Talk:Komtar

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• KOMTAR Year 2016 April.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serious rewriting.

We need rewriting, a reposition of the sections, and integrate the chronology (the table) into the main article. KOMTAR is itself a complex, not the skyscraper, so simply referring KOMTAR as the KOMTAR Tower for its main headline is not suitable. I'll be trying to see what could I do, possibly a rewrite in the future.

We need images for the skyscraper though, the old ones are outdated, and the current image does not put a lot of focus on the building (the fireworks acts as a distraction).

(PenangLion (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]

UPDATE:User:PenangLion/sandboxIN THE SANDBOX CONTAINS A DRAFT FOR A POSSIBLE REVAMP OF THE PAGE (PenangLion (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Update (2): I am ranking this page as a High-importance article for WikiSkyscrapers.

Reasons are as such:

• - Tallest skyscraper in Malaysia (1985-1987);
• - First skyscraper in Malaysia to surpass 200 m (660 ft);
• - Cultural icon of Penang;
• - Was among the tallest buildings outside the Western Hemisphere (2nd in 1985-1986, 3rd in 1986-1987);
• - Important statement of Modernism in Malaysian architecture (Asian architecture would probably be an overstatement);
• - First urban complex in Penang;
• - Last project related to Buckminster Fuller in Southeast Asia.

If you have any concerns, please do reply to me, then we can make a change again.
(PenangLion (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]

After two and a half years I finished the article. Cheers, gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• KOMTAR1976.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Komtar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PenangLion (talk · contribs) 04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'll be reviewing this article. 141Pr -_\contribs/- 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.: - Article seems to be stable, I don't see anything wrong with it.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Initial comments

Article looks good at a glance, I'll have a closer review in a bit. 141Pr -_\contribs/- 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...are there any further comments for this review? gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• There is some sandwiching going on in the construction section - there are just a lot of images in general. Consider removing some or grouping them together.