stringtranslate.com

Beta-propeller

In structural biology, a beta-propeller (β-propeller) is a type of all-β protein architecture characterized by 4 to 8 highly symmetrical blade-shaped beta sheets arranged toroidally around a central axis. Together the beta-sheets form a funnel-like active site.

Structure

Each beta-sheet typically has four anti-parallel β-strands arranged in the beta-zigzag motif.[2] The strands are twisted so that the first and fourth strands are almost perpendicular to each other.[3] There are five classes of beta-propellers, each arrangement being a highly symmetrical structure with 4–8 beta sheets, all of which generally form a central tunnel that yields pseudo-symmetric axes.[2]

While, the protein's official active site for ligand-binding is formed at one end of the central tunnel by loops between individual beta-strands, protein-protein interactions can occur at multiple areas around the domain. Depending on the packing and tilt of the beta-sheets and beta-strands, the beta-propeller may have a central pocket in place of a tunnel.[4]

The beta-propeller structure is stabilized mainly through hydrophobic interactions of the beta-sheets, while additional stability may come from hydrogen bonds formed between the beta-sheets of the C- and N-terminal ends. In effect this closes the circle which can occur even more strongly in 4-bladed proteins via a disulfide bond.[2] The chaperones Hsp70 and CCT have been shown to sequentially bind nascent beta-propellers as they emerge from the ribosome. These chaperones prevent non-native inter-blade interactions from forming until the entire beta-propeller is synthesized.[5] Many beta-propellers are dependent on CCT for expression.[6][7][8] In at least one case, ions have been shown to increase stability by binding deep in the central tunnel of the beta-propeller.[4]

Murzin proposed a geometric model to describe the structural principles of the beta propeller.[9] According to this model the seven bladed propeller was the most favored arrangement in geometric terms.

Despite its highly conserved nature, beta-propellers are well known for their plasticity. Beyond having a variety of allowed beta-sheets per domain, it can also accommodate other domains into its beta-sheets. Additionally, there are proteins that have shown variance in the number of beta-strands per beta-sheet. Rather than having the typical four beta-strands in a sheet, beta-lactamase inhibitor protein-II only has three beta-strands per sheet while the phytase of Bacillus subtilis has five beta-strands per beta-sheet.[2]

Function

Due to its structure and plasticity, protein-protein interactions can form with the top, bottom, central channel, and side faces of the beta-propeller.[4] The function of the propeller can vary based on the blade number. Four-bladed beta-propellers function mainly as transport proteins, and because of its structure, they have a conformation that is favorable for substrate binding.[4] Unlike larger beta-propellers, four-bladed beta-propellers usually cannot perform catalysis themselves, but act instead to aid in catalysis by performing the aforementioned functions. Five-bladed propellers can act as transferases, hydrolases, and sugar binding proteins.[4] Six- and seven-bladed propellers perform a much broader variety of functions in comparison to four- and five-bladed propellers. These functions can include acting as ligand-binding proteins, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, signaling proteins, structural proteins, and oxidoreductases.[4]

Variations in the larger (five- to eight-bladed) beta-propellers can allow for even more specific functions. This is the case with the C-terminal region of GyrA which expresses a positively charged surface ideal for binding DNA. Two alpha-helices coming out of the six-bladed beta-propeller of serum paraoxonase may provide a hydrophobic region ideal for anchoring membranes. DNA damage-binding protein 1 has three beta-propellers, in which the connection between two of the propellers is inserted into the third propeller potentially allowing for its unique function.[4]

Clinical Significance

Examples

Domains

Repeat domains known to fold into a beta-propeller include WD40, YWTD, Kelch, YVTN, RIVW (PD40), and many more. Their sequences tend to group together, suggesting a close evolutionary link. They are also related to many beta-containing domains.[19]

References

  1. ^ Sprague ER, Redd MJ, Johnson AD, Wolberger C (June 2000). "Structure of the C-terminal domain of Tup1, a corepressor of transcription in yeast". The EMBO Journal. 19 (12): 3016–27. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.12.3016. PMC 203344. PMID 10856245.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g "Beta-propellers: Associated Functions and their Role in Human Diseases". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2018-11-17.
  3. ^ Kuriyan, Konforti, Wemmer, John, Boyana, David (2013). The molecules of life: physical and chemical principles. New York: Garland Science. pp. 163–164. ISBN 9780815341888.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Chen CK, Chan NL, Wang AH (October 2011). "The many blades of the β-propeller proteins: conserved but versatile". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 36 (10): 553–61. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2011.07.004. PMID 21924917.
  5. ^ Stein KC, Kriel A, Frydman J (July 2019). "Nascent Polypeptide Domain Topology and Elongation Rate Direct the Cotranslational Hierarchy of Hsp70 and TRiC/CCT". Molecular Cell. 75 (6): 1117–1130.e5. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.036. PMC 6953483. PMID 31400849.
  6. ^ Plimpton RL, Cuéllar J, Lai CW, Aoba T, Makaju A, Franklin S, et al. (February 2015). "Structures of the Gβ-CCT and PhLP1-Gβ-CCT complexes reveal a mechanism for G-protein β-subunit folding and Gβγ dimer assembly". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112 (8): 2413–8. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.2413P. doi:10.1073/pnas.1419595112. PMC 4345582. PMID 25675501.
  7. ^ Cuéllar J, Ludlam WG, Tensmeyer NC, Aoba T, Dhavale M, Santiago C, et al. (June 2019). "Structural and functional analysis of the role of the chaperonin CCT in mTOR complex assembly". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 2865. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.2865C. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10781-1. PMC 6599039. PMID 31253771.
  8. ^ Ludlam, WG; Aoba, T; Cuéllar, J; Bueno-Carrasco, MT; Makaju, A; Moody, JD; Franklin, S; Valpuesta, JM; Willardson, BM (2019-11-01). "Molecular architecture of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome protein 2-7-9 subcomplex". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 294 (44): 16385–16399. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA119.010150. hdl:10261/240872. PMC 6827290. PMID 31530639.
  9. ^ Murzin AG (October 1992). "Structural principles for the propeller assembly of beta-sheets: the preference for seven-fold symmetry". Proteins. 14 (2): 191–201. doi:10.1002/prot.340140206. PMID 1409568. S2CID 22228091.
  10. ^ Gregory A, Kurian MA, Haack T, Hayflick SJ, Hogarth P (1993). Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE (eds.). Beta-Propeller Protein-Associated Neurodegeneration. University of Washington, Seattle. PMID 28211668. Retrieved 2018-11-20. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  11. ^ Air GM (July 2012). "Influenza neuraminidase". Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. 6 (4): 245–56. doi:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00304.x. PMC 3290697. PMID 22085243.
  12. ^ Matrosovich MN, Matrosovich TY, Gray T, Roberts NA, Klenk HD (November 2004). "Neuraminidase is important for the initiation of influenza virus infection in human airway epithelium". Journal of Virology. 78 (22): 12665–7. doi:10.1128/JVI.78.22.12665-12667.2004. PMC 525087. PMID 15507653.
  13. ^ Neer EJ, Schmidt CJ, Nambudripad R, Smith TF (September 1994). "The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins". Nature. 371 (6495): 297–300. Bibcode:1994Natur.371..297N. doi:10.1038/371297a0. PMID 8090199. S2CID 600856.
  14. ^ Smith TF, Gaitatzes C, Saxena K, Neer EJ (May 1999). "The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 24 (5): 181–5. doi:10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01384-5. PMID 10322433.
  15. ^ EMBL-EBI, InterPro. "WD40-like Beta Propeller (IPR011659) < InterPro < EMBL-EBI". www.ebi.ac.uk. Retrieved 2018-11-19.
  16. ^ Zhang DW, Garuti R, Tang WJ, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH (September 2008). "Structural requirements for PCSK9-mediated degradation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (35): 13045–50. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10513045Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806312105. PMC 2526098. PMID 18753623.
  17. ^ Betteridge DJ (February 2013). "Cardiovascular endocrinology in 2012: PCSK9-an exciting target for reducing LDL-cholesterol levels". Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 9 (2): 76–8. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.254. PMID 23296165. S2CID 27839784.
  18. ^ Chen CC, Cheng KJ, Ko TP, Guo RT (2015-01-09). "Current Progresses in Phytase Research: Three-Dimensional Structure and Protein Engineering". ChemBioEng Reviews. 2 (2): 76–86. doi:10.1002/cben.201400026.
  19. ^ Kopec KO, Lupas AN (2013). "β-Propeller blades as ancestral peptides in protein evolution". PLOS ONE. 8 (10): e77074. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...877074K. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077074. PMC 3797127. PMID 24143202.

Further reading

External links