Slovenia?
Regarding the last edit of anonymous user I'd like to ask: what territory gained by the "Treaty of Rapallo" lies in Slovenia? --Romanm 21:26, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Dear user, you have to realise that when you massively modify an article that has been there for a while you should first go trough the talk page or inevitably your edits will be reverted because you are deleting portion of text that were agreed with large consensus in the past. --Silvio1973 (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have only replaced the number which was previously been rounded to 1.5 million, with more precise (less rounded) number - 1.3 million. I gave the source, too. It clearly shows that 1.5 was not the precise number. --DancingPhilosopher my talk 15:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have restored the version before your edits. Clearly if your edits are reverted you need to go trough the talk page or you will be reverted automatically. This article is about the Treaty of Rapallo, not about Italianization. This last subject is treated in the relevant article. You have already tried to push your POV's without any success in the article Italianization, now you want to do elsewhere. This attitude is becoming disruptive and if your aim is to continue "contributing" to the project in such a way you will be reported. --Silvio1973 (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Soca?
The article now says that after this treaty, Soca was given to Yugoslavia. In other articles (Rijeka, Treaty of Rome, 1924) it is said that Sušak (presently an eastern suburb of Rijeka) was given to Yugoslavia. Is Soca the Italian name for Sušak, or is Soca wrong? I suppose the area around the river Soča was not involved in this treaty. Markussep 19:57, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Before WW1 the last Italian (dark green) village was San Giorgio di Nogaro while Cervignano del Friuli was under Austrian empire (light green) 5.90.133.183 (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You are correct. It is clearly a mislabeled place on the map because, in reality, Cervignano is South-southeast of Palmanova, while this place on the map is indicated at a place southwest of Palmanova - quite possibly at the place where San Giorgio di Nogaro is located. Since that particular label adds nothing to understanding of the map, I'll see if it is possible to modify the map by merely removing the erroneous label from the map entirely. Thanks for pointing this out.--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: ThaesOfereode (talk · contribs) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dobar dan! This is a good looking article and it looks like most things are in order, but we should fix a few things before I put the rubber stamp on it. THIS ARTICLE HAS PASSED ITS GOOD ARTICLE NOMINATION; THE FOLLOWING TABLE SERVES ONLY TO DEMONSTRATE ITS STATUS PRIOR TO PROMOTION.
Thank you very much for reviewing the article. I intend to address your concerns within two days (maybe three). CheersTomobe03 (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ThaesOfereode Could you please look at the changes to the article. Thanks!Tomobe03 (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tomobe03: Sve u redu. Looks like everything I marked was fixed and I see no reason now not to promote to GA status. This was a wonderful read; I learned a lot. Congratulations on an excellent article! Hope to see you back at GA soon. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
