La tercera ronda de la WikiCup 2019 ha llegado a su fin. Los 16 usuarios que llegaron a la cuarta ronda necesitaban obtener al menos 68 puntos, lo que es sustancialmente menos que los 227 puntos del año pasado. Nuestros máximos goleadores en la ronda 3 fueron:
Cas Liber , nuestro ganador en 2016, con 500 puntos derivados principalmente de un artículo destacado y dos GA sobre temas de historia natural.
Adam Cuerden , con 480 puntos, un recuento construido a partir de 16 fotografías destacadas, fruto de un minucioso trabajo de restauración.
SounderBruce , finalista en los dos últimos años, con 306 puntos de una variedad de presentaciones, en su mayoría relacionadas con el deporte o el Estado de Washington.
Nombre de usuario único , con 305 puntos derivados de un artículo destacado y dos GA sobre arqueología y temas relacionados.Los concursantes lograron 4 (5) artículos destacados, 4 listas destacadas, 18 imágenes destacadas, 29 buenos artículos, 50 entradas DYK, 9 entradas ITN y 39 buenas reseñas de artículos. Al entrar en la cuarta ronda, recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 3 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 4 se puede reclamar en la ronda 4. Recuerde también que debe reclamar sus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a "ganarlos". y es imperativo reclamarlos en la ronda correcta; un reclamo de la FA tuvo que ser rechazado porque se presentó incorrectamente (reclamado en la Ronda 3 cuando calificó para la Ronda 2), ¡así que tenga cuidado! Al realizar GAR, asegúrese de verificar que se cumplan todos los criterios de GA.
Si le preocupa que su nominación (ya sea nominaciones para buenos artículos, un proceso destacado o cualquier otra cosa) no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia: WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su lista cuando ya no esté disponible). requerido). Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregar o eliminar su nombre de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ). Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 20:12, 2 de julio de 2019 (UTC)
Gracias también por haber agregado nombres a esa lista. ¡Te recuerdan! - Gerda Arendt ( discusión ) 06:09, 12 de agosto de 2019 (UTC)
La cuarta ronda de la competición terminó con una oleada de actividad de último minuto, siendo necesarios 454 puntos para clasificarse para la ronda final. Fue una ronda muy competitiva con dos concursantes con más de 400 puntos eliminados, y todos menos dos de los finalistas lograron un FA durante la ronda. Casliber , nuestro ganador de 2016, fue el máximo anotador, seguido por Enwebb y Lee Vilenski , ambos nuevos en la competencia. En cuarto lugar quedó SounderBruce , finalista el año pasado. Pero todos esos puntos desaparecen cuando comenzamos de nuevo para la ronda final.
En la cuarta ronda se lograron 11 artículos destacados. Además, Adam Cuerden anotó con 18 FP, Lee Vilenski lideró la puntuación de GA con 8 GA, mientras que Kosack realizó 15 revisiones de GA. Hubo alrededor de 40 DYK, 40 GAR y 31 GA en total durante la ronda 4. Aunque los concursantes realizaron más GAR de los que lograron GA, todavía hubo cierta frustración por el tiempo necesario para revisar los artículos.
Al comenzar la ronda 5, nos despedimos de los ocho competidores que no lograron sobrevivir; Gracias por las útiles contribuciones que has hecho a la Copa y a Wikipedia, y esperamos que vuelvas a unirte a nosotros el año que viene. Recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 4 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 5 se puede reclamar en la ronda 5. Recuerde también que debe reclamar sus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a "ganarlos" (algunas personas no han cumplido con esta regla). y los puntos han sido eliminados).
Si le preocupa que su nominación, ya sea por un buen artículo, un proceso destacado o cualquier otra cosa, no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia: WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su lista cuando ya no esté disponible). requerido). Si desea ayudar con WikiCup, ¡haga su granito de arena para ayudar a reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregarse o eliminarse de Wikipedia: WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 , Sturmvogel 66 , Vanamonde y Cwmhiraeth Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 18:44, 1 de septiembre de 2019 (UTC)
¡La WikiCup ha terminado un año más! Nuestro campeón este año es 
Adam Cuerden ( presentaciones ), quien a lo largo del concurso acumuló 91 fotografías destacadas, incluidas 32 de la ronda final. Nuestros finalistas este año fueron:
Adam Cuerden ( presentaciones ) con 964 puntos
Lee Vilenski ( presentaciones ) con 899 puntos Casliber ( presentaciones ) con 817 puntos
Kosack ( presentaciones ) con 691 puntos
SounderBruce ( presentaciones ) con 388 puntos
Enwebb ( presentaciones ) con 146 puntos Nombre de usuario único ( envíos ) con 145 puntos
HaEr48 ( presentaciones ) con 74 puntosTodos los que lleguen a la final ganarán premios. Los siguientes premios especiales se otorgarán en función del alto desempeño en áreas particulares de creación de contenido. Para que los finalistas no tengan una ventaja indebida, estos premios se otorgan al competidor que obtuvo la puntuación más alta en cualquier campo en particular en una sola ronda, o en caso de empate, al líder general en ese campo. Los premios se entregarán en las próximas semanas. ¡Por favor sea paciente!
Casliber ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al artículo destacado, para un total de 7 FA durante el transcurso del concurso. Lee Vilenski ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al buen artículo, por 14 GA en la ronda 5.
Yashthepunisher ( presentaciones ) gana el premio de la lista destacada, por 4 FL en total. Adam Cuerden ( presentaciones ) gana el premio a la fotografía destacada, por 91 FP en total.
MPJ-DK ( envíos ) gana el premio al tema, por 7 artículos sobre buenos temas en la ronda 2. Lee Vilenski ( presentaciones ) gana el premio DYK, por 14 artículos de ¿Sabías que en la ronda 5?
Muboshgu ( presentaciones ) gana el premio ITN, por 7 en los artículos de noticias de la ronda 1.
¡Ed! ( envíos ) gana el premio del revisor, por 56 buenas reseñas de artículos en la ronda 1.Felicitaciones a todos los que participaron en la WikiCup de este año, ya sea que hayan llegado a las rondas finales o no, y felicitaciones en particular a los recién llegados a la WikiCup que han logrado mucho este año. Gracias a todos los que participaron y ayudaron con la competencia, sin olvidar al Usuario: Jarry1250 , quien dirige el robot de puntuación.
Hemos abierto un debate sobre la puntuación sobre si es necesario ajustar las reglas y la puntuación. Por favor, da tu opinión. La competición del próximo año comenzará el 1 de enero. Estás invitado a registrarte para participar ; La WikiCup está abierta a todos los wikipedistas, tanto editores novatos como experimentados, y esperamos verlos a todos en la competencia de 2020. Hasta entonces, ¡solo queda felicitar una vez más a nuestros dignos ganadores y agradecer a todos los participantes su implicación! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregarse o eliminarse de Wikipedia: WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 , Sturmvogel 66 , Vanamonde y Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 de noviembre de 2019 (UTC)
¡Hola!
La Fundación Wikimedia busca mejorar el proceso de consulta comunitaria para las políticas de la Fundación, y estamos interesados en saber por qué no participó en una consulta reciente que siguió a una discusión comunitaria en la que participó.
Complete esta breve encuesta para ayudarnos a mejorar nuestro proceso de consulta comunitaria para el futuro. Sólo debería tomar unos tres minutos.
La política de privacidad de esta encuesta está aquí. Esta encuesta es una solicitud única nuestra relacionada con este tema único.
Gracias por su participación, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 de noviembre de 2019 (UTC)
¡Feliz año nuevo, feliz década nueva y feliz nueva WikiCup! El concurso comienza hoy y todos los creadores, ampliadores y mejoradores de artículos pueden participar. Si ya se ha registrado, su página de envíos se puede encontrar aquí . Si aún no se ha registrado, puede agregar su nombre aquí y los jueces configurarán su página de presentaciones. Estamos flexibilizando la regla de que solo contará el contenido en el que hayas realizado un trabajo significativo durante 2020; Ahora, para ser elegible para obtener puntos en la competencia, ¡debes haber completado un trabajo significativo en el contenido en algún momento! Cualquier pregunta sobre las reglas o cualquier otra cosa relacionada con la Copa debe dirigirse a uno de los jueces o publicarse en la página de discusión de WikiCup . Las inscripciones se cerrarán a finales de enero y la primera ronda finalizará el 26 de febrero; los 64 puntajes más altos en ese momento pasarán a la ronda 2. ¡Buena suerte! Los jueces de WikiCup son Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Godot13 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Vanamonde93 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ) 11:43, 1 de enero de 2020 (UTC)
Y así termina la primera ronda de la competición. Todos los que obtengan una puntuación positiva pasan a la Ronda 2, en la que se clasificarán 57 concursantes. Hemos abolido los grupos este año, por lo que para calificar para la Ronda 3 deberás terminar la Ronda 2 entre los treinta y dos mejores concursantes.
Nuestros máximos goleadores en la Ronda 1 fueron:
Epicgenius , un recién llegado a WikiCup, lideró el campo con un artículo destacado, cinco buenos artículos y una variedad de otras presentaciones, especializadas en edificios y ubicaciones en Nueva York, para un total de 895 puntos..svg/1280px-Royal_standard_of_England_(1406%E2%80%931603).svg.png){kind=small}
Gog the Mild le siguió con 464 puntos, de un artículo destacado, dos buenos artículos y varias reseñas, siendo el tema principal la guerra naval. Raymie quedó en tercer lugar con 419 puntos, obtenidos de un buen artículo y la impresionante cifra de 34 DYK en estaciones de radio y televisión de los Estados Unidos.
Le siguió Harrias , en el 414, con un artículo destacado y tres buenos artículos, un especialista en batallas de la guerra civil inglesa.
CaptainEek quedó en quinto lugar con 405 puntos, en su mayoría obtenidos al llevar a Cactus wren al estado de artículo destacado. L293D ,
Kingsif , Enwebb , Lee Vilenski y
CAPITÁN MEDUSA . Siete de los diez mejores concursantes de la Ronda 1 son nuevos en WikiCup.Estos concursantes, como todos los demás, ahora tienen que volver a sumar puntos desde cero. En la Ronda 1 hubo cuatro artículos destacados, una lista destacada y dos imágenes destacadas, así como alrededor de doscientos DYK y veintisiete ITN. Entre ellos, los concursantes completaron 127 buenas revisiones de artículos, casi cien más que los 43 buenos artículos que reclamaron, lo que hizo una mella sustancial en la acumulación de revisiones. Los concursantes también solicitaron 40 reseñas de artículos destacados/listas destacadas, y la mayoría incluso recordaron mencionar su participación en WikiCup en sus reseñas (un requisito).
Recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la Ronda 1 pero antes del inicio de la Ronda 2 se puede reclamar en la Ronda 2. Algunos concursantes hicieron reclamos antes de que se configuraran las nuevas páginas de envíos y deberán volver a enviarlos. Las invitaciones para esfuerzos de escritura colaborativa o cualquier otra discusión sobre trabajos potencialmente interesantes siempre son bienvenidas en la página de discusión de WikiCup. Recuerde, si dos o más competidores de WikiCup han realizado un trabajo importante en un artículo, todos pueden reclamar puntos. Si le preocupa que su nominación, ya sea para buenos candidatos a artículos, un proceso destacado o cualquier otro lugar, no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews .
Si desea ayudar con WikiCup, ¡haga su granito de arena para reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregarse o eliminarse de Wikipedia: WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ). Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( charla ) 16:46, 1 de marzo de 2020 (UTC)
Hubo un error en el boletín de marzo de WikiCup 2020; L293D no debería haber sido incluido en la lista de los diez mejores anotadores en la Ronda 1 (lideraron la lista el año pasado), en cambio, Dunkleosteus77 debería haber sido incluido, habiendo obtenido 334 puntos de cinco buenos artículos sobre animales, vivos o extintos, y varias reseñas. Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 09:30, 2 de marzo de 2020 (UTC)
La segunda ronda de la WikiCup 2020 ya ha finalizado. Fue una ronda de alta puntuación y los concursantes necesitaban 75 puntos para avanzar a la ronda 3. Hubo algunos esfuerzos muy impresionantes en la ronda 2, y los diez mejores concursantes obtuvieron más de 500 puntos. Una gran cantidad de puntos provinieron de los 12 artículos destacados y los 186 buenos artículos logrados en total por los concursantes, y las 355 buenas revisiones de artículos que realizaron; La acumulación de pedidos de GAN y el imperativo de quedarse en casa durante la pandemia de COVID-19 pueden haber sido parcialmente responsables de estas impresionantes cifras.
Nuestros máximos goleadores en la ronda 2 fueron:
Epicgenius , con 2333 puntos de un artículo destacado, cuarenta y cinco buenos artículos, catorce DYK y muchos puntos extra. Gog the Mild , con 1784 puntos de tres artículos destacados, ocho buenos artículos, una cantidad sustancial de artículos destacados y buenas reseñas de artículos y muchos puntos extra.
The Rambling Man , con 1262 puntos de dos artículos destacados, ocho buenos artículos y cien buenas reseñas de artículos. Harrias , con 1141 puntos de dos artículos destacados, tres listas destacadas, diez buenos artículos, nueve DYK y un número sustancial de artículos destacados y buenas reseñas de artículos. Lee Vilenski con 869 puntos,
Granja de cerdos con 801, Kingsif con 719, SondaBruce con 710, Dunkleosteus77 con 608 y
MX con 515.Se han ajustado las reglas para las revisiones de artículos destacados; Las reseñas pueden cubrir tres aspectos del artículo, contenido, imágenes y fuentes, y los concursantes pueden recibir puntos por cada uno de estos tres tipos de reseñas. Recuerde también el requisito de mencionar la WikiCup cuando realice un FAR por el que desee reclamar puntos. Recuerda también que los DYK no se pueden reclamar hasta que hayan aparecido en la página principal. A medida que ingresamos a la tercera ronda, cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 2 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 3 se puede reclamar ahora, ¡y cualquier contenido que hayas olvidado reclamar en la ronda 2 no! Recuerde también que debe reclamar sus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a "ganarlos". Al realizar GAR, asegúrese de verificar que se cumplan todos los criterios de GA.
Si le preocupa que su nominación (ya sea nominaciones para buenos artículos, un proceso destacado o cualquier otra cosa) no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia: WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su lista cuando ya no esté disponible). requerido). Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregar o eliminar su nombre de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) y Cwmhiraeth . - Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 17:44, 1 de mayo de 2020 (UTC)
¡Que tengas un muy feliz cumpleaños en tu día especial!
Mis mejores deseos, CAPITÁN RAJU (T) 18:49, 20 de junio de 2020 (UTC)
La tercera ronda de la WikiCup 2020 ha llegado a su fin. Los 16 usuarios que llegaron a la cuarta ronda obtuvieron al menos 353 puntos cada uno (frente a 68 en 2019). Fue una ronda muy competitiva y se eliminaron varios concursantes que habrían avanzado en años anteriores. Nuestros máximos goleadores en la ronda 3 fueron:
Epicgenius , con un artículo destacado, 28 buenos artículos y 17 DYK, acumulando 1836 puntos. The Rambling Man , con 1672 puntos obtenidos de cuatro artículos destacados y diecisiete buenos artículos, además de reseñas de una gran cantidad de FAC y GA. Gog the Mild , concursante por primera vez, con 1540 puntos, un recuento basado en gran medida en 4 artículos destacados y puntos de bonificación relacionados.Entre ellos, los concursantes gestionaron 14 artículos destacados, 9 listas destacadas, 3 imágenes destacadas, 152 buenos artículos, 136 entradas DYK, 55 entradas ITN, 65 reseñas de candidatos a artículos destacados y 221 reseñas de buenos artículos. Además, MPJ-DK agregó 3 elementos a temas destacados y 44 a temas buenos. A lo largo del concurso, los concursantes completaron 710 buenas reseñas de artículos, en comparación con 387 buenos artículos enviados para revisión y promoción. Estas grandes cifras probablemente estén relacionadas con una acumulación de pedidos pendientes de GAN en abril y mayo, y con los cambios en los patrones de edición durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Al entrar en la cuarta ronda, recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 3 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 4 se puede reclamar en la ronda 4. Recuerde también que debe reclamar sus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a "ganarlos". Al realizar GAR, asegúrese de verificar que se cumplan plenamente todos los criterios de GA. Recuerde también que todos los envíos deben cumplir con las políticas básicas de Wikipedia, independientemente del proceso de revisión.
Si le preocupa que su nominación (ya sea nominaciones para buenos artículos, un proceso destacado o cualquier otro lugar) no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia: WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su lista cuando ya no esté disponible). requerido). Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregar o eliminar su nombre de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ), Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ) Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 12:33, 2 de julio de 2020 (UTC)
Tu mejor trabajo 7 de enero ( charla ) 14:14, 20 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
La cuarta ronda de la competición ha finalizado y se necesitan 865 puntos para clasificarse para la ronda final, casi el doble que el año pasado. Fue una ronda muy competitiva con dos concursantes con 598 y 605 puntos eliminados, y todos menos dos de los concursantes que llegaron a la ronda final habían logrado un FA durante la ronda. Los mayores puntajes fueron
Bloom6132 , con 1478 puntos obtenidos principalmente en 5 listas destacadas, 12 DYK y 63 en las noticias;HaEr48 con 1318 puntos obtenidos principalmente de 2 artículos destacados, 5 buenos artículos y 8 DYK; Lee Vilenski con 1201 puntos obtenidos principalmente de 2 artículos destacados y 10 buenos artículos.Entre ellos, los concursantes lograron 14 artículos destacados, 14 listas destacadas, 2 imágenes destacadas, 87 buenos artículos, 90 entradas DYK, 75 entradas ITN, 95 reseñas de candidatos a artículos destacados y 81 reseñas de buenos artículos. Felicitaciones a todos los que participaron. En general, fue una ronda productiva y con muchos goles y creo que podemos esperar un final de competición muy competitivo.
Recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 4 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 5 se puede reclamar en la ronda 5. Recuerde también que debe reclamar sus puntos dentro de los 10 días posteriores a "ganarlos". Si le preocupa que su nominación no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews . Sería útil si se pudiera eliminar de esta lista cualquier elemento que ya no sea relevante. Si desea ayudar con WikiCup, ¡haga su granito de arena para reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en la charla de Wikipedia: WikiCup , y se puede contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregarse o eliminarse de Wikipedia: WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ), Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ) Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 19:52, 1 de septiembre de 2020 (UTC)
¡Que tengas un muy feliz primer aniversario de edición!
Del Comité de Cumpleaños , CAPITÁN RAJU (T) 19:35, 14 de septiembre de 2020 (UTC)
La WikiCup 2020 ha llegado a su fin, y la ronda final llega hasta el final. Nuestro nuevo campeón es Lee Vilenski ( sumisiones ), subcampeón del año pasado, seguido de cerca por Gog the Mild ( presentaciones ). En la ronda final, Lee logró 4 FA y 30 GA, principalmente en temas de deportes básicos, mientras que Gog logró 3 FA y 15 GA, principalmente en batallas y guerras importantes, lo que le valió una gran cantidad de puntos de bonificación. The Rambling Man ( presentaciones ) ocupó el tercer lugar con 4 FA y 8 GA en temas de fútbol, con Epicgenius ( presentaciones ) le sigue de cerca con 19 GA y 16 DYK, siendo su interés los edificios de Nueva York.
Los otros finalistas fueron Granja de cerdos ( presentaciones ), HaEr48 ( presentaciones ), Harrias ( presentaciones ) y Bloom6132 ( presentaciones ). La ronda final fue muy productiva y, además de 15 FA, los concursantes lograron 75 revisiones FAC, 88 GA y 108 revisiones GAN. En conjunto, Wikipedia se ha beneficiado enormemente de las actividades de los competidores de WikiCup durante todo el concurso. ¡Bien hecho a todos!
Todos aquellos que lleguen a la final recibirán premios y se otorgarán los siguientes premios especiales, basados en el alto desempeño en áreas particulares de creación de contenido. Para que los finalistas no tengan una ventaja indebida, estos premios se otorgan al competidor que obtuvo la puntuación más alta en cualquier campo en particular en una sola ronda, o en caso de empate, al líder general en ese campo.
Gog the Mild ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al artículo destacado, para un total de 14 FA durante el transcurso de la competencia. Bloom6132 ( presentaciones ) gana el premio de la lista destacada, por 5 FL en la ronda 4. Rhododendrites ( presentaciones ) gana el premio a la imagen destacada, por 3 FP en la ronda 3 y 5 en general. Lee Vilenski ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al revisor de artículo destacado por 23 revisiones de FAC en la ronda 5. Epicgenius ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al buen artículo, por 45 GA en la ronda 2 y 113 en total. MPJ-DK ( envíos ) gana el premio por tema, por 33 artículos sobre buenos temas en la ronda 2. The Rambling Man ( presentaciones ) gana el premio al buen revisor de artículos, por 100 buenas reseñas de artículos en la ronda 2. Epicgenius ( presentaciones ) gana el premio DYK, por 22 artículos ¿Sabías que en la ronda 4 y 94 en general? Bloom6132 ( presentaciones ) gana el premio ITN, por 63 artículos en las noticias en la ronda 4 y 136 en total.La competición del próximo año comenzará el 1 de enero. Estás invitado a registrarte para participar ; La WikiCup está abierta a todos los wikipedistas, tanto editores novatos como experimentados, y esperamos verlos a todos en la competencia de 2021. Hasta entonces, ¡solo queda felicitar una vez más a nuestros dignos ganadores y agradecer a todos los participantes su implicación! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregarse o eliminarse de Wikipedia: WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 , Sturmvogel 66 , Vanamonde y Cwmhiraeth Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 11:37, 3 de noviembre de 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items. The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs..svg/1280px-Standard_of_Oliver_Cromwell_(1653%E2%80%931659).svg.png){kind=small}
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews. Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles. Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs. Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points. Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths. Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews. Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews. Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations. Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Dylan620. I'm just posting to let you know that Timeline of the 1996 Atlantic hurricane season – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 9. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs. Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points. Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died. Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles. Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. .jpg/1280px-Wandbild_Portrait_George_Floyd_von_Eme_Street_Art_im_Mauerpark_(Berlin).jpg){kind=small}
Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Beardbrarian. I'm part of a small team of Iowa State University library staff, along with HematISU, that are working on Wikipedia, following the guidelines laid out in Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Cultural_Professionals. The edit HematISU made yesterday, was to future-proof an existing citation to one of our finding aids by changing it from a direct link to an Archival Resource Key or ARK. Over the years, our library has hosted finding aids at various URLs, some older links from Wikipedia point to www.add.lib.iastate.edu and are now broken because that URL has changed. The prior Kniskern Mather link pointed to findingaids.lib.iastate.edu, which is no longer the current home of our finding aids. While the link currently works, the platform it links to will be retired eventually. The link HematISU added points to the current platform for finding aids, cardinal.lib.iastate.edu, which will almost certainly be replaced by something else in the future, if past practices hold. When that happens we will update the ARK to point to the new location and the ARK, but the link in Wikipedia will not need to be changed.
The purpose of updating Wikipedia links to ISU library resources to ARKs is to reduce dead links in Wikipedia and to reduce the burden on Wikipedia editors to update external links as URLs change. We are only making such changes for links to resources managed by the ISU library. This is very similar to the use of DOIs throughout Wikipedia to link to resources.
May we restore HematISU's edit?
Beardbrarian (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:
The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 pointsAll those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5. Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5. Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5. Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4. The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5. The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5. Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall. Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
I didn't see the sandbox thing on ur last thing. I thought I was on sandbox, but nope. SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, it is pretty hard to visually edit. How do I do it? SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Why does everyone say Wikipedia lies? I call BS on that tho SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Oh ok lol SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
You would be right; I thought I was reverting the vandalism. I was using Huggle, and I believe what may have happened was that there was a delay between ClueBot reverting the vandalism and me still seeing the vandalised revision so choosing to revert it, also! Thank you for clearing that one up for me. :-) Patient Zerotalk 03:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there,
I just uploaded the album cover for This Wild Willing by Glen Hansard (incredible album, strongly recommended listening, but I digress). I couldn't figure out how to reduce the file size before I initially uploaded, so I did so with a resolution of 700px2; I managed to reduce the resolution to 300px2 after uploading, but I would like for an administrator to please delete the previous version because it is now orphaned NFC. (If anyone has any suggestions of how I could reduce the resolution of a file before uploading it, I would welcome that, too.) Thank you, Dylan620 (he/him) (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Since I notice you’ve been very alert on the active vandalism on 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL), you might be interested that the vandal you’ve been reverting is part of an LTA, located here. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Stop Hipponos (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs. Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews..svg/1280px-Flag_of_Provo,_Utah_(1989%E2%80%932015).svg.png){kind=small}
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways. Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
You reverted my legitimate redirect/merge of duplicate articles.--142.167.135.137 (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
You're most welcome... Happy editing! Volten001 ☎ 02:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. FourGLTE (talk) 00:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects. Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs. Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir I removed that section because of that section Sidhu was getting unnecessary hate. Everyone has different opinion about Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale for Punjab people he is matry and strong leader who stood against Indian government dominance according to many sources he never demanded khalistan his main motive is anandapur resolution many big politicians like Subramanian Swamy also said that bhindranwale was Sant Daredevils56 (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Dear Dylan620,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
You requested an RD1. I declined it as the listed sites appear to be public domain. Do you think I'm missing something? S Philbrick(Talk) 00:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
You requested an RD1 for United States Army Sniper School
One of the sites you listed: https://www.benning.army.mil/Armor/316thCav/Sniper/Description.html Is a public domain website, so that should not be reverted or subject to an RD1.
The other site you listed: https://snipercentral.com/u-s-army-sniper-school-ft-benning/
Would be eligible for reversion and RD one but I'd want you to make absolutely sure that the material found that site was not also found at the public domain site. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations, Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round. Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition. Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4. Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1. SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1. Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5. Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall. Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall. Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.
We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 03:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello @Dylan620 and sorry to bother you, but the blocked user El Cubano 153 left several more fictional drafts that are probably unwanted. Should a discussion be started for deletion?
Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 04:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Hurricane Gloria for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews. Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points. TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points. Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews. Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews. FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, 
MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and 
AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews, Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews, Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Until I Found You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
It is inappropriate to use Huggle to revert good faith and well supported edits as you did at Long hot summer (disambiguation). Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines of using the tool before making such edits again. 142.157.250.127 (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dylan620. Please note that according to WP:CHARTS, a chart needs to be ... static, that is, the data in the chart cannot change. This excludes dynamic "all-time" charts ...
You are adding the "Greatest of All Time Adult Alternative Songs" which is, by nature, not static. I removed the chart up to #20, please remove the rest yourself. --Muhandes (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, 
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
BeanieFan11 with 2582 points Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points Epicgenius with 1518 points MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points Sammi Brie with 520 points Unlimitedlead with 5 pointsCongratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2. MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total. Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4. MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total. BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round. Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round. LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1. MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round. Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on my 2nd vote mistake. I tried to strike the vote, but it still added to the count so I just deleted it with your reply. I hope that's not an issue. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 20:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm currently working on a revamped version of the 1990 Pacific typhoon season, which you can find here. After I'm finished with that, could you collaborate with me on making a timeline of those events? ''Flux55'' (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.
Our current leader is newcomer 
Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK; Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
voorts (submissions) and 
Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.
The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:
Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviewsIn this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.
Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The recent discovery that one of my colleagues was a sockpuppet has prompted me to reflect on old accounts for which I have no use, and from which there should be no edits. Please block the following accounts indefinitely:
Thank you very much, Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
On 11 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1993 Pacific hurricane season generated more than double the average number of major hurricanes, which have sustained winds of at least 111 mph (179 km/h)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Sullivan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Dylan :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 14:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television; voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs; Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
On 22 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1994 Pacific hurricane season was the first to produce three hurricanes that attained Category 5 intensity, the highest rating on the Saffir–Simpson scale? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Dylan620. I'm just posting to let you know that Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 20. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television; Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history; SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article; voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
On 19 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Not Strong Enough" by Boygenius describes conflicting mental states of self-hatred and self-importance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
On 21 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that all Atlantic hurricane activity in 1993 ceased two full months before the season officially ended? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Dylan620, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Windswept Adan. At the same time, SupremeLordBagel, will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.
To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC/Circles#Circle #1.
GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Hey there Dylan! I just wanted to let you know that I nominated Hurricane Hilary for FAC, which you reviewed for GAN. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews; Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations; Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
On 17 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ghost in the Machine (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one critic interpreted a SZA song as being about her fears about the growing influence of AI in the music industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ghost in the Machine (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ghost in the Machine (song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there! I am sending this alert to all members of the WikiProject Weather and editors who have recently edited in the realm of tornadoes.
There is a large and important discussion ongoing, with the goal to completely overhaul and improve the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. The previous improvement attempt back in 2022/2023 gained almost no participation. This alert is being sent out so these discussions hopefully gain a reasonably-sized participation, so the F5/EF5 tornado article, one of the most viewed weather-related articles on Wikipedia, can be improved for all readers!
Si desea participar, visite: Charla de Wikipedia: WikiProject Weather/Posibles tornados F5/EF5/IF5 . The Weather Event Writer ( página de discusión) 16:23, 17 de julio de 2024 (UTC)
