but before you revert them, here are the exerpts from the same references you supposedly cited.
[3] Bangladesh: 'Visa required, except for Nationals of Guyana with a return/onward ticket and traveling as tourists can obtain a visa on arrival for a maximum stay of 30 days. They can apply to extend their stay.' THUS, VISA NOT REQUIRED.
[4] Panama: 'Visa required, except for Nationals of Guyana for a maximum stay of 180 days'. THUS, VISA NOT REQUIRED.
I question your thoroughness. Did you actually read the references that you've cited?
Eriochrome (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Eriochrome
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eriochrome (talk • contribs) 16:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Additions: [1] UAE 'E-visas can be obtained before departure at www.ednrd.ae. Passengers must have a printed e-visa confirmation and airlines can check the validity of the e-visa on the same site by clicking on "Query GDRFA-D APP". Visa required, except for Passengers with a normal passport and a confirmation that a visa has been approved before departure can obtain a visa on arrival for a maximum stay of 96 hours, 30 days or 90 days.' THUS E-VISA. Did you actually read the reference before you reverted the change?
[2] Bangladesh: I meant VISA ON ARRIVAL, which is what I had on the page. Is it not? Did you change it? I caution you to read the reference before you revert changes. I will make a formal complaint if you continue to do so.
Eriochrome (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Eriochrome
I requre you to correct UAE immediately, else I will submit a formal complaint against you. Eriochrome (talk) 18:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Eriochrome
Hi. I want to ask a question about Timatic. If I see a mistake, I write them, they check and correct. In the last few times they refused to accept the request, because I do not have them paid account to log in to their database. I have a question. Wikipedia uses a reference to a closed part of a paid Timatic's database. Is it legal? Maybe we are all unwitting accomplices? Norvikk (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, my recent edit for Visa requirements for Armenian citizens was reverted by you saying "don't copy paste like that from another website". How should it be copied/pasted then? The source (timatic website) is there and it was taken directly from there. If it's the wrong format then please update the article with the missing info in the correct format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahanovski (talk • contribs) 12:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I changed the visa articles. Add width="18%. It looks better for tablet version.
without
with
Cheers. --Norvikk (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Why was Philippines removed from the list of Visa required countries on the Cuba Visa Policy page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.171.97.57 (talk) 16:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
First, rare situations don't equal to policy violation, edits which are hard to be "seen in any other article" doesn't mean it violates Wikipedia policy. Also, you would better assuming good faith to other editors, I have made essential explanation for things happened before so you can just take it easy, unnecessary anger is bad for your health. Finally, I don't think which things I should stop because I did nothing wrong here and most of my edits are highly constructive. --Whisper of the heart 04:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
According to the map attached to this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Visa_policy_of_India Armenian citizens also can receive E-visa for 30 days. Almost a couple of months ago I asked to edit the maps of this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Visa_requirements_for_Armenian_citizens but no reactions.
Hi,
the website of the Embassy of Belarus in Ukraine. http://ukraine.mfa.gov.by/ru/consular_issues/
Formal visa is not required for any period of time. --Norvikk (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I made a request to the foreign Ministry of Belarus and the Belarusian Embassy in the UK. "Visa-free entrance for 5 days extends to holders of passports of BOTC · BN(O) · BOC"?"
the response from the Embassy: "Добрый день, Спасибо за сообщение. Да, на указанные вами паспорта также распространяется безвизовый режим, т.к. в них в графе гражданство указано British Citizen"
the response from the MFA: "...Что касается Вашего вопроса, разъясняем, что Соединенное Королевство Великобритании и Северной Ирландии входит в перечень государств, в отношении граждан которых распространяется действие Указа Президента Републики Беларусь "Об установлении порядка въезда и выезда иностранных граждан". Таким образом воспользоваться возможностью посещения Беларуси без виз смогут владельцы общегражданских паспортов Великобритании, в том числе Британских заморских территорий и Коронных земель, гражданская принадлежность которых определена как "гражданин Королевства Великобритании и Северной Ирландии", то есть в графе паспорта "nationality" (гражданство) которых указано British citizen (гражданин Великобритании). Граждане Китая, постоянно проживающие в специальном административном районе КНР Гонконг, могут посещать Беларусь только по общегражданскому паспорту САР Гонконг либо по паспорту КНР. ... Начальник Главного Консульского Управления" --Norvikk (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
The second answer from embassy: "The passport has to belong to the citizen of Great Britain, and these territorial units belongs to the EU. Yes, it is necessary to arrive and leave from Belarus through the airport of Minsk." I have got confused in information. It is better not to specify these passports, otherwise there will be a confusion. --Norvikk (talk) 19:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
I just came across with this information, though can not be sure on its authentity as I did not manage to find that warning in the official website of Australia's Ministry of Tourism: http://www.armenpress.am/eng/news/854109/australian-citizens-travelling-to-armenia-to-acquire-entry-visa-in-advance.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.43.141.100 (talk) 03:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have made some changes. I think it is better for mobile version.
was1 now1
was2 now2
Please, change it again if looks bad in desktop version or it isn't pleasant. Thanks. --Norvikk (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you might recognise me from some of the edits I have made to Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens and Visa policy of Singapore.
I have been thinking about changing the standard map used in the articles to this one. The layout is similar, except the latter includes islands and national territories (like India's Andaman and Nicobar Islands and the USA's Hawaii) that are otherwise left out from the standard map. Switching to this version could complement the 'Territories' table included in all visa requirement articles.
The map requires some touching up, which can be done (eg: including circles for microstates, drawing lines to link country mainlands to their outlying territories). I just wanted to know what you think. Also, where do these maps come from? I've tried searching the blank map gallery on Wikimedia commons but to no avail. Tiger7253 (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Why in the section the general rules of entrance for Russia and China are selected (nore1, note2)? All need to have a machine-readable passport, Form I-736 and Form I-94. Notes 1/2 are superfluous? And one more question. In what a difference between "visa-free" and "visa waiver"? In Russian it translates: entry without a visa. --Norvikk (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
I have made changes about which I spoke. If I am mistaken, don't hesitate to cancel my editing. Thank you very much. --Norvikk (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Turkey citizens can get Australian visa from the internet (Online Visitor e600 visa). Can you fix the visa policy map? Do you know how to turn australia green? For example, australia is green in the visa map for ukraine citizens. Thank you Emresunay80 (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello Twofortnights, thanks for your work on visa pages across Wikimedia sites.
I'd like to know if there was an ICA update regarding Kosovo passport-holders being refused entry into Singapore? I don't see this on the current website which was last updated 19 Jan 2016 (typo of 2017?), nor on any of the copies captured by the WayBack Machine, and the only reference on Visa policy of Singapore is a TimaticWeb source, so I thought you might know where else to look. As far as I can tell, the Iraqi S-series passport denials were due to the phasing out of an old insecure passport type in favour of more secure types, as the UK did in 2006.
May I also ask why you reverted QBear's edit? I'm trying to trace when this change took place to see if there was a publicly-stated reason for it, and saw your exchange in the Wikipedia article history.
Thanks! Icedwater (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Åland does not issue their own passports. As your lnk clearly shows, those are Finnish passports as the islands are part of Finland. Cover might say "Åland" but it´s still the same passport. KaMeWa2 (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, please check references before you attempt to remove edits. Visa is in deed on arrival for Egyptian Citizens coming in Indonesia and Malaysia. Unlike countries such as Sudan which allows Egyptians without VISA and accept their national ID card [69] [70].M. Hassan talk here 09:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Twofortnights, do you know if there's any wikipage that lists the citizenships with any forbidden visits? Eg taiwanese cannot enter Georgia, israeli cannot enter Iran, etc ? Thanks, --Bouzinac (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
List of nationalities forbidden at border --Bouzinac (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
I have came across with an information that Armenia is going to make available visa on arrival for Indian citizens holding residence permit of the 5 Gulf Cooperation Council countries (excluding Saudi Arabia). The source is in Armenian though. That newspaper also has an English and Russian sections but I have found that article only in Armenian language. http://hetq.am/arm/news/75525/iraqi-ev-hndkastani-qaxaqacineri-mutqy-hayastan-kheshtacvi.html
Hi, You know visa free countries are divided into two categories: 1. Without a visa 2. Without a visa, but with a tourist card. The Dominican Republic is referred to as "visa on arrival" on maps. I think it must be a "visa free" with the note "90 days (Tourist card $ 10 valid for 30 days upon arrival to purchase)".
Map: VR for British - right; VR for Russian - wrong
Table: VR for Russian - right; VR for British - wrong
What do you think? --Norvikk (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I told this to the IP editor so it only seems fair to inform you as well - you both seem to be engaging in slow-moving edit war behavior. Perhaps next time instead of reverting, leave a message on the talk page explaining your reasoning and pinging the other editors in order to try to build a consensus. If they fail to respond then reverting may be appropriate, but as of yet there have been no apparent attempts except by me to engage in discussion. Thanks, Pishcal (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, You probably noticed the outline of Armenia incorrect on a few maps. Please fix this on two maps VP of Russia. If you have free time and desire. Thank you.
Outline of South Sudan. Has a significant difference. VR for UK vs VR for US.
The location of Hong Kong and Macau. Several options for the location. They are close to each other in real life. Very far (VR for citizens of Mongolia), far and different location (VR for UK vs VR for NZ), close (VR for RUS).
Which map is the right one? Which map is the perfect? --Norvikk (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
P.S. I found a map with perfect contours of Armenia. It is VR for Argentine citizens's map. --Norvikk (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have already posted this message on your Wikimedia Commons talk page, but figured it would be easier to communicate with you on this talk page instead. Please change the colour of Taiwan to purple stripes on the Hong Kong visa policy map, as Taiwan citizens are allowed by the Hong Kong immigration department to obtain online pre-arrival registration free of charge for a social visit lasting 30 days. Thanks. --Agent5514 (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
Links format "Timatic|nationality=xX|destination=XX" don't work anymore. It's more than 4000 dead links. The big problem. I don't know what's going on. --Norvikk (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I canceled the edits on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Template:Timatic May be these changes became a reason for broken links.
Yes. Everything is working now. --Norvikk (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Two for nights ! This is Kenneth! I like the work that you do greatly ! I like how you take the necessary time out of your schedule to update articles here on Wikipedia ! Keep up the good work... I would like for you to kindly update the Visa Requirements For Bahamas please ! I'm going on a trip so I just want to be updated on the countries I'll be visiting ! Thank you so much.. Calvinck3 (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
Probably Tajikistan has cancelled visas on arrival. Only visa free (9 nations) and electronic visa (80 nations). Information on visas on arrival has disappeared from the database Timatic, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan and Airport Dushanbe.
For citizens of Taiwan, Syria, Libya there were visas on arrival. I have written to Timatic. Today they have changed the database - visa is required.
Change of 80 articles and maps will be required. --Norvikk (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights,
According to the IATA data it states that Singaporeans have visa on arrival benefits to Egypt, but this is not reflected on the map. We should update it as soon as possible. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.161.133.87 (talk) 20:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
What you think about a horizontal legend? This edit [73]
[74]
[75]
[76]. --Norvikk (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
We have seen from georgia and azerbaijan evisa page, the uk in the country list does include bno passport. Please be note that georgia offers uk passport visa as shown in the webpage. For armenia evisa page, the countries not appear in the countries list is consider as visa free. Dont be silly to provide the false information to everybody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.0.164.163 (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
Look at this article Visa requirements for EFTA nationals
This Talk
The edit [77]
What's going on? Spring? --Norvikk (talk) 14:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Second case. The edit [78]. See Talk on the page. --Norvikk (talk) 18:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I am wondering why you undid my revisions about the onward travel ticket. This is not listed as a requirement on the DHS or CBP official websites. And when I called the DHS and ESTA offices this month to make sure, I spoke with three different people who all confirmed that this is not required. My wife is in this case, so I needed to know for sure what is correct. Also, we came in before to the US on the VWP and nobody every said anything about seeing this ticket. Would you mind updating the Wikipedia article so people know this is not a current requirement? Otherwise, people may get misled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.33.59.72 (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Here is the official DHS webpage for requirements: https://www.dhs.gov/visa-waiver-program-requirements — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.33.59.72 (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I got a complaint. Can you explain this edit? You didn't use an edit summary, so it's not easy to understand your reasoning. El_C 04:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I can't find some old British laws.
First British published list of visa states: Home Office, Immigration appeals Bill: Draft Instractions to Immigration Officers cmnd 3830 (November 1968), Appendix
Statement of Changes of Immigration Rules, 1982-1983 House of Commons Papers 66, Appendix
Exchange of Notes between the United Kingdom and Denmark respecting the reciprocal abolition of visas on passports on 29 Jan 1924
Can you help me? Thanks. --Norvikk (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
visa requirement/visa policy always delete the correct information without any explanation. For example,
someone on Mar 31 deleted Macau in visa free section in visa policy of Tanzania without any explanation, it at least obtain visa on arrival which is the same as China passport
delete Macau in Zambia visa policy on Mar 18, although evisa page shows visa free.
The Uganda visa policy page never shows Hong Kong as visa free without any explanation.
For visa free of Chinese citizen of Macau, the Georgia can be accessed by evisa, same as Hong Kong which can be seen in IATA, but someone deleted without any explanation.
For visa policy of ukraine, it never shows Macau as visa on arrival which confirms by the Macau Government recently.
Please look into the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:C800:9003:8:0:0:0:13 (talk) 05:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, now that the e-Visa has branched out into three separate categories (e-Tourist, e-Business, and e-Medical), I think it'd be prudent to simply call it the 'e-Visa' in all visa requirements tables. The official site now refers to it as the 'e-Visa' (https://indianvisaonline.gov.in/evisa/tvoa.html). You can see my edit here. Tiger7253 (talk) 18:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I can't find information on visa agreements with Japan, the USA, Argentina, Israel and Uruguay. Maybe agreements of these countries with United Kingdom extended to New Zealand? I don't know depth of relationship between NZ and UK in 40s, 50s, 60s. In article New Zealand passport, passport of NZ (1949-1950s-1960s) with an inscription British Passport. The agreements of United Kingdom with these countries are in the article VP of the UK - Data of visa abolition. I can't translate online, it is the scanned text. Perhaps, these agreements are applied on the right of legal succession. --Norvikk (talk) 19:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I assume that we look at content of the section at different angles.
Cuba. USSR -> Russia and Cuba had several visa-free agreements: 1981 - 1985; 1985 - 1994; 1994 - present; in progress negotiations on a new agreement. These agreements are united by one - visas have been cancelled. In your opinion, which date should be in the section - 1981 or 1994? --Norvikk (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Yugoslavia After collapse of Yugoslavia and the USSR were formed 20 states (Serbia and Montenegro as the one state). One agreement has turned into 75 potential agreements. Incredible case. Some countries still enforce this agreement. It's a tangle. --Norvikk (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
User Nthep have killed ALL references on the visas articles (over than 40.000!!). He have changed the Template:Timatic Visa Policy and Template:Timatic.
I think This person has exceeded the authority.
Every day in Wikipedia takes away a piece of nerves. --Norvikk (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Do you remember our conversation? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/User_talk:Twofortnights#Timatic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Twofortnights/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Is_this_a_copyvio_or_just_a_breach_of_a_website.27s_T.26Cs.3F%7Cit is a sequel.
On 10 May 2014, you edited the Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong article to remove all information about visa reciprocity (in the edit reason you stated 'reciprocity information to be found at Visa policy of Hong Kong'). At present, however, there is no visa reciprocity information in either article. Could you either restore the information to the Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong article or add it to the Visa policy of Hong Kong article please? Bonus bon (talk) 23:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, Nthep has provided a response from Timatic. It seems like they think the use of the template is "reverse engineering" for some reason. However, they did mention that accessing Timatic through a public interface is allowed (e.g., from Gulf Air's website). C-GAUN (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, there's been an overhaul of the Kurdish visa policy (and I've edited the article accordingly), but the map hasn't been updated André Devecserii (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Please edit your Tajik visa policy maps, as VOA is no more. Also eVia eligibility has been somewhat expanded, with Hong Kongers, for example, now being eligible André Devecserii (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Please explain why the recent edit content in Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong is accepted, but it is deleted in Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Macau, be noted that the rules is also applied in both citizens.182.239.72.56 (talk) 01:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
It was an error. The original research info should be gone from both articles and this was agreed before already. People from Macau and HK might be Chinese citizens but not the same rules apply to their passport holders as the ordinary PRC passports, just like PRC has a different visa policy from Macau and HK.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The Macau and HK SAR passport holders Chinese citizens. The nationality shown on passport information is Chinese and the MRP shown as 'CHN'. Many countries treated these passports as original PRC passport. You might be wrong in understanding this issue.182.239.69.24 (talk) 23:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
C-GAUN - this again.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I left a message for him on the talk page of his last known IP address and haven't heard back from him yet. As he is using a mobile network, the IP address tends to change frequently. I will keep leaving messages to let him know. C-GAUN (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
This is getting out of hand. I have issued three warnings in the last few hours but this guy just keeps coming at it. He has not responded to any of my messages either. C-GAUN (talk) 02:52, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I put a maintenance tag on the Visa policy of the Schengen Area article which you removed (without engagement on the issue). The grammar needs to be re-worked in the majority of the sections; complex sentences with complex grammar are making the whole thing entirely unclear. But despite that, there are various content issues which go against WP:NOTGUIDE. I'm referring to the 'Obtaining a visa' section, which is basically a step by step process in how to get a Schengen visa (and in my opinion, should be simplified entirely or else removed). Rather than putting the tag back on the page, I'd like to get your views on the development of the article before I post on the talk page. st170e 20:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
OK, so now the Flightworx interface requires you to log in, meaning that is no longer an option either. Any suggestions? André Devecserii (talk) 10:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
What would also be good is to switch to other sources where available when a certain country code is invoked. For example if Georgia country code is invoked it would lead to the following page instead of Timatic - [83]. The real problem is with countries that do not publish their visa policies online but we can at least work with those that do.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I left message on your wikimedia page , please update those 5 outdated maps. --31.202.25.100 (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Two for nights ! This is Men ! Can you ease update visa requirements of Bahamian citizens.. Please I'll be going on a trip very soon so I would like to be updated about the countries I visit . thank you so much ! Calvinck3 (talk) 05:57, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I think there is a slight mistake in the map for Mongolia's visa policy. The map shades Cuba under dark blue (indicating that Cubans have 90 days visa free access) while the rest of the article states that Cubans only have 30 days visa free access. Cuba should be shade in light blue (30 day visa free countries) as opposed to dark blue (90 day visa free countries).
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs980 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Two for nights ! This is Calvinck3 ! I would like if you would so kindly update the Visa requirements for Bahamian Citizens ! Thank you so much ! Keep up the tremendous work ! Calvinck3 (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Two fortnights ! This is Calvinck3 ! I would appreciate if you can update the Visa Requirements for Bahamian Citizens page ! Norviik has deleted his page and can you also update the Visa Requirements Maps has well Thank you ! One last question I have a picture of Bahamian passport and I would like if you can update it for me.. I'm having trouble going about it.. Thank you Two fortnights ! Calvinck3 (talk) 14:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
@BushelCandle +Twofortnights, the problem with the Israeli stamps us that them seem to target specific type of countries: East Asian/West Pacific [China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea (South), Philippines, San Marino, and Thailand], major historically-Catholic countries [Andorra, Brazil, France, Hungary, Mexico, Monaco, Poland, Portugal, and Spain], and some random set of countries [Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Norway, and Serbia]. It explicitly excludes most Anglophone countries except Australia and New Zealand, African countries, Carribean countries, and certain large countries such as India, Italy, and Russia. There seem to be an intrinsic reason why the editor is intent on forewarning people from these countries. That and the statement reamins unsourced which may equate to vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello mate,
Who is this user going with the username""BushelCandle"? -He's promoting himself of view requirement wikies, assigning own template or style of writing as if he came up with the bible or something. He keeps adding irrelevant refrences (For instance; French national travelling to Iraq timatic page as a reference to a Lebanese travelling to China section, plus he keeps removing valid validity, vaccination, and passport rejection scenarios without citing a valid reason. I'm onto his undo-practices and will take every chance in reporting him once he gets into 3 undo's. Please be-aware as he's into many other wikipages.
For your work with maps. Thank you very much! --Norvikk (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Why do you combine Israel and Palestine on a map? 134 UN countries presenly the State of Palestine. International recognition of the State of Palestine
--Norvikk (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Heitordp! Thanks for the detailed analysis. I gave it a lot of thought over the last three days. I agree with many of the things that you said. However major concerns still remain. Namely, I am concerned about the objective measure and also on how much we can research in practice. For example "Palestinians cannot obtain Israeli passports" - but is it always the case? Is there a law which prohibits Palestinians from obtaining Israeli passports or do Palestinians refuse to do something that would make them full fledged citizens? Apparently 20% of Israeli citizens are Arabs (Arab citizens of Israel) so the matter seems complicated. And if we take that as a measure, we would then have to find out all nuances of obtaining Serbian, Georgian, Chinese, Cypriot, Turkish, Somali, Moroccan etc. passports to find out whether they are eligible or not. For example Serbian passports issued in Kosovo are not eligible for Schengen waiver, but what if a Kosovan gets his Serbian passport at a Consulate of Serbia abroad? Can we realistically get answers to such questions? Then it also means we have to follow recognition and relations as per your suggestion to merge Abkhazia and South Ossetia on all maps except for Russia and Cayman Islands. It means to make those maps we first have to check whether Russia and Cayman Islands recognized them and declared a separate visa policy before creating a map. A huge gap is then for all the countries that have broad visa policies - for example visa on arrival for all coming to the Comoros. But what does "all" mean? Does it mean any passport, so if an Abkhazian passport holder arrives to the Comoros does that also make him eligible or is it just for the countries that the Comoros has diplomatic relations with? We won't find that info on IATA and most African countries don't publish their policies anywhere online. Then we also come to very subjective moments such as Western Sahara should be merged with Morocco on all maps but we would have different policy for Palestine which you suggest should be shown on all maps where only Israel or only Palestine gets a visa waiver. Without going into the fact that most countries do not list disputed countries as described on the Comoros example making it impossible to know what would actually happen with a Palestinian passport holders in such places, it's also confusing why would we show Palestine which does not control its borders separately while Western Sahara which has some land, albeit very small, under control and both places have significant international recognition. Although what is significant international recognition is another question, is it the majority of countries (upper house style) meaning countries that pursue recognitions by small island states get advantage or should we count the population (lower house style) meaning that without the recognition of China and India you don't have much to hope for. Opening that can of worms would then bring the lack of recognition of Israel into the spotlight as well. And then we will also get a question of how do we show Crimea? Do we want to follow de facto or de jure policy here. All of this would attract political commentators and edit wars that we don't care about and don't want. Visa articles have been free of that specifically because they relied on strong objective criteria. Anything else would get us into a labyrinth without a way out.
Autonomous territories with independent visa policies could be included but it's too much of a clutter for a not so relevant subject. If you check the statistics of how many people read which visa policy articles you will see that only a very very small number of readers go to the articles on British, French and Dutch territories. The Cayman Islands visa policy was clicked on by 85 people last month, French territories stood at 2,038 and Dutch at 1,187 views. This is compared with the 9,246 views for the UK visa policy article or the 22,384 views for the Schengen policy article.
What I do agree on however is to include disputed territories where it's extremely relevant, so Georgian breakaway republics could be shown on Russian VP/VR maps. Kosovo could be shown on Albanian and Northern Cyprus on Turkish VP/VR maps. Also Taiwan is geographically always going to be shown separately so that can be shown without fear of edit wars moving the border line around. However I am against any changes across the board as there are a lot of questions and not enough answers. It would make us vulnerable to political edit wars, and I couldn't care less about figuring out the status of Western Sahara, apartheid citizenship policies in Israel or Somali statehood crisis. I would really like to continue keeping the visa articles and maps free of politics and that is why I propose to stick to the most objective criteria as we did so far but also to expand the tables as much as possible with various special permit rules for territories around the world such as Mount Athos, Tibet, Gorno-Badakhshan etc. as I am sure we have missed many. Cheers!--Twofortnights (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Why did you delete the question/complaint about the ban against Qatari citizens? All I wanted to do was to be nice with you and ask WHEN the boycott will be permanently lifted. Please, I want to ask you nicely! :'( --62.63.238.28 (talk) 23:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I've just noticed that you changed the image at Visa policy of Ireland. A visa waiver in Ireland is only conditional on having a UK visa - this should therefore not be included as a different colour in the map. Russian citizens for example do need a visa for Ireland and it would be misleading to say that they have a visa waiver. To save confusion, it would be best to revert the colour change. Similarly, Schengen/US/UK visa holders can have the visa requirement waived for Albania but this is not reflected in the map. st170e 02:53, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights!
I appreciate the work you have done on the map for the UK visa policy. However, there is one issue that I think is worth looking into.
On the map, you have shaded the countries that require a land visa but do not require an airside transit visa in light gray, while the countries that require an airside transit visa are shaded in a darker shade of gray. This is very tricky as the color code is a little hard to pick up due to the similarity in color between gray and this darker shade of gray. I was thinking that we can shade the countries that do not require an airside transit visa in yellow/orange/brown while the countries that do require an airside transit visa in red? Let me know your thoughts.
Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs980 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, that MFA website of theirs is never updated ever - it even falsely says Swedes require a visa.
This visa exemption is quite new from what I can gather - so why on Earth would Timatic add it if they weren't notified of it by their sources? André Devecserii (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. What you think about gif-animation?--Norvikk (talk) 21:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
The UK. draft - http://gifmaker.me/PlayGIFAnimation.php?folder=2017072721eZ6hVMdjjajjrtva4TRaFc&file=output_2M79Q1.gif
This is a map for 1960. [85] Do you agree? Any comments, suggestions. Thanks --Norvikk (talk) 16:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I added the gif. Thanks! Norvikk (talk) 21:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brazilian passport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Heya, I saw that you've added a new category (teal colour) for Electronic Travel Authorisations/eVisas on the visa requirements map of Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens. While this is a good change, I reckon it would also make sense to add the US ESTA to this category and colour the US teal.
The American and Australian ETAs are almost completely identical in terms of the application process and the fee charged, so it makes no sense to separate the two. It would streamline things to have them both in the same category. Besides, lumping in the US ESTA with the rest of the visa-free policies is a bit confusing because it implies that you can stroll into the US without any prior paperwork, which is the case for many of the visa-free countries, but not the US. The US may call it a 'visa waiver' but it is more accurately an ETA that needs to be paid for. I would thus shift the ESTA to the teal-coloured category, and perhaps colour Canada teal as well. Tiger7253 (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
This was the quickest way to try to get you to stop reversing correction of the visa on arrival information for Thailand.
The visa incentive program includes two countries (Fiji and Papua New Guinea) that are not eligible for visa on arrival. See http://www.consular.go.th/main/th/customize/62281-Summary-of-Countries-and-Territories-entitled-for.html for the current correct information. If you still do not believe me, see this photo: http://cdn.airportthai.co.th/uploads/profiles/0000000001/filemanager/images/15%281%29.jpg
The countries eligible for VOA have not changed in many years.
--- Dear Twofortnights: On signing in tonight, I saw a message from April alerting me that you reverted a posting I made on Passport validity changing NZ passport validity from 5 to 10 year. Unfortunately you have done this in error, perhaps because you relied on current information for new passport holders, rather than researching what in fact is a transition.
Please see
in which I show an actual 5-year passport that remains currently valid. Then please go to the www.nzherald.co.nz article that explains that effective Nov 30, 2015 NZ went back to a 10-year, having used the five year after the 9-11 attacks. This means that New Zealanders will have valid 5-year passports until Nov 29, 2020 and if any bureaucrat relies on your information, they would be misinformed. Feel free to note in your calendar to come back on Nov 30, 2020 to remove the 5-year information.ClassicalScholar 10:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey, Yes i would like to change and add to the page more details, i mean more specific details such us the Territories and Islands , South and north poles etc. etc.
what do you think?
https://www.immigration.go.ug/content/visas-and-passes The visa free list from the Uganda immigration, Hong Kong is not included which is not consistent with visa requirement of Hong Kong citizen. Please check and reply.182.239.83.201 (talk) 11:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Please check that in the visa requirement of macau passport shows visa required in Georgia, it should be the same as visa requirement of hong kong passport. The IATA shows both passports can apply that country evisa.
Hong Kong citizens not having visa free access to Yemen, the hk immd information is seriously outdated.
Other user shows that the azerbaijan allows hong kong and macau citizen as chinese citizens to apply for AZAN e visa
Another question is in zambia e visa http://evisa.zambiaimmigration.gov.zm/ choose macau, it shows exempted from visa. It only shows eVisa status in visa requirements of macau passport page. Please reply. Thanks.182.239.83.116 (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
I fielded a question in the IRC channel from an IP user who thought you were reverting their edits without examining the references. Maybe it's the same person who asked the question immediately above. I can't evaluate the contents of these disputed edits, but let me ask two things: 1) use edit summaries to explain why you're reverting when a plausible content dispute exists and 2) respond to their query about checking the refs. Thanks. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. AbhishekShenoy (talk) 16:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi , Just want to let you know that as confirmed from Serbia embassy in India, there has been no official date decided for the visa-free regime for Indians to be activated. Also, it not true that after 8th day of it being published into "Official Gazette of RS", the visa free regime will be starting. As a comparison, please view the below link for abolition of visas for Malaysians for Serbia. Although it was published in official Gazette in October itself, it was entered into force from 1st December 2015 only.
http://www.mfa.gov.rs/en/consular-affairs/entry-serbia/news-for-entry-to-serbia/15801-the-decision-on-visa-exemption-for-the-nationals-of-malaysia AbhishekShenoy (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, I'm not sure how to insert the yellow legend text without it crossing the map. Could you please modify it as you deem suitable? Thanks André Devecserii (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourgish passport 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I am new here. First of all, I have to thank you for your countless contributions here especially to Visa-related articles. You are Awesome! I wanted to request you to please modify the map of Sri Lanka's visa policy and shade Pakistan as it is eligible for an ETA. Albert Dawkins (talk) 17:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I see the problem.
Articles about visa policy of Vatican, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino are redirected on article about visa policy of the EU. Any information on visa policy of these countries is absent in this article. There is no information about open borders which documents regulate open borders.
As I understand, Monaco can't conclude visa the agreement. The visa policy of Monaco is completely regulated by the legislation of France. I can be mistaken here. This assumption.
San Marino and Vatican can sign visa agreements.
Between San Marino and China there is visa an agreement. Russia and Vatican have signed the agreement. I assume, there are also other agreements. Information on it is absent. The lack of four visa articles is omission.
I won't be able to write these articles. My knowledge of English is not sufficient for text. I beg you to pay attention to it. You may be able to fix it.
What do you think? --Norvikk (talk) 20:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Look at this. [90] San Marino has a lot of agreements on the abolition of visas for all types of passports. This information isn't in the encyclopedia. It's wrong. I can try to make the table of agreements of San Marino if it is appropriate..Norvikk (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
I asked one of the editors to made the three articles. He knows French and Italian. It will be easier for him. I hope he will find time for it.--Norvikk (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. What of options is more preferable to countries with both e-visa and visa on arrival? --Norvikk (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Maybe go straight to
--Twofortnights (talk) 21:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Look at the new proportions of the table. [91]
Old 19%
New 22%
This changes the proportions of all columns of the table. I don't see a problem. What do you think 19vs22?--Norvikk (talk) 23:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, Thank you for the update of the 'Visa policy of Mali' page. I am aware that the official website (http://diplomatie.ml/?page_id=5522) states that nationals of Andorra and Monaco are exempted from the visa requirements prior to visit Mali, but considering that the copyright year being 2015, is it not possible that the information contained within is not up-to-date? I have contacted Mali representation in India (http://www.maliembassy.co.in/index.php/en/2016-02-24-09-01-34/visa) and yet to receive the response. I have tried looking for some pertinent information with regards to the list, but the website only provides update on the recent visa requirements abolition between Mali and Indonesia.
Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlies280590 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Noted, thank you! I am also aware that Timatic might experience a glitch on their system, such as the case with Indian nationals traveling to Macedonia. There was a period of moment that Timatic enlisted India as recipient country of Macedonia's visa-free facility but I believe it has been corrected not long after. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlies280590 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, I have received a response from Mali Embassy in India. It is stated here that Monaco nationals are required visa in advance prior to traveling to Mali. I also specifically asked for Andorra but received no response for it. I believe that the website (http://diplomatie.ml/?page_id=5522) is not afterall up-to-date. Regards --Charlies280590 (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
I have now updated the article to reflect conflicting sources.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi There,
I was taking a look at the map for visa policy of Azerbaijan, and while Singaporeans have visa on arrival access, Singapore is shaded in brown (E Visa only). It should be shaded in blue, indicating a visa on arrival at all airports.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs980 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I'm working on updating the page. FYI, the guy before me added certain language that I had edited out. Almost all visa Wiki links have such data. I do not see why this page should be excluded.
By the way, I have added visa required for Vietnam. However, last I checked Phuc Quoc was part of Vietnam not mars. Thanks! Faraz (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
I moved my reply to the article talk page.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, According Timatic visa policy differs from information in Wikipedia. I changed the map. Visa-free countries and visa free if arriving from or transiting through the United Kingdom (yellow). This is visa-free regime with the conditions. What you think we can trust Timatic in this case? --Norvikk (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that you have undone my revision on the visa on arrival for Bolivia and anything else.
I have double checked the reference and confirmed that a 90 day visa on arrival could be obtained for Bolivia, regardless of where the passport holders reside.
It also applies to the Macau passport holder
Please check first before undoing revisions.
Thanks! Trevoronc (talk) 03:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi! This is the answer from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kyrgyzstan to request. (not mine). On the second page there is an unofficial English translation. [93] I think we can add e-visa for Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. --Norvikk (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Twofortnights, American Samoa changed its visa policy last month. I searched online and found three pages with the alleged new list of waiver countries: 1 (US Visa Waiver Program, minus Ireland, plus Canada), 2 (US VWP minus Greece, Hungary and Ireland, plus Canada), 3 (US VWP exactly). First I combined the lists (US VWP plus Canada) and added the result to the Wikipedia article, with the three lists as references, but later I decided to contact the Immigration Office of American Samoa, which is granting the "OK to board" ([email protected]), to confirm the information. They sent me the actual memorandum from the Attorney General of American Samoa implementing the recent changes. The list on the memorandum matches the list on 1 (US VWP minus Ireland, plus Canada). After I received this response, I removed Ireland from the Wikipedia article. However, later you added it back. I just checked the sources again, and now 2 has US VWP exactly, 3 no longer exists, while 1 remains the same. I don't know what to conclude, but I prefer to rely on the memorandum from the Attorney General. What do you think? Heitordp (talk) 00:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, on the pages Visa policy of Paraguay and Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens, a user has added an edit that claims Singaporeans have access to Paraguay visa-free. I've tried to corroborate the sources, but there doesn't seem to be anything? Tiger7253 (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, a user has added an edit saying that Monaco citizens have access to Paraguay. I didn't find any government source for that but it clearly mentions it from when I looked it up on Timatic/IATA. Is the Timatic site mixed up? DZaidan55 (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights-
Singapore needs to be shaded in blue on the map. Also, I highly recommend that we use a different color for visa free countries vs visa on arrival countries as opposed to a darker shade of blue for visa free countries and a lighter shade of blue for visa on arrival countries to avoid confusion. Maybe green for visa free countries and yellow/blue for visa on arrival countries? Let me know what you think
Kind Regards,
Hi! In Visa policy of Albania article, I checked all the countries that are under the temporary visa waiver and it was explained that the waiver was from 31 May or 10 June 2017 until 15 November 2017. But according to the visa requirements for those countries, I discovered that the visa waiver only lasts until 1 November 2017. I found different sources in Visa policy of Albania and Bahrain, Belarus, Oman, Qatar, Russia and Saudi Arabia Visa requirements pages. One explains that the waiver lasts until 1 November 2017 while the other mentions that the waiver is still in progress and will end 15 November 2017.(http://www.punetejashtme.gov.al/files/userfiles/Regjimi_i_vizave_per_te_huajt_26.01.2017.pdf) (http://www.punetejashtme.gov.al/files/userfiles/VISA_REGIME_FOR_FOREIGN_CITIZENS_27.10.2017.pdf)
To avoid confusion, which one is correct and more accurate? RoboTitan28 (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi! In the map for Visa policy of Tanzania, for some reasons, Sweden is not shaded as countries eligible for visa on arrival. Also, according to Timatic (IATA), Georgian citizens must obtain a visa prior to arrival. Moroccan citizens, on the other hand, are now eligible to obtain a visa upon arrival. It is recommended that the map gets updated with the said information. Thanks! RoboTitan28 (talk) 01:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights! On the visa policy map, I don't know why you have shaded Bangladesh and Myanmar as countries eligible for visa on arrival. I checked the Timatic website and visas are still required in advance for nationals of Bangladesh and Myanmar. If you were correct, could you provide a source that mentions that Palau introduced visa on arrival for those countries? Thanks! Dunkroll 6 (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
One of the IP user insisted that timatic is the most accurate source over the Government official sites. Please explain it is not always the case. Please also help to revert the article to the correct one. It is considered as vandalism. That IP is used to be banned in other language version of wiki. It is not expected to keep wrong information here.Jekeme (talk) 23:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)a
I have requested a protection of the page and was granted. The user involved, Nixiao1983, refused to engage in consensus building and claimed that Taiwan as a part of China. A relevant discussion has been opened on the NPOV noticeboard here, and I would like to hear your thoughts on the subject. Meanwhile you are more than welcome to leave thoughts on the talk page of Visa policy of China (the user involved has refused to do so thus far).C-GAUN (talk) 13:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
In the British Citizen visa requirements, someone edit something with government source. For Zimbabwe as it is Cat B countries, only eligible for visa on arrival. The Qatar visa waiver applies to British citizen, also Rwanda visa on arrival countries can choose evisa pay online. If you were correct, could you provide a explanation for this revert? Thanks!Jekeme (talk) 02:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
In the British Citizen visa requirements, someone edit something with government source. For Zimbabwe as it is Cat B countries, only eligible for visa on arrival. The Qatar visa waiver applies to British citizen, also Rwanda visa on arrival countries can choose evisa pay online. If you were correct, could you provide a explanation for this revert? Thanks!Jekeme (talk) 02:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
According to the website (http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/248829/Armenia_to_waive_visa_requirements_for_Indian_citizens), Armenia announced that visa on arrival would be extended for Indian citizens but I don't know if they have ratified it yet. It seems that holders of all passports from India are eligible.
The decision has come into force. Norvikk (talk) 13:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Look at this. I think we can make changes. Norvikk (talk) 14:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
[97] eVisa
Hello, Twofortnights. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Moved to > Template talk:Timatic
Hi! In the article, I remember that you mentioned that Egypt and Lebanon were visa exempt according to news reports. However, Timatic now seems to have updated saying that Egypt and Lebanon are now visa exempt. Egypt (20 days) and Lebanon (30 days). I'm confused if Timatic accidently added Egypt and Lebanon to visa exemption. RoboTitan28 (talk) 11:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Please stop removing the updated information from this page. I will revert your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moon hun ming (talk • contribs) 06:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
May your world be filled with warmth and good cheer this Holy season, and throughout the year.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! --Norvikk (talk) 11:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I made changes in the Visa article on the basis of the website of the Immigration Department of Gambia. [98] I thought it was a reliable source. But many countries were not on the list. Now I can't open the page. If you can not open the site too, you can see a copy. [99] --Norvikk (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Peruvian passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy new year Twofortnights, have a great one! André Devecserii (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done Done Done / finish 31 October Done Done / Text Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done Done Done / Text Done Done / Text Done Done--Norvikk (talk) 21:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
It's called Break logic.
Visa free for passports of Macao and Hong Kong
Stalemate. --Norvikk (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi! The Department of Immigration could have made a mistake, since HK and Macao don't have diplomatic/service passports. We should probably refer to both Timatic and the eVisa Portal. --RoboTitan28 (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
The map does not shade Visa exempted Malaysia, Australia and Singapore in the right colors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bs980 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi! In Visa policy of Algeria, someone has shaded Syria and Yemen on the map as visa exempt, which does not make sense at all. RoboTitan28 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
I've just stumbled across the Irish statute books and found the visa policy of Ireland all the way back to the 1930s. It's interesting because Polish citizens were actually banned from transiting Ireland as late as 1992/3. Would this be of sufficient interest for inclusion? st170e 21:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
I used simple sentences to write. I hope you understand the meaning. Translator distorts some things.
I propose to make changes to the editing of articles. Let's use ‘transcluded section’ more often. Now we use ‘transcluded section‘ for the statistics. I propose to extend this to other multiple values.
India. eVisa: was-24 airports; now-25 airports. More than 100 articles need to be corrected information.
China. Transit: Changed conditions 72->144 hours. Added a new entry points. 50 articles need to be corrected information.
Russia. Regional eVisa. 18 articles.
I think these changes are not final. In the future this will change again and again.
The adjustment of articles will take many hours of our time.
I created a page where collected these changes. Template:Transcluded sections for the visa articles I hope I have not violated the rules of Wikipedia. It will be enough to make the change there and they will be reflected automatically in all articles. It will save a huge array of time.
For example [103] [104]
--Norvikk (talk) 18:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Please be noted that all information come from reliable sources. You have to explain why revert all edits without any reason.Cceobus (talk) 09:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cypriot passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Did you see the designer of the index? Now we can see what countries they consider in the rating.
https://www.henleypassportindex.com Improve My Passport - Select a Passport - under a cover See more - View list
I see two problems:
1. Selective calculation.
Not the objective index. Probably, policy has won against honesty.
2. Criteria.
--Norvikk (talk) 19:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Update on 16 Jan. Russia. before 110 -> after 113 --Norvikk (talk) 22:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Update on 22 May. They continue to ignore Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Wallis and Futuna. --Norvikk (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you recently changed the "note 3" on the visa policy of Brazil, from 90/180 days to 3/6 months. It's true that the agreement between Brazil and the EU specifies 3/6 months, but the "note 3" also applies to some other countries on the list, not just the EU, and all those other agreements specify 90/180 days. In any case, the official visa policy of Brazil clearly says 90/180 days for all of these countries, including the EU. Sometimes what gets implemented is slightly different from the agreement, for example the agreement between Brazil and Belarus says 90 days per year, but Brazil decided not to impose the yearly limitation. In the article, I think that it's better to list the visa policy that is actually implemented by the destination country than the text of the agreement. Heitordp (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
As per Visa requirements for Canadian citizens, should we roll out the 'government advises against all travel' to all articles or remove it from the Canadian article? I would say it violates WP:TRAVEL but I'd argue against that because it effectively limits the consular assistance the government is willing to provide citizens in that country (which is certainly the case for the British situation). st170e 15:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I suggest using two templates [105] and [106] for different types of tables. If they make changes, we don't have to re-edit all the articles. they can change the number of airports. --Norvikk (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
For this type Somalia. VOA [107] and for this Somalia. VOA/2 [108]
Hi Twofortnights, do you happen to know who Timatic's source of information in Albania is?
The problem is, my IATA contact suddenly stopped replying to my last few well-founded review requests, despite the ones before that leading to corrections.
On 26 January, after I contacted the Albanian MFA, they updated the list of nationals whose ID cards constitute a passport exemption.
However, Timatic still uses a list which they claim to be based on what the border police at Tirana airport uses.
As I'm soon going to Albania by air with a group of friends of different nationalities, I would really like to get in touch with whoever supplies info to Timatic directly, as I doubt that the lists are meant to be different. Rather I think there's been poor communication between the local police and the MFA.
To be exact, the MFA says Bosnian and Croatian IDs are accepted, and the MFA told me the Irish passport card is as well.
Meanwhile, Timatic doesn't list Bosnia, Croatia and Ireland, but does state American, Australian, Canadian and New Zealander IDs are accepted. American ones have never been listed by the MFA at least for the past year, and the other three were removed from the MFA list after I informed the MFA that they don't actually issue national ID cards. The Albanian embassy in Canada used to claim the Canadian citizenship card is accepted, but Canada was also removed by the MFA.
So do you know by any chance whom to contact? André Devecserii (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Embassy in Russia.[110] Общая информация о правилах получения визы в Туркменистан. Для оформления визы по прибытию в аэропорт города Ашхабада необходимо предоставить заграничный паспорт, а также оригинал или ксерокопию приглашения от юридического или физического лица, оформленного в установленном порядке и согласованного с Государственной службой Туркменистана по регистрации иностранных граждан. Norvikk (talk) 17:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, I am writing regarding Georgia-Serbia visa free agreement. As it written here ► link The Foreign Minister of Serbia Ivica Dacic announced that the agreement would come into effect before parliament’s completion of certain administrative procedures.
--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 07:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop deleting right informations and putting erong information ! Algerian citizens need to apply for e-visa for turkey ! Dengel91 (talk) 20:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Visa agreement between the countries was signed in 2010. This agreement on diplomatic passports. It has been changed twice. Service and ordinary passports have been added in 2017. Changes for ordinary passports have come into force in March 2018. I don't know why Timatic considers that it is a visa on arrival. [112]
"Граждане государства одной Стороны - владельцы паспортов, указанных в пункте 2 настоящей статьи, за исключением сотрудников дипломатических представительств и консульских учреждений, находящихся на территории государства другой Стороны, вправе без визы въезжать и выезжать с территории государства другой Стороны, пересекать ее и пребывать там на срок, не превышающий 30 (тридцать) дней с даты въезда, через пропускные пункты, открытые для международного сообщения".
I think we have to return former information. --Norvikk (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Countries have slowly started publishing visitor statistics for 2017. So far I've found Georgia, Cyprus, Seychelles, Iceland, Japan (partial), Taiwan, Maldives, Mauritius, Vietnam, South Korea, Thailand, Fiji, Antigua and Barbuda, French Polynesia, Netherlands, Jamaica, Hong Kong, Serbia, Slovenia, Grenada, Turkey, Bulgaria, Sri Lanka, Spain, Mexico (partial), New Zealand, Estonia, Czech Republic (partial), Chile, Australia, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, Colombia (partial), Macao, Bermuda. Hope more countries will follow soon. A few rather big countries haven't published 2016 reports tough, China, France, Greece to name a few.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, could you please look at this page [114]. What's the right option? For St. Kitts and Nevis or St. Lucia? Thanks! --Norvikk (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I consider that we should create the Visa Disclaimer Template and add it to the top part of each visa article.
“The information provided in the article is not intended to be binding, and visa information must be verified with a travel agent or embassy representative before travel arrangements are made.”
Many people use articles as a reference book. Sometimes authoritative sources provide opposite information. It creates a confusion and disputes. We can't ignore any options. Who knows what information is correct? Especially for some countries in Asia and Africa, which do not respond to requests or not provide information on government websites. I think this template will remind readers of their responsibility for a choice of information. What you think? --Norvikk (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft
OK. Thank you for yours opinions. --Norvikk (talk) 10:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Here I propose to list all countries where visa policies remain unclear.--Twofortnights (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Swedish ID card 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Afghanistan visa specimen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, does not this count as a verifiable source for you? https://noticiassin.com/2018/03/dominicanos-podran-viajar-sin-visa-a-nicaragua/ Oli (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
https://www.listindiario.com/la-republica/2018/04/07/509597/no-tiene-visa-estos-son-los-paises-donde-los-dominicanos-pueden-viajar-solo-con-su-pasaporte?platform=hootsuite Oli (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Afghanistan visa specimen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I think we should use the full name of the countries. Not USA, UAE, UK, St. Lucia and other. The only exception is DR Congo. Do you agree? --Norvikk (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Why did you cancel my edit? Wikiped201820 (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Take a look- Israel is mention in the 11th place in the tab Wikiped201820 (talk) 08:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
https://www.dei-benin.com/visa.phpWikiped201820 (talk) 14:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I checked Timatic and it did not list Somalia as countries eligible for visa on arrival. Instead, it lists that holders of non-biometric passports from Somalia are refused admission and transit. Would biometric passport holders have to obtain a visa in advance? I'm a bit confused.--Dunkroll 6 (talk) 22:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello,Twofornights,I am a Chinese citizens of Macau,therefore,I offen check for the visa information of Macau SAR passport.But I have found some mistakes about the information that you have signed:
https://www.gov.mo/zh-hant/news/68530/
http://www.foreign.gov.bb/documents/foreign-policy/54-june-2012-visa-list-for-barbados/file
http://bbs.qoos.com/viewthread.php?tid=1749302&extra=&page=56
I hope that all the above information can help you,and Please modify it as soon as possible.I absolutely do not have the willingness to damage the authority of Wikipedia, and finally thank you for your reading, and I hope you work well.
If you read this message, please reply as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincentkpopme (talk • contribs) 03:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Also refer to the following website:https://test17089.wordpress.com/vincentkpopme (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Twofortnights,I hope that all the above information can help you,By the way, the Chief Executive of Macao has granted all the necessary powers to the Chief of the Department of Administration and Justice to sign a mutual visa exemption agreement on behalf of the government of the Macao Special Administrative Region and the Republic of Kazakhstan,the visa policy of both parties will change in the future. http://bo.io.gov.mo/bo/i/2018/15/ordem59_cn.asp Thank you for your reading, and I hope you work well. —-Vincentkpopme (talk) 04:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! How are you? I think this info will be interesting for you. This is the wiki statistics for the visa policy articles in 2017. I used fuller data (with redirects).--Norvikk (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The least popular:
The Overseas articles:
WikiStatistics 2017 without Redirects [138] Total: over 7,200,000 viewings
The least popular:
WikiStatistics 2017 without Redirects [159] Total: over 16,300,000 viewings
Hi, have you ever heard of this article? [160]
Huge surprise! 15,585 viewers in 2017, 162 place from 214 [161] 8,556 in 2018 Jan-Jun [162] --Norvikk (talk) 22:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Dear Twofortnights,
Can you please make sure that as of tomorrow there are changes in the page of VISA REQUIREMENTS FOR CROATIAN CITIZENS regarding the UK, the Netherlands and Slovenia - freedom of movement full! Also, please put correct colors on the map. Thank you for your work!
MM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.53.46.104 (talk) 11:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Tajikistan should be Visa Free (90 days), similar to the shades of Iran and Macao. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.43.141.100 (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
On that map Armenia's colour is visa-free, while on the section below it is stated that eVisa / Visa on arrival is required from Lebanese citizens.
Romania, Moldova and Colombia are listed as eVisa, but the links from the websites of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of respective countries state, that Lebanese citizens are required to obtain a visa beforehand at embassies/consulates. [163] [164] [165].
Hello Twofortnights,Myanmar will grants free visa for some Asian citizens soon,Chinese is one of them,although they did not explicitly point out that the scope of visa exemption includes Hong Kong and Macao, the official website of the Myanmar government did not see that the e-visa policy implemented by the Burmese government did not include Hong Kong and Macao, but it was clearly stated on Wikipedia that Hong Kong and Macao were covered by the e-visa policy.On Wikipedia, all visa information about countries around the world is subject to IATA supervision and authority.,it means that Myanmar's e-visa policy is for Chinese citizens including Hong Kong and Macao people.Does this mean that the Myanmar government’s visa-free treatment for China also applies to Hong Kong and Macao?
Thanks for your reading,good luck with your work!
Please reply me as soon as possible.
https://evisa.moip.gov.mm/noticetotourists.aspx
vincentkpopme (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cypriot identity card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi! For Visa policy of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, there's something unusual about Taiwan [166] and Palestine [167]. It doesn't say that these territories are exempt but it still lists "Extension of stay possible for visitors eligible for the 1 month visa exemption." Timatic doesn't list them as exempt at all. I tried to check some other sources but I can't seem to find anything. Could those websites be glitched?--RoboTitan28 (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
--Wikivisa (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Please pay attention. --109.252.45.173 (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
1. Cambodia eVisa. [168] On the website there are no restrictions for citizens of 10 countries. Timatic says banning the issuance of electronic visas for Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh and others. I think timatic is wrong. I filled out the form as a citizen of Afghanistan, reached the moment of payment. No problem. I asked on the website in the livechat section. - no answer. MFA - no info [169]. Unclear situation.
2. VP of Russia. The page has limitations for editing without an account. The page hasn't been attacked in a long time. How to cancel this restriction?
3. Renaming. Page for citizens of St. Lucia is called VR for Saint Lucian citizens (not Saint Lucia citizens). I think that's right. I suggest renaming the page VR for Saint Kitts and Nevis citizens - VR for Kittitians and Nevisians citizens. The government website uses this name. [170] I can't rename this page without an account.
4. VP St. Kitts and Nevis for Omani. Government site says visa free [171] Timatic says no. Unclear situation.
5. Template:Visa policy by country MERCOSUR and ASEAN are highlighted in a separate line. I think this is a huge mistake. These are economic and political associations. They do not have a common visa policy. Thus, many political, economic and customs unions can be distinguished. This is wrong. I can't edit this page without an account.
6. I can't do mass editing because almost every edit needs to be confirmed by typing in a spam code. It's tiring. Also I can't edit maps without an account. Sorry. And thanks for your help.
7. Rwanda. I'm guessing the news sites misrepresented the information. Perhaps the Cabinet has ratified the agreements. We know the three agreements (China, Mozambique -dip/ser, St.KittsNevis). This source only refers to diplomatic and service passports. [172] --109.252.43.147 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
8. Hi. Australia- eVisa. A few years ago we removed Australia as a country with a evisa from the all VR maps. This is the only country that is not marked on the maps. E-visa is not a simplification of the visa regime. E-visa is a simplification of the process of submission of documents for consideration of the request. Each country has its own set of documents, somewhere it is several forms, somewhere a huge package of documents and certificates. To obtain a visa-the Same package of documents in paper or electronic form, then there is the processing of the package and a decision - a paper sticker or an e-mail with a bar code. Just a simplification of the process, but the process is not changed in its essence. Australia requires a large package, but it's still an electronic visa. I believe Australia should be painted on the maps again as an e-visa country. Now Australia is the only country that has an electronic visa and is not painted on the VR maps. This is a distortion of the essence, if we note the e-visa on the maps, it should be done for all countries with e-Visa without exception. What you think? --109.252.43.147 (talk) 03:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
9. Hi. Senegal changed visa policy again. Visa free/voa. --109.252.43.147 (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
10. Hi. Could you please change the table for the VR for Ukranian. Qatar 90/18 and Senegal voa 90. Changes are possible only with an account. Thanks. --109.252.45.190 (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
11. Hi. Could you please change tables for VR for Ukranian and VR for US. Swaziland –> Eswatini. Changes are possible only with an account. Thanks. --109.252.43.152 (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
12. Hi. I need an advice. Ethiopia eVisa/voa. Which option is preferable? --109.252.45.226 (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
13. I suggest adding the “Other " section to the table. For article Visa requirements for crew members. This article has its readers. 01.01.2018 - 27.11.2018 · 19 912 views. We must stop ignoring this article and include it in the register. What you think?--109.252.45.226 (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't think either eVisa or VoA have preference but most African VR maps have not been updated to include this optional group so it's either or as you choose. As for the length of stay info I guess "up to 90 days" covers all those options?--Twofortnights (talk) 22:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
For crew members, I think it should be added but not necessarily as another column. I would add it the same way as information on diplomatic or service passports - Visa_requirements_for_Russian_citizens#Non-ordinary_passports as another section.--Twofortnights (talk) 22:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
14. Hi. What type of passport is an emergency passport? Ordinary or service category passport? 109.252.44.236 (talk) 15:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
15. Hi. I added Politics template to the visa articles. I am convinced that this is the right step. Visa policy is part of a foreign policy of a state. The template allows you to go directly to other articles about the policy. I add a foreign section to the templates if it is missing. The template complements a visa article. Thanks. --109.252.44.236 (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mexican passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi dear buddy,
Cambodia gives e-Visa to Iranians. I have myself granted an e-Visa from Cambodia by this Iranian passport. Do not you want to see ya!?
Anyways, Iran is already in the e-Visa country lists on its e-Visa portal: https://www.evisa.gov.kh/
P.S. IATA states Iranians can grant a VOA and e-Visa: https://www.iatatravelcentre.com/KH-Cambodia-passport-visa-health-travel-document-requirements.htm Please follow the instruction and insert Iran there and see the result!
The other source Timatic website however shows contradiction which I do not care. IATA website has the superiority! P.S.S. It is no data about the exclusion of day trip to Cambodia by those other nationals. I did not find this tab even on Timatic so I made fundamental changes in the article of "Visa Policy of Cambodia".
Please write here before making new edits to at least the article of "Visa Requirements for Iranian Citizens" until we reach a solution, because I will revert the changes again. Regards Milad Mosapoor (talk) 14:47, 03 Nov 2018 (GMT)
First, I have to revert the article "Visa Requirements for Iranian Citizens" since I wrote earlier "do not change that until we reach a solution".
Second, it is already mentioned that Iranians are both eligible for VOA and e-Visa in this link of IATA: https://www.iatatravelcentre.com/KH-Cambodia-passport-visa-health-travel-document-requirements.htm Please follow the instruction and insert Iran there and see the result! I have already made an easy photo for you here: http://uupload.ir/files/2qh_iata.jpg Regards Milad Mosapoor (talk) 16:33, 03 Nov 2018 (GMT)
Hello, Twofortnights. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Uzbekistan from February 1, 2019 cancels visas for 45 countries. Also increases the list of 76 countries that can enter with an electronic visa. Could you add this to the article and the map? Thanks! Akhemen (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The visa on arrival is still available. The faq #21 of eVisa page is not correct. It's "as of" May 1, 2018.
Here is the picture of my visa on arrival. It's issued at the airport.
I just traveled to Djibouti 2 months ago and successfully applied the visa on arrival at the airport. Before I traveled, I had emailed to the Djibouti embassy in Japan and Djibouti Office of Tourism. Both confirmed visa on arrival was available. --Parinya71 (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Slovenian passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Liberty Pedia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Visa policy of China have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Please stop reverting recklessly without any references or with outdated sources!
I was made aware of this conflict via WP:RFPP. I've checked out many of Liberty Pedia's edits and have come to the conclusion that they are misinterpreting sources.
For example, this edit misrepresents the source text: Chen Wei said this through a statement issued on the port visa system. “The law stipulates that foreigners who need to enter China urgently for humanitarian reasons, or who are invited to enter China for urgent business or rush repair work, or have other urgent needs, or who are organised to visit China as tourists through Chinese travel agencies, may apply for port visas with the visa-issuing authorities entrusted by the Ministry of Public Security at the ports approved to issue port visas by the state council,” the statement says. “The duration of stay for port visas shall not exceed 30 days. Bangladeshi citizens who are qualified and able to provide relevant supporting documents can apply for port visas at relevant Chinese ports,” according to the statement.
It does not follow from the source text that Visa on arrival for Bangladeshi citizens who visit for tourism, business, medical care or other humanitarian grounds
, as the edit states. One point of misinterpretation is that all tourists qualify; in reality, only tourists through Chinese travel agencies qualify.
This edit also misrepresents the source text, which is as follows: On Nov 22, the embassy said in a statement that Bangladeshi citizens who are qualified and able to provide relevant supporting documents can apply for Chinese visa on arrival at its ports. It also laid out criteria for the visa on arrival at its ports that apply to foreigners, including Bangladeshis. The eligibility includes foreigners who need to enter China “urgently for humanitarian reasons, or who are invited to enter China for urgent business or rush repair work, or have other urgent needs, or who are organised to visit China as tourists by Chinese travel agencies”.
It does not follow that Visa on arrival for Bangladeshi citizens who visit for tourism, business, medical care or other humanitarian grounds
, as written in the edit.
While these sorts of edits may be initially unintentional, failure to rectify such behavior is considered disruptive editing and is grounds for sanction, such as a block. @Liberty Pedia: please consider this a formal warning to be more careful when using source material. Continued disruption through source misrepresentation could lead to a temporary block. Airplaneman ✈ 02:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey Twofortnights, I've procedurally declined your page protection request. Page protection (we would need full protection in this case) is usually considered too heavy-handed if the conflict involves just two users. Full protection is generally reserved for disputes where three or more editors cannot agree. The edit-warring noticeboard might be a more appropriate venue for this kind of stuff in the future. That being said, there's no need to start all over again there. I'm just going to investigate this dispute now and see if there's any action I can take. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 01:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Azerbaijan let Hong Kong citizen have electronic visa, but your photo hasn’t updated please change Azerbaijan as light green 維多利亞-伊恩 (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there. Can you please provide a clear link to the image in this edit so I can check that it corresponds to a passport issued in Singapore? Thanks.--Jetstreamer Talk 15:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, please revert your move. The adjectival use, nationality and other topics will be debated in a proposed Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Macedonia)/2019 RFC. While officially the name of the state is changed, the official nationality is Macedonian / citizen of North Macedonia. Thanks in advance. --FlavrSavr (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Haitian passport holders do not need visas to get into Hong Kong for 14 days[182]. Please carefully check the reference before removing what I added on the article of Visa requirements for Haitian citizens. Thanks. 2607:FEA8:BC9F:F4C8:A477:B976:E2A3:4728 (talk) 05:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear User:Twofortnights, you undid my edit in Visa policy of Saudi Arabia without mentioned reasons. The new information is notable with a credible source, it is about a new special visa designated for events in Saudi Arabia. Please provide your reason for deleting the new edits so we can discuss more about it.
Thank you Jaseromer (talk)Jaseromer —Preceding undated comment added 15:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
hi, I don't know why you undid my edit. There is no visa on arrival for ordinary passport holders in Laos. Recently a diplomatic visa exemption agreement was signed for diplomatic passport holders but a visa is still required for ordinary passports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furkthevagabond (talk • contribs) 22:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
No we are not and you can't give an inaccurate news page as a reliable resource. I checked the Turkish foreign ministry's website and IATA and visa is required for ordinary passports. I also checked the Turkish news and the recent agreement is only for diplomatic passports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furkthevagabond (talk • contribs) 22:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
So unless you can provide a reliable resource (and save me from 50 dollars as I will visit Laos soon) please edit the visa information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furkthevagabond (talk • contribs) 22:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I think you have no idea about press freedom in Turkey or the quality of it. I don't care if you re-edit it or not as it has no effect on my life but that visa information is incorrect and you obviously can't provide any reliable resource eg from an embassy or foreign ministry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furkthevagabond (talk • contribs) 19:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bangladeshi passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
With regards to this edit, the new British Citizen passport has the same design as that of the BN(O) passport – their front covers are the exact same. st170e 18:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you uploaded a new version of the visa policy map of Brazil, and the only differences are Moldova and the shade of green. However, the visa waiver agreement with Moldova is still in the process of ratification with no expected date to take effect. Was your intention only to change the shade of green? If so, please mark Moldova as gray. Thanks. Heitordp (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bangladeshi passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bangladeshi passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Twofortnights is to Wikipedia what Einstein is to Physics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.226.59.199 (talk) 18:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bangladeshi passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey @Twofortnights:, I hope you've been doing well. I just wish to bring your attention to the fact that on the "Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens" map, Egypt is coloured grey; however on IATA and the Wikipedia article on the visa policy of Egypt, both indicate that Singaporeans can receive a visa on arrival (hence it should be coloured light green). Seeing as you are the main maintainer of the visa maps, I came to you (I don't really know how to edit the maps myself yet).
Additionally, on the "Visa policy of Egypt" map, Malaysia is coloured pale green, but should be coloured green as its citizens do not need a visa to visit Egypt. You might also want to edit that map.
Cheers! JaventheAldericky (talk) 14:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Possible shared account/paid editing?. --194.207.146.167 (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Henley Passport Index/The Passport Index. Thank you. 194.207.146.167 (talk) 11:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Can you explain why did you remove ETIAS?
Hi. Please pay attention to the discrepancy between the info of IATA and the Public notice of Ministry of Internal Affairs. IATA might have misinterpreted "Commonwealth".
Commonwealth of Nations and Commonwealth of Independent State.
Could you please add Luxembourg on the map. Sorry, I can't help with a massive update.
Have a nice day. --83.220.239.143 (talk) 09:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Why do you keep reverting stuff like the passport covers Nasro19dz (talk) 23:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the changes, but you seem to have missed old NZ in the map.--Nay1989 (talk) 00:46, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jamaican passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear Twofortnights: I am starting using Wikipedia and i want to get to know why did you delete Galápagos in Visa Requirements. As you put Puerto Rico in United States i put Galápagos in Ecuador. Greetings from Argentina. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejitao123 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi twofortnights,
Just to let you know that Indonesian passport holder can already enter East Timor without visa for 30 days. This changes has been in force since the end of September 2019. IATA record in this matter is outdated. So far there seems to be no official statement in English language from Easst timor authorities (maybe there is in Portugese or in Tetum, but I don't speak both languages), and their immigration office website is not updated very often, but this change in the visa regime has been confirmed by Indonesian immigration office in Kupang on their official twitter account (In Bahasa Indonesia, unfortunately) and also by a member of the Indonesian national Parliament Mr Fadli Zon in his official twitter. Can you please update the wiki page of Visa policy of East Timor and also Visa requirements for Indonesian citizens to reflect this change?
All the Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blasty3 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
The general rule of eVisa eligibility is the website only mention China, however it shows in IATA https://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=&page=visa&NA=HK&AR=00&PASSTYPES=PASS&DE=GN&user=GF&subuser=GFB2C and https://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=&page=visa&NA=MO&AR=00&PASSTYPES=PASS&DE=GN&user=GF&subuser=GFB2C https://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=&page=visa&NA=TW&AR=00&PASSTYPES=PASS&DE=UZ&user=GF&subuser=GFB2C https://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=&page=visa&NA=MO&AR=00&PASSTYPES=PASS&DE=UZ&user=GF&subuser=GFB2C which is also eligible for the two territories. Someone misunderstood the issue and try to vandalize the related page. Please look into the problem and reverted to a correct version.Shillart (talk) 11:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear Twofortnights, you have now reverted my contributions twice in the above-mentioned article, and as an experienced wikiuser, you know better than anyone that this kind of behavior that doesn't include any explanation is to say the least annoying.[1]Servitas Vitae (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Since the page is for "Visa requirements for United States citizens", the reference should be based on either US or Taiwan governmental policy or website. From US Department of State website:( https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages/Taiwan.html), you can clearly find Taiwan in "country information" and is not required for Visa. Thus, listing Taiwan in China visa tab is incorrect and has no supporting evidence or appropriate citation from either US or Taiwan government. I believe Taiwan should be removed from China's visa requirement tab. I understand you devoted a good amount effort in reviewing and maintaining all visa related pages and I really appreciate these efforts. I believe you will agree that all information provided on the this page for US passport holder should be based on US or corresponding government. This is the only way we can prevent misleading or false information disseminating to Wiki users. All the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auhiy1224 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Twofortnights, Thank you for your response and explanation. I'm not try to discuss or determine the political status of Taiwan since there might be some very different perspectives. Actually, I understand why Taiwan was listed in "Territories or administrative subdivisions" because the undetermined political status. However, I think we should still better remove Taiwan from China tab or edit it since it says "Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan do count as third countries under the 72 and 144-hours visa-free visit transit policy." but US citizen do not required VISA to visit Taiwan and according to "Taiwan Transit Policy" (https://www.roc-taiwan.org/ph_en/post/2788.html), US passport holders do not required transit visa no matter the hours. Thus, the statement "Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan do count as third countries under the 72 and 144-hours visa-free visit transit policy." is incorrect and misleading since US passport holders do not require visa to visit Taiwan and also do not require transit visa regardless the hours. Hopefully, we can provide some practical and legit information to Wiki users whoever visit this page. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auhiy1224 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your explanation. Even though this might be an uncommon case but I respect your idea and appreciate your time for maintaining all visa pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auhiy1224 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Visa policy of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EEA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey there Twofortnights, long time no talk. Hope you're doing well.
If you've kept up with my edits on Visa requirements for Singaporean citizens, you'll know that I occasionally trim the "recent changes" section by clearing out changes that took place more than two years ago. This prevents the section from getting excessively bloated and detracting from the main focus of these articles, which is the map and table.
I recently took a look at Visa requirements for Indian citizens, and it would seem as if the recent changes section in that article has ballooned beyond what is considered reasonable. The section takes up the entire screen and includes changes from as far back as 2013. I'm sure it's the same for a number of other visa req articles. Which necessitates the question: Should we mandate a set period of time for these changes to be displayed before they get removed to make way for more immediate changes? "Recent" is wholly subjective and is open to interpretation, so perhaps we could figure that out. Cheers! Regards, Tiger7253 (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you changed the legend of the B visa validity map, but that doesn't seem right. Some countries marked in red, such as the Republic of the Congo and São Tomé and Príncipe, have a validity of 6 months. Are you also planning to change the map? Also note that some countries have multiple validities depending on the issuance fee or specific B visa type. I thought that it was better to show in the map the maximum validity available for the general B-1/B-2 type, for example in that case Cuba would be 6 months, and no country has less than 3 months. Do you prefer to show the minimum validity instead? Heitordp (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bangladeshi passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:British passport data page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I did some updates on the page regarding Venezuelan citizens who want to enter the Caribbean Netherlands. It must be understood that the visa requirement for Venezuelan citizens are temporary in response of the ongoing crisis and to control the influx of Venezuelans entering that country following the Venezuelan refugee crisis. Also, Venezuelans must apply that visa through VFS Global agency, not directly with the Dutch embassy according to the official government website. Thank you --cyrfaw (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to get in contact regarding how visa policy maps on Wikipedia are created? South Korea’s visa policy map is now outdated since it was their policy changed on the 13th of April. Any help would be more than appreciated. Ire96 (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Your 5 months absence is getting me worried. We need you here. Hope it is just a break and that you'll be back with renewed energy. JMK (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Guinean passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Malian passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Brizton (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC) "Country information (visa section)". Timatic. International Air Transport Association (IATA) through Olympic Air. Retrieved 1 April 2017. https://cms.olympicair.com/timatic/webdocsI/countryinfo.html
Please, do you have any information why this link does not work? Thanks
Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourgish biometric passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Documento Nacional de Identidad (Spain).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Finnish identity card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Maltese identity card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Latvian identity card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Honduran passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourgish passport 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourgish identity card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Passport of Djibouti.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Claiming that he made the visa policy article of Mongolia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suzyeon (talk • contribs) 07:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Good evening, I searched the owner of the file of the Mauritian passport. I would like to add this file (photo) to the next article: List of passports. If you're not the owner, I'll be glad if you'll be able to connect me with the owner. Adir David (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Yemeni passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Passport of Bahrain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Passport of Syria.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dominica passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cameroonian passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, @Twofortnights, I think that the changes you made to the visa policy of Azerbaijan with some countries are not correct because the countries you have added with free visas for Azerbaijan are located in the e-visa section, while the citizens of Azerbaijan can enter without visas in these countries, so it is a unilateral decision of these countries and not a bilateral agreement. There is also information on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, but also on the pages of the corresponding Foreign Ministries of, for example, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Thank you Brizton (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Citizens of Saint Kitts and Nevis and citizens of Albania can move to each other without the need for a visa, for 90 days every 180 days. This was confirmed both by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Albania and the authorities of Saint Kitts and Nevis, as well as by travelers who have traveled to these countries, meanwhile on sites that provide information on travel and visa policies such as: emirates.com, koreanair.com, passportindex.org, it is said that in these countries you have to apply for an e-visa to enter!! What do you say to this case? Brizton. (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Cristiano Toàn (talk) 00:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC) I have added some countries in Grenanda's visa free list because I have looked here: https://grenadaembassyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Visa-Requirements-for-Grenada-final-UPDATED-April-2024-Approved1.pdf. Furthermore the United Kingdom should be listed separately because they already left the European Union
Hi, @Twofortnights, I made this change because the Albanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the latest updates and data on the movement of citizens dated 23.08.2024 and it is said that Albanian citizens must be provided with a visa to go to the state of Guyana. (https://punetejashtme.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/1-Regjimi-i-visave-per-shtetasit-shqiptare-23.08.2024.pdf)
This has now entered into force because a decision was taken on 17.07.2024 by the Albanian government to suspend the agreement (https://www.kryeministria.al/newsroom/vendime-te-miratuara-ne-mbledhjen-e-keshillit- to-the-ministers-date-July-17-2024/).
A part of the article about the suspension of the agreement in the media (...The sudden decision, the Albanian Government suspends the agreement for visa-free travel with the South American country. All Albanian citizens who travel to the country of Guyana in South America, either with diplomatic passport, service or ordinary passport, must first be equipped with a visa, writes newsbomb.al.
For unknown reasons, the Council of Ministers has accepted the request of Minister Igli Hasani for the suspension of the agreement with the state of Guyana, for exemption from visa requirements. The decision entered into force immediately this Wednesday and was ordered to be published in the "Official Gazette", but as newsbomb.al reports, the reasons that pushed the head of Albanian diplomacy, Igli Hasani, to request the adoption of this measure are not known. ..).
Meanwhile, the source of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Guyana that you received is from last year, so it is not updated, because I also saw it before making the changes, but the information above verifies what I have changed. Brizton (talk) 23:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Just a heads up–I noticed you rewrote the leading sentence of visa requirement articles to the format of Visa requirements for X are administrative entry restrictions by the authorities of other states that are imposed on Y
. These sentences should be removed per MOS:REDUNDANCY and MOS:AVOIDBOLD. The lede does not need to be a definition, and in this case it should not. Northern Moonlight 02:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Where did you notice this?
that has been around for 10+ years
On Wikipedia, nothing is set in stone. If material is not suitable for Wikipedia according to the current standards, it will be deleted or corrected regardless of how old it is. Any text on any page is subject to change at any time, no matter how long it has been that way. If there is a good reason to remove long-standing text, the length of time it has been there should not be an obstacle.
on Wikipedia, If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If there is no evidence of a real problem, and fixing the "problem" would not effectively improve Wikipedia, then don't waste time and energy (yours or anybody else's) trying to fix it.The current ledes appear to be functional, informative, and in line with Wikipedia's standards. Unilaterally removing them without a substantial reason goes against this reason, which discourages unnecessary changes to content that serves its purpose.
I thought it was something recent–in what world does “being old enough” mean “I didn’t rewrite it”?)
that will be reported and reverted
a decade and are part of a consistent style across a series of nearly 200 related articles
Furthermore... every article on Wikipedia is required to have a lead section that provides a concise overview of the article’s topic. Removing or significantly altering these ledes without proper discussion disrupts the structure and readability of the articles... Unilaterally removing them without a substantial reason goes against this reason, which discourages unnecessary changes to content that serves its purpose.
It’s also worth noting that the content of these ledes from 10 years ago
The current ledes appear to be functional, informative, and in line with Wikipedia’s standards.
Keep redundancy to a minimum in the first sentence. Use the first sentence of the article to provide relevant information that is not already given by the title of the article. The title need not appear verbatim in the lead if it is descriptive.
For example:
Iraq–Pakistan relations are the relations between Iraq and Pakistan. Significant changes to this established content should be discussed and agreed upon by the community, especially when they affect a large number of articles with a uniform style.
Significant changes to this established content should be discussed and agreed upon by the community, especially when they affect a large number of articles with a uniform style.And you made 158 unilateral changes without prior discussion. You mentioned
long-standing contentas if it were a result from a spontaneous trend instead of mostly just one person. Can you show me where you have built this consensus? Northern Moonlight 10:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
it is unacceptable for an editor to routinely accuse others of misbehavior without reasonable cause in an attempt to besmirch their reputations. Concerns, if they cannot be resolved directly with the other users involved, should be brought up in the appropriate forums with evidence, if at all.. Engaging in good faith discussions is essential for maintaining the constructive atmosphere that Wikipedia relies on. Instead of making baseless claims, I would encourage you to focus on addressing the content and policy-based arguments presented, as this will lead to a more productive discussion. If you have any concerns about the validity of the arguments, please refer to the specific policies or guidelines that apply. This will help keep the conversation constructive and focused on improving the encyclopedia, rather than on personal accusations. If you disagree, I’m willing to discuss this and your accusation in an alternative dispute resolution channel. Until you do that, consider this conversation over.
as per WP:AINT if there is no evidence of a real problem, and fixing the "problem" would not effectively improve Wikipedia, then don't waste time and energy (yours or anybody else's) trying to fix it.I’d also like to highlight that Wikipedia is not a place for personal battles or grudges. Your approach, particularly with repeated questioning and insinuations, could be seen as verging on a battleground mentality. Per WP:BATTLEGROUND, Wikipedia discussions are meant to be collaborative, civil, and focused on content, not on pursuing personal conflicts. As the policy outlines
Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals.. Repeatedly challenging edits that have been long-established without substantive policy-based reasoning can create an unnecessarily adversarial atmosphere, which is counterproductive to the collaborative spirit Wikipedia strives for. Instead of casting aspersions or pursuing a confrontational tone, the proper path forward is to address content issues calmly and engage in polite, constructive discussion.
with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. You have brought up many of my older edits without providing a clear policy-based reason for revisiting them, and this pattern of behavior—tracking and confronting me over edits made a decade ago—appears to align with the definition of hounding. This behavior is disruptive, not only to my ability to contribute constructively but to the collaborative environment Wikipedia strives to maintain. Hounding is not tolerated on Wikipedia because it disrupts the editing environment and can become a serious issue if done without constructive intent. The policy emphasizes that even if individual edits are not inherently disruptive, following another user around, especially with confrontational or tendentious behavior, can become problematic if it serves no constructive purpose. I urge you to focus on content improvements in line with Wikipedia's policies rather than continuing this personal focus on my past edits. If you believe there are legitimate content issues, discussing them in good faith on the relevant article talk pages is the appropriate way forward. Otherwise, this behavior can be considered a violation of Wikipedia's guidelines on editor conduct.
Sorry but an "e-Visa" is more precise than just a "visa". In visa requirements terminology, when we see the category "visa required", it means visa in advance at a diplomatic mission (countries like Algeria, China, Sudan or Turkmenistan). Otherwise it is written "e-Visa", "visa on arrival" or "visa-free" (or something else). 109.164.195.131 (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Northern Moonlight 03:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
@Twofortnights Hi, why did you undo my edits on the Visa policy of Argentina article? I updated Albania and Moldova as these are the two countries in Europe that Argentina requires visas for them, but they are in negotiations process with Argentina and Argentina will soon remove visas with Albania and Moldova. So, I need to update again this article with this information. Like all the other European countries enjoy free travel to Argentina, including the countries that aren't part of EU but candatate countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia) also Albania will remove visas with Argentina. Is the Albanian's right to travel without visa to Argentina, as Albania is one of the oldest countries in the world with a rich history, culture and society. Thanks Hi Mzeka95. (talk) 21:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Twofortnights, I wanted to discuss about the issue of visas of the state of Iraq. I made some changes to the map of visa requests for citizens of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro, but I am not sure if they are correct. (I believe that the information provided by others in Serbia and North Macedonia must be incorrect) From the information I read, there are visas on arrival and e-visas for the Kurdistan region in Iraq, which is not related to the visas of the Iraqi state, which is based in Baghdad. And the Iraqi government based in Baghdad does not say about visas on arrival or e-visas for the countries of the Western Balkans?! So there is some confusion about this. The title in the forum is the visa policy of Iraq and not the visa policy of the Kurdistan region in Iraq! Brizton (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Jordanian passport cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kuwaiti passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Omani passport.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Tenga en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en la sección F5 de los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. -- B-bot ( discusión ) 17:24 14 oct 2024 (UTC)
