The ode begins with a priamel, where the rival distinctions of water and gold are introduced as a foil to the true prize, the celebration of victory in song.[7]Ring-composed,[8] Pindar returns in the final lines to the mutual dependency of victory and poetry, where "song needs deeds to celebrate, and success needs songs to make the areta last".[9] Through his association with victors, the poet hopes to be "famed in sophia among Greeks everywhere" (lines 115-6).[1] Yet a fragment of Eupolis suggests Pindar's hopes were frustrated, his compositions soon "condemned to silence by the boorishness of the masses".[10][11]
Pelops
At the heart of the ode is Pindar's "refashioning" of the myth of Pelops, king of Pisa, son of Tantalus, father of Thyestes and Atreus, and hero after whom the Peloponnese or "Isle of Pelops" is named.[9] Pindar rejects the common version of the myth, wherein Tantalus violates the reciprocity of the feast and serves up his dismembered son Pelops to the gods (lines 48-52); Pelops' shoulder is of gleaming ivory (line 35) since Demeter, in mourning for Kore, unsuspectingly ate that part.[12][13] Instead Pindar has Pelops disappear because he is carried off by Poseidon.[12][14] After his "erotic complaisance", Pelops appeals to Poseidon for help, "if the loving gifts of CyprianAphrodite result in any gratitude" (lines 75-76);[15] the god grants him a golden chariot and horses with untiring wings (line 87); with these Pelops defeats Oenomaus in a race and wins the hand of his daughter Hippodameia, avoiding the fate of death previously meted out upon a series of vanquished suitors.[13]
In Homo Necans, Walter Burkert reads in these myths a reflection of the sacrificial rites at Olympia.[12][13] The cultic centres of the sanctuary were the altar of Zeus, the stadium, and the tomb of Pelops, where "now he has a share in splendid blood-sacrifices, resting beside the ford of the Alpheus" (lines 90-93).[13] According to Philostratus, after sacrifice and the laying of the consecrated parts upon the altar, the runners would stand one stadion distant from it; once the priest had given the signal with a torch, they would race, with the winner then setting light to the offerings.[13][17] Pindar, subordinating the foot race to that of the four-horse chariot, "could reflect the actual aetiology of the Olympics in the early 5th century [BC]".[12][18]
Patronage
According to Maurice Bowra, the main purpose of the poem is "Pindar's first attempt to deal seriously with the problems of kingship", and especially "the relations of kings with the gods".[5]Hieron, "Pindar's greatest patron" and honorand in four odes and a now-fragmentary encomium,[9] is likened to a Homeric king, as he "sways the sceptre of the law in sheep-rich Sicily" (lines 12-13).[5] Pindar incorporates the ideology of xenia or hospitality into his ode, setting it in the context of a choral performance around Hieron's table, to the strains of the phorminx (lines 15-18).[19] Yet the poet keeps his distance; the central mythological episode is concerned with chariot racing, a more prestigious competition than the single horse race;[12] and Pindar warns Hieron that there are limits to human ambition (line 114).[5]
English translations
Olympian 1, translated into English verse by Ambrose Philips (1748)
Olympian 1, translated into English verse by C. A. Wheelwright (1846)
Olympian 1, translated into English prose by Ernest Myers (1874)
^Köhnken, Adolf (1974). "Pindar as Innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the Relevance of the Pelops Story in Olympian 1". The Classical Quarterly. 24 (2). Cambridge University Press/The Classical Association: 199–206. doi:10.1017/s0009838800032730. JSTOR 638481. S2CID 170440064.
^Cairns, Francis (1977). "'ΈΡΩΣ in Pindar's First Olympian Ode". Hermes. 105 (2). Franz Steiner Verlag: 129–132. JSTOR 4476002.
Cairns, Francis (1977). "'ΈΡΩΣ in Pindar's First Olympian Ode". Hermes. 105 (2): 129–132. JSTOR 4476002.
Eckerman, Chris (2017). "Pindar's Olympian 1, 1-7 and its Relation to Bacchylides 3, 85-87" (PDF). Wiener Studien. 130: 7–32. doi:10.1553/wst130s7. JSTOR 44647509.
Farenga, Vincent (1977). "Violent Structure: The Writing of Pindar's Olympian I". Arethusa. 10 (1): 197–218. JSTOR 26307830.
Howatson, M. C. (1984). "Pindar's Olympian One". The Classical Review. 34 (2): 173–175. doi:10.1017/S0009840X0010335X. JSTOR 3062375. S2CID 164143431.
Nagy, Gregory (1986). "Pindar's Olympian 1 and the Aetiology of the Olympic Games". Transactions of the American Philological Association. 116: 71–88. doi:10.2307/283911. JSTOR 283911.
Nairn, J. Arbuthnot (1901). "On Pindar's Olympian Odes". The Classical Review. 15 (1): 10–15. doi:10.1017/S0009840X00029346. JSTOR 695741. S2CID 162919256.
Segal, Charles Paul (1964). "God and Man in Pindar's First and Third Olympian Odes". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 68: 211–267. doi:10.2307/310806. JSTOR 310806.