stringtranslate.com

Talk:52 (album series)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 21:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Panini! (talk). Self-nominated at 19:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/52 (album series); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

Overall: The article is long enough and old enough. The hooks are interesting. I'm not certain about the image requirements. The one issue that stands out to me is that one quotation in the article isn't cited or listed in the closest ref, which I've noted in-line. Otherwise, this is looking good! Significa liberdade (talk) 06:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Significa liberdade Thanks for the review! The quote comes from ref 6 at the end of the paragraph (this ref). It verifies the "The podcast released once a week for 52 weeks" part at the end as well. As for the image, I have plans to replace it with a verified free image that comes from Bush himself; it should be uploaded within the next day or so. I'm not too sure how long it takes the Wikimedia Foundation to verify the image after that, however. Panini! 🥪 20:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Panini!! I'm not sure why I wasn't able to find the quote in the source, but it's certainly there! Everything looks good now. :)
Significa liberdade, the images are in! I received this new one, among others, from Bush himself. He will be emailing Commons the permission ticket in the near future, after which there's the estimated backlog wait of about 4 days until the image is officially verified as freely liscensed. In the meantime, this is what it will look like.
Panini! 🥪 03:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Going with the approved hook - in our article I see Upon returning to his music career when COVID-19 restrictions subsided in 2022, Bush was encouraged to "reimagine setbacks as opportunities" and release 52 songs in one year and it is cited Bruxton (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:52 (album series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Panini! (talk · contribs) 18:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IanTEB (talk · contribs) 16:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is generally well-written but I have some concerns about the abundance of primary interview sources. I’ll give a full review but will request a second opinion, hopefully from an editor with more GA reviews and nominations than me; this is only my second review.

Comments

Background and release

  •  Done
  •  Done, but merged the covid details with the other sentence
  •  Done
  •  Done

52 | ATL x BNA

  •  Yeah lol
  •  Done
 Done, and replaced "blend" for redundancy
  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done

52 | In the Key of Summer

  •  Done Yes! "Upbeat" was the word I was looking for! I hated using the word positive here because it felt so out of place.
  •  Done
  •  Done Songs, just a type
  •  Done

52 | New Blue

  •  Done
  •  Done, merged it with another sentence

52 | This Year

  •  Done
  •  Done
  •  Done

Lead and infobox

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    Earwig detects nothing but the quotes, though I would recommend cutting a few that I've listed in the review.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Images have fair use or are under creative commons.
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Alt text needed, otherwise all good.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Apart from the issues I've outlined, the prose is quote good, the article is illustrated, and sources are cited properly. My main concern lies within the heavy usage of primary interview sources. Everything apart from Entertainment Focus and The Music Universe seems to be interviews with the subject. As a result, the article primarily discusses 52 from the perspective of Bush; there is nothing about the thoughts of critics, commercial performance, or musical analysis. If these sources don't exist it may be difficult to ever get this album series to GA. I'm unsure if these issues calls for a fail, but I'm also not certain if it could pass even if all my outlined issues are adressed, so I will call in a more experienced editor for a second opinion. I apologize if this delays the process of getting the review finished. IanTEB (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @IanTEB, thank you very much for the detailed review! And sorry for the late response. I'll work on your comments as soon as I can.
Uh, I agree... I'm not too sure why I ever submitted this for GAN? Without being able to fill in more specific information about each album individually (hence why they're all together), I don't see this article escaping WP:PERMASTUB. Not that it is a stub, but it certainly will be difficult to expand further on the comprehensiveness side of things.
I apologize for the immature nomination, and I'm perfectly fine with you failing this nomination. Since I wasted your time technically, feel free to let me know when you nominate a video game for GA and I'll give you a quid pro quo for your time. I've only recently started working on music articles and I'm still trying to get a grasp on what GA means to them. Just recently I had a quick-failed album GAN and a failed DYK nomination for another, although I did have one music-related DYK success. Panini! 🥪 22:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Panini!: If we are in agreeance, I will unfortunately fail this nomination, but I do really appreciate you taking the time to implement most of my suggestions. You don't need to feel as if you've wasted anyone's time; over-reliance on primary sourcing in music articles is something I can very much relate to (for example, it was the reason for my GA withdrawals of Lighthouse (EP) and the accompanying talk show). I think the VG article Danganronpa S: Ultimate Summer Camp that I wrote in 2021 is close to GA but I never submitted it out of uncertainty. If I do nominate it I'll let you know, if you are willing to review it of course :)
I really hope this and the other fails you mentioned don't discourage you from contributing more to music articles. Browsing your userpage, I think Something Like This and The Joy of Music (album) could both pass GA reviews and The Walking in Between could get there with a copyedit. If you submit any, I can absolutely review them or help out. IanTEB (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]