stringtranslate.com

Talk:John Rudge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Rudge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: EchetusXe (talk · contribs) 21:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 19:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Upcoming review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):
    Occasional typos
    B. MoS compliance (including, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources (including an appropriate reference section):
    The article is based on an autobiography.
    B. Citation of available and reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):
    C. No original research:
    D. No copyright violations:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):
  6. Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
    A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

@EchetusXe: Hi. Sorry for the wait. As soon as I complete Pure Japanese's review I'll continue with this one. (CC) Tbhotch 04:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
Early life
Huddersfield
Carlisle
Torquay
Bristol
Bournemouth
Okay, thank you. I have implemented those changes.--EchetusXe 07:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
checkY
Coaching career
1983–85
1985–91
1991–99

@EchetusXe: I normally review the sources at the end but I read this: "writing in his autobiography...". Then I went to the ref section and saw that the book is cited 103/145 times. Autobiographies are primary sources. Reviewing similar examples, the overall opinion is that these primary sources are acceptable for non-controversial statements said by the subject about the subject, but secondary sources are still preferred, especially in biographies of living people. The question that arises is how much of what the book says was verified by Lowe. For example, "In all he made a profit for Port Vale of almost £5 million in the transfer market". Is this a statement by Rudge? Or was an investigation made by Lowe. If so, what is the source for that? Unfortunately, I don't have access to the book and I don't reject articles because of that, but using online searches, I cannot verify it ([1]). But I went to the publisher's website and it says," "About the author: John Rudge has collaborated with Simon Lowe to tell his life story." Then it explains who Lowe is, but it doesn't mention if he did any investigative work.

There is a free sample provided by the publisher here, however: [2], and the 35 pages available are written in the first person. If the full book is an autobiography, we cannot use it throughout the article (at most, early and personal life, his personal quotes, and things attributable to Rudge) because we don't write WP:autobiographies as "People will write overly positive impressions of themselves, and often present opinions as facts". Using this version, I see an example:

If you feel this is an error, you may re-nominate it. If you'd like to discuss it further, you can ping me on the main talk page. (CC) Tbhotch 05:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.