I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs) 19:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is well researched and clearly has potential to reach Good Article status. However, it is not there yet, and needs more improvement than can reasonably be expected during a GA review. Three of the Good Article criteria are not met:
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct): The translation quality here is not sufficient for GA. For example, there are untranslated words like
Abril, mistranslations like
lanes, and awkward wording like
Station at its surroundings. There are also issues with excessive bolding, and with unneeded capitalization of words like horsecar and port wine.
it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections...: Two sentences is not a sufficient lede for an article of this length, and it does not accurately summarize the article.
it addresses the main aspects of the topic): There is no information about the station building itself, and no information about what services stop at the station.
Additionally, the last two sections should be removed entirely: the quoted literary reference is not about the station whatsoever, and the gallery is unnecessary per WP:GALLERY.