Talk:Look for the Light

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 March 2023

In Reception, please change "demonstrating terror, fragility, and terror" to "demonstrating terror and fragility" or something else to get rid of the echo. Neftalirr (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Ashley Johnson

• ... that Ashley Johnson (pictured), who portrayed Ellie in The Last of Us, played Ellie's mother Anna in the season finale of its television adaptation? Source: Los Angeles Times
  • ALT1: ... that an alternative ending was filmed for the season finale of The Last of Us at HBO's request, but the showrunners removed it? Source: The New Yorker
  • ALT2: ... that Ashley Johnson (pictured) watched videos of natural births to prepare for her role in the season finale of The Last of Us? Source: Los Angeles Times
  • ALT3: ... that an actress attained a black eye while filming a fight scene for the season finale of The Last of Us? Source: TVLine
  • ALT4: ... that the season finale of The Last of Us used real giraffes? Source: Variety
  • ALT5: ... that the season finale of The Last of Us was filmed in unused floors of a hospital? Source: Variety
  • Reviewed: The Care and Keeping of You
  • Comment: Image with ALT0 and ALT2.

Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 01:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Look for the Light; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

• Article is new enough and long enough. Cursory look shows no uncited claims. QPQ is done. Overall, everything looks—uh, oh. Earwig is showing a 93% copyvio likelihood based on IMD? This is probably a false positive assuming the IMDB editor took the info from the wiki page, but I'll need you to get back to me before I properly pass it. Assuming it gets passed, I'd go with any of the given hooks, except ALT5, which isn't too interesting. ALT1 is a bit confusing; did they accept the request, film the alternate ending, then remove it, or did they refuse to make the alternate ending altogether? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Krisgabwoosh: Thanks for the review! This is definitely a case of WP:MIRROR with IMDb; it's happened before with other episodes too. I've rephrased ALT1; hopefully it makes more sense. Let me know if there's anything else! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Perfect, just making sure. Any of these alts look good to go. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like ALT4 and I know they are real giraffes or live giraffes because I made the connection to the Calgary Zoo in the article. But perhaps we need to explicitly state it in the article "real giraffes". Bruxton (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Look for the Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs) 06:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain: I'll be awaiting your responses. Shouldn't take too much work. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spot checks

Numbers from this revision [1].Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 16 Good
• 25 Good
• 28 Good
• 32 Good
• 33 Good
• 39 Good
• 46 Good

Drive by comment

@OlifanofmrTennant: It has been three weeks since your last edit on this page. Do you plan to continue the review or should it be closed so the article can wait for a different reviewer? -- ZooBlazer 19:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry I completely forgot, I'll get on with it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Thanks for the review. To clarify your concerns: Den of Geek's Boo is a little repetitious but I believe it would be inconsistent and potentially confusing to rephrase, and the two uses are far apart anyway; EverythingGP is a local Grande Prairie publication, used here to verify uncontroversial production information; and there are several negative/critical comments in the Reception section, especially the last paragraph. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see the scattered negative thoughts. Upon looking through the sources it seems that you've taken as much as you can from the reviews. I specificlly called out Den of Geek at random, regardless I see your point. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]