Usuario discusión:Doc James

Regarding "integrating" the translated material I don't know what you mean with this.

Por otra parte, no queda claro dónde poner ese texto, cómo integrarlo en la página existente.

El motivo es el siguiente: Por favor, revisa la política de borrado y solo si crees que el artículo en cuestión no se ajusta a lo descrito ahí, expón tus argumentos en esta página.

Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 20:58 31 may 2018 (UTC)[responder] Hola, Doc James.

El motivo es el siguiente: Por favor, revisa la política de borrado y solo si crees que el artículo en cuestión no se ajusta a lo descrito ahí, expón tus argumentos en esta página.

Thank you very much for your work.--Jalu (discusión) 14:36 7 ago 2023 (UTC)[responder] Hi Doc!

Well, whatever, it's a great pleasure to communicate with you, I hope to see you here and there more often, a big hug and we'll stay in touch.

I see that several pages created with your project have already been deleted here.

You cannot directly translate new articles without adhering to our conventions and rules.

Any editor can create whatever he wants in his or her sanbox, but that does not mean Wikipedia considers it encyclopedic.

However, the Spanish version was not a translation of this English article.

Furthermore, that editor in English did not create the article; he copied it from another wiki.

From my perspective, the article is of very low quality and has several problems.

It's just one more point to consider and we prioritize Spanish references so our readers can access them.