I decided to change WKMR to include Portsmouth, Ohio. I looked at the call letters on Portsmouth's TV Guide channel and it is served by WKMR which is Morehead's call letters.
The last section of the page mentioned the KET5 and KET6 coverage when the General Assembly is in session, but earlier in the entry the article read that KET had four broadcast services. I changed the four to six, and made mention of the high-definition service available exclusively in Louisville.
Seems like someone should do an entry on O. Leonard Press?
Image:Logo mid ket6.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo mid ket5.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo mid ket4.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo mid ket3.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo mid ket2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Logo mid ket1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
i do not understand this page at all... i get ket1 on channel 13 and ket2 on channel 15 and i have insight cableMatrix8110 (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Matrix8110 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I know KET for Kids are real, but all of you guys would never see them before and I remember the blue, K-shaped mascot for the KET Kids block. It was back in the 90's when PBS Kids' P-Pals are introduced. KET for Kids' former mascot was in fact, the K-Kid. Since KET Kids' videos are nowhere to be seen on the entire internet, I cannot find references to this. CanidG on the ROCKS! 19:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kentucky Educational Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kentucky Educational Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kentucky Educational Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ket.org/content/uploads/2014/05/cable-guide-2015.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
User:K-Johnson 127 Why create separate articles on each KET station? I think they should be remerged. The stations aren't notable on their own, and the articles simply reuse info from the KET article. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Well, the articles contain additional information, such as the locations of the transmitters, additional info on the coverage areas, plus the results of each station's future allocations after the 2016 Spectrum auction. The KET article is simply overlong, too. Besides, The Georgia Public Broadcasting TV affiliates have seperate articles, too. K-Johnson 127 (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Various template errors related to the usage of Infobox_broadcasting_network need to be fixed.Pmaxhogan (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've proposed the merger of our articles on WCVN-TV, WKAS, WKGB-TV, WKHA, WKLE, WKMA-TV, WKMR, WKMU, WKOH, WKON, WKPI-TV, WKSO-TV and WKZT-TV into the KET article.
The articles nominated are purely transmitters of the network and have always been. They have never had deviation from the network schedule in any way, and their history does not contain major information separate from the network; indeed, most of the pertinent information is already in the main KET article. A transmitter of a large multi-station network like this, carrying the same programming, should only have an article if it has had a distinctly separate history, typically with other ownership or programming.
(This merge nomination does not contain WKPC-TV and WKPD, which were once separate stations altogether from KET, or WKMJ-TV, which since 1997 has had separate programming.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: "There is a specific reason why I have used ibx tvs, not broadcasting network which is kinda deprecated" What is this reason? And why is the other template deprecated? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Maxim Masiutin (talk · contribs) 16:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I picked up this article for review, come back to you soon. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I checked the article upon all Good Article criteria. I figured out that in its current form it does not qualify to the criterias 1a, and 3a. In particular, related to 1a, it is not understandable to an appropriately broad audience, especially in the lead section. However, this can be quickly resolved. Please find the details below.
My second concern is compliance to criteria 3a: that it is not broad in its coverage and does not fully address the main aspects of the topic. However, I’m not fully qualified to make a judgement on 3a since I’m not a specialist on the area. I just made general questions regarding 3a. Please consider adding the information related to 3a or write in separate sections on the Talk page on why this information is not available or not needed. I would strongly recommend that the article be reviewed by a subject-matter expert who can ensure that all key aspects of the topic are adequately covered, however, lack of such review should not prevent it from being compliant to GA. In the meantime, please consider adding the information related to 3a or provide explanations in separate sections on the Talk page on why this information is not available or not necessary. This will help other editors understand the rationale behind the current structure and content of the article. I believe that I’m fully qualified to judge on whether the articles is understandable to an appropriately broad audience, as I myself consider to be a member of such a broad audience: if I don’t understand something, than the broad audience does not understand it. Please consider addressing the issues related to the broadness of the audience. I urge you to address the issues related to the comprehensibility of the article to ensure that it is accessible to as wide an audience as possible.
The term "PBS" is not explained. It is used in the lead and in the Short description. Me and my family live in the republic of Moldova, and we have no idea on what "PBS" is; if "PBS" is something well-known to an "US" or Kentucky audience, then the article should not be U.S.-centric or Kentucky-centric: according to MOS:LEAD, the language should be chosen in such a way that that as wide as possible audience should understand it. Difficult-to-understand terminology should be avoided. Where uncommon terms are essential, they should be placed in context, linked, and briefly defined. The subject should be placed in a context familiar to a normal reader. Readers should not be dropped into the middle of the subject from the first word; they should be eased into it. If the term “PBS” can be linked and briefly defined in the lead, it can’t be in the Short description. I tried to figure out what PBS was and found out that it was a “Public Broadcasting Service”, is an American public broadcaster and television program distributor. Therefore, please consider, on the first instance of the “PBS”, write instead is “Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), an American public broadcaster and television program distributor”.
Unless specified in the "Exceptions" section below, an acronym should be written out in full for the first time, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses, e.g. maximum transmission unit (MTU) if it is used again in the article. Common exceptions are post-nominal initials ... or for something most commonly known by its acronym, in which case the expansion can be omitted (except in the lead of its own article) or be in parentheses.Our article on the topic at hand is at PBS and not an expansion thereof.
The wikilink of the term Commonwealth does not follow the good practice explained in MOS:PIPE. In particular, it is mentioned "Commonwealth of Kentucky", but when I click to "Commonwealth" I get to an article on "US state" which is perplexing for me as a non-U.S. person. For me, as a non-U.S. person, it is known that "Kentucky" is a U.S. state, but that it is a "Commonwealth" is puzzling. One of the following variants would be OK without any wikilink or if only Kentucky would be wikilinked:
As you see in the last variant, the Commonwealth of Kentucky is linked as a whole. I didn’t know what commonwealth meant, my search revealed that in the context of US states, a commonwealth is a state that has chosen to call itself a commonwealth. Kentucky is one of four US states officially called commonwealths. Maybe we should explain that in the lead if we use the term "commonwealth". Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The sentence on funding is incomplete, there is a sentence: “It is operated by the Kentucky Authority for Educational Television, an agency of the Kentucky state government, which provides more than half of its annual funding”, however, it does not seem to be complete, as it is not mentioned even briefly on who provides the remaining funding, a good addition would have been: ", the rest are grants and public donations".Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The term American Public Television may not be well understood by a general audience. According to MOS:INTRO, it is not enough to just wikilink a term. It is better to avoid terms at all, but if we cannot avoid it, besides wikilinking, we should define it, i.e. "American Public Television, the largest syndicator of programming for public television stations in the United States." -- however, the word "syndicator" itself might not be understandable by a broad audience, such as adolescents outside U.S.Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The term "Kentucky General Assembly" is also not defined. A member of a broad audience may have a feeling that it is a kind of "referendum", where all citizens of the state decide something, but it turned to be a state legislature of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, consisting of 38 (Senate) and 100 (House) people.Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
It was only mentioned on partnership to technically broadcast the video/audio information, but not on content creation and exchange. Were there any notable partnerships or collaborations with other organizations in the field of education, culture, or public affairs, or among similar organizations in the other states or countries on cross-licensing of content? If it was the case, please augment the article, if it was not, please mention that as a separate topic on the Talk page.Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The article mentions the specific programs or content that KET produces and broadcasts, but does not go deeper on how is the content created, any noteworthy and remarkable details content creation would have been useful. The article more focused on technical aspects of content distribution, however, the most important aspect of any content is not its distribution but its essence, i.e. what interesting information does it contain and how it was created. Was it used for continuous professional education of adults?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Are there any details about the viewership ratings or audience demographics for KET's programming, besides schools?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Is there any information on the impact of KET's educational programs on schoolchildren or student learning outcomes, if at all – how was the impact of KET was measured, if it was? Is there any overview and reference to studies and research demonstrating the effectiveness, value, efficacy, outcomes, results (etc.) associated with using televised media as an instructional tool specifically within Kentucky context?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Are there any community engagement initiatives organized by KET to involve local residents and promote civic participation, and promotion of public goods activities and awareness that go beyond children at schools?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Can be compiled a list or description of popular and influential programs produced by KET throughout its history. This would showcase the diverse range of educational, cultural, public affairs shows or programs broadcasted by the network?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The article gives information on a few grants awarded. Did the KET receive awards for its contributions? Are there any notable achievements and awards received by specific productions/programs from national/regional broadcasting associations recognizing excellence in television production/content quality, or from state, national or worldwide organizations and intergovernmental bodies?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Is there any information available about any significant partnerships/collaborations between KET and schools/districts/Kentucky Department Education aimed at enhancing educational opportunities for students across various subjects/disciplines based on the feedback from schools?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Is there any information regarding how funding has evolved over time; including changes made due state budget fluctuations & shifts towards private donations/grants etc?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Was KET mentioned in songs, books, shows (apart from KET itself)? Were there major (national) news coverage, such as in the NY Times, i.e. there was a link to https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/30/education/to-teach-distant-pupils-educators-in-kentucky-turn-on-interactive-tv.html - are there any more mentions? Are there any recent news developments, such as https://www.murrayledger.com/news/kentucky-band-exile-to-be-featured-in-two-ket-events/article_dfa83906-d775-11ee-add0-2fb0be835896.html ?Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
While the article is almost ready for GA, it currently falls short of the Good Article criteria the key area related to the requirement to be understandable to an appropriately broad audience, as specified in criteria 1a, especially in the lead section. Fulfilling this broadness requirements is mandatory. However, as for the criteria to be complete, this is not required if you provide a plausible explanation with sufficient details and arguments on why they are not required or not relevant. As with some focused editing and expansion, I believe it could meet these criteria and serve as a valuable resource for readers interested in this topic.Maxim Masiutin (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
I will ask for second opinion. Question is whether the fact that the terms "PBS", "Commonwealth", "American Public Television", "General Assembly", and "Corporation for Public Broadcasting" not explained in the lead consists a violation of 1a (understandable for the broad audience". Please only make the opinion, but the final decicion is on me as the first reviewer. According to WP:GAN/I#R3, if there is disagreement over interpretation of the good article criteria, a reviewer may ask for a second opinion. I am asking for the second opinion on the following question is the fact that the terms "PBS", "Commonwealth", "American Public Television", "General Assembly", and "Corporation for Public Broadcasting" are not explained in the lead constitutes a violation of the broad audience requirement of the criteria 1a. Please reply according to WP:GAN/I#2O and then put the status back to "onreview".Maxim Masiutin (talk) 13:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 12:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 681 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC).