stringtranslate.com

Talk:One in a Million (Aaliyah album)

Orphaned references in One in a Million (Aaliyah album)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of One in a Million (Aaliyah album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "CRIA":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on One in a Million (Aaliyah album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on One in a Million (Aaliyah album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:One in a Million (Aaliyah album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Moonlighttt (talk · contribs) 16:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 21:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

This will run over the next two days! --K. Peake 21:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Background and development

Recording and production

Music and lyrics

Marketing

Imagery

Release

Live performances

Singles

Critical reception

Accolades

Awards and nominations

Listings

Commercial performance

Impact and legacy

Track listing

Personnel

Charts

Certifications

Release history

See also

References

Notes

Citations

Bibliography

External links

Final comments and verdict

  • OkIGetIt20 Thanks for implementing these as I picked up on despite no mention from you to me, however you still need to make the song titles inside quotes into singular speech marks ('); see reception for a good example. Also, please write out the notable lists in prose of the listing section since you do mention publications in the lead. --K. Peake 08:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You're Welcome! I just put the song titles into singular speech marks, and wrote the listing section in prose! OkIGetIt20 (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Pass now, well done on this! --K. Peake 08:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm only seeing this now. Thank you so much! Bronx Langford (talk) 21:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]