stringtranslate.com

List of Slavic deities

The pagan Slavs were polytheistic, which means that they worshipped many gods and goddesses. The gods of the Slavs are known primarily from a small number of chronicles and letopises, or not very accurate Christian sermons against paganism. Additional, more numerous sources in which Slavic theonyms are preserved include names, proper names, place names, folk holidays, and language, including sayings.

Information about Slavic paganism, including the gods, is scarce because Christian missionaries were not very interested in the spiritual life of the Slavs.[1] Also, no accounts written down directly by the pagan Slavs exist. During the Christianization missions, the deities, on the one hand, were demonized to deter from worshipping them, on the other hand, their characteristics and functions were assumed by the saints, which was supposed to make the new religion less alien.

Common Slavic deities

Because of the small number of sources, there is no consensus among scholars of Slavic mythology on the extent of the worship of even the most important deities. Listed in this paragraph are those whose Panslavic range is most often recognized. In addition to these, the East Slavic Mokosh (a presumed toponym in the Czech Republic), and the East Slavic Stribog (toponyms in Poland) are sometimes indicated.

Supreme deities

Based on the reconstructed myths around the figures of Perun and Veles, some scholars believe that both of these gods are chief deities.[2] They are primarily found in the Slavic creation myth. According to some scholars, a pair of these gods prove "Slavic dualism", but there is no consensus on this either, and those who assume that such dualism in mythology may have existed, point out that Slavic dualism was probably not as extreme as in Christianity or Zoroastrianism.

Other deities

Personifications

West Slavic deities

East and South Slavic deities

Deities listed anonymously

There are two sources that mention a nameless Slavic chief god. Procopius of Caesarea in the Gothic Wars describes the religion of the South Slavs:

Indeed, they believe that a single god, creator of the lightning bolt, is the sole lord of all things and they offer him sacrifices of cows and all manner of victims. The idea of destiny is unknown to them nor do they believe that it has any influence over men, but when death is at their heels because they have fallen sick or are preparing for war, they promise that, if spared, they will immediately offer a sacrifice in honour of the god in exchange for their life and, once they have been spared, they sacrifice whatever they have to hand and believe they have bought their salvation with this sacrifice.[49]

Greek original text
θεὸν μὲν γὰρ ἕνα τὸν τῆς ἀστραπῆς δημιουργὸν ἁπάντων κύριον μόνον αὐτὸν νομίζουσιν εἶναι, καὶ θύουσιν αὐτῷ βόας τε καὶ ἱερεῖα πάντα· εἱμαρμένην δὲ οὔτε ἴσασιν οὔτε ἄλλως ὁμολογοῦσιν ἔν γε ἀνθρώποις ῥοπήν τινα ἔχειν, ἀλλ’ ἐπειδὰν αὐτοῖς ἐν ποσὶν ἤδη ὁ θάνατος εἴη, ἢ νόσῳ ἁλοῦσιν ἢ ἐς πόλεμον καθισταμένοις, ἐπαγγέλλονται μὲν, ἢν διαφύγωσι, θυσίαν τῷ θεῷ ἀντὶ τῆς ψυχῆς αὐτίκα ποιήσειν, διαφυγόντες δὲ θύουσιν ὅπερ ὑπέσχοντο, καὶ οἴονται τὴν σωτηρίαν ταύτης δὴ τῆς θυσίας αὐτοῖς ἐωνῆσθαι.[49]

Similar information, however, concerning the West Slavic Polabians, appears in Helmold's Chronicle:

Within the multifarious aspect of the manifestations of their divinities, to which their fields, forests, sadness, and happiness are entrusted, they do not deny that there is one god in heaven who reigns above the others, that this is the only one responsible for celestial matters, and that the others obey him; each assuming a role, they come from his line and are more powerful the closer they are to said god.[50]

Latin original text
Inter multiformia uero deorum numina, quibus arua, siluas, tristicias atque uoluptates attribuunt, non-diffitentur unum deum in celis ceteris imperitantem, illum prepotentem celestia tantum curare, hos uero distributis officiis obsequentes de sanguine eius processisse et unumquemque eo prestantiorem, quo proximiorem illi deo deorum.[50]

It is unclear how reliably these accounts describe Slavic theology. Some scholars believe that these texts are Christian interpretations of the faith of the pagan Slavs; Helmold, writing about the god of gods, clearly borrowed the term (deus deorum) from the Book of psalms (50:1). In the case of Procopius' text, for example, Aleksander Brückner argued that the text was a calque, an image with a Hellenized tinge imposed on Slavic paganism. Scholars who accept at least partial authenticity of these messages believe that they may convey information about henotheism, the Slavic deus otiosus – a passive god who does not interfere directly in world affairs and whose commands are carried out by other gods. It is also possible that they may refer to the replacement of the passive sky god by a more active thunder god, just as the Greek Uranus was replaced by Zeus. Although Procopius and Helmold do not mention the names of these gods, whose names they probably did not know because of taboos, it is generally believed that Perun, or Svarog, was involved here.[51][52]

Cosmas of Prague describes Czech paganism in his Chronica Boemorum through the Interpretatio Romana: "Therefore, sacrifice to your gods an ass so that they become your succour. Those who wish you to make this offering are Jupiter, most important of the gods, Mars himself, his sister Bellona and the son-in law of Ceres (i.e. Pluto).[53]

In the Chronicle, Thietmar describes the Christianization of Pomerania. In 1000, during the congress of Gniezno, Reinbern was appointed bishop of Kołobrzeg. Thietmar further wrote that Reinbern "destroyed the temples of the idols, he burnt them, and, after anointing four stone idols of their demons with holy chrism, he threw them into the lake and then blessed the water to cleanse it".[54] Perhaps the passage in this message is about the sea god.[55]

Deities of uncertain status

Pseudo-deities

See also

References

  1. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 9.
  2. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 315.
  3. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 85.
  4. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 97.
  5. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 65.
  6. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 44–45.
  7. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 92–93.
  8. ^ a b Gieysztor 2006, pp. 89–91.
  9. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 45.
  10. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 48–52.
  11. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 56–57.
  12. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 50.
  13. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 107–108.
  14. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 105–107.
  15. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 309.
  16. ^ Téra 2009, pp. 68, 320–321.
  17. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 171.
  18. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 167–170.
  19. ^ a b Szyjewski 2003, p. 194.
  20. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 206–207.
  21. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 129.
  22. ^ a b c Szyjewski 2003, pp. 191–193.
  23. ^ Strzelczyk 1998, p. 174.
  24. ^ Váňa 1990, p. 61.
  25. ^ a b Zarubin 1971, pp. 70–76.
  26. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 114.
  27. ^ a b Szyjewski 2003, p. 116.
  28. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 114–115.
  29. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 116.
  30. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 147–153.
  31. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 169.
  32. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 117–119.
  33. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 133–135.
  34. ^ a b c Szyjewski 2003, p. 127.
  35. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 91.
  36. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 222.
  37. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 131.
  38. ^ a b Gieysztor 2006, p. 132.
  39. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 153.
  40. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 184–186.
  41. ^ a b Gieysztor 2006, pp. 180–181.
  42. ^ a b Borissoff 2014, pp. 11–12.
  43. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 201–2004.
  44. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 128.
  45. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 186–190.
  46. ^ Vilkul 2015, pp. 146, 159, 164–165.
  47. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 171–172.
  48. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 102, 105–107.
  49. ^ a b Álvarez-Pedrosa 2021, pp. 22–25.
  50. ^ a b Álvarez-Pedrosa 2021, pp. 161–163.
  51. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 109–111.
  52. ^ Szyjewski 2003, pp. 99–100.
  53. ^ Brückner 1985, p. 37.
  54. ^ Wejman 2004, p. 140.
  55. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 121.
  56. ^ Gorbachov 2017.
  57. ^ Kolankiewicz 1999, p. 461.
  58. ^ Brückner 1985, p. 88.
  59. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 153–154.
  60. ^ Álvarez-Pedrosa 2012–2014.
  61. ^ Szyjewski 2003, p. 118.
  62. ^ Kempiński 1993, p. 219.
  63. ^ Peroš, Ivon & Bacalja 2007, p. 69.
  64. ^ a b Kropej 2012, pp. 35–44.
  65. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 199.
  66. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 160.
  67. ^ Witkowski 1970, p. 377.
  68. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 197.
  69. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 99.
  70. ^ Gieysztor 2006, pp. 188–189.
  71. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 89.
  72. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 133.
  73. ^ Gieysztor 2006, p. 195.
  74. ^ Pitro & Vokáč 2002, p. 15.

Bibliography

Further reading