The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: EnthusiastWorld37 (talk · contribs) 06:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I will take on this review. I should be done within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
1. Well-written
No MoS issues, only two prose issues noted below:
2. Verifiable
The article uses reliable sources. Passes Copyvio check. Spot check: 2, 7, 14, 16, 22, 24, 31, 38, 43, 51, 57, 64, all look good.
3. Broad
The article fully covers the event and stays focused.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its coverage of the event.
5. Stable
The article is stable.
6. Illustrated
The images used are free use, relevant, and have suitable captions.
@EnthusiastWorld37: Great work! I will be happy to pass once a couple of changes are made. -Riley1012 (talk) 18:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)