User talk:Liberalufp

http://images.wikia.com/memoryalpha/en/graphics/banner_468x60_2.gif

Welcome!

Hello, Liberalufp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Liberalism. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 23:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalufp, you are invited to the Teahouse

Edits to Denise Crosby

Greetings! I reverted your edits to the Denise Crosby article, because they did far more damage (broken links, bad capitalization, etc.) than good. —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to User:C.Fred, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Encephalon Cross

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Faith

It's considered very bad protocol to redact talk page commentary there to improve the article. Please stop. Come to the talk to discuss improvements. Don't much care for the ideology one way or another but please don't disrupt the article nor the talk.-Justanonymous (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll watch your page if you want to discuss this if not, just know it's not welcome in Wikipedia.-Justanonymous (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To just anmyonous

I'm so sorry it was probably by accident can you please tell me what edit I specifically did so I won't do it again

You removed these 9,000 bytes of commentary. We have a good group of people working to make the article better. It's tough going with all that is going on. No worries if it was a mistake. We just have to use a lot of words to describe our viewpoints - which are complex. cheers -Justanonymous (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response to just A.

This is by total accident I was using an anti-vandal tool that detects words that is commonly used by vandals for an example idiot or shit, or etc. I respect all view points and I am so soooooorry. Again I am so sorry. I did not even know it was a talk page. next time I will pay attention much more closely. I am sorry if I offended anyone. pls respond to my user page.--Liberalufp (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good don't think twice about it. Cheers and thx for checking for vandals-Justanonymous (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Ayrton

Hi, what are you up to reverting my edit to this article (which I wrote)? It is perfectly fine for there to be wikilinks in text and captions, and indeed also in article leads. Could we have the link back please. Thanks very much - Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but the edit you made was vandalism. Please do not revert it. If this is a misunderstanding please discuss it on my talk page. This is your FIRST WARNINGBold text.--Liberalufp (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? Don't be ridiculous. I put a valid wikilink in a caption on a page that I have carefully edited in the past. This was a normal edit, both in intention and in fact correct in practice. Could you please agree to that? It is totally out of order to issue warnings to named editors, by the way; we normally only do that with IP editors; but in this case, not only have I done nothing wrong, but you have made a mistake both in your initial reversion, and in failing to apologise at once when the matter was drawn to your attention. I would be grateful if you could say so now, and we can move on. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for keeping an eye when we're sleeping

Speedy deletion nomination of Word windowism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 20:11, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it was really only a repetition of the article's title. I see no need to undelete it, and you are of course free to write an article about it. Do you really want it undeleted? I can do that, of course, so just ping me. Lectonar (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kiker and Mills!

I'm a user of Wikipedia and I can't help notice your inconsistency of facts. You've created two pages on Kiker and Mills Elementary. Your articles was filled with mistakes. No elementary schools can achieve an exempalary award on Science or Social Studies because it is not a standardized test in the grades 3-5. You had also put a wrong principal of Kiker and put in a wrong account of students for both schools! So I took the liberty of out smarting your ignorance and just completely deleted your text. If you go back and add text I will simply delete it again! so spare yourself the embarrassment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lj63 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of An article and not a redirect!

Hello Liberalufp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged An article and not a redirect! for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, →Σσς. (Sigma) 00:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Word windowism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Word windowism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 08:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Task force Science fiction for wiki project novels

I sympathize with your goal, but forcing people to do homework assignments that you personally assign them probably won't work well. Try a different approach. First, assume that the members of the task force want to help, but don't assume that you know how they will help. To figure this out, ask them what they might like doing or talk to them about their own interests. Personally, I think the best way to approach this is to consult a metric, such as The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction. For example, on Talk:The Man in the Moone I listed five early works of important science fiction using the Cambridge Companion as a guide. Since these works are important (core) to the project, they should be prioritized beyond their current Start-Class ratings so that they can be brought up to GA/FA standards. I'm only using these five early works as an example based on an already existing classification scheme. Most editors will be far more interested working on more recent works, so this won't necessarily appeal to them, but you can use this kind of model as a basis for a roadmap that you yourself design. Other projects approach their articles in this way as well. So, to summarize, figure out a way to determine your core articles (for example using the Cambridge Companion or some other metric) and then find editors who are interested in working on core articles that appeal to them. I can give you another model for this approach in case you don't like the one I just gave you. Determine the most important science fiction writers (using some kind of outside classification scheme) and then determine which of their works is considered their most important. This is not as easy as it sounds, but it gives you another perspective to the roadmap. Then, find editors who are already working in areas related to that author and ask them if they might be interested in helping work on a particular book or story by that author. That's how I approached Childhood's End. Viriditas (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I second Viriditas's first sentence. This isn't an effective way to rouse the troops. I haven't done a lot recently in this area, and have been considering taking my name off the list of project participants. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Task force Science fiction for wiki project novels

Hello Liberalufp. Thanks for your message on my Talk page about the changes in the Task Force. A bit more context would have helped to understand it better, though, even if it had been a brief introduction of who you are and how you became appointed to the task, perhaps a quick view of your goals. That said, I look forward to getting to know you better as we all help making the sf entries the best possible.

I also just wanted to let you know that, as much as I want to help the task force, I do have a very demanding day job, so I can only contribute when I have a breather...I am sure you understand. DrX 15:26, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick answer! Like I said, I am happy to help, just let me know and give me some time. DrX 22:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kiker Elementary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiker Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiker Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should note that consensus on this project is that primary and elementary schools are typically not notable enough to have articles. Even most high schools do not pass the notability test. Remember that Wikipedia is an international project: does some grade 1 to 5 school in Wherever, Idaho really matter to a reader in Vilnius? (No) (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STOP removing comments from the AFD discussion, or you may be blocked for disruption. Yes, you have created a couple of articles that are not appropriate for the encyclopedia, as per consensus. Yes, they are likely to be deleted. However, it makes no sense to get yourself blocked (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:23, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Okay, why are you undoing the archiving of old material from the SF task force talk page?

You did so without any explanation [1], so I'm giving you a chance now to explain your actions. Thanks. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've rearchived the materials (actually, just removed them as they are still archived here). Please don't undo this again. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:45, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have to explain to you anything but I still will. The things you archived should not be archived yet. It should only be archived if there are more than 30 large sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalufp (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure where you get that arbitrary number of sections "required" to archive them, but any talk page may be archived at any time if the older discussions are cluttering things up and making it harder to see the current discussions. The discussions I archived were mostly over 1 year old, so we don't need to keep them on the talk page. The two sections that were not over 1 year old were 4 months and 10 months old, respectively.

I'm still trying to figure out why you seem to be intent on taking over a task force that doesn't need someone leading it and never elected you, and ordering people around. You haven't answered that question on the task force talk page yet. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

March 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, including personal attacks and removing votes at AfD. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Speedy deletion tag at Qanat Bid-e Do

I've initially declined your G6 speedy tag at Qanat Bid-e Do because you didn't specify a move or merge target and I don't see how a deletion of the page would be a housekeeping maneuver. If there is a move or history merge that needs to be done, let me know me know and I'll do it. Thanks. --Michael Greiner 06:31, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help test new SuggestBot design

We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Help test new SuggestBot design

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

Views/Day: Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality: Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

Content: Is more content needed?
Headings: Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images: Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links: Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources: For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CSD declined

I declined your speedy of Cox-Hord House. It is an NRHP site, which, if not automatically notable, certainly requirs at least an AfD for removal.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 15:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jinkinson talk to me 23:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 72 hours its not tolerated anywhere user or talk page, consider yourself lucky you aren't blocked indef. Secret ^account 00:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you are wrong I was not attacking anyone i was making a fake psychology page to practice my scientific writing style. Please look at my history it has been i postive one and i hope one day to make admin. Please next time ill pick a different way to practice.

Wikipedia isn't a host for fiction or writing practice. As for "you are wrong, I was not attacking anyone" I firmly disagree. I deleted it the first time as an attack, and you should have gained clue from that. Restoring it is unacceptable. We're not able to tell if the person is real or not, and it was an abuse of your privileges as a Wikipedia editor to post it. Please learn from this, as a repeat of this behavior will earn an indefinite block. Acroterion (talk) 03:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Nomination of Ashish Nanda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashish Nanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Nanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ashish Nanda page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

January 2014

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Based on your edit, it's rather obvious now that User:98.113.249.51 is also you - which means that since you !voted twice in the AFD, you're now guilty of the improper use of alternate accounts, which can lead to a block. ES&L 11:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have also undone your reversion. Only the person who MADE the comment can change their comments - a random IP address (you) changed SOMEONE ELSE'S comments, which is not permitted, and is fraudulent. Pay closer attention please ES&L 12:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

u are wrong i am not the one that did that i am connected to the jfk airports public network so u r wrong

Really? Why would YOU undo their improper edit that changed a delete !vote to a keep !vote? We do have the WP:DUCK test ES&L 12:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 12:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both Secret and I told you not to do that again, or you'd face an indefinite block. You did, and you are indefinitely blocked. Acroterion (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liberalufp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sorry pls unblock me i was just writing random stuff i wont do it again pls i beg u i want to continue editing wikipedia it was in my namespaceLiberalufp (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been given enough chances and warnings. Even now, you remove the blocking administrator's comments. Your promise not to do it again is not even a little bit credible. Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What part of "its not tolerated anywhere user or talk page, consider yourself lucky you aren't blocked indef" and "a repeat of this behavior will earn an indefinite block" did you not understand? Between that, the transparent sockpuppetry noted above, the copy/paste article creation and the all-around defiant attitude you've taken with other editors, it's best that you avoid Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And stop removing my comments: they're part of the block review process. Acroterion (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your "namespace" still belongs to the Foundation - BLP and attack pages apply across the entire project. Between this "page" and your behaviour on the AFD noted above, I can see no reason to unblock you - you're clearly lacking the maturity to edit a serious encyclopedia ES&L 14:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pls give another chance ill never do it again pls i beg u

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.[reply]

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter

Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 1, June/July 2014
by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery

This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.

note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:

WHO's list of Essential Medicines[2]
Neglected tropical diseases[3]
Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

IEG grant

I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.

Wikimania 2014

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.

Integration progress

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.

Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
Arabic
The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration guides

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [4]

News in short

To come

Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
Proofreading drives

Further reading

Translators Without Borders
Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 06:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, Liberalufp. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]