stringtranslate.com

User talk:GiantSnowman

Notability for FK Jugohrom

Hey GS--there's been a sock in that history and I blocked a bunch of em; an editor has tagged it for notability. I don't know if there's an easy answer by the footy guidelines, but if there is, maybe you can provide it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low level team in a minor footballing nation - highly unlikely to meet GNG. GiantSnowman 18:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria the Giraffe

I think I can detect block evasion going on here regarding this and Tommy the Turtle93 - comparisons: [1][2] with exactly the same two word pairing, [3][4] page-move vandalism and the timing of edits seems to be on early Wednesday afternoons. So probably another sock account from you know who...

p.s. I assumed someone had already reported this sock but have not so I have done so here. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:25, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, thanks! GiantSnowman 17:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least this time, both talk pages of the affected moved articles have their page histories as they should be. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, makes my life easier! GiantSnowman 18:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It also saves me or anyone else from asking about the issue of thinking "that page history does not look right to me". Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about redirect

Hi, I'm contacting you about this edit on the Team Titans article. I'd like to know if the user's procedure was correct so he erased the entire article to make a redirect without any previous discussion.

According to him at his talk page, he acted "boldly" (exact words) based on WP:FICT or WP:BK. So I need to know if he acted correctly or a discussion should have existed, considering the extension of the content removed. Fma12 (talk) 21:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]