stringtranslate.com

Wikipedia: lista de candidatos destacados

Nominaciones

Lista de elogios recibidos por Carol (película)

Nominadores: Lapadite ( discusión ) 12:49, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Revisando esta nominación. He tenido tiempo ahora para abordar adecuadamente las recomendaciones anteriores, así como actualizar el formato para cumplir con los estándares FL recientes y actualizar las referencias. Esta película es ampliamente aclamada y ha aparecido en muchas listas de las mejores. Recibió nominaciones de todos los premios importantes. La mayoría de sus premios provienen de críticos y organizaciones de festivales, por lo que el protagonista se centra en eso en el párrafo final. Lapadite ( charla ) 12:49, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Lista de ciudades en el Óblast de Zaporizhzhia

Nominador(es): Nietzsche flamenco ( discusión ) 00:12, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Otra lista de ciudades del oblast de Ucrania; esto utiliza un formato similar al de la Lista de ciudades en el Óblast de Donetsk , y su contraparte del norte y FL, Lista de ciudades en el Óblast de Luhansk , y también es un oblast cuyo territorio (y ciudades) está ocupado por Rusia. tropas. Gran parte del formato y la prosa se perfeccionaron en la entrada FLC de Dantheanimator Wikipedia: Lista de candidatos destacados/Lista de ciudades en Donetsk Oblast/archive1 y, por lo tanto, ya debería estar en su mayoría bien. Flamenco Nietzsche ( charla ) 00:12, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Lista de sitios del Patrimonio Mundial en Egipto

Nominadores: Tono 06:35, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

¡faraones! ¡Pirámides! Y... ballenas milenarias, ¡guau! Egipto tiene 7 WHS y una serie de sitios provisionales. Estilo estándar. La nominación de Argentina ya está recibiendo apoyo, así que sumo una segunda nominación. Tono 06:35, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios del Alavense

Eso es todo lo que vi. Gracias por tu dedicación a la lista, Tone . Atentamente. Alavense ( charla ) 07:19, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano de 1964

Nominadores: Hola, soy josh ( discusión ) 12:35, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Como seguimiento de mi nominación del medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno de 2018 , decidí que también quería completar un medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano. Se basa en otros medalleros de los Juegos Olímpicos de verano que también han sido promovidos al estado de lista destacada, así como en los comentarios proporcionados en las otras nominaciones al medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de verano. Como siempre, haré todo lo posible para responder y abordar rápidamente todas y cada una de las inquietudes que surjan. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 12:35, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios de Arconning

Aquí están mis comentarios, ¡envíame un ping una vez que hayas terminado! Arconning ( discusión ) 16:52, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

  • "Con 18 medallas olímpicas en total, Latynin", debería ser Latynina. – Oh... arreglado.
  • "para la mayoría de las medallas olímpicas", podría reformularse como "para la mayoría de las medallas olímpicas de un individuo". – Ehhh, sentí que estaba implícito, pero lo modifiqué.
  • "También se convirtió, y sigue siendo, en la poseedora del récord de más medallas de oro y medallas olímpicas totales obtenidas por una atleta femenina". ¿Necesitaría esto un "A partir de..."? - ¿Hacemos? Creo que eso sólo es realmente necesario si hay cambios frecuentes en las clasificaciones. No me gusta la idea de que esto tenga que actualizarse cada año, en lugar de actualizarse según sea necesario.
  • El título de la imagen probablemente debería especificar "en estos juegos", ya que "atleta que compite" probablemente podría sonar como un atleta activo. – Yo personalmente no lo leo de esta manera. Creo que está bastante claro según el contexto de "... en los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano de 1964, la mayor cantidad de cualquier atleta que compite"
  • Se podría añadir una nota a pie de página que explique "Equipo Unido de Alemania". - Hecho.
Espero haber abordado todas tus inquietudes. ¡Muchas gracias por la reseña @ Arconning ! Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 19:14, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
¡Apoyo , buena suerte! Arconning ( discusión ) 02:49, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Lo único que puedo sugerir es cambiar "sobre la participación de Taiwán (República de China)" por "sobre la participación de Taiwán (República de China)", lo que me parece un poco más elegante... - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 09:52, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola Chris, una IP agregó los nombres entre paréntesis, lo que sentí que era innecesario y también interrumpió el flujo. También implementé tu redacción, que definitivamente es más elegante. ¡Muchas gracias por echar un vistazo y brindar comentarios! Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 12:55, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

96 premios de la Academia

Nominadores: Charla de Birdienest81 08:56, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando a los Oscar 2024 como lista de destacados porque creemos que tiene un gran potencial para convertirse en una lista de destacados. Seguí cómo los años 1929 , 1979 , 1980 , 1981 , 1982 , 1984 , 1986 , 1987 , 1988 , 1989 , 1990 , 1991 , 1992 , 1993 , 1994 , 1995 , 1996 , 1997 , 1998 , 1999 , 2000 , 2001 , 2002 , 2003 , 2004 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015, 2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 0 , 2021 , 2022 y 2023 se escribieron las ceremonias . Tenga en cuenta que esta lista se ha reescrito en gran medida desde la primera nominación fallida para darle un formato similar a las otras páginas de la ceremonia de los Oscar que fueron promovidas al estado de lista destacada. Charla de Birdienest81 08:56, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

  • @ ChrisTheDude : Listo . He leído sus comentarios y he realizado los cambios sugeridos como se indica en sus comentarios.
- Charla de Birdienest81 08:15, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de jugadores de los Firebirds del Valle de Coachella

Nominadores: XR228 ( discusión ) 16:31, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Siguiendo con mi tendencia de llevar listas de hockey sobre hielo a FL, esta vez, me refiero a los jugadores de los Coachella Valley Firebirds. Creo que esta lista cumple con todos los criterios. Gracias. XR228 ( discusión ) 16:31, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios


Revisión de accesibilidad (MOS:DTAB)

Delegaciones del Congreso de los Estados Unidos desde Colorado

Nominadores: Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 17:51, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

¡El siguiente en mi serie de delegaciones del Congreso de los Estados Unidos es el estado de Colorado ! Las listas anteriores incluían Utah , Indiana , Hawaii , Connecticut y Arizona . He hecho todo lo posible para implementar todas las sugerencias proporcionadas en nominaciones anteriores (en particular, con referencias; ¡gracias EN-Jungwon!). ¡Esperamos escuchar más de esas sugerencias! ¡Gracias! Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 17:51, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Lista de los números uno de Billboard Easy Listening de 1970

Nominadores: ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 16:55, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Vayamos a los años 70 en la historia de la lista de Billboard "música para mamás y papás en lugar de para niños". En este año en particular, los Beatles encabezaron esta lista por primera vez justo a tiempo para separarse, y una joven con voz de ángel y su hermano comenzaron a establecerse como uno de los actos más destacados de todos los tiempos en este tipo de música. Los comentarios, como siempre, serán recibidos con gratitud y se actuará con mucha rapidez..... - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 16:55, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

¡Gracias por tu maravilloso trabajo como siempre! Apoyo en imágenes y prosa. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 17:42, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

ES-Jungwon

Eso es todo lo que pude encontrar. -- ES - Jungwon 01:13, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Revisión de la fuente : Aprobada

Comentario:

Eso es literalmente todo. Esta vez casi me atrapó Chris, ¡pero encontré algo! Buen material como siempre, apoyo porque he interactuado contigo lo suficiente como para estar seguro de que solucionarás el problema cuando veas esto. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 16:04, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de hipopósidos

Nominadores: Pres N 15:34, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Volvemos con otra lista de mamíferos, la n.° 42, y pasamos la página al penúltimo orden de mamíferos: ¡quirópteros o murciélagos! Me tomé un descanso antes de comenzar esto para ajustar los scripts que uso para generar las tablas iniciales para que me fuera más fácil lidiar con las revisiones taxonómicas recientes, y también salí y compré un libro de referencia de 10 libras y 800 páginas para poder Puede dejar de hojear los resultados de Google Books. El resultado es la familia de murciélagos n.° 1/20: los hipopósidos. Esta lista sigue las convenciones de las listas anteriores, con dos cambios: todos estos murciélagos comen aproximadamente las mismas cosas, por lo que solo aparecen en el encabezado en lugar de en cada fila; y agregué la longitud del brazo/ala, porque es relevante para las criaturas voladoras (¡y tenía una fuente consistente!). En cualquier caso, ¡gracias por comentar! -- Pres N 15:34, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

  • @ ChrisTheDude : Listo y listo, ¡gracias! -- Pres N 16:20, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

¡Se ve bien! Soporte Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 15:53, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Clasificación mundial de billar 1987–88

Nominadores: BennyOnTheLoose ( discusión ) 22:51, 26 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Otra lista de billar. Por una vez, la Asociación Mundial de Billar y Snooker Profesional decidió no meterse con el sistema del año anterior, pues evidentemente consideraba que ya era lo suficientemente complicado para sus gustos. Un par de jugadores se perdieron en una versión posterior; A partir de fuentes puedo dar cuenta de uno de ellos. Una vez más, Steve Davis fue el líder indiscutible en la cima. Número uno durante seis temporadas cuando comenzó la clasificación, Ray Reardon (QEPD) quedó fuera del top 16 por primera vez. Como siempre, estaré encantado de proporcionar extractos relevantes de fuentes a los revisores. Gracias de antemano por sus sugerencias de mejora. Saludos, BennyOnTheLoose ( charla ) 22:51, 26 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

  • Muchas gracias, ChrisTheDude . He hecho esas enmiendas. Avíseme si se requiere algo más. Saludos, BennyOnTheLoose ( charla ) 10:31, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios del Alavense

  • Lo he quitado. La lista se publicó alrededor del 18 de mayo de 1987 (dado que recibió menciones en la prensa el 19 de mayo), pero estoy bastante seguro de que ninguna fuente habría publicado nada más allá del top 20 antes de que Snooker Scene y Pot Black tuvieran la lista completa en sus publicaciones. Números de junio. Avíseme si cree que debería volver a agregar algo. BennyOnTheLoose ( discusión ) 10:21, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • "Smith, Terry (19 de mayo de 1987). "Hendry da un gran salto". The Daily Telegraph. P. 25." se trata como un "Smith 1987" y al eliminar las a se produce un "error de Harv: CITEREFSmith1987 tiene múltiples objetivos (2×)". BennyOnTheLoose ( discusión ) 10:21, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Eso es todo lo que vi. Gracias por tu esfuerzo, BennyOnTheLoose . Atentamente. Alavense ( charla ) 09:43, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

  • Muchas gracias alavesa . He implementado los cambios, excepto donde se indica arriba. Por favor, avíseme si se requiere algo más. Saludos, BennyOnTheLoose ( charla ) 10:21, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Gracias por sus prontas respuestas, BennyOnTheLoose . Hice esto para evitar tener la "a" junto al año. Puedes revertirlo si no te gusta. Apoyo . Alavense ( charla ) 11:09, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Gracias. ¡He tomado nota de eso! Saludos, BennyOnTheLoose ( charla ) 11:17, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno de 1956

Nominadores: Arconning ( discusión ) 03:02, 26 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Una lista breve en comparación con mi otro FLC, esta es una lista sobre las medallas obtenidas por las naciones que compitieron en los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno de 1956. Esperando algunos comentarios, y etc etc! Arconning ( discusión ) 03:02, 26 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Verificación MrLinkinPark333/verificación copyvio

Dirigir
Sección del medallero

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Comentario:

Eso es lo que tengo. Por favor envíame un ping cuando respondas. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( habla )

Lista de presidentes estatales del Congreso Nacional Indio

Nominadores: 25 CENTS VICTORIOSOS  🍁 13:07, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando esto para la lista destacada porque creo que la lista se escribió teniendo en cuenta los criterios de FL. "Todo tipo de sugerencias y aportes son bienvenidos. Gracias. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  🍁 13:07, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios de Alavense

Gracias de antemano por sus respuestas, 25 Cents FC . Saludos cordiales, Alavense ( charla ) 11:05, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Cronología de la temporada de huracanes del Pacífico de 1995

Nominador(es): Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 17:47, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estuve todo junio sin nominar nada a FLC, así que aquí hay una segunda nominación de julio para compensar 🤠 La temporada de huracanes en el Pacífico de 1995 fue la más tranquila en 16 años y anunció el inicio de una era de menor actividad para la cuenca (algunas temporadas particularmente activas durante Al diablo con la década de 2010). Aun así, la temporada todavía contó con tres huracanes de categoría 4 en la escala Saffir-Simpson (de sólo 10 tormentas en total, lo que yo diría que es una proporción bastante impresionante), así como el mortal huracán Ismael , cuyo nombre fue retirado el primavera siguiente. "Sólo" categoría 1 en su máxima intensidad, Ismael utilizó el elemento sorpresa como arma, adentrándose en el Golfo de California y en la costa mexicana antes de lo previsto. Como resultado, muchas personas en tierra y mar no estaban preparadas para la tormenta y más de 100 personas murieron. Actualmente tengo otra nominación abierta, pero ya cuenta con un par de apoyos y actualmente no hay inquietudes que no se hayan abordado. Como siempre, espero con interés los comentarios de la comunidad y trataré de rectificar cualquier problema lo más rápido posible. Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 17:47, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios de AndrewPeterT

Hola Dylan. Planeo comentar sobre esta nominación y su otra nominación activa en breve. Por ahora, señalaré que hay un enlace rojo a lo que debería ser el artículo de la cronología de la temporada de huracanes del Pacífico de 1996 en el cuadro de navegación de la pantalla LED. ¿Hay planes para crear este artículo en un futuro próximo? De lo contrario, sugeriría agregar un enlace de redireccionamiento a la línea de tiempo del artículo principal sobre la temporada de huracanes del Pacífico de 1996.

Además, aunque sólo está tangencialmente relacionado con este tema, el nombre que reemplazó a Ismael (es decir, Israel ), tuvo que ser eliminado debido a la recepción negativa (lo que, dados los acontecimientos actuales, hace que uno se pregunte cómo nadie pensó siquiera en esas implicaciones negativas hasta hace medio siglo). década después) . AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 23:19, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola Andrés , ¡qué bueno verte! Cambiaré el enlace en breve; tengo la intención de crear una línea de tiempo para la temporada de 1996 en un futuro cercano, pero no estoy muy seguro de qué es cercano porque hay otros proyectos que tengo en trámite. En cuanto a la cuestión Ismael-Israel (que estoy de acuerdo contigo es completamente desconcertante) , pensé en incluirla, pero no pensé que fuera lo suficientemente relevante como para mencionarla en el lede. El párrafo donde se describen los impactos de Ismael ya es bastante completo y quería asegurarme de tener espacio para mencionar también los impactos de Flossie y Henriette. Veo que también tienes un FLC activo. ¡Me aseguraré de echarle un vistazo en los próximos días! Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 00:52, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de lugares históricos en Upper Hutt

Nominador(es): Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 06:35, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ responder ]

Oh, oye, olvidé hacer uno de estos por un tiempo. Aquí hay otro para el registro de sitios históricos de Heritage New Zealand ; ¡Todavía queda un largo camino por recorrer para superar todo esto! Upper Hutt es una pequeña ciudad de cercanías en las afueras de Wellington, pero tiene una sorprendente cantidad de arquitectura histórica interesante, incluidas varias casas de moda de James Chapman-Taylor , uno de los arquitectos más notables de Nueva Zelanda. Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 06:35, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios del Alavense

Eso es todo lo que vi. Buen y minucioso trabajo, Generalísima . Alavense ( charla ) 09:19, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Una cosa más, Generalísima . "Upper Hutt City es una ciudad", se lee un poco redundante. Creo que "Upper Hutt es una ciudad" sería mejor. Gracias por tus ediciones. Alavense ( charla ) 06:29, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Alavense ¡ Ah, buen punto! fijado. Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 09:54, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Gracias por sus prontas respuestas, Generalísima . Apoyo . Alavense ( charla ) 11:03, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Revisión de la fuente : Aprobada

Comentario:

Por favor envíeme un ping cuando se hayan solucionado los problemas anteriores. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 16:14, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ Hola, soy Josh : ¡Arreglado! Muchas gracias. Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 17:04, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Apoyo . Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 18:34, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Elecciones presidenciales de Estados Unidos en Wyoming

Nominadores:金色黎明( discusión ) 04:40, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando esto para la lista destacada porque cumple con la condición金色黎明( discusión ) 04:40, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Comentarios

Eso es todo de mi parte. Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 01:42, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

¡Eso es todo! Bien hecho y gracias por tu trabajo. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 02:53, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de ciudades en Crimea

Nominadores: Dan the Animator 21:08, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

He estado trabajando en esta lista desde hace algún tiempo y he realizado oleadas de revisiones para intentar llevarla al nivel FL. Dada la reciente promoción de mi FLN para Ciudades en el Óblast de Luhansk y haber completado todo lo que puedo hacer por mi parte para mi FLN para Ciudades en el Óblast de Donetsk , pensé en seguir adelante y comenzar con esta nominación. No está perfectamente listo y planeo editarlo más durante el período de nominación, pero considerando el largo período de tiempo del proceso de FL y los beneficios de recibir comentarios durante la edición, pensé que sería mejor comenzar ahora y continuar trabajando en ello. simultáneamente con el nom. A diferencia de las otras dos nominaciones FL para Donetsk y Luhansk, esta lista es única porque representa un área geográfica con dos entidades legales distintas: la República Autónoma de Crimea y la ciudad con estatus especial Sebastopol . Teniendo en cuenta esto y su ocupación por parte de Rusia desde 2014 , esta lista tiene un alcance mayor y, naturalmente, será más compleja/detallada y más larga que las otras listas. En mi opinión, los detalles legales de Sebastopol pueden resultar muy confusos, así que no dudes en publicar preguntas sobre esta nominación o comunicarte con nosotros si te ayuda. ¡Gracias de antemano a todos por las sugerencias y estamos emocionados de comenzar esta nominación! :) Dan the Animator 21:08, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

¡Esto es realmente interesante! No hablo ruso ni ucraniano, por lo que no puedo hablar en nombre de las fuentes, pero

Eso es todo de mi parte por ahora. Generalísima ( charla ) (ello/ella) 04:05, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Lista de selecciones All-Pro de Associated Press de los Green Bay Packers

Nominadores: «Gonzo fan2007 (discusión) @ 14:07, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Tengo una nueva lista para FLC: ¡ Lista de selecciones All-Pro de Associated Press de los Green Bay Packers ! Esta lista sigue el mismo formato que la Lista de selecciones del Pro Bowl de los Green Bay Packers . Como siempre, encantado de resolver cualquier problema de manera oportuna. «Gonzo fan2007 (discusión) @ 14:07, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Gracias ChrisTheDude , creo que he abordado todos sus comentarios aquí. «Gonzo fan2007 (discusión) @ 16:48, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Revisión de la fuente : Aprobada

Comentario:

Eso es todo lo que tengo. ¡Buen material! Por favor envíame un ping cuando respondas. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 16:00, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Gracias ¡ Hola hombre, soy Josh ! Hice los cambios necesarios. Debo haber copiado ese enlace AP de algún otro lugar, ya que realmente no coincidía con mi formato de referencia típico. Lo cambié a sitio web = APNews.com. «Gonzo fan2007 (discusión) @ 17:09, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Apoyo . Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 18:36, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de ganadores del Inkigayo Chart (2018)

Nominadores: EN-Jungwon ( charla ) y explícito ( charla ) 11:30, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Sí, es otra lista de Inkigayo. El cuarto que nomino en esta serie. Esta lista sigue el mismo formato que las tres y nueve listas anteriores de Music Bank. -- ES - Jungwon 11:30, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

@ ChrisTheDude , todo listo. Siempre agradeceremos sus comentarios en FLC. Gracias de nuevo. -- ES - Jungwon 05:44, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

¡Gracias por tu trabajo nuevamente @ EN-Jungwon y @ Explicit ! Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 16:21, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Se agregó texto alternativo. Gracias por captar eso. -- ES - Jungwon 01:30, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de los números uno de Billboard Easy Listening de 1969

Nominadores: ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 14:24, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

¿Te gustan las canciones de películas y musicales teatrales? Entonces encontrarás algo que te guste en la lista de los éxitos fáciles de escuchar de Billboard de 1969. Alternativamente, tal vez te gusten las canciones sobre cómo la humanidad se va a extinguir en el futuro, también hay una de esas ahí... .... Como siempre, los comentarios serán recibidos con gratitud y se actuará rápidamente en consecuencia - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 14:24, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios del Alavense

Excelente trabajo, ChrisTheDude . Sólo tengo una pregunta: ¿realmente tiene sentido tener la llave así? Si "Hurt So Bad" encabezó la edición de fin de año pero ni siquiera aparece en la lista, creo que sería mejor mencionarlo en la prosa, ¿no es así? Tal como están las cosas ahora, parece como si el lector esperara (al menos yo lo esperaba) encontrar algo resaltado en amarillo en el gráfico y luego no lo encuentra. Alavense ( charla ) 14:39, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ Alavense : Sinceramente, no veo la necesidad de mencionarlo en el artículo, pero "era así cuando llegué aquí, señoría" ;-) -- ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 14:53, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Entonces no hay problema. Apoyo . Alavense ( charla ) 15:09, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

NO

Trabajo estelar y, como siempre, disfruto de las excelentes fotografías de estas listas.-- N Ø 19:00, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@MaranoFan : ¡ Listo ! - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 07:18, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

Gracias y maravilloso trabajo como siempre, @ ChrisTheDude . Soporte en imágenes. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 02:12, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Revisión de la fuente : Aprobada

El único comentario que tengo es considerar agregar la plantilla en la parte superior del artículo debajo de la breve descripción en caso de que alguien más agregue referencias más adelante y no sea tan cuidadoso como usted. ¡Apoyo , gran cosa Chris! Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 13:38, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]{{Use mdy dates|July 2024}}

@ Hola, soy Josh : gracias por tu reseña. ¡He agregado esa plantilla! - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 19:01, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

dylan620

Marcando un lugar para una reseña en prosa, que probablemente se realizará mañana o pasado. Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 22:31, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Este es un gran trabajo como se esperaba y no encuentro mucho que criticar, aunque tengo un par de comentarios:
  • una pista que alcanzó el puesto número 2 , según MOS:NUMERAL , ¿no deberían deletrearse todos los números inferiores a 10? También recomendaría usar un espacio sin separación, ya que la palabra "número" y la posición aparecen en líneas separadas en mi computadora portátil.
  • Abordado pero de otra manera. Decidí que la posición específica en la que la canción alcanzó su punto máximo no es realmente tan importante, lo único importante es que no alcanzó el número uno... -- ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 07:27, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ responder ]
  • En el tercer párrafo, la secuencia que sigue a Cinco canciones encabezaron ambas listas durante el año me resulta un poco incómoda. Siento que eliminar el "y" antes de la mención de la Quinta Dimensión y el "así como" antes de Zager y Evans daría como resultado un flujo más fluido.
Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 20:42, 24 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ Dylan620 : - gracias por su reseña, respuestas anteriores - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 07:27, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
No hay problema Chris , ¡me parece bien! Apoyo . Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 17:39, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de emisoras de Seattle Kraken

Nominadores: XR228 ( discusión ) 08:48, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Creo que esta lista contiene suficientes fuentes y suficiente prosa para ganarse un lugar en la Lista Destacada. Siéntase libre de revisar. XR228 ( discusión ) 08:48, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Por favor envíame un ping cuando respondas. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 14:00, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ Hola, soy Josh : hice los cambios. Por los problemas con la sección sobre afiliados de radio, decidí rehacerla por completo según la fuente de iHeartRadio. (ver aquí) XR228 ( discusión ) 11:15, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ Hola, soy josh XR228 ( discusión ) 09:34, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Estoy bien con los cambios que se han realizado. Aunque recomendaría la eliminación del atributo width=100%, ya que creo que hace que la tabla sea más ancha de lo necesario. Esa es una preferencia personal y nada que pueda retrasar esta nominación.
Las referencias 12, 13 y 17 aún deben especificarse porque necesitan una suscripción. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 14:39, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ Hola, soy Josh : hice los cambios. Personalmente creo que tener las mesas al 100% queda mejor estéticamente. Solo es mi opinión. XR228 ( discusión ) 17:44, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Personalmente, encuentro que la columna extremadamente amplia "jugada por jugada" es desagradable y parece que la tabla tiene el formato incorrecto, pero no es un factor decisivo. Apoyo . Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 18:36, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Nota menor: las etiquetas alcance=col ponen las celdas del encabezado en negrita, por lo que no es necesario volver a ponerlas en negrita (en este momento los encabezados de las columnas están en doble negrita). -- Pres N 15:37, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@PresN : Corregido . Gracias. XR228 ( discusión ) 23:53, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Discografía de Crystal Castles

Nominadores: Charla sobre Skyshifter 01:43, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Esta es la discografía del dúo electrónico canadiense Crystal Castles , que tiene todo un culto de seguidores . Este es mi primer FLC, por lo que creo que habrá algunos errores, pero haré todo lo posible para abordarlos en el transcurso de esta nominación. Charla de Skyshifter 01:43, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Soporte en prosa e imágenes (relevantes para el texto, subtítulos, con la licencia adecuada, texto alternativo presente). Bien escrito y comprensible para mí. Lo único: ¿tal vez profundizar un poco en las acusaciones de abuso? Tuve que profundizar un poco más para entenderlos y dejó un poco más que desear. Por lo demás, ¡gran trabajo y bien hecho! Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 03:04, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
¡Gracias por tu apoyo! Así que eso es lo principal de lo que no estoy seguro, considerando WP:BLP y WP:UNDUE . Creo que es relevante citar las acusaciones, ya que es por eso que Glass dejó la banda y por eso está en pausa. Definitivamente es lo suficientemente importante como para citarlo aquí. Sin embargo, debido a estas políticas que mencioné, creo que entrar en detalles sería demasiado. Charla de Skyshifter 03:16, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Comentarios de TechnoSquirrel69

Próximamente una reseña. - TechnoSquirrel69 ( suspiro ) 15:01, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Números de citas de esta revisión . ¡Hagámoslo!

Eso es todo lo que tengo por ahora; Es posible que vuelva con más comentarios después de otra lectura. - TechnoSquirrel69 ( suspiro ) 18:00, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ TechnoSquirrel69 : ¡Todos respondieron! Charla de Skyshifter 19:58, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Revisión de fuente

Ahora trabajando a partir de esta revisión .

Planeo hacer una verificación más profunda de las fuentes, pero tendré que oponerme por el momento. - TechnoSquirrel69 ( suspiro ) 18:48, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Agregó un poco más. - TechnoSquirrel69 ( suspiro ) 21:01, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Respondió; algunos cambios pendientes. Charla de Skyshifter 22:14, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de elogios recibidos por Parasite

Nominadores: Sgubaldo ( discusión ) 14:52, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Parasite se estrenó en 2019 e hizo historia al convertirse en la primera película en idioma no inglés en ganar Mejor Película en 2019. El estilo es el mismo que el de otras FL existentes de este tipo. Sgubaldo ( charla ) 14:52, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Temporada de patinaje artístico 2023-24

Nominadores: Bgsu98 (Discusión) 12:20, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando esto para la lista destacada porque toda la información se obtuvo correctamente y las tablas se formatearon para cumplir con el MOS de Wikipedia. Bgsu98 (Discusión) 12:20, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

Gracias por tu trabajo @ Bgsu98 . Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 13:57, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Todos estos deberían abordarse. ¡Muchas gracias por tu aporte! Bgsu98 (Discusión) 18:10, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Se ve bien. Soporte en imágenes. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 01:54, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentario

Creo que aún queda bastante trabajo por hacer en este artículo. Por favor envíame un ping cuando respondas. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 14:52, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola, soy Josh , con respecto a tu primera pregunta, no lo sé. Así se han configurado siempre estos artículos de temporada. ¿Hay algún beneficio en proporcionar un enlace en lugar de una fuente integrada? Si no, los convertiré todos en fuentes. Bgsu98 (Discusión) 17:31, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Perdón por la respuesta tardía @ Bgsu98 , me perdí la tuya cuando me puse al día con mis pings ayer. Consulte WP:CS:EMBED , que trata sobre cómo evitar enlaces incrustados. Además, creo que tiene sentido ser coherente en toda la lista y que las tablas no tengan estilos de referencia diferentes. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 12:10, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Eso tiene sentido. He comenzado a reemplazar los enlaces con fuentes adecuadas. Bgsu98 (Discusión) 14:17, 25 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de accesibilidad (MOS:DTAB)

Primeras mujeres admitidas en carreras de la Universidad de Oxford

Nominadores: Omnis Scientia ( discusión ) 16:45, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando este artículo para la lista destacada porque tiene buenas fuentes y, en mi opinión, cumple con los requisitos básicos de una lista destacada. Omnis Scientia ( charla ) 16:45, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Referencias

  1. ^ https://www.firstwomenatoxford.ox.ac.uk/article/from-lectures-for-ladies-to-university-examination
  2. ^ https://www.firstwomenatoxford.ox.ac.uk/1894-1896
  3. ^ https://www.some.ox.ac.uk/about/a-brief-history-of-somerville/pre-war-years/

Comentarios de Alavense

Excelente trabajo, Omnis Scientia . No vi nada más que tal vez faltaba una coma en "¿Fue Constance Savery quien murió?" Apoyo . Alavense ( charla ) 07:41, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@Alavense , he arreglado la coma. ¡Gracias por las amables palabras! :) Omnis Scientia ( charla ) 11:52, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de ciudades en Manitoba

Nominadores:B3251(discusión) 16:33, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Nominar de manera similar a mi nominación anterior para la Lista de ciudades de New Brunswick . Avíseme si debo ampliar o cambiar algo y estaré más que feliz de hacerlo. ¡Gracias, críticos!B3251(discusión) 16:33, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[respuesta]

Comentarios

Verificación de verificación MrLinkinPark333

Prosa
Mesa

- MrLinkinPark333 ( discusión ) 21:21, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ MrLinkinPark333 Parcialmente terminado : seguí adelante e hice algunos cambios, pero no pude encontrar una fuente adicional en el área terrestre. Por favor, hágame saber qué se puede hacer al respecto. Con respecto a las regiones, mi suposición es que sería WP:SKYBLUE porque esto se puede verificar solo en función de sus ubicaciones geográficas, y es lo que supongo que es la razón por la que se aprobó mi Lista de ciudades de New Brunswick, también nominada recientemente. sin requerir citaciones para los condados a los que pertenece cada ciudad allí.B3251(discusión) 23:12, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[respuesta]
En lo que respecta a la superficie terrestre, creo que una fuente adicional que indique específicamente los nombres de las 10 provincias podría ayudar. Esto podría colocarse junto a la fuente de Stats Canada, como dice Canadá, provincias y territorios . Para las regiones, no estoy seguro de si pasa el conocimiento común como "fácilmente verificado por un mapa no especializado". Esto no tiene regiones, mientras que usa regiones diferentes. De lo contrario:
  • La fuente del Gobierno de Manitoba también necesita la página 1 para mostrar la Ley Municipal de 1996.
  • sexta más grande por superficie terrestre" -> es posible que desee cambiar la redacción a "sexta provincia más grande por superficie terrestre" para evitar confusiones.
  • La fuente de la Enciclopedia canadiense se puede reutilizar para la nota de Flin Flon en la tabla.
  • Las densidades de población todavía necesitan ajustes.
MrLinkinPark333 ( discusión ) 23:52, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ MrLinkinPark333 :  Listo B3251(discusión) 16:55, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[respuesta]
Ya casi estás ahí:
  • La fuente archivada del Gobierno de Manitoba de 2009 no incluye a Winkler y Morden como ciudades del Valle de Pembina.
  • La fuente archivada del Gobierno de Manitoba utiliza las regiones Norte y Winnipeg Capital, en lugar de Norte de Manitoba y Winnipeg Metropolitan. Quizás se pueda agregar aquí una fuente adicional con estos nombres, especialmente desde que Winnipeg Capital pasó a llamarse Winnipeg Metropolitan.
  • No estoy seguro de si la fuente archivada del Gobierno de Manitoba tiene 100% claro que Selkrik también está en Winnipeg Capital. Las dos fuentes que muestran Interlake y Winnipeg Capital podrían ayudar aquí.
  • Todavía se necesita una fuente sobre la sexta provincia más grande para mostrar las diez provincias. Esto se puede colocar junto a la fuente de Stats Canada.
MrLinkinPark333 ( discusión ) 19:07, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Hola hombre, soy Josh.

Eso es lo que tengo por ahora. Por favor envíame un ping cuando respondas. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 14:31, 23 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

@ Hola, soy Josh : Parcialmente terminado : los primeros tres terminados, déjame saber lo que piensas. Tengo un par de preguntas:
Haré todo lo demás una vez que reciba una respuesta solo para mayor claridad. ¡Gracias!B3251(discusión) 17:00, 27 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[respuesta]
@ B3251 : Lo siento, recibí muchos pings y me perdí algunos a los que necesitaba responder. En cuanto al punto de aclaración, sugería una nota para aclarar de dónde sale el resto del total, sin incluir las ciudades listadas. Para la referencia 9, la fuente en sí no es el problema, es que utilizó el editor, que de forma predeterminada utiliza texto sin cursiva, mientras que sus otras citas a sitios web de la ciudad utilizaron el parámetro sitio web/trabajo, que de forma predeterminada está en cursiva. Sin embargo , hice el cambio yo mismo, lo que significa que las referencias a Ciudad de X ahora están constantemente en cursiva. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 16:56, 31 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de miembros del año del equipo académico All-America de baloncesto femenino

Nominadores: TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD ) 04:45, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Estoy nominando esto para la lista destacada debido al éxito reciente de Wikipedia: Lista de candidatos destacados/Lista de miembros del año del equipo académico de fútbol americano de todo Estados Unidos/archivo2 . Creo que esta lista es de calidad y preparación similar.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD ) 04:45, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Comentarios de accesibilidad desde el vehículo

Lista de misiones Apolo

Nominadores: The Herald , ~ Matthewrb Háblame · Cambios que he realizado 05:39, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ responder ]

Estoy nominando esto para la lista de destacados porque todavía creo que tiene calidad de lista de destacados. Mi co-nominador, The Herald, se tomó el tiempo para abordar muchos de los temas desde la última FLC. ~ Matthewrb Habla conmigo · Cambios que he realizado 05:39, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

Comentarios de paso

Revisión de accesibilidad (MOS:DTAB)

Además del comentario anterior de MPGuy2824:

Lista de sitios del Patrimonio Mundial en Argentina

Nominadores: Tono 07:36, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Argentina tiene 12 WHS, incluidos los caminos incas, las cataratas del Iguazú y antiguas misiones jesuíticas. Estilo estándar. Como la lista de Sudán ya está recibiendo apoyo, voy a añadir una nueva nominación. Tono 07:36, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

MPGuy2824

Comentarios

Alaska

ES-Jungwon

Eso es todo. -- ES - Jungwon 02:07, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Fijo, 17 era el sitio provisional que ahora está obsoleto. Lo dejé en la lista en ese entonces porque la nueva página aún no se ha actualizado. ¡Gracias por revisar! Tono 09:40, 28 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Símbolos nacionales de Nigeria

Nominadores: Vanderwaalforces ( discusión ) 07:09, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Los símbolos nacionales de Nigeria representan la identidad, el patrimonio y los valores del país, y reflejan su diversidad cultural y su trayectoria histórica. Estos símbolos incluyen la bandera nacional, el escudo de armas, el himno y el compromiso, así como la flor, el animal, la moneda nacional, etc. Esta lista pretende ser parte del Concurso Wiki de países en desarrollo, en el que estoy participando. ( charla ) 07:09, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

MPGuy2824

Conducir por comentarios

SafariScribe

Gracias por tus comentarios. El cielo es azul por ejemplo, no necesita fuente, ¿verdad? No estoy seguro. El símbolo de Naira, ₦, se deriva de la letra inicial de Nigeria con un doble trazo. Es algo que necesita una fuente porque es obvio, pero tengo una fuente que puedo citar para eso. El Teatro Nacional y el sello del Presidente no son "símbolo nacional" per se. La fuente que mencionaste es la única que afirma eso. Por ejemplo, el sello del presidente de Nigeria es más o menos hijo del escudo de armas, por lo que prefiero llamar al escudo de armas el símbolo nacional que el sello. De hecho, iba a mencionar el sello en las notas del escudo de armas, por cierto, pero creo que luego cambié de opinión. - Vanderwaalforces ( discusión ) 16:13, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@Vanderwaalforces , cuando quieras responder a un comentario como el suyo, es posible que desees responder cada reseña, para que el revisor no tenga que revisarlas . A veces, una revisión general como la anterior no necesariamente le da al revisor una respuesta a un comentario determinado. Uno de los mejores marcados es "*:". Salud. ¡Ediciones de Safari Scribe ! ¡Hablar! 18:16, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ SafariScribe : Gracias por tus comentarios. Ya he abordado todos estos. - Vanderwaalforces ( discusión ) 23:53, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Luce bien para mi. Estoy feliz de apoyar . ¡Ediciones de Safari Scribe ! ¡Hablar! 00:11, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@Safari Scribe: No veo por qué el sello del presidente y el teatro nacional de las artes están en esta lista. No incluiríamos al Taj Mahal en una lista similar para la India, ni a la Catedral de San Basilio para Rusia, a pesar de que son símbolos culturales populares. Además, el sello del presidente es esencialmente el escudo de armas nacional. ¿Qué nos impide añadir la bandera de la Armada de Nigeria a esta lista? - MPGuy2824 ( discusión ) 08:59, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ MPGuy2824 Literalmente disputé SS, porque pensé exactamente lo mismo que acabas de decir. Pero más tarde vi una fuente que afirmaba que el Sello era un símbolo nacional, pero provenía de una revista depredadora que no pude citar. Definitivamente no consideraría la bandera de la Armada de Nigeria como un símbolo nacional.
Haciendo ping correctamente a @SafariScribe . Vanderwaalforces ( discusión ) 09:16, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@ MPGuy2824 , por supuesto, la bandera de la Armada de Nigeria no puede considerarse un símbolo nacional. Según esta fuente, un símbolo nacional u oficial es algo que hace único a un país y lo identifica entre otros. Si bien estoy seguro de que el Teatro Nacional es un símbolo nacional, tengo algunas dudas sobre el Mar del Presidente. Sin embargo, dado que identifica al Presidente, que es la autoridad suprema del país, también puede considerarse un símbolo (oficial). Por ejemplo, muchos obispos tienen su propio escudo de armas, lo que ayuda a identificarlos, tal como lo hace el Papa. No tengo ninguna objeción si alguien cuestiona el Sello del Presidente de Nigeria como símbolo nacional. @Vanderwaalforces , la fuente que cité aquí contiene información completa sobre estos símbolos nacionales, por lo que la recomiendo durante la revisión de la fuente. ¡Salud! ¡Ediciones de Safari Scribe ! ¡Hablar! 09:35, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@SafariScribe quizás no tengas cuidado. La fuente que mencionaste es una de las publicaciones que ya cité , mientras que esa fuente no solo dice "Aquí hay algunos", tampoco menciona el Sello del Presidente de Nigeria ni el Teatro Nacional como símbolo, al menos, según página 295. Como dije antes, encontré una fuente (que no es la que mencionaste) que menciona el sello (no el teatro nacional) como símbolo nacional, pero es de una revista depredadora y no pude citarlo. . Estoy muy inclinado a volver a mi versión original (sin el sello y el teatro), pero déjame escuchar a otros. Vanderwaalforces ( discusión ) 09:58, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
@Vanderwaalforces , siempre que el Seal y el Teatro Nacional tengan acceso adecuado a una fuente confiable , estoy listo para comenzar. Si hay alguna discusión sobre el Sello y el Teatro, debe ir a la página de discusión. Volver a la versión original puede resultar perjudicial ya que lo fue de un revisor. Por lo tanto, las objeciones deberían ser una cuestión de si el artículo cumple o no con las pautas de FL. ¡Ediciones de Safari Scribe ! ¡Hablar! 10:06, 22 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Lista de distritos electorales parlamentarios de Zambia

Nominadores: - MPGuy2824 ( discusión ) 12:16, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

La cuarta nominación en la serie de distritos electorales. Mejoré el cliente potencial, agregué una sección de historial y convertí la lista en una tabla con más información que la que estaba presente antes. Lo he modelado en FL similares como Tripura y Mizoram . - MPGuy2824 ( discusión ) 12:16, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Conducir por comentarios

Gracias por revisar. Se corrigieron todos estos. - MPGuy2824 ( discusión ) 11:01, 19 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Descendientes de Cristián IX de Dinamarca

Nominadores: AndrewPeterT ( discusión ) ( contribuciones ) 02:49, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Esta lista de los descendientes de Christian IX ayuda a contar la historia de un rey danés, su reina, sus hijos, sus nietos y sus bisnietos. Señalaré que esta lista fue examinada tanto en Artículos para la creación como en ¿Sabías que?

Esta nominación es significativa por varias razones. Personalmente, este es mi primer intento de crear una lista destacada en Wikipedia y su éxito demostraría que soy capaz de producir contenido ejemplar. En segundo lugar, observo que en el momento de esta nominación, sólo 10 listas relacionadas con la realeza, y ninguna sobre descendientes de individuos, están destacadas. Espero que este artículo pueda servir como modelo para todos los editores de Wikipedia sobre cómo puede ser una gran lista real y genealógica. Finalmente, y sobre todo, espero mostrarle a la audiencia general que hay mucho más en la realeza (europea) que solo la Casa de Windsor . ¡Todos son bienvenidos a dar su opinión para hacer realidad estos objetivos!

Gracias, AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 02:50, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios de Borsoka

Al leer la lista y sus fuentes, no estoy convencido de que coincida completamente con Wikipedia:Notability , y creo que su tema no está verificado por una fuente confiable. Borsoka ( discusión ) 03:09, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Estoy de acuerdo, su DYK se mantuvo durante mucho tiempo y no estaba del todo seguro de que pasara WP:NOTDATABASE y WP:NOTGENEALOGY . -  48 JCL 12:04, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
En la nominación de ¿Sabías que? se plantearon preocupaciones muy similares. Respondí a esta pregunta señalando que Aronson 2000 y Lerche y Mandal 2003 establecieron la notoriedad. El objetor luego admitió el punto (en mi opinión). Las dos fuentes antes mencionadas (aunque la versión 2020 del texto de Aronson) también se enumeran en la sección "Lecturas adicionales" de este artículo.
Dicho esto, no objetaré si el consenso de esta discusión es fusionar o eliminar esta lista independiente. Si es así, solicito que las tablas se fusionen en las secciones "Asunto" (o correspondientes) de los artículos sobre Christian IX y sus hijos. AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 16:51, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Gracias por los enlaces. No estoy seguro de que las obras escritas por Theo Aronson sean fuentes fiables. Miranda Carter no escribió sobre los descendientes de Christian, sino sobre tres primos que gobernaron tres grandes potencias durante la Primera Guerra Mundial. Lerche y Mandal no parecen historiadores. Borsoka ( discusión ) 02:14, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

(quitar sangría para garantizar que la plantilla de colapso funcione correctamente) Para que mi proceso de pensamiento al escribir el artículo quede claro tanto para usted como para todos los demás que comentan, calificaré aún más la notoriedad del tema:

Aunque personalmente creo que estos antecedentes sobre los autores califican suficientemente el tema para un artículo de Wikipedia, dejaré que el consenso de esta página vea si este es realmente el caso. AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 17:31, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Con estas fuentes seguramente estas deberían reemplazar las fuentes del “Royal Family Tree” (que parecen ser SPS) se podrían reemplazar ¿no? Todavía no voy a justificar una oposición, pero sugeriría retirarme, hay mucho trabajo por hacer. 48JCL público ( discusión ) 19:13, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Eliminé todas las fuentes autoeditadas en el artículo que pude encontrar y reemplacé las citas con referencias a fuentes más confiables. Si me perdí una fuente y/o aún así debería usar los textos de lectura adicional de manera más exhaustiva en el artículo, hágamelo saber. Además, con respecto a WP:NOTDATABASE , el único criterio que de manera realista podría ver que se use contra esta nominación es el n.° 3, ya que los trabajos creativos, las letras de las canciones y las actualizaciones de software no se enumeran en este artículo. Para que toda la información sobre la vida sea relevante enciclopédicamente, he escrito prosa que acompaña a cada tabla y que detalla la vida familiar de Christian/Louise y las familias de sus hijos. Por favor, avíseme si esa prosa debería ser más completa. AndrewPeterT ( discusión ) ( contribuciones ) 00:07, 21 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

48JCL

No creo que una lista deba contener "Este artículo describe a los hijos, nietos y bisnietos de Christian y Louise". al final de la lista

@ 48JCL : ¿Podría sugerir cómo se debería reemplazar esta oración? Según WP:SALLEAD , los criterios de inclusión de una lista independiente deben hacer una declaración directa sobre los criterios de inclusión. Éste es el propósito del texto que usted citó. AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 16:51, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
He reescrito esa oración para intentar que los criterios de inclusión sean lo más explícitos posible sin hacer una referencia activa al artículo. Por favor, avíseme si debo modificar más el texto. AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 23:59, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Problema con las fuentes

Me doy cuenta de que se citan Blogspot y Wordpress. ¿Qué los hace confiables? Más por venir. 48 JCL 12:12, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

He reemplazado las fuentes de Blogspot y WordPress. Dicho esto, mi justificación para incluirlos fue que los autores específicos parecían tener credenciales profesionales en su campo. AndrewPeterT ( charla ) ( contribuciones ) 16:21, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Sí, pero eso no lo hace exactamente confiable, ya que sigue siendo un SPS. Todavía no estoy seguro de si este artículo debería recibir soporte o no, pero gracias por abordar mis inquietudes. 48 JCL 17:58, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

dylan620

Hola Andrew: Acabo de empezar a trabajar en una revisión que se centrará principalmente en prosa e imágenes y debería estar terminada a más tardar al final del día lunes. Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 23:38, 26 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Una actualización rápida: si bien he progresado bastante con esta revisión, desafortunadamente me han frenado cosas de la vida real, por lo que estoy un poco retrasado. Mañana saldré del trabajo bastante temprano, así que toco madera, debería poder terminar en las próximas 24 horas aproximadamente. Tengo algunos comentarios preliminares:
Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 23:42, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Bueno, pensé que ya casi había terminado, y luego me di cuenta de que tendría que revisar un PDF de 119 páginas para verificar el origen de una de las imágenes, a la que le falta el número de página en la página de carga de Commons. Recuerdo haber visto al menos un par de casos similares en otras partes de la lista. Desafortunadamente, eso significa que esta revisión llevará bastante más tiempo de lo que había previsto. Intentaré completarlo dentro de los próximos cinco a siete días; acepte mis disculpas. Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 23:52, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Cronología de la temporada de huracanes del Pacífico de 2014

Nominador(es): Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 21:48, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

Después de tomarme un descanso para concentrarme en otros proyectos, estoy de regreso con la sexta nominación a la línea de tiempo de una serie en curso. Esta cronología particular documenta la temporada de huracanes en el Pacífico de 2014 , una de las más activas jamás registradas en la cuenca. Incluyó un gigante de categoría 5 , el huracán de mayo más fuerte conocido en la cuenca , un raro sistema que tocó tierra en la Isla Grande de Hawái, un huracán infame que devastó grandes extensiones de la península de Baja California y otros doce huracanes para un total que empató un huracán de todos los tiempos. récord de tiempo establecido más de 20 años antes. Hasta la semana pasada, partes de esta lista (especialmente a partir de septiembre) estaban desactualizadas por casi una década, y hace ocho años se colocó una Scary Orange Box TM aludiendo a este problema, que ahora se ha resuelto. Espero los comentarios de la comunidad y abordaré cualquier inquietud lo antes posible. (Dejando de lado las matemáticas nerd... 2+0+1+4=7, y si esta nominación se aprueba, será mi séptima lista destacada). Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 21:48, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

MPGuy2824
Gracias MPGuy2824 por tus comentarios. Respuestas a continuación:
  • Agregar "an" delante de "divergencia de nivel superior" realmente no funcionaría porque "divergencia" es un sustantivo incontable, al menos en este contexto. Sorprendentemente, la divergencia (meteorología) es un vínculo rojo; El artículo existente más cercano que se me ocurre probablemente sería zona de convergencia . Al final, decidí condensar la oración en cuestión para eliminar la mención de divergencia, ya que a una parte de mí le preocupaba que fuera demasiado profunda para lectores ocasionales.
  • Respecto a Genevieve, pensé en cuán largas son algunas de esas distancias. Originalmente había decidido seguir con Baja California como punto de referencia porque se menciona explícitamente en el Informe sobre ciclones tropicales de Genevieve. Por el contrario, no se menciona ningún lugar específico en Hawái; sólo se refiere a las islas hawaianas como grupo. He ajustado las referencias de ubicación comenzando con la segunda disipación de Genevieve, donde Hawaii se menciona por primera vez en el TCR, con distancias inferidas de 21°30′N 158°00′W / 21,5°N 158,0°W / 21,5; -158.0 , que es el punto de ubicación en la esquina superior derecha del artículo de Hawaii . Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 12:41, 16 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Promoción de apoyo basada en prosa. - MPGuy2824 ( discusión ) 09:56, 20 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de fuente

A primera vista nada parece poco fiable. Así que haré la revisión de la fuente. Todo esta archivado ¿Preguntas? cuatro Olifanofmrtennant (ella/ella) 00:41, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

El único problema que veo es que la Ref 28 debería marcarse como en japonés.

Pronto continuaré con los controles puntuales.

El único problema que veo es que la Ref 28 debería marcarse como en japonés. – Gracias por señalar esto; ¡cuidado! Dylan 620 (él/él • habla • edita ) 10:17, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisé todas las fuentes impares para un total de 20. Todo coincide.

Listado de municipios de Albacete

Nominadores: Mattximus ( discusión ) 18:58, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC) y Alavense ( discusión )[ responder ]

Estamos intentando que la lista de municipios de las provincias españolas alcance el estándar que se ve en las otras listas de municipios destacadas. Alavense ha realizado algunos cambios excelentes en este artículo y juntos nos gustaría crear una plantilla que pueda usarse en otras provincias españolas y eventualmente llevarlas al estado de lista destacada. Éste puede requerir una importante edición por pares, ya que es el primero en España, pero dará sus frutos ya que puede replicarse en otras provincias españolas. ¡Gracias por todos tus comentarios de antemano! Mattximus ( discusión ) 18:58, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

  • Encontré esta instancia y la solucioné, pero ¿hay otras? Debería ser coherente ahora.
  • Supongo que significa que nunca puedes sumar un número impar, ya que eso haría que el total fuera par. Intentaré reformularlo.
Eso fue mi culpa. En realidad quise decir lo contrario, que la cifra final nunca puede ser igual porque eso permitiría empates a la hora de votar cualquier asunto. Pero tampoco creo que sea correcto ahora. Intentaré explicarlo. Tenemos 25 a 100.000. En 200.000 sumamos uno y deberíamos tener 26, pero, dado que es un número par, obtenemos uno adicional (27) para resolver el problema. Cuando la población llega a 300.000 habitantes, se añade un concejal más , por lo que obtenemos 27 nuevamente. Creo que la redacción actual significaría que obtendríamos 27 a 200.000 y 29 a 300.000, lo cual no es el caso. ¿Podemos tal vez moverlo, Mattximus ? Alavense ( charla ) 16:36, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Confío en que ustedes resolverán esto entre ustedes :-) - ChrisTheDude ( discusión ) 16:49, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Oh, sí, mi redacción es incorrecta. Lo reformulé. ¿Tiene sentido esta nueva redacción? Mattximus ( discusión ) 18:11, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Eso es lo que quise decir, Mattximus . Ahora está bien. Estamos felices ahora, ChrisTheDude . Gracias. Alavense ( charla ) 18:46, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • ¡Gracias! ¡Ambas inquietudes abordadas! Mattximus ( discusión ) 16:19, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

No estoy seguro de este. Creo que ser los municipios más poblados de la provincia también los convierte en los más relevantes y los que deberían destacarse con las imágenes.
Creo que colocar imágenes en el lateral causa algunos problemas de accesibilidad en pantallas pequeñas como los teléfonos. Mattximus ( discusión ) 15:18, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Hecho.
Hecho.

¡Gracias por tu buen trabajo @Mattximus y @Alavense ! Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 23:04, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Gracias por tu reseña, Staraction . Hice los cambios que sugeriste, excepto el primero, porque no estoy seguro. Atentamente. Alavense ( charla ) 05:25, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
¡Se ve bien! Soporte en imágenes. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 06:20, 18 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios de Dudley

  • De acuerdo, hice el cambio.
  • Dejaré que Alavense responda a esto, estoy seguro de que se refiere a la lista de registro a la que se alude al principio del artículo donde todos se registran en un municipio. Mattximus ( discusión ) 18:05, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • He ampliado la información al respecto, Dudley Miles . Espero que ahora sea más fácil de entender. Alavense ( charla ) 06:49, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • Hice una traducción pero no estoy seguro si es 100% correcta, diferiré al español de Alavense .
  • Estoy contento con eso: Alavense.
  • Se agregaron dos más, ¿se requiere alguno más?
Sugiero poner una selección de imágenes a la derecha de la tabla. Es una tabla estrecha en comparación con muchas, por lo que debería causar menos problemas en los teléfonos siempre que no se utilice un ancho fijo como px. Dudley Miles ( discusión ) 18:28, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Realmente no veo cómo esto puede ser una mejora, Dudley Miles . ¿Cuántas imágenes debemos agregar? Entre las listas promocionadas más recientemente, veo algunas con menos (o incluso ninguna) imagen que esta. De todos modos, ya teníamos un mapa destacando la provincia dentro de España, otro mapa con cada municipio ubicado y una selección de imágenes de los municipios más poblados ordenados en fila. Ahora tenemos más imágenes, pero sigue siendo una selección arbitraria. Sin embargo, ya no están en una fila ordenada. Además, creo que es menos cómodo para aquellos lectores que usan la aplicación móvil, porque tienen que desplazarse para encontrar una tabla (que al fin y al cabo es lo más importante de la lista) que se ha hundido más abajo. Alavense ( charla ) 06:35, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • Probé estos y todos funcionan para mí, pero ¿tal vez Alavense lo sepa?
  • No podré usar una computadora al menos hasta mañana, pero intenté arreglarla. ¿Está bien ahora? - Alavense.
  • DE ACUERDO. Los mensajes de error han desaparecido. Dudley Miles ( discusión ) 07:30, 29 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
  • Apoyo . No estoy de acuerdo con las imágenes, pero eso es una cuestión de preferencia personal. Dudley Miles ( discusión ) 06:54, 30 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno 2018

Nominadores: Hola, soy josh ( discusión ) 16:22, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC)[ responder ]

En el espíritu de los próximos Juegos Olímpicos, comencé a trabajar en esto y de hecho es mi segunda nominación a una lista no relacionada con el fútbol americano. Se basa en el medallero de los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno de 2022 , que se promovió el 14 de mayo de 2023 . Como siempre, haré todo lo posible para responder y abordar rápidamente todas y cada una de las inquietudes que surjan. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 16:22, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Revisión de imágenes por Staraction

¡Gracias por tu trabajo como siempre! Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 21:25, 15 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Movimiento de novato josh, movimiento de novato. ¡Gracias por ver @Staraction ! He hecho los cambios. Hola hombre, soy Josh ( discusión ) 14:24, 16 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]
Soporte en imágenes. Acción estelar ( charla | contribuciones ) 18:58, 16 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]

Comentarios

MPGuy2824

Comentarios y verificación de citas de Arconning

  1. COC: Confiable, aunque me pregunto por qué la fecha es el 10 de agosto de 2011.
  2. COI - Confiable
  3. Reuters - Confiable
  4. CNN - Confiable
  5. BBC Deporte - Confiable
  6. COI - Confiable
  7. Juegos Olímpicos de NBC: confiable
  8. El guardián - Confiable
  9. NYT - Confiable
  10. Yahoo! - Confiable
  11. AP - Confiable
  12. BBC - Confiable
  13. COI - Confiable
  14. ESPN - Confiable
  15. Heraldo de Nueva Zelanda - Confiable
  16. POCOG - Confiable
  17. COI: Confiable, pero me pregunto para qué se utiliza. Si desea conservarlo, cambie el guión del título por un guión.
  18. El guardián - Confiable
  19. Daily Mirror: un poco dudoso según WP:RSPSS , pero el tema no es polémico, así que estoy haciendo una revisión condicional de este.
  20. ESPN - Confiable
  21. COI - Confiable
  22. CBC AP - Confiable
  23. Telégrafo - Confiable
  24. Dentro de los Juegos - Confiable
  25. CAS - Confiable
  26. BBC - Confiable
  27. COI - Confiable

Comments by Birdienest81

--Birdienest81talk 19:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Eureka Stockade defenders

Nominator(s): Robbiegibbons (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a fairly comprehensive list of the best-documented Eureka Stockade rebels Robbiegibbons (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that this nomination was not transcluded to WP:FLC until now. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charles Ross is a link to a disambiguation page Dajasj (talk) 19:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

Comments from Steelkamp

Oppose. This list is heavily reliant on www.eurekapedia.org. That website is written by just two people, with no indication of fact checking or quality control by someone else like what would happen in a newspaper or a non self-published book. As a list relating to history, I would expect to see more scholarly sources. Steelkamp (talk) 11:43, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using a user-submitted wiki as a source is a deal-breaker, yeah, and if there isn't some movement on this soon I'm going to close the nomination. @Robbiegibbons: do you intend on addressing this concern? --PresN 13:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @PresN and @Steelkamp, I would like to disagree on this issue. Eurekapedia seems to be written by two domain experts, works by both of them have been cited in this article. Also, while looking through some of the pages there, they seem to be reliable and have proper citations. I'm a little busy at this time, so I can't check the h-indices or peer reviews of the two writers' works, but I think academia would also have found them reliable sources. Also, just because a site uses MediaWiki, that doesn't mean it is unreliable and user generated. See the discussion at the FAC for Sher Shah Suri, where Banglapedia is considered a reliable source as it has been compiled by scholars. I think we can allow this here, though I could be wrong as well. Please let me know what you think. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 08:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could convince me to rescind my oppose by showing that the authors of that source meet the requirements at WP:EXPERTSPS, i.e.: "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." Steelkamp (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, looking closer, it does appear to basically be a selfpub source by Clare Gervasoni & Dorothy Wickham, and not publicly editable, which clears that up, but a) the references should then have the author's name(s), and b) they need to be shown to meet EXPERTSPS, like Steelkamp said - right now the only used source that has them as authors is The Eureka Encyclopedia, which appears to also be a self-published work. It's possible they are, I'd just like to see some proof. --PresN 15:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @PresN and @Steelkamp, Gervasoni & Wickham seem to run the Ballarat Heritage Service and its associated publishing arm, the latter is notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. The authors seem to have okish h-indices for a subject this niche, I'll have to check academic reviews of their books or papers published in notable journals to further confirm this. What further proof would be required for establishing reliability? Matarisvan (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National symbols of India

Nominator(s): Magentic Manifestations (talk) 16:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC) and The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first featured list nomination and I am nominating this post improving the article. This is a list of the national symbols of India. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 16:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dajasj

Thanks for working on the list and nominating it! Some first thoughts:

Thanks for the review and comments. I have addressed the comments (MOS, sorting, caps and font size) except the notes part, which I will work on trimming it to keep it relevant.
For the last point, Hockey is listed as a national game in government websites, text books etc. but as per an official note, there is no declared national game. Not sure whether to omit this altogether or keep it with mentioning the same in comments. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kavyansh

I appreciate you nominating the list and I respect the efforts that must have been made to improve the list to this extent. That being said, I have a few fundamental issues with this nomination. The official Nation Portal of India lists only these 8 national symbols. Our list has 21 official symbols. Even if me make an exception for the "official name", the other alleged national symbols are being cited by an archived version of this site. It is a site hosted by "International Institute of Health and Hygiene,New Delhi" and sponsored by "Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change Govt of India". Does that make it an official site of the Government of India (as claimed in the citation)? For the other alleged national symbols, our article cites various news articles like TOI or HT. While these news articles do confirm the claim, wouldn't it be much better to cite an official source? For example, rather than this news article, why not directly cite this official declaration. But that leads me to the next question: if there are actual official symbols not specified in the Nation Portal of India website, what steps have we taken to ensure that the list is comprehensive? It is claimed by a HT article that Ganga is the national river of India. I am not able to find an official reliable source for it! The closest I can find is this audit report from the CAG, which again isn't an official declaration. So what criteria are we exactly using to determine which symbol gets to be in this list and which doesn't? How exactly are we justifying keeping Hockey as the National game? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh Thanks for the comments. I understand that your question broadly focuses on the comprehensiveness of the symbols and the verifiability of the same.
As there is no clear definition of what constitutes a official/national symbol (either officially or as an agreed consensus in WP), I am afraid that the list can neither be comprehensive nor be exhaustive. The article covers symbols that are generally regarded as official/national symbols as per various given sources. For the question of whether these 21 symbols are verifiable as official, let us classify into three categories for the discussion at hand.
a. Fifteen symbols with official sources:
  1. Eleven symbols, which are quoted as such directly in the official source: Official name and the nine symbols (motto is part of the emblem, described in detail in the same site) listed here officially are clear. National days are mentioned in the same official site here. These are fairly straightforward.
  2. Four symbols, where official press releases available. These have official sources, so verifiability should not be a concern. (Aquatic Animal: Official source by the Ministry of Environment here, Heritage animal: Official press release by the Ministry of Environment here, River: Apart from news sources, official press release from PMO here and official website of NMCG, Ministry of Jal Shakti also states so here, Microbe: Official press release by the Ministry of Environment here)
b. Four symbols, where Government affiliated sources and other citations are available. As there are multiple government affiliated sources and independent sources backing the same information, they are verifiable plus there are no sources stating anything to the contrary.
  1. Pledge: Apart from the general news sources, it is mentioned as such in Government sources (From Ministry of Education here, other here) and in a discussion in Parliament as a pledge (here).
  2. Tree and Fruit: These are quoted here in a site maintained by ENVIS, a government organization functioning under the Ministry of Environment. While not officially the Government website, it is affiliated to the Government. There are multiple other government affiliated sources/court mentions (For fruit: here, here, here and for tree: here, here, here, here) + independent news sources.
  3. Reptile: Apart from the general news sources, it is mentioned as such in Government exams(here), question papers (here), text books (here) and third party sources (here)
c. Two symbols, with contradictory sources.
  1. Flower: ENVIS source here and other government affiliated source here + was part of the official symbols here. It was not mentioned as a national flower in an RTI query in 2017 and in Parliament in 2019 (here), but was part of the official website till 2021, referenced as such in official statements in 2019 (here) and by ministers in 2022 (here, here)
  2. Game: As I had mentioned in the previous revert, I am not sure whether to keep hockey or not. An RTI reply in 2012 said that officially there is no national game here and it was reiterated in 2020 here. While the ENVIS source still lists it here.
For both the above cases, can remove/keep with a note based on consensus here.
I have tried to address the points raised in your queries. Please do let me know if you have further comments/clarification on the same. Thanks again! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 10:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the delayed response. I understand that it is wrong to hold our editors accountable for information that is simply not available or unclear, but I am still not entirely convinced. In the lead of the list (which I believe needs to be more elaborate), we claim, "The Government of India has designated official national symbols that represent the Republic of India." However, the instances here unfortunately show that there are symbols that are not officially designated. As things stand, if the list can neither be comprehensive nor exhaustive, then we need to set clear criteria for what is to be included and what is not. In my opinion, that criteria should be based on what reliable official sources say. Alternatively, given the lack of available information, we can set the criteria based on the opinions of the major contributors to this list or through a talk page discussion (RfC if required). I won't oppose the nomination merely for this reason, but in my opinion, government exam question papers, privately published grade 6 textbooks, and even sites affiliated with the government aren't entirely reliable for such extraordinary claims. As a side note, I have filled a RTI application regarding this awaiting response from the Ministry of Home Affairs. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kavyansh.Singh I do agree with your point on the criteria and I am open to take it to a discussion as there seems to be no precedent or agreement on what is consisted as a national symbol (apart from these, there are symbols which are termed as national announced by private organizations as well!). If your RTI gets a revert, nothing like it as it will probably help clarify things from the official perspective. Then the question is whether we split into two sections or keep only the official symbols recognised. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Mercedes-EQ vehicles

Nominator(s): 750h+ 17:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first featured list nomination. This is a list of all the Mercedes-EQ models, including the production and concept models. If this gets promoted, it will be the first automobile featured list. Thanks, and enjoy the read! 750h+ 17:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

I'll do a larger review later on, but for now I want to point out some accessibility issues.

Again, I'll be back to a larger review later on. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

those should be addressed now 750h+ 17:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review: Passed

Feedback:

done
i couldn’t find any references
done
done
done
done
done
done
done
done

That's what I've got, good stuff! Please ping me when you reply. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! All addressed, @Hey man im josh:. 750h+ 15:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Much thanks for the review! 750h+ 15:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commentd

Comments from Steelkamp

added
removed
I couldn't find any good references for some of the classes, so I just didn't add them
added
done

That's all. Steelkamp (talk) 08:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All have been addressed. Thanks for the review, @Steelkamp:. 750h+ 10:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Steelkamp (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! 750h+ 15:01, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FLC director and delegates: hope this isn't bugging but will there be an image review? 750h+ 05:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Featured list candidates don't strictly need an image review, unlike FAC, although someone can do an image review if they so choose. (not a FLC director or delegate) Steelkamp (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. 750h+ 12:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That said, this is pretty image-heavy in an area that I'm not well familiar with, so I'd prefer one. The reason it's not "required" is due to a lack of people actually doing them. I'd give this a pass on the image review though- all commons, all self-uploads by... 3 people? Looks like a whole world of car photography I didn't know we had people doing. --PresN 22:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the pass! 750h+ 23:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Older nominations

List of Chivas USA seasons

Nominator(s): Brindille1 (talk) 03:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm following up my previous MLS featured lists (List of New England Revolution seasons, List of New England Revolution managers) with a list about the defunct club Chivas USA. This poorly-run team existed for ten unsuccessful seasons. I've created and improved this list, and believe it now meets the Featured List criteria. Brindille1 (talk) 03:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MrLinkinPark333

Comments

Gonzo_fan2007

Please ping me when you have responded. Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by the Linda Lindas

Nominator: – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) 17:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list, now that I've secured three Supports for my FLC of the Linda Lindas discography. Feel free to leave any comments if you don't think this is ready, but I believe it is. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 17:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NØ

Comments

List of Intercontinental Cup winning managers

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some hard work on this list, I now believe it meets the criteria. This will form part of the Lists of UEFA club competition winning managers topic if it passes here and would be a long overdue addition. My current list has four supports, so I'm assuming it's ok to nominate this one now. Thanks in advance for the comments. NapHit (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

United States congressional delegations from Idaho

Nominator(s): Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the Gem State. Hopefully I've improved this article enough for it to be considered a gem here at Wikipedia!

Other FLs in the vein of this one include those for Indiana, Utah, Hawaii, and Connecticut. I've also nominated Arizona, currently another FLC that has gained support from the two reviewers who have reviewed it.

Thanks for taking a look, and I appreciate any feedback that y'all give! Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

Comments

EN-Jungwon

-- EN-Jungwon 03:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EN-Jungwon, thanks for the review, it is very appreciated! I believe I've fixed all the issues you've pointed out. I don't think Suzanne Bates is the same person as the one who wrote the article for ref 7. If there's anything else amiss please let me know! Staraction (talk | contribs) 17:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was a few unarchived links. I went ahead and archived those. Happy to support now. -- EN-Jungwon 01:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gonzo_fan2007

Nice work. Please ping me when you have responded. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Swiss Nobel laureates

Nominator(s): Broc (talk) 08:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created this list, with the aim to fulfill the featured list criteria from the start. I believe it does meet all of them, hence my nomination. Switzerland has been closely linked to the Nobel prize since the start, and a large number of laureates were Swiss. Broc (talk) 08:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from nominator

I did significantly expand the last lead paragraph, which at the time of nomination only included Switzerland is among the countries with the highest number of Nobel laureates, both in total and per capita. I wanted to add some context with explanations that have been published in Swiss media, as well as a remark on the general Nobel controversies (Western bias is a pretty obvious one). This should provide better context and more WP:NPOV, avoiding the mildly celebratory tone that country-based lists end up having. Broc (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments from Staraction

Excited to see this list nominated! Staraction (talk | contribs) 15:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Staraction! I added alt text to all images and changed the sentence as you suggested. Upright scaling can only be used with thumbnails, which might not be the best option in a table. What would you recommend? Broc (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added upright scaling using "frameless" option. Broc (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

Comments

MPGuy2824

Drive by comments

  • @Broc, I feel like splitting would be better to avoid confusion. Also, there might be some discrepancy regarding Theiler's citizenship. According to this report by SERI (p. 16), Max Theiler is listed as a Swiss citizen. Maybe he could be placed in the naturalized citizen section with Pauli and Steinberger. Nitro Absynthe (talk) 09:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nitro Absynthe uhm that's a tricky one. The Historical Dictionary of Switzerland mentions that Theiler was Swiss citizen by birth (place of origin: Hasle), which makes sense as his parents were Swiss. On the other hand, he certainly received a honorary citizenship, again from Hasle, in 1952, which would not make sense if he already was a citizen. However, according to the list you shared, he was Swiss when he received the prize. I think it might be best to add him in the main list with a footnote. Broc (talk) 12:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Broc, agreed. I think that's better. Nitro Absynthe (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nitro Absynthe done, with footnotes on Theiler and Annan. Thanks a lot for raising these points, I think the list is better off now. Broc (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment

List of Green Bay Packers team records

Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A high-level overview of Green Bay Packers team records. Note, per WP:NOTSTATS, I tried to stick to the most notable and commonly reported records, and avoided to the best of my ability to dive too much into sports almanac or statbook territory. As always, happy to address any concerns. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Drive by comments, I'll be back for a full review later on:

As mentioned, I'll be back for a thorough review. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review: Passed

Feedback:

I replaced that FootballDB sources. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Downcase "Titles" to "titles" in all of these headers
  • Downcase "Wild Card Berths" to "Wild card berths"
  • Downcase "Playoff Appearances" to "Playoff apperances"
  • Downcase "NFL Title Game Appearances" to "NFL Title Game appearances"
  • Downcase "Super Bowl Appearances" to "Super Bowl appearances"
  • Downcase "All-time Record" to "All-time record"
Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not doing that. Do you think it is necessary? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The source doesn't provide this. My assumption is that each season had to qualify, but that would likely be OR. Thoughts? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added threshold and fixed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Single-game records -> Offense -> Passing -> Attempts
  • Single-game records -> Offense -> Passing -> Yards
  • Single-game records -> Special teams -> Punting -> Punts
Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Brackets closed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that's all I've got, good stuff Gonzo! Please ping me when the above issues have been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thorough review Hey man im josh. I have addressed everything except two items, where I provided responses. Let me know what you think. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't necessarily think it's necessary to call out when something noted as an NFL record is a tie. I think it might be nice to have it as T-NFL record in the bracket to make it clear, but I won't be a stickler for it. Source review passed, support. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review by Staraction

@Gonzo fan2007 I think that's it from me! Thanks for the nomination, as someone who doesn't follow American football very closely it was an interesting read. Staraction (talk | contribs) 03:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image review Staraction! I fixed both captions, although Martinez's record was for a single season, not a single game :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Support on images. Staraction (talk | contribs) 13:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of SB19 live performances

Nominator(s): – Relayed (t • c) 18:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I have nominated an article/list, but here I am with another, List of SB19 live performances! This list documents the live performances that the Filipino boy band SB19 have done since their debut, including tours, one-off concerts, awards shows, television, and more. I began revamping this list last February, but only progressed much later in May, and I finally finished it this week. This has to be the hardest list I have got my hands on revamping; sorting their performances, working with multiple sources, and the size of the article is definitely a pain.

The revamping of lists like this is part of my efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of SB19, hopefully getting them to have their featured topic soon! I believe I have improved the list pretty significantly from its previous state with the criteria in mind, and I think this list is deserving to be promoted as a featured list. I would be happy to address all your concerns, suggestions, and feedback; they are much appreciated. I sincerely thank the reviewers in advance who will put their time and effort here. – Relayed (t • c) 18:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review and accessibility review

Support on image and accessibility review. 48JCL 14:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support and for being here, 48JCL! – Relayed (t • c) 14:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Vaughan J.

Placeholder. Full table review coming soon! — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 10:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's all the concerns I have for this review. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 10:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being here, Vaughan J.! I have addressed your concerns. Let me know if you have anything else. – Relayed (t • c) 18:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Everything else is sorted. For the second concern, that does makes sense, so I'm crossing that out. — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 07:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support, Vaughan! – Relayed (t • c) 08:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Taylor Swift live performances

Nominator(s): Ippantekina (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This list covers the live performances of Taylor Swift, who has recently become the first artist to headline a $1 billion-grossing tour. Kudos to Medxvo for assisting with removing NONRS. Ippantekina (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would this still qualify for deletion to quality despite that the person who nominated it for deletion was the FL nominator? 48JCL TALK 20:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The consensus at the AfD was keep so I really don't see the issue. Ippantekina (talk) 04:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pseud 14

Image review: Pass

Hi @Pseud 14: I've addressed all of your comments except the links to countries. I think while it makes sense to not link "common" countries like U.S., England... there are also "lesser-known" ones like Wales, Northern Ireland... so I decide to link them all to avoid potential demographic biases. Ippantekina (talk) 06:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That seems reasonable. Maybe just a minor nitpick but not a deal-breaker. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

  • This list and all other articles within the T.Swift WProject adhere to WP:FALSETITLE, which is not an official MOS but a very helpful guide. Ippantekina (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am still not a fan of it, but I believe this falls under personal preference so it will not hold up my review. Aoba47 (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I switched it up a little. Ippantekina (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 21:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • While I found no sources that described the 1989 Tour as a "pop tour", I added something about the genre shift. Ippantekina (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I responded above to Pseud14 who has the same concern. Ippantekina (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did see that response, and your argument there does not convince me. Aoba47 (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • While thinking this over further, this should not be a big deal since it was not a major concern for any of the other reviewers here. Aoba47 (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awards shows are linked to the yearly ceremony and thus each link is different. Ippantekina (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies for that, and thank you for your clarification. I should have checked the awards links more thoroughly. That being said, my other point still stands. Since the tables are sortable, it cannot be controlled which entry a reader may encounter first. Things like songs are currently linked on only the first instance if no sorting is done, but if a readers does sort, they may through multiple, unlinked entries before getting to the link. As I said above, I would think that every item would have to linked in each instance to account for this. Aoba47 (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It makes sense as WP:DL does say that duplicate links are allowed in tables. I'll implement this shortly! Ippantekina (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is because the cited references do not include this information. Ippantekina (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the clarification. Aoba47 (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should be done now. Ippantekina (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I oppose this list for promotion, primarily because of errors in the citations. I have also noticed inconsistencies with how linking is handled in the tables, which would not be as big of an issue by itself. Apologies again, and I would be more than happy to revisit this review once my comments are addressed. You have always done great work so I hope that this does not come across as too harsh or anything overly negative. Aoba47 (talk) 18:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Aoba47:, I believe your points are actionable and will act on them. In the meantime I've replied to some of your points above. Ippantekina (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Take as much time as you need. I have replied to your responses above. Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Aoba47: for the refs. could you kindly specify the article revision that you reviewed so I could better keep track of them? Ippantekina (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for not including this earlier. I honestly did not think of doing that, but it makes sense as things will likely change during revision. I believe this version was what I was looking at during the time of this review. Aoba47 (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: Thank you for your patience. I believe I've addressed all points that you raised above :) Let me know if anything remains unsatisfactory. Ippantekina (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for responding to everything. It all looks good to me. My only remaining point is that the citation for the first Nova's Red Room performance does not support the songs. The archived citation (at least for me) goes to an overview of different articles on the site. I do see a link to an article about her performing "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" there, but that does not appear to be archived. Once that has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this FLC for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find a replacement ref anywhere so I'll remove that until a reliable source is found... Ippantekina (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I had a feeling that would be the case. I tried to either get access to a better archived version of the original source or to find a different citation, but I did not have any luck with either. Removing it would be the best option. I approach this kind of list as containing all of the notable live performances of a particular artist, rather than being an exhaustive list so since I think that it is okay that this performance does not make it due to a lack of a citation. I did not look through newspapers so maybe that would help, but I think this is the right choice for now.
Apologies for the long response, but I do support this FLC for promotion based on the prose and I have struck my oppose. Aoba47 (talk) 17:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did look through Newspaper.com, ProQuest for potential news sources to no avail. I'll try to continue looking for a replacement ref anyways. Thanks so much for your constructive feedback :) Ippantekina (talk) 04:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am just glad that I could help. Thank you for your patience with my review. Best of luck with finding a replacement reference. Aoba47 (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments (ec with last editor)

  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Boxscore" is actually a term used by Billboard [6] but I removed it altogether as it might be jargon-y. Ippantekina (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I followed other examples like List of Lady Gaga live performances, and if I rationalize that myself, each concert tour (the content of the first 3 tables) is a combination of various concerts and hence the tour names being listed first makes more sense; plus dates are presented in rage so including them first is confusing imo. Meanwhile other events (TV, radio, awards) are one-off events so it makes more sense to sort it chronologically by including the event date first. Ippantekina (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can think of the number of songs but that is not the most helpful. Do you think the "Performed song(s)" column should be unsortable? Ippantekina (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • done. Ippantekina (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As Stand Up to Cancer is a telethon I italicized it. Other concerts were not broadcast on TV/radio so they're not italicized :) Ippantekina (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

Most sources in the article are reliable. Some are acceptable primary sources (i.e. iHeartRadio source to confirm a show at the iHeartRadio Music Festival). Some are long-established local newspapers related to the city where Swift played. However, there are some sources that don't appear to be reliable at a first glance.

  • Swapped Linfonerealtv with Cosmopolitan
  • The Boot is published by Townsquare Media who also publishes music review sites listed in Metacritic like BrooklynVegan and XXL. Writers that contributed to The Boot include Annie Zaleski for example ([7]) Ippantekina (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pure Charts (fr:Charts in France), British Comedy Guide and Canoe.com are all news portals so they should suffice in their usage as reports on live appearances. I don't see issues with them. Ippantekina (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skyshiftertalk 21:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Swapped with another source. Ippantekina (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll get back to you asap. My preliminary comments are that while Bustle, Us Weekly are not the most reliable for BLP or commentary, in this usage as reports of popular culture they should suffice. Ippantekina (talk) 03:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Ippantekina. No rush, just following up on a number of FLC comments at the moment. Just pinging to see if the concerns have all been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh: @Skyshifter: hey, I've responded above. Let me know if anything needs further adjustments :) Ippantekina (talk) 13:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since Skyshifter didn't do spotchecks, I used a random number generator to check 10, and found some consistent problems:

I do believe that the information given is accurate; why wouldn't it be. But over half of the randomly selected refs don't actually say the date for the event they're citing, as far as I can see, which I feel is problematic. Please see what you can do to address this in general (presumably this is an issue for more than just these specific refs). --PresN 00:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally news coverage of awards shows/TV like 72, 125, 155 are published pretty much immediately after the events happen; of course articles that explicitly mention the dates do exist so I hope to find alternatives asap. 48 does imply she sang more than the 2 songs listed but since it doesn't say more, why would we include more; plus the "Part of the Fearless Tour" is cited by ref 35. Ippantekina (talk) 16:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PresN: update, I'm running through all refs again to make sure they mention the exact dates. For refs that fail this verification and there are no replacement news/articles/reports, I use {{Cite episode}} or {{Cite AV media}} which are a little on the nose but the second best thing we can go for.. Will update you once it's done. Ippantekina (talk) 03:55, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rock-climbing equipment

Nominator(s): Aszx5000 (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because this is a comprehensive list of equipment for the discipline of rock climbing. While individual elements of rock climbing equipment will change/evolve, the essence is quite stable. Rock climbing is now a new Olympic Sport, so I think this area will get even more attention in the future. I had proposed it as a GA but the recommendation was that the article was more of a list, which is correct, and that it would be a good suggestion as an FL per Talk:Rock-climbing equipment/GA1. thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123

This review will take me a little while – feel free to ping me if I go more than a few days without following up.

Done.
Done.
Done., I have mentioned chockstones in the body, where they were replaced by nuts.
Done., hopefully that is better now.
Done., and agree, hopefully better now.
Done., CE marking is the actual name here.
Done.
Done.
Done.

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delighted that you are willing to help @RunningTiger123. This is (clearly) my first attempt at Featured article status. I have a few GAs under my belt and I think I am writing at a reasonable GA standard, but have little concept of FA stardard, but if you are up for it, I would love to learn and happy to spend time on this with you at whatever pace you prefer. thanks again :) Aszx5000 (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More comments:

Done.
Done.
understand thanks,
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done.
Done., I also added one extra item, the Knee pad, which is a commonly used piece of equipment
Done., changed to "is very popular amongst rock climbers"
Done.
checking this.

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123, thanks for those comments. I have made all of the changes but I am not sure I understand the last one re WP:IABOT? My understanding is that that bot runs automatically, or am I meant to run it? thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can run IABot on demand here – it's not required but it can be nice to include. Also, I think you missed the "e.g. a static rope..." comment above, but I don't think it's worth waiting to support over that. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, have fixed the "static rope" now, and I will run the IAB. Thanks so much for your help and comments on this. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just ran the IABot as well - wasn't aware of that. Thanks again. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Johnson solids

Nominator(s): Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time nominating FL, and I hope this meets all the criteria of FL. One reason I am nominating this for the featured list is because it is a complete list of Johnson solids, along with the surface area and volume, as well as the symmetry. As for the background for someone who does not comprehend mathematics, especially in geometry, the Johnson solids were in the list proposed by Norman Johnson, and he conjectured that there were no other solids, after which was proved by Victor Zalgaller. I think I can give three examples for the exhibition:

There are actually 92 of them, but I would not exhibit them a lot here. I hope this could be the next FL of WP:WPM, and it could be the first FL of sister WikiProject, WP:3TOPE. Anyone, including someone interested in it, can review this. Many thanks for the comments and suggestions. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remsense

Claiming a spot here, since I think it's a great article and I still want to properly go through it like I promised. Remsense诉 07:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

@Sgubaldo. I think I have complete all of the suggestions above. Let me know if there are any remaining missing. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, I'll have a full read-through later. In the meantime, I've added some urls/other missing author links myself. Sgubaldo (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone through and made some copyedits. Feel free to revert an edit you're not happy with it.
Here are some more commments:
  • The passage
    These solids may be used to construct another polyhedron with the same properties, a process known as augmentation; attaching a prism or antiprism to those is known as elongation or gyroelongation respectively. Some others are constructed by diminishment, the removal of those from the component of polyhedra, or by snubification, a construction by cutting loose the edges, lifting the faces and rotate in certain angle, after which adding the equilateral triangles between them.
is a bit confusing to read because I'm not sure what 'those' is referring to. I'm reading it as you attach the prism/antiprism to any of the first six Johnson solids, but it's not very clear.
  • Is defining area and volume necessary? I'm specifically taking about the sentences "An area is a two-dimensional measurement calculated by the product of length and width, and the surface area is the overall area of all faces of polyhedra that is measured by summing all of them. A volume is a measurement of the region in three-dimensional space." I understand you have to consider WP:TECHNICAL but perhaps you could just include how the volume and surface area are calculated for a polyhedron and remove the definitions themselves.
  • Is the sentence "one case that preserves the symmetry by one full rotation and one reflection horizontal plane is of order 2, or simply denoted as " also necessary? You already explain the group and this is just one example
Sgubaldo (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "defining area and volume necessary": This is on purpose to make readers (for non-mathematicians, students, or anyone who is interested in it) recap the meaning of area and volume. If it does not exist, readers may search them on the previous wikilinked. I am aware that one problem here is our articles is somewhat technical, making readers even much more confused. Take an example of Surface area, stating that "a measure of the total area that the surface of the object occupies". This is not only to help readers to understand the definition, but rather to give the meaning of the object specifically. Here, I wrote the surface area of a polyhedron specifically as the total area of all polygona faces. So to put it plain, this is intended to summarize them specifically about the polyhedron's characteristics. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 05:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern was more whether the sentences "An area is a two-dimensional measurement calculated by the product of length and width" and "A volume is a measurement of the region in three-dimensional space." were necessary, but if you think they are per WP:TECHNICAL, then I'm fine with their inclusion. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dedhert.Jr Anyways, final comment on this part: "The volume of a polyhedron is determined by involving its base and height (as in pyramids and prisms), slicing it off into pieces after which summing them up...." – I'm slightly unsure as to what 'involving its base and height' means here. Could you clarify? Sgubaldo (talk) 10:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is just like saying that volume of a prism and pyramid is the product of height and its base, with an exception that pyramid is one-third of it. The inside bracket is meant to show the merely examples. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 00:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dedhert.Jr, could you rewrite the sentence a little to clarify that? I think it's still hard to understand in its current state. Sgubaldo (talk) 17:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I'm trying to say that volume of a polyhedron can be calculated in different way. Take examples as in the prism and the pyramid. The volume of a prism is the product of base and height . The volume of a pyramid is one-third of the product of base and height . From all of these examples, their calculation only involves the base and height . Dedhert.Jr (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dedhert.Jr. Thank you, I understand now; these will be my final comments then, after which I can support.
  • What do you think about tweaking the relevant part of the sentence mentioned above to something like: "The volume of a polyhedron may be ascertained in different ways: either by decomposing it into smaller pieces, such as pyramids and prisms, calculating the volume of each component, and then computing their sum, or......"
  • When you say "meaning their construction does not involve both Archimedean and Platonic solids", is that intending that it doesn't involve both Archimedean and Platonic solids at the same time or that it involves neither of the two. If it's the former, then it's fine. If it's the latter, I think it should be changed to "meaning their construction does not involve neither Archimedean nor Platonic solids"
Sgubaldo (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "tweaking": What? This means something different. My interpretation is that you pointed the polyhedrons such as pyramids and prisms can be defined their volume by decomposing it into smaller pieces.
What I meant about those facts is that every polyhedron's volume is different to finding them. One example that I already explained is involving the produvt of base and height. However, not all the volume of polyhedrons can be done in that way. We can see an example of Triaugmented triangular prism in which constructed from a triangular prism by attaching three equilateral square pyramids onto its square faces. To find its volume, we need to slice it off into a triangular prism and three equilateral square pyramids again. Finding their volume, and then add up the volume again, and the volume of a triaugmanted triangular prism is total of those. But this method is not working for sphenomegacorona, and the alternative way is by using root of polynomial, as described in OEIS. That is what I meant also in the previous copyedit. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "elementar": The definition by not involving Platonic and Archimedean solids was copyedited from the previous meaning in several articles of Johnson solids. However, Cromwell and Johnson gives different meaning, so I'm going to copyedited the rest of them. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sgubaldo Update. This was already discussed after I changing the definition; you can see my talk page. Feel free to ask. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel really silly, I was misreading the sentence about finding the volume and couldn't see there were three different methods. The changes to the definition look good. There were a couple of minor prose issues I had, but to not enter a WP:FIXLOOP, I tried making the changes myself. Please do check and revert if you disagree with anything.
Support promotion, I hope this becomes one of the few mathematics-related FLs. Sgubaldo (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "": Not expert in symmetry here. As far as I'm concerned, the symmetry is explicitly stated in the source [8], consisting of identity and mirror plane, and this can be denoted as . Is there something wrong? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 06:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert either. What I was trying to say was that you explain the symmetry group with the sentence "The symmetry group of order preserves the symmetry by rotation around the axis of symmetry and reflection on horizontal plane", but then also go into specific detail about , which seems to be a specific case of . My concern was whether this was necessary, since no other examples of a symmetry group are explored in the article. Is it because it needs to be shown that is denoted as ? Sgubaldo. It is a mirror symmetry, merely. (talk) 10:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Our articles says it is involution group symmetry, as it is shown in List of spherical symmetry groups,. The notation is in Schoenflies notation. If it's possible, let me ask this in WP:WPM to gain more precise meaning ensurely. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 00:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'm happy with this part now. Sgubaldo (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re "these solids". It means that the first six Johnson solids can be used to construct more new Johnson solids by attaching the uniform polyhedrons (as it is included in the article), and those constructions are already mentioned above, with some exceptions that snubification does not need them basically. Some of the Johnson solids cannot be constructed without them. I think I will fix this one, but I have to be careful my writing. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. I've made some minor edits here too and I'm happy with this part now. Sgubaldo (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

Reminder

This is already 20 days, almost three weeks, and there are no responses from the reviewer. Pinging @Sgubaldo, @Remsense, and @PresN. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ping you with my last reply, but I supported above. Sgubaldo (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will have remarks by the end of tomorrow, apologies. Remsense诉 14:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Remsense: Just pinging to see if you're still planning to follow up with a review. Ideally, a source review would be very much appreciated if you're at all familiar with the subject matter. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sending a ping again to @Remsense. Please at least just let us know if you're no longer interested in doing a review. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll withdraw, as I don't think I'm presently qualified for this. Deep apologies. Remsense诉 15:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Remsense. That's fine. I merely waited for someone reviewed the article; otherwise, the nomination would start over again because of inactivity by reviewers. @Hey man im josh. Do you mind if you can review the article? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, this isn't an area I'd be comfortable reviewing. One thing not to clear me, at a passing glance, is what verifies what's actually in the table? Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh. Sorry, I can't comperehend your words. Can you clarify? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind @Dedhert.Jr. I was asking what verifies the formulas in the last column, but I missed that there was a reference in the column header. Though, if you were referring to the first part of the comment, I'm not comfortable enough with the subject matter to review it. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh Well, I'm now worried that this nomination will expire. I am tired of repeating nominations in the same situation. I already saw this when I looked up the FAC. Should I ping members on related topics WikiProject, or are there alternative ways? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to share your nomination at a relevant WikiProject, but we're pretty patient with nominations. There are currently 8 people nominations that are older than yours and I promoted one yesterday that was over two months old. For a source review, I think someone from a relevant WikiProject would be excellent. Perhaps a message asking if anybody is a subject matter expert and could provide a source review at the nomination? Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh That's a good idea. Thank you. But how long does the nomination will be expired? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no hard established hard deadline. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. I have invited the members, but I doubt that some of them will ignore it. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dantheanimator

  • also, just a note, the reason I think some additional, probably not too helpful, text should be added to the above sentence is due to MOS:SEAOFBLUE

Well that's everything I have! The table looks perfect and the article is just overall really well done! Thanks for bringing this to FL Dedhert.Jr and excited to see this get promoted! :) Dan the Animator 21:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dantheanimator I have accomplished most of your comments, but not of them.
  • Re "in various process": to be honest, what I meant that is those Johnson solids can be constructed by literally attaching them. I think there is no guidance procedure of how to construct by attaching mathematically unless it describes the construction with Cartesian coordinates.
  • Re "in two-dimensional space": it was intended to describe the cyclic group and dihedral group in two-dimensional space, to understand the analogy symmetry in three-dimensional space.
  • Re "See also": I don't mind that, but I'm aware that the table has already had many problems if I looked at it. Will think about it later.
Dedhert.Jr (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Dedhert.Jr! Everything looks great now though for the See also, don't worry about choosing that article! I just spotted it from a cursory glance of Category:Polyhedra and thought it look/sounded similar to Johnson solids. Feel free to chose any article/list you know of with an English wiki article that isn't already linked in the article that you think would be helpful for readers interested in Johnson solids. If it helps, here's the link to the guidelines with tips for making see also sections. Many thanks again for your work on this list! Dan the Animator 06:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, almost forgot... I now fully support promoting this nom and think once its source review is completed, it should be ready for FL! Dan the Animator 06:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 09:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

support

List of Line of Duty episodes

Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second and final stop at FLC for a good topic I'm working towards. Still waiting on quite a few GA reviews before I can get there (plus two articles I still need to do some expansion on), so I thought I'd get this FLC going in the meantime. This is the episodes page for a popular UK television series. It has set quite a few records in terms of viewership so there were enough sources to write a pretty engaging lead so I spent a few hours tonight expanding it. I look forward and thank you all in advance for any reviews! :) TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

MPGuy2824

Dantheanimator

Just a quick pass for now, probably will put any additional suggestions later today if I'm feeling up for it... Dan the Animator 21:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's everything I got! Awesome work TheDoctorWho (talk)!! :) Dan the Animator 07:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference for the air date columns. I also added a border for the image in the article. The directors are credited within the episodes via on-screen credits, so I believe that this would semi-fall under the same guidelines as MOS:PLOTSOURCE (in that the information is sourced to the work itself). I can probably still put together for sources for it if it's absolutely necessary to gain your support. I do also question how well that link would serve readers in a see also section. In the parent article possibly, but from the list of episode page it doesn't quite feel as necessary. Similar to the last point though, I'd also compromise and add it if necessary for a support !vote. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and don't worry about it! I think the changes help but its perfectly fine not having the ref for the credits column! For see also, its completely optional so up to you if you want to add it! I like to suggest it though since most articles usually have other articles that aren't linked in the body but would be interesting for readers (also feel free to choose any relevant articles... definitely doesn't have to be List of police television dramas which I found through a quick browse in the categories). Please ping if I can help with anything and great work Gallifreyan! ;) Dan the Animator 07:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dantheanimator: I've addressed everything you left in your full review, bar the optional one. The "–" denotes that an episode with that number doesn't exist within the series (some series have more episodes than others). I started to add a note attempting to explain that, but it seemed to get confusing quickly when I say that episodes don't "exist" when they were never planned to be created in the first place. Thank you so much for the review! TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well that was quick! Might as well reply now before I head to sleep... I support this being promoted and strongly believe its ready for FL! Thanks again Doctor for your great work (both on wiki and across the realm of timey wimey stuff :) Dan the Animator 08:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of music released by Romanian artists that has charted in major music markets

Nominator(s): Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it offers a well-written and well-sourced overview over the most successful Romanian music released. It is the first list of its kind here on Wikipedia, but I believe it meets the required criteria. I am happy for any comment. Greets, Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment - alt text is needed for the images in the article. Staraction (talk | contribs) 02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Staraction: Done. Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Unusual and very interesting topic for an article. Here are my comments:

@ChrisTheDude: Many thanks for your comments! I solved them. Let me know if you support the nomination. Greets, Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

Removed
Removed
"Documented" is needed here since Brazil is not a country that has an easily searchable chart archive. "Stereo Love" is the only song we can prove charted there, but my personal opinion is that at least the other big international hit "Mr. Saxobeat" charted there too (it's just we don't have the archives).

I am glad to see you back on Wikipedia! Great work with this list. This is an interesting topic, and I do not think that I have seen a similar type of list in the FLC space (although I have not been particularly active in the FLC process or with FLs or lists in general for some time now). I only have three comments, and they are rather nitpick-y. Once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this list for promotion. Hopefully, this review will encourage others to take a look at this FLC. Have a great rest of your day and/or night (whichever it is when you are reading this lol). Aoba47 (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Thank you very much for your comments :) I'm here more rarely now and only for special projects. Thank you so much for your words as well :) Done everything, except for one comment I left. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad that I was able to help out with this FLC. Your reply about the Brazil chart makes sense to me. Best of luck with your future work on here. I hope everything is going well for you overall. I support this FLC for promotion based on the prose. I hope you have a great weekend. Aoba47 (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments & thoughts

I have seen other dynamic lists being promoted to FLC status, including my own List of certified albums in Romania. In my opinion, the status of being a dynamic list doesn't affect the stability. Even if this list is probably not complete (since I occasionally add entries I find out about), I would say the "content does not change significantly from day to day" since it already covers the majority of works that have charted.
This is how you refer to music recording certifications. For example, you would also say "It was certified two times/double platinum" rather than "It was certified platinum twice".
I ended up using "some"; "in a number of regions" implies it was successful in several regions, which is not the case.
Done
Unused parameters give off a warning when you try to edit the article; in this case, no warning appears, so this indicates there are no parameter problems. There was one more ref with a subscription template, which I have fixed.
Done
Done
Done
Done. No other instance found.
Done
Done
I don't think references are needed here. In the first note, I link to the List of largest recorded music markets, in which all the IFPI reports that have been published yet are sourced. In the second note, I link to West Germany, which sources the fact that Germany was "West Germany" until 1990.
Done

Well that's everything I have. Interesting list and many thanks for nominating it! :) Ping me on reply if I'm needed. Cheers, Dan the Animator 00:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dantheanimator: Hi there Dan. First of all, many thanks for spending time reviewing my nominee. I have answered all your comments. Let me know what you think. Greets, Cartoon network freak (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cartoon network freak!!! :) Everything looks good except for the references on the IFPI & West Germany notes, which only needs a ref that verifies "annually published the ten largest recorded music markets...[since] 1996" and a ref that verifies West Germany became Germany in 1990.
In general, while it's true that many readers would just click on the links if they wanted to verify the info, I think in the spirit of WP:V, it's always better to make it as easy as possible for a reader to verify non-obvious info (especially specific details like years which most people don't know/remember), which is easiest when that source is linked in a footnote next to the claim and which is why a lot of FA and FL articles will duplicate refs throughout the article to backup different info and data (so a reader doesn't have to sift through to figure out which ref is backing up which source).
Also, its best imo to assume the average reader doesn't know any specific details like years or data. Really recommend taking a look at WP:ORIENT which although a wiki essay, does a much better job than me explaining why adding footnotes for these things is a good idea. Once the refs are added, I'll add my support for promoting this to FL. Cheers, Dan the Animator 01:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dantheanimator: Thank you again for your further comments. I have in the first case linked to the 1996 and 2024 IFPI reports, while in the second case, I have linked to the 1990 treaty that united West and East Germany to what is now Germany. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 00:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cartoon network freak! The refs work great and it looks like that covers the last of it! Support promotion to FL status. Awesome work! :) Dan the Animator 00:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Donetsk Oblast

Nominator(s): Dan the Animator 20:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did an overhaul of the article a few days ago and I think it's ready for the review process. The Ukrainian language wiki version of the list already has selected list status (which is their equivalent of FL) so don't see why this can't be promoted too. Expect there'll be a few things that can be added and some minor improvements but I'm confident based on the state of the article that I'll be able to get this promoted. Also hoping to use this article as a general framework for additional "list of cities in oblast" articles after the review. Cheers, Dan the Animator 20:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd put my thoughts about this in case it helps future reviewers. While the article as-is I think covers the subject well, I've been considering adding in a column for the establishment years of the cities (which both the Ukrainian and Russian wiki articles have). That said, the main List of cities in Ukraine just sticks with admin. subdivision and population and I also don't want to overload the table with too much info so not sure if this would be a good addition. Also was thinking of adding into the lead a few sentences about which are the oldest cities, that many were created as part of industrialization and are tied to the mining industry, and maybe also some comments about the current status of some of the cities (e.g. the fact that Bakhmut, Mariupol, Avdiivka, etc. have been mostly destroyed during the full-scale invasion) but not sure if it makes sense here since these already fall in the Donetsk Oblast article's scope. Feel free to let me know y'all's thoughts on these and hopefully they help with ideas but happy to make whatever improvements I can to the article! Cheers, Dan the Animator 21:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Before nominating, I tried searching to see if there's other similar list of cities articles that're FL and found this: List of United States cities by population. Not the exam same type of article but it also starts off with "this is a list." If it helps though, I could take out that sentence and reword the next sentence to say: There are currently 52 populated places in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine, that have been officially granted city status...by the Verkhovna Rada, the country's parliament.
That list was promoted over 15 years ago and standards have changed massively since then. Your alternative suggestion sounds good for an opening -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it based on the above. Thanks again ChrisTheDude! :) Dan the Animator 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed
Also fixed
Thanks ChrisTheDude! :) Dan the Animator 21:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Just like the first comment above saying no article should start with "this is a list", no article should have a reference to the list outside of the list itself. The sentence "The below list shows the English name, Ukrainian name, raion, 2001 census recorded population, 2022 population estimate, and population percent change for each city." does not seem to serve a purpose.
Fixed
  • "currently" not needed in first sentence.
Fixed
  • What do the numbers in the first column mean? Why is this column there?
Fixed? when overhauling this article, I tried to base it on conceptually similar articles, primarily List of cities in Ukraine and others like List of cities in Australia by population and List of cities in Kansas. From my understanding and the way I've always used it, the column is a type of number ranking which allows readers to sort tables and have number rankings for each row, which can be quiet useful for finding out things like what's the 10th largest city in 2001/2022, how many cities saw 10%+ pop. change, etc. In case it helps, I added one of the template's title options "#" on the top of the column with some extra table code. That said, I saw other list articles such as List of cities in Canada and List of cities in the United Kingdom don't use it so I don't mind taking it out. The template also allows for the title "No." but I think "#" works just the same. Let me know what you think about it though.
  • It's not common to have a link to a portal in the see also, would suggest removing both portals from the see also section.
Removed
  • Image alts could be more descriptive (for accessibility reasons)
Fixed? Tried to make them more informative but let me know if I should reword/shorten/expand them.
  • as could image captions (for example, "the largest city in Donetsk")
same as above
  • table completely unsourced, need refs for population columns in header.
Fixed 2022 column; for the 2001 census results, I'm currently searching for a Ukrainian gov. website to add to that column though haven't had luck with finding a gov. source that lists all of them. I'll make sure to send a follow-up update when I find it!
  • No need for external links subheading, just external links is fine
Fixed
Normally estimates would not be encyclopedic, but given the extenuating circumstances and lack of any recent census, I suppose this makes sense until the next census? Other than these points above, the article looks quite good! Many of them are vital before being promoted.

Mattximus (talk) 02:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the Next Ukrainian census doesn't seem like it's happening anytime soon and with the current war, I don't think the statistics would be as useful anyways since they've been changing a lot frequently. Let me know if there's anything else I can do and many thanks Mattximus for all the comments!!! :D Dan the Animator 05:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks good, just two outstanding issues. First, it is critical to have a citation for the 2001 census populations, it cannot pass without this. Second, I do like your change to alphabetize the list (that makes it easier to update when the next census actually comes out), but I think the table should not include the number column as it doesn't serve the purpose beyond a count. Since it is a list of cities, the cities column should be the same colour as the headings. Mattximus (talk) 18:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Still working on the 2001 census citation but for the number column, I removed it. About the cities column shading, I haven't seen any table in a "List of cities" article that has it like that. I've looked through at least a dozen varied similar articles (also highly recommend checking out this to see how other articles do it) and they all use the same general shading (the only column that gets fully shaded in any of the tables I've seen is the number column (which I removed from this article per above) and not the cities column. Also don't think it would conceptually make sense to have that shading since both the English and Ukrainian name columns are both "cities columns" imo (and they both are exactly the same in functionality/formatting). Let me know though if I'm missing something and thanks again with the comments! :) Dan the Animator 21:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this is a requirement for the nomination, I just checked all featured lists of cities have it. I clicked on one at random: Cantons of Costa Rica which was one I put up for promotion. I know this is a requirement because I was asked to do it many times. Mattximus (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mattximus can you post a link to other, more recent past FLs of cities (as many as you know of)? I don't think the article for Cantons of Costa Rica is a good comparison to this article since the Ukrainian equivalent of that article would be List of hromadas of Ukraine (or Raions of Ukraine depending how you look at it). Would help to see maybe some of the other FLs tho, especially if they're more recent (I noticed your FLN for Costa Rica is from 2016 but was wondering if they'd changed it since then). Thanks!!! Dan the Animator 17:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes this has been a policy for at least 8 years (it's in the MOS somewhere), common format for all featured lists in general. You can check out User:Mattximus and click on any of the 45 featured lists of cities/municipalities (the ones with a star beside them), there is also a more comprehensive list when you click on featured lists and scroll to find the cities lists. I clicked randomly to a whole bunch, and can't find any that didn't fit this standard, so I think it is a necessary change. Mattximus (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose just for now based on missing citation for the entire 2001 census column (the link failed verification as it has similar but not identical numbers as the table here). And the format for the table seems to be incorrect. Specifically ,city name should be same colour as headings, and tables needs captions (|+ <caption_text>, or |+ <caption_text> if that text would duplicate a nearby section header). Table captions allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables, without having to read all prior text to provide context.). Mattximus (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattximus: Completely fixed the table/formatting issues. For the citation, would either of these sources (source A, source B) be acceptable? It's alright if not but given the complete 2001 census data increasingly seems like its not available online (and thus would probably be a book citation) and the Ukrainian language wiki page (which has recognized article status) uses the former source (the mashke.org one) in their version of the list, I wanted to ask. Many thanks again with everything and let me know if there's any other issues I can fix (and if the formatting for the table is alright now). Cheers, Dan the Animator 15:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Table is completely fixed, good work, but the one last citation problem remains. Is there anyone who can help find where these numbers come from? The links you provided give different numbers, and don't seem to come from any official document. But surely this document exists. Maybe another user has an idea? 19:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
@HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith, Ymblanter, Mupper-san, Shwabb1, Yulia Romero, and Микола Василечко: pinging in case y'all have any advice about this (wasn't sure who to ping so sorry in advance for the bother!!!) Dan the Animator 00:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not particularly well-versed in the discussion, so do forgive if this isn't what is being talked about, but given the fact that mashke.org has an unclear source and (at least according to Firefox for me) has an unsafe connection, I would personally use the numbers included alongside the currently-used sources, as they're official documentation. As citypopulation.de cites mashke.org, I also wouldn't include it.
Perhaps, it would be possible to e-mail Mr. Bespyatov (the owner of mashke.org, judging by the copyright at the bottom) and ask him for a source? Although I'm not quite sure.
Mupper-san (talk) 01:59, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mupper-san! :) I agree with the concerns for the two sources though the only official Ukrainian government source I could find lists the 2001 census results for only 28 of the 50+ cities in the oblast. Also, although my guess is he got the numbers from the physical records in Kyiv, I think contacting Mr. Bespyatov is a great idea! I'll send him an email in a moment and reply here if he follows up. Dan the Animator 04:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's on the 2001 census website. Go to Publications, download the file kl_2001.rar under "Кількість та територіальне розміщення населення України" (The number and territorial distribution of the population of Ukraine). Open the file 5.xls, you'll see the breakdown of population by raion/city/urban-type settlement. The data for Donetsk Oblast starts on row 552. Be aware that the names are before the decommunization laws (e.g., Artemivsk instead of Bakhmut). Shwabb1 (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Shwabb1!!!!! :D It worked perfectly and I accessed all the stats (only one of the numbers was off on the article thankfully tho). @Mattximus: I think that about finishes everything? Take a look and let me know if there's anything else to do. Dan the Animator 17:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall looks good, I only see two small mistakes: Krasnoarmiysk should be Krasnoarmiisk using official romanization (per WP:UAPLACE), and in the first citation "urban-type settlements" are mistranslated as "towns". Shwabb1 (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now I will strike the oppose. I think there should be a heading "notes" just like references below and the note can go there instead of floating kind of below the table. I think the format of the reference needs a bit of work (I believe you need filetype for something like a rar?), but nothing here to oppose over. Nice work! Mattximus (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mattximus and Shwabb1!!!! :) I think I fixed basically all the above suggestions! For the new reference's formatting tho, I wasn't sure exactly how much needed changing but I added the |format= parameter in with a link to RAR which hopefully helps (feel free to let me know if there's anything else I can do tho). Dan the Animator 01:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

  • I'm still getting an error on the citation for the 2001 census, is it just me? One more small change:
Fixed? I think I accessed it using the link about a week ago but you're right! Don't know why both the archived and normal link stopped working. I switched it with the permanent, webpage link and added instructions on the ref of how to access the numbers. Let me know if its good now.
  • The image captions seem to be incorrect, the are not the largest or smallest cities, as no land area was given. They are the most populous, least populous, have the second largest population, wording like that is more correct.
Fixed
  • That's it!

Mattximus (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mattximus! :) Let me know if that fixes everything! Dan the Animator 16:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Things look great, but I still can't access the source for the 2001 statistics. I do believe this article needs a source review so whoever does that will give the go ahead and I'll agree with them since I'm not an expert on sourcing. Mattximus (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Mattximus:! :) I saw that the Luhansk list is already in queue for a source review but not this one so not sure if there'll be a source review soon. About the source tho, how does it look on your end? Is it the link to the ukr gov stats website that doesn't work (it's an unsecure site so might help to check browser settings) or is it the RAR file download link that doesn't work (the instructions on the wikiref are supposed to help with this)? Dan the Animator 00:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review by Staraction

Thanks for your work @Dan the Animator! Staraction (talk | contribs) 17:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by FL nominator

Nominations for removal

List of World Heritage Sites in Africa

Notified: Ericleb01 Arsenikk, WikiProject Africa

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it has been tagged for update (for over a year), some descriptions are empty, some are straight up copied from the unesco website with no attribution, some images need alt text and is straight up missing some world heritage sites. 48JCL public (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remain neutral in the voting and get to work fixing/updating the article. Pliny the Elderberry (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging Tone for awareness, as they've been working on World Heritage Sites lists for quite a while now. --PresN 20:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of deaths at the Berlin Wall

Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

There are significant citation issues here, including one section that's been tagged for citations since 2018. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 06:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian Premier League captains

Notified: WP Cricket, WP IPL, Vensatry & Sahara4u (both involved in FL promotion comments), Razr Nation (promoted this to FL in 2013). Note, the nominator of this to FL is indef blocked, so not notified them.

Estoy nominando esto para que se elimine de la lista destacada porque no cumple con muchos de los criterios de Wikipedia: lista destacada , particularmente los criterios 1, 2 y 3. El texto principal no se ha actualizado significativamente desde que se convirtió en FL en 2013, aparte de la adición de en su mayoría Texto sin fuente que también incluye estadísticas aleatorias y trivia . Además, el líder y la tabla enumeran a los capitanes por títulos ganados, pero la fuente principal de estadísticas [9] no tiene los títulos mencionados. En la tabla, además de que los títulos no tienen fuente, el uso de texto de fondo azul inexplicable, que supongo que enumera a los capitanes de IPL actuales a partir de 2024, viola MOS:COLOUR, ya que es la única forma de identificarlos. Tampoco es necesario, pero si se mantiene el color, es necesario agregarlo a la sección clave y también usar un símbolo según MOS. El abastecimiento de este artículo también es bastante débil en general, ya que la mayor parte del texto principal proviene únicamente de la tabla de estadísticas de la base de datos. En definitiva, nada cerca de los criterios actuales de FL. Joseph 2302 ( discusión ) 11:02, 11 de julio de 2024 (UTC) [ respuesta ]