Hola. No quiero destruir tu trabajo, pero esta enciclopedia tiene ciertas reglas sobre cómo se escriben los artículos.
Mis sugerencias son tres:
Espero que esto ayude. - Biruitorul Talk 11:04, 25 de julio de 2020 (UTC)
Estimado señor, muchas gracias por crear un sandbox.
Empecé a trabajar hace unos días, llenando 3 páginas con enlaces a Wikipedia y enlaces externos. Después de cerrar Internet, se eliminaron todos los datos. ¿Podrías indicarme cómo se guardan los datos en la zona protegida? Por otra parte, serías tan amable de indicarme cómo crear un enlace al contenido de CONTENIDO.
Estoy buscando en las políticas: WP:V, WP:CS, WP:RS. Trabajo destacado. Hago todo lo posible para mejorar la calidad.
Agradecería mucho tu ayuda, más adelante, para corregir el inglés. Muchas gracias Dealuri (discusión) 04:14 29 jul 2020 (UTC)
Estimado señor, intenté varias veces cargar la imagen en el sandbox. ¿Podría ayudarme?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard/sandbox&withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js
Dealuri (discusión) 10:08, 16 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
Estimado señor, muchas gracias por su ayuda para crear un sandbox. Gracias también por su intención de ayudar más adelante con la corrección del inglés, se lo agradezco mucho.
Miré las características y políticas básicas, gracias nuevamente.
Por el momento, por favor, ¿sería tan amable de aconsejarme: -Desde hace unos días, no funciona de forma continua, para vincular a Wikipedia y a un enlace externo. Después de terminar algunas páginas, Internet se cierra y, cuando se vuelve a abrir, se pierde todo el trabajo. ¿Podrías aconsejarme cómo guardar el enlace antes de cerrar Internet? -Hay contenido. ¿Cómo hacer un enlace desde cada tema del contenido, por favor? Muchas gracias Dealuri (discusión) 03:33, 29 de julio de 2020 (UTC)
Veré qué puedo hacer en los próximos días. Realmente debería haber una cita (por ejemplo: <ref>Stan Vasile, Istoria Rădășenilor , p. 56. Suceava: Editura Cetatea Scaunului, 2001, ISBN 978-0-7646-23-1283</ref>) al final de cada oración, para que se pueda rastrear la información. - Biruitorul Talk 11:49, 10 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
Estimado señor, muchas gracias. Por favor, deme algunos ejemplos en el artículo para empezar. Lo seguiré. Muchas gracias. Dealuri (discusión) 10:20 12 ago 2020 (UTC)
Comencemos con un ejemplo: “De un documento de 1743, de la época del gobernante Constantin Mavrocordat, descubrimos que alrededor de 1580 funcionaba una escuela religiosa en Rădășeni”.
¿Cómo lo sabes? ¿Dónde aparece la información? Supongo que hay alguna fuente secundaria involucrada, que no miraste un documento de 1743. - Biruitorul Talk 15:12, 13 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
Regresando a la información anterior, investigaré para ver dónde encontrar el documento.
Observé que eliminaste del artículo "Historia de un aldeano", tal vez porque no está relacionado con el tema Historia de Radaseni. ¿Puedes indicarme dónde lo eliminaste? ¿Puedes darme un enlace? Porque no está guardado y tengo la intención de hacer un nuevo artículo sobre esto. Muchas gracias Dealuri (discusión) 20:51, 14 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
“De un acta de 1743, de la época del gobernante Constantin Mavrocordat, nos enteramos de que, alrededor de 1580, funcionaba una escuela de la iglesia en Rădășeni”. Hay en la pestaña 231 del Volumen V del libro de AD Xenopol. Editorial ELF Bucarest, 2009. La fila 231 del volumen V al cărții lui AD Xenopol. Editura ELF București, 2009. "Astfel de scoli se infiintara in curind si la episcopiile de Roman si Radauti... Despre una din ele, aflam ca ar fi existat pe timpul copilariei lui Stefan Tomsa in satul Radaseni din tinutul Sucevei, renumit astazi pentru pomii sai roditori. Intr-un document posterior de la Constantin cordat din 1743, relativ la o hotarnica din Baia si mosnenii din Radaseni, mai multi dintre acestia marturisesc ca au apucat de la batrinii lor " ca fiind Stefan Tomsa Voda copil mic si sarac a invatat carte la scoala de aici din Radaseni, si miluindu-l Dzeu cu Domnia, a venit la Radaseni si le-a facut biserica si jeluind oamenii ca le locul strimt si n-au unde se hrani, le-au dat si o bucata de loc din hotarul Tirgului Baii [Baia]" Dealuri (discusión) 05:07, 15 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
¿Es hora de publicar, por favor? Dealuri (discusión) 04:34 16 ago 2020 (UTC)
Refiere tu comentario a:
«Interesante, pero más una historia personal que un contenido enciclopédico»
Historia verdadera de uno de los aldeanos
ok, gracias, pero ¿no puedo hacer un nuevo artículo con su nombre real?
Su vida fue más interesante que la mayoría de las que aparecen en Wikipedia.
Dealuri (discusión) 05:00, 16 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
«Interesante, pero más una historia personal que un contenido enciclopédico»
Ok, gracias, pero ¿no puedo hacer un nuevo artículo con su nombre real?
Su vida fue más interesante que la mayoría de las que aparecen en Wikipedia.
Dealuri (discusión) 04:56, 16 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
Estimado señor, intenté varias veces cargar la imagen en el sandbox. ¿Podría ayudarme?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard/sandbox&withJS=MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js Dealuri (discusión) 10:06, 16 de agosto de 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Bucharest,Street of Rădășeni.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:View of Rădășeni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://ziarullumina.ro/societate/reportaj/radaseni-satul-muzeu-de-la-portile-bucovinei-107245.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sirs, I was blocked because of copyright violation.
I would like to inform you that as a beginner in Wikipedia, I have not realized the great importance of this deviation.
In addition, some of the photos refused were actually taken by the undersigned, and yet removed, not knowing where and how to complain.
Other photos, being published on the internet, I asked them from the owners of the publications themselves, and sent them to me separately. The large number of rejections is also due to the lack of knowledge from the beginning of the references to the base, or even photos taken by the undersigned, but not registered as such.
Another, that I wasn't organized enough, to classify the pictures that were turned down in different folders. And sometimes the insistence with which I tried to resend the pictures. Indeed, some of them have been resumed disallowed, and I apologize.
Those were major reason for the large number of refusals. Please unlock me, fully understanding the importance of copyright infringement. I want to complete a work started many months ago, before I sign up for Wikipedia
With thanks and respect, Dealuri Dealuri (talk) 14:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to inform you that as a beginner in Wikipedia, I have not realized the great importance of this deviation. In addition, some of the photos refused were actually taken by the undersigned, and yet removed, not knowing where and how to complain. Other photos, being published on the internet, I asked them from the owners of the publications themselves, and sent them to me separately. The large number of rejections is also due to the lack of knowledge from the beginning of the references to the base, or even photos taken by the undersigned, but not registered as such. Another, that I wasn't organized enough, to classify the pictures that were turned down in different folders. And sometimes the insistence with which I tried to resend the pictures. Indeed, some of them have been resumed disallowed, and I apologize. Those were major reason for the large number of refusals. Please unlock me, fully understanding the importance of copyright infringement. I want to complete a work started many months ago, before I sign up for Wikipedia With thanks and respect, Dealuri
Decline reason:
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Is the right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia
Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time. The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work)) which is identifiable in pictures
Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products
Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed
First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, since they do not know enough the use of links that are licensed,compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from copyright owner.
I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"
Go to Advanced Image Search for images or Advanced Search for anything else.In the "all these words" box, type what you want to search.In the "Usage rights" section, use the drop-down to choose what kind of license you want the content to have.Select Advanced Search).
Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it.
Can you please bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage? There have been many retouching small things that no longer appear.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri/User_talk:Dealuri?markasread=198429942%7C198429746&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:100'years_Old_school_Rădășeni_renewed-1.jpg
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri/User_talk:Dealuri?markasread=198429942%7C198429746&markasreadwiki=enwiki#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_File:Iarna_la_Rădășeni-3.jpg
Many thank you, Dealuri (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
*In defense, in addition to above those shown, I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in the shadows,for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Dealuri (talk) 08:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products
Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted.
Dealuri (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
{unblock | reason=your reason here copyright violation} Dealuri (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
One open unblock request at a time, please. You had three! --Yamla (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry please, because i don't know were to enter Dealuri (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Reply to question:
Is the right to use photos or any kind registered
with the owner's consent, or with the citation of
the basic source if it is accepted. There are many
sources, not supported by Wikipedia
Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time.
The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures
Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products.
I add that, by violating copyrght, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself.
Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future..
Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed
First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, until know/learn enough the use of links that are licensed,compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from copyright owner.
I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"(Find free-to-use images)
Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it.
In defense, in addition to above those shown, I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in background - shadows, considering to be just for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Wikipedia .
I'm ashamed of it, and I apologize, certainly that it will not repeat (maybe only rarely and accidentally, by any typo only , and not by copyright )
If you accept the arguments, and you reinstate me, kindly request bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage ( my work was turned back in time and many retouching small things that no longer appear.)
Being a beginner, just one month entered, you are kindly enough to accept some errors, ( but in no case copyright errors or vandalism), like now, maybe unblock requested twice because no entered in proper case.
Many thank you for your understanding.
Dealuri (talk) 14:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In the continuation of the previous request for un-block, I make further arguments re copyright:
Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights, if there are similarities as a paraphrase close to, such a situation is serious, because copyright infringements not only harm Wikipedia, but also create legal problems.
That's why it's necessary and I understand this, like any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution of the undersigned, and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made.
Many thank youDealuri (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now I understand why Wikipedia (that I've been reading for 15 years ) has such 80% credibility because of the strict rules that have to be followed.
Once entered in this community, must subordinate yourself to these necessary logical laws in order to be accepted.
And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance, stupidity (that I have no other explanation, since I constantly saw when the pictures were rejected, in red, that I could be blocked at any time) that everything is voluntary.
Many thank youDealuri (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why am I here?
As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve it, according to my powers, by filling in some articles stub (such as the one I work on now, as a beginner) , but also by adding / improving some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, serious, scientific, studying in the library, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places but also people, in the spirit of encicopledia, without breaking its rules.
And through community organizing meetings, so that we can get new, then documented information about certain interesting biographies, history, social events.
And later, to sign up to the "Programs and Events Dashboard"
I mention that the beginning of the current project, I consider documented enough, I did it without any help or advice from other participants, apart from the fact that initially, a volunteer of yours, made my sandbox, and gave me some initial advice.
The rest had to be hard work, to decipher each line of what it meant and where it took me.
Many Thank you Dealuri (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Request reason:
Please disregard the previous three unlock requests, and consider this last one, all gathered in one:
Reply to question requested:
What is copyright?
Is the right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia.
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Is freely licensed, its content can be used at any time.
The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Because, as an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products.
Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights, if there are similarities as a paraphrase close to, such a situation is serious, because copyright infringements not only harm Wikipedia, but also create legal problems.
I add that, by violating copyrght, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself.
Instead of helping Wikipedia, by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I understand well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future..
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. If a picture is collage-of several pictures, it will be called the owner/link each picture of the collage is composed.
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
First and foremost, by using my own pictures, already over 200 of which can choose, until know/learn enough the use of links that are licensed, compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from copyright owner.
I'll use free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"(Find free-to-use images)
Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, when an accidentally incorrect picture will be posted and will be deleted due to violation-so as not to repeat it by posting again.
Additional explanation:
I say, that the article where I violated copyright, being sandbox, behind Wikipedia, in background - considering to be just for testing, I didn't realize it was as important,as if the article were published in front of Wikipedia .
I'm ashamed of it, and I apologize, certainly that it will not repeat (maybe only rarely and accidentally, by any typo only , and not by copyright )
Being a beginner, just one month entered, you are kindly enough to accept some errors, ( but in no case copyright violalation), like now.
I understand why Wikipedia (that I've been reading for 15 years ) has such high 80% credibility because of the strict rules that have to be followed.
Once entered in this community, must subordinate myself to these necessary logical laws in order to be accepted.
And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance, stupidity (that I have no other explanation, since I constantly saw when the pictures were rejected, in red, that I could be blocked at any time - a fragile explanation is that I worked on the sandbox ) that everything is voluntary.
That's why it's necessary and I understand this, like any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution of the undersigned, and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made.
Why am I here?
As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve it, according to my powers, by filling in some articles stub (such as the one I work on now, as a beginner) , but also by adding / improving some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, serious, scientific, studying in the library, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places but also people, in the spirit of encicopledia, without breaking its rules.
And through community organizing meetings, so that we can get new, then documented information about certain interesting biographies, history, social events.
And later, to sign up to the "Programs and Events Dashboard"
I mention that the beginning of the current project, I consider documented enough, I did it without any help or advice from other participants, apart from the fact that initially, a volunteer of yours, made my sandbox, and gave me some initial advice.
The rest had to be hard work, to decipher each line of what it meant and where it took me.
If you accept the arguments, and you reinstate me, kindly request bring the work with the contents to the date of the blockage ( my work was turned back in time and many long retouching small things that no longer appear.)
Many thank youDealuri (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Why do you have so many open unblock requests? I'm sorry for being a bit rude here, but I'm not going to read through all these long unblock requests. I'm going to skip over all of them and decline them all. If you make another unblock request, make sure you only make one unblock request, and it is concise. This is a test of your ability to follow instructions, so please don't make four unblock requests again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sir, Many thank you to allow unblock request again. I was blocked due to violation of copyright –picture. As a beginner –just one month-, working on sandbox, in background - considering to be for testing, I didn't realize it was as important , as if the article were published in front , and now I understand it's same. Once entered in this community, must subordinate myself necessary logical laws in order to be accepted. And not as the undersigned thought, out of ignorance –( a fragile explanation is that I worked on sandbox ) that everything is voluntary. Any action taken on Wikipedia, to reflect the productive contribution , and not with such violations, which unfortunately, I made. By violating copyright, I am harming Wikipedia, the very institution that gives me the possibility to express myself. Instead of helping , by expanding the information, copyright infringement comes the exact opposite, against it, what I teach well, why it should not be copyrighted anymore in future Reply to question requested: What is copyright? Right to use photos or any kind registered with the owner's consent, or with the citation of the basic source if it is accepted. Even copying a text with some changes, can be infringement of property rights .There are many sources, not supported by Wikipedia. How is Wikipedia licensed? Freely licensed, its content can be used at any time. The exception is the use of fair use,(exception to the exclusive right granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work) which is identifiable in pictures Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? As an entity, it can be legally held accountable by licensed owners of the products. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? Can only be used with the appointment of the original property link, if they are free-copyright, or with its written consent, when the copyright is not free. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? By using in principal, my own pictures, over 200 of which can choose; to use of links that are licensed, compatible with Wikipedia, or the request of consent from copyright owner; free copyright on Wikipedia, except "fair use"; Organizing and classifying pictures in good order, to avoid repeated accidentally incorrect posted. Why am I here? As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community, I want to participate into improve some articles, as well as creating new articles, well documented, from credible sources, mainly related to the history of places, people, in the spirit of Encyclopedia, without breaking its rules. Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 1:23 am, 5 September 2020, last Saturday (3 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Based on the writings throughout this page, I do not believe you have the competence required to edit the English Wikipedia. As such, I am declining this and revoking talk page access. only (talk) 01:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
only (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
The file File:A young man hiking.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused {{userspace file}}.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Carrying over from UTRS appeal #34757--
In summar ,I will follow the rule: In principal, using own picture/video, creation. Use : images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, explicitly been placed in the public domain For permission to use non-free content , I will contact the owner , asking to send a e-mail special permission, making a note of that fact and use under the conditions given by the copyright holder Fair use exceptions being ill-defined, and at this stage of newcomer, I will avoid to use. However, for verification - looking on image description page, review page footer, page history, discussion page . I will verify for freely compatibly licensed (text with CC BY -SA 3.0) or public domain If I import media under a compatible license which requires attribution, I will credit the author. If original source contains a copyright disclaimer or other indicate free for use, a link to it is enough . I cite its sources by link to copyrighted material I will use quotations I never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others . In doubt, not use, or I write the content myself. I will reformulate the concepts in my own words, make distinction between summary and abridgment . Many thank you
--Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 13:07:43I've copied the summarized unblock request. You should read the discussion there. Will likely restore talk page access so you can request unblocking there. There are concerns. It will be best if you agree to avoid file uploads for a while. There is also a concern with your proficiency in English-- it might not be sufficient for encyclopedia building. If you have an English language spell checker, it would be best to spell check everything before posting. (I have tremors and am a little dyslexic, I run a lot of my posts through a spell checker first.) Awaiting futher responses from other admins.
deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 13:52:44 Yeah, definitely need to agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload.
deepfriedokra 2020-09-24 15:43:36 If you upload images, they should be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and should only be images taken by you.
--Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sir, Thank you for un-blocked Talk page.
I will not violate copyright (which is a license similar to the contract)
Definitely and deeply understand and agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload
If I upload images, will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and only be images taken by myself.
Non free-media - Fair use exceptions, being ill-defined , i will not use .
Regarding proficiency in English , i will do my best and i will use spell check everything before posting.
I will reduce sentences to the essentials, in a clear and concise manner.
Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 03:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sirs,
It's been two weeks since I applied for un-block and no administrator has made a decision -(Decline stale).
1. Understand what I have been blocked for : copyright violation -(which is a license similar to the contract) by uploading several pictures :not specifying the copyright status ; copyrighted taken from other web sites ;
At the time of violation, as a beginner, not understood such regulations, and more, that Wikipedia's editing policy applies to all pages, including sandbox (where article it was under construction).
Definitely and deeply learned from my mistakes and agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload .
If I upload images, at this stage- will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and only be images taken by myself.
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption , but obey and follow Wikipedia law/policy:
-A person who creates a work, becomes its owner - not to copyright violate.
Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law.
Fair use exceptions being ill-defined, notoriously hard to understand , i will not use .
3.Will make useful contributions instead.
Regarding uploads project I will improve it, to be in line with the severe demands of the encyclopedia:
Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles. Vigorous, effective writing is clear and concise.
Not try to convince the reader of anything, only to provide the salient facts as best they can be determined, and the reliable sources for them.
Present the sourced information without embellishment, agenda, fanfare, cleverness, or conversational tone.
Copyediting involves the "five Cs": clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, consistent.
Eliminate expressions that are flattering, disparaging, vague, clichéd, or endorsing of a particular viewpoint.
Use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Very important to say it in my own words.
I cite its sources by link to copyrighted material I will use quotations I never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others . In doubt, not use, or I write the content myself. I will reformulate the concepts in my own words, make distinction between summary and abridgment .
However, always new article or contribution to stub article, will be work on sandbox, then I'll ask for help from an administrator to check, to see if it's ripe for the main page . I will never post directly, without checking.
Many thank you Dealuri (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, the unblock request does not show that you are able to follow Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please see below. — Newslinger talk 15:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Copyediting involves the "five Cs": making the article clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, and consistent.
Copyediting involves the "five Cs": clear, correct, concise, comprehensible, consistent.
Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles.
Reduce sentences to the essentials. Wordiness does not add credibility to Wikipedia articles. Vigorous, effective writing is clear and concise.
Gentlemen, thanks for the advice.
Regarding your various opinions: I have not hidden that the information given to you, I have selected them from several articles, including the Copyright, without passing them through my words.
I wanted to prove that I read them, but I understood them. The amount of information is immense, on the background of the main Encyclopedia pages (over 6 million articles) is another Encyclopedia full of information, which I strive with my strength to learn as deeply as possible, especially the copyrighted part, both texts and photos.
This, on the one hand that the site of Wikipedia is in the US, and is subject to the draconian rules there, on the other hand, for the sake of order.
I was asked what it means to "in my words"-paraphrasing/rephrasing : : a good example is a poem/poetry transcribed into prose,( apply also to any author text ) becomes a new work, derivative, independent, but which, necessarily, must assign to the primary source, who wrote it- citation or link. The modification must be sufficiently enough to consider separate work- which implies a developed vocabulary and a sufficient culture ( as a result of a deep reading in the past, which, forgive my lack of modesty only in this case, I consider to have accumulated).
In the case of citation of an exact sentence from an author, it is done by "quotes ", including if there is any original mistake, with [sic]
I will avoid poor paraphrasing of a material from a source, exposed in my own words, and I will add the source/author. Without this attribution, it can be plagiarism.
Translations are also separate, derivative works, but equally, mandatory, must be indicated the original source,/author, even Wikipedia article, which is under copyleft license.
Regarding the pictures, I clearly understood their meaning in the context and importance of copyright, as I have written in many previous messages. And I will abide by the rule "zero tolerance".
In case you unblock me, and kindly ask this , the works posted on the sandbox, I will ask for your help to be checked before being placed on the main page.
The existed work on the sandbox, called "Radaseni", which has been deleted, (I'll pray to me back) I think it has some elements of good behavior, with the inherent mistakes of the very beginner, can be seen by you . I worked on it for two months, but basically the information I gathered over a period of over a year.
Realize I still have a lot to learn, like a driver who takes his license and knows very little.
Regarding editing article/stub, in summary, an article must be clear and concise, without unnecessary words, every word to express something, the shorter a sentence, the deeper it becomes.< William Strunk, Jr. from the 1918 work, The Elements of Style
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6437238.William_Strunk_><https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles>
Many Thank you, Dealuri (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Dealuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Gentlemen, thanks for the advice. Regarding your various opinions: I have not hidden that the information given to you, I have selected them from several articles, including the Copyright, without passing them through my words. I wanted to prove that I read them, but I understood them. The amount of information is immense, on the background of the main Encyclopedia pages (over 6m articles) is another Encyclopedia full of information, which I strive with my strength to learn as deeply as possible, especially the copyrighted violation part (use of any kind of works protected by copyright law without permission for a usage), both texts and photos. This, on the one hand that the site of Wikipedia is in the US, and is subject to the draconian rules there-(up to $150k fine for each work infringed or even jail -<https://www.lib.purdue.edu/uco/CopyrightBasics/penalties.html>) on the other hand, for the sake of order. I was asked what it means to "in my words"-paraphrasing/rephrasing : : a good example is a poem/poetry transcribed into prose,( apply also to any author text ) becomes a new work, derivative, independent, but which, necessarily, must assign to the primary source, who wrote it- citation or link. The modification must be sufficiently enough to consider separate work- which implies a developed vocabulary and a sufficient culture ( as a result of a deep reading in the past, which, forgive my lack of modesty only in this case, I consider to have accumulated). In the case of citation of an exact sentence from an author, it is done by "quotes ", including if there is any original mistake, with [sic] I will avoid poor paraphrasing of a material from a source, exposed in my own words, and I will add the source/author. Without this attribution, it can be plagiarism. Translations are also separate, derivative works, but equally, mandatory, must be indicated the original source,/author, even Wikipedia article, which is under copyleft license. Regarding the pictures, I clearly understood their meaning in the context and importance of copyright, as I have written in many previous messages, and I will abide by the rule "zero tolerance". Definitely understand and agree to not upload any more files without seeking feedback on the advisability of the upload If I upload images, will be uploaded to commons.wikimedia.org and only be images taken by myself. In case you unblock me, and kindly ask this , the works posted on the sandbox (I'll always work initially on the sandbox), I will ask for your help to be checked before being placed on the main page. The existed work on the sandbox, called "Radaseni", which has been deleted, (I'll pray to me back) I think it has some elements of good behavior, with the inherent mistakes of the very beginner, can be seen by you . I worked on it for two months, but basically the information I gathered over a period of over a year. I Realize I still have a lot to learn, like a driver who takes his license and knows very little. Regarding editing article/stub, in summary, an article must be clear simple and concise, without unnecessary words, the shorter a sentence, the deeper it becomes < William Strunk, Jr. from the 1918 work, The Elements of Style https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/6437238.William_Strunk_><https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dealuri/Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles> Many Thank you Dealuri (talk) 5:20 am, 5 November 2020, Thursday (14 days ago) (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
Hello Dealuri. Having reviewed your contributions to Wikipedia, combined with your several unblock requests here, I am sorry but I have to agree with my colleagues that you don't at the moment have the appropriate skills and knowledge to edit this encyclopaedia. Your edits are quite harmful. Though we do boast that Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" we do require that editors have sufficient competence. However, that I am declining your request now, doesn't mean you can never edit Wikipedia. After waiting at least six months, you can make another appeal. I would strongly suggest that such an appeal should be very short, and that in your appeal you agree not to upload any images or files. If your appeal is granted, it may include an agreement that you could appeal the restriction on uploading images and files after six months of productive and trouble free editing has passed. SilkTork (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you for uploading File:Post Stamp 1944 -Rădăşeni 3-.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:His Father in 1916 - 36 old.jpeg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Back cover of picture written in 1955-.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 09:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna -2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna -2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rădăşeni Pregatirea de iarna-1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Se ha propuesto eliminar el archivo File:Hora Rădăşeni- people -1.jpg debido al siguiente problema:
Imagen no utilizada de una multitud al azar. Fuera del alcance.
Si bien se agradecen todas las contribuciones constructivas a Wikipedia, las páginas pueden eliminarse por diversas razones .
Puede evitar la eliminación propuesta eliminando el {{proposed deletion/dated files}}aviso, pero explique por qué en el resumen de la edición o en la página de discusión del archivo.
Considere abordar las cuestiones planteadas. La eliminación {{proposed deletion/dated files}}detendrá el proceso de eliminación propuesto , pero existen otros procesos de eliminación . En particular, el proceso de eliminación rápida puede resultar en una eliminación sin discusión, y los archivos para discusión permiten que la discusión llegue a un consenso para la eliminación. -- Minorax «¦ discusión ¦» 14:47, 13 de abril de 2022 (UTC)
Se ha propuesto eliminar el archivo File:A lady and young.jpg debido al siguiente problema:
Foto personal sin usar. Fuera del alcance.
Si bien se agradecen todas las contribuciones constructivas a Wikipedia, las páginas pueden eliminarse por diversas razones .
Puede evitar la eliminación propuesta eliminando el {{proposed deletion/dated files}}aviso, pero explique por qué en el resumen de la edición o en la página de discusión del archivo.
Considere abordar las cuestiones planteadas. La eliminación {{proposed deletion/dated files}}detendrá el proceso de eliminación propuesto , pero existen otros procesos de eliminación . En particular, el proceso de eliminación rápida puede resultar en una eliminación sin discusión, y los archivos para discusión permiten que la discusión llegue a un consenso para la eliminación. -- Minorax «¦ discusión ¦» 14:27, 14 de septiembre de 2022 (UTC)
