SQP methods solve a sequence of optimization subproblems, each of which optimizes a quadratic model of the objective subject to a linearization of the constraints. If the problem is unconstrained, then the method reduces to Newton's method for finding a point where the gradient of the objective vanishes. If the problem has only equality constraints, then the method is equivalent to applying Newton's method to the first-order optimality conditions, or Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions, of the problem.
The standard Newton's Method searches for the solution by iterating the following equation, where denotes the Hessian matrix:
.
However, because the matrix is generally singular (and therefore non-invertible), the Newton step cannot be calculated directly. Instead the basic sequential quadratic programming algorithm defines an appropriate search direction at an iterate , as a solution to the quadratic programming subproblem
where the quadratic form is formed with the Hessian of the Lagrangian.
Note that the term in the expression above may be left out for the minimization problem, since it is constant under the operator.
Together, the SQP algorithm starts by first choosing the initial iterate , then calculating and . Then the QP subproblem is built and solved to find the Newton step direction which is used to update the parent problem iterate using . This process is repeated for until the parent problem satisfies a convergence test.
Practical implementations
Practical implementations of the SQP algorithm are significantly more complex than its basic version above. To adapt SQP for real-world applications, the following challenges must be addressed:
The possibility of an infeasible QP subproblem.
QP subproblem yielding a bad step: one that either fails to reduce the target or increases constraints violation.
Breakdown of iterations due to significant deviation of the target/constraints from their quadratic/linear models.
To overcome these challenges, various strategies are typically employed:
Use of merit functions, which assess progress towards a constrained solution, or filter methods.
Trust region or line search methods to manage deviations between the quadratic model and the actual target.
Special feasibility restoration phases to handle infeasible subproblems, or the use of L1-penalized subproblems to gradually decrease infeasibility
These strategies can be combined in numerous ways, resulting in a diverse range of SQP methods.
SQP methods have been implemented in well known numerical environments such as MATLAB and GNU Octave. There also exist numerous software libraries, including open source:
SciPy (de facto standard for scientific Python) has scipy.optimize.minimize(method='SLSQP') solver.
NLopt (C/C++ implementation, with numerous interfaces including Julia, Python, R, MATLAB/Octave), implemented by Dieter Kraft as part of a package for optimal control, and modified by S. G. Johnson.[2][3]
^Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright (2006). Numerical Optimization. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-30303-1.
^Kraft, Dieter (Sep 1994). "Algorithm 733: TOMP–Fortran modules for optimal control calculations". ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 20 (3): 262–281. CiteSeerX10.1.1.512.2567. doi:10.1145/192115.192124. S2CID 16077051. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
^"NLopt Algorithms: SLSQP". Read the Docs. July 1988. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
^KNITRO User Guide: Algorithms
References
Bonnans, J. Frédéric; Gilbert, J. Charles; Lemaréchal, Claude; Sagastizábal, Claudia A. (2006). Numerical optimization: Theoretical and practical aspects. Universitext (Second revised ed. of translation of 1997 French ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. xiv+490. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35447-5. ISBN 978-3-540-35445-1. MR 2265882.
Jorge Nocedal and Stephen J. Wright (2006). Numerical Optimization. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-30303-1.