User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law

Welcome!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaitani Rasmein (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaitani Rasmein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaitani Rasmein has been accepted

Shaitani Rasmein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ishq Murshid

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ishq Murshid. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. This removal for the show being finished has nothing to do with the reason the tag exists. CNMall41 (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 06:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Splitsvilla

Hi please don’t add male and female Color’s in tables please as we know who is who gender please remove them. 2A02:6B68:10:EF00:3152:C892:B897:EC4B (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, adding the gender column is required as per standard Wikipedia guidelines. Not everyone who reads wikipedia watches the show. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for letting me know also could you please do me a favour. In Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8 in Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8#Housemates could you change the sub heading Pontentail with Not-selected housemates as it already has that title over here Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8#Potential housemates 2 thanks 2A02:6B68:10:EF00:7D91:86FE:B4ED:889A (talk) 16:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Splitsvilla

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ems 27 03 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ems 27 03. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 21:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I would like to confirm that I'm not a Sockpuppet. This is my only account. I have interest in editing the article Splitsvilla (mostly) and that is why I created this account. User Ravenfire has been targeting me since he begin editing the same page (Splitsvilla 15) and now suspected me as a Sockpuppet because our interest doesn't match. I am new to the community and request to please help me.Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every sockpuppet says they aren't one, as that is the whole point. You'll have to do better than that. Even if this is your only account, that would make this meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please read the next statement, check my edit history. check the talk page of Splitsvilla 15. The only reason he suspected me as a Sockpuppet of someone I didn't know about is because he just don't like the way I edited. He has been doing it since he begin editing the article Splitsvilla 15 saying I don't edit as per Wikipedia MOS (I'm new and still learning new things everyday it takes time). You can verify by checking history, our talk pages, article editing history and talk page. I would request you to give me a chance and also take strict against user Ravenfire for harrassment.331dot The Wordsmith^{Talk to me please do the justice.Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)}[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please read the next statement, check my edit history. check the talk page of Splitsvilla 15. '''The only reason he suspected me as a Sockpuppet of someone I didn't know about is because he just don't like the way I edited.''' He has been doing it since he begin editing the article Splitsvilla 15 saying I don't edit as per Wikipedia MOS (I'm new and still learning new things everyday it takes time). You can verify by checking history, our talk pages, article editing history and talk page. '''I would request you to give me a chance''' and also take strict against user Ravenfire for harrassment.[[User:331dot|331dot]][[User:The Wordsmith|'''The Wordsmith''']]</span><sup><span style="font-family:Papyrus"><small>''[[User talk:The Wordsmith|Talk to me]]'' please do the justice.[[User:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law|Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law]] ([[User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law#top|talk]]) 11:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please read the next statement, check my edit history. check the talk page of Splitsvilla 15. '''The only reason he suspected me as a Sockpuppet of someone I didn't know about is because he just don't like the way I edited.''' He has been doing it since he begin editing the article Splitsvilla 15 saying I don't edit as per Wikipedia MOS (I'm new and still learning new things everyday it takes time). You can verify by checking history, our talk pages, article editing history and talk page. '''I would request you to give me a chance''' and also take strict against user Ravenfire for harrassment.[[User:331dot|331dot]][[User:The Wordsmith|'''The Wordsmith''']]</span><sup><span style="font-family:Papyrus"><small>''[[User talk:The Wordsmith|Talk to me]]'' please do the justice.[[User:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law|Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law]] ([[User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law#top|talk]]) 11:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please read the next statement, check my edit history. check the talk page of Splitsvilla 15. '''The only reason he suspected me as a Sockpuppet of someone I didn't know about is because he just don't like the way I edited.''' He has been doing it since he begin editing the article Splitsvilla 15 saying I don't edit as per Wikipedia MOS (I'm new and still learning new things everyday it takes time). You can verify by checking history, our talk pages, article editing history and talk page. '''I would request you to give me a chance''' and also take strict against user Ravenfire for harrassment.[[User:331dot|331dot]][[User:The Wordsmith|'''The Wordsmith''']]</span><sup><span style="font-family:Papyrus"><small>''[[User talk:The Wordsmith|Talk to me]]'' please do the justice.[[User:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law|Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law]] ([[User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law#top|talk]]) 11:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Checkuser (technical) data is mostly stale in this case. I'm pretty confident Era Amber Spencer is unrelated to this user but I can't say whether or not either is related to Ems 27 03. No comment on the behavioural evidence. --Yamla (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]