stringtranslate.com

Discusión del usuario:Mvolz

Editar con VisualEditor

Archivos manuales

Discusión del usuario:Mvolz/Archivo 1

Agregar tema

Las semanas maravillosas

Hola, publiqué una nota aquí para pedirte que mires la página de discusión de The Wonder Weeks y me ayudes a entender mejor tus inquietudes, pero ahora no la veo. Lo estoy intentando de nuevo. Bn ( discusión ) 21:24 15 oct 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Aclaración de la redacción del tema prohibido por Barbara

Sandstein ha cerrado la discusión sobre el tema User:Barbara (WVS) con una prohibición de tema que dice "está prohibida (WP:TBAN) en los artículos médicos". Tras una discusión con Sandstein sobre el alcance de esa prohibición de tema ( User_talk:Sandstein#What_the_topic_ban_covers ), se considera que se necesita una redacción más amplia. Por lo tanto, se propone que se modifique la redacción de la prohibición de tema para que diga:

"Por consenso de la comunidad, Barbara (WVS)  ( discusión  · contribuciones ), que también edita como Bfpage  ( discusión  · contribuciones ), tiene prohibido el acceso a temas médicos y de salud, incluyendo anatomía y sexualidad, en sentido amplio , y también tiene prohibido interactuar con Flyer22  ( discusión  · contribuciones ) ( WP :IBAN )."

Como ya participó en la discusión, visite Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de administradores/Incidentes#Propuesta_para_aclarar_el_alcance_de_la_prohibición_de_temas para dar su opinión. SilkTork ( discusión ) 08:40 26 mar 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Abril 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

Notificación de enlace de desambiguación para el 7 de abril

Hola. Gracias por tus ediciones recientes. Un proceso automatizado ha detectado que cuando editaste recientemente Alcohol and pregnancy , agregaste un enlace que apunta a la página de desambiguación Premature (verificar para confirmar | corregir con el solucionador Dab). Dichos enlaces suelen ser incorrectos , ya que una página de desambiguación es simplemente una lista de temas no relacionados con títulos similares. (Lee las Preguntas frecuentes  • Únete a nosotros en el WikiProject DPL ).

Está bien eliminar este mensaje. Además, para dejar de recibir estos mensajes, siga estas instrucciones de cancelación de suscripción . Gracias, DPL bot ( discusión ) 09:18, 7 de abril de 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Nominación del MfDWikipedia:WikiProject Parenting

Wikipedia:WikiProject Parenting , una página que usted creó o a la que contribuyó sustancialmente, ha sido nominada para su eliminación . Sus opiniones sobre el tema son bienvenidas; puede participar en la discusión agregando sus comentarios en Wikipedia:Miscelánea para eliminación/Wikipedia:WikiProject Parenting y asegúrese de firmar sus comentarios con cuatro tildes (~~~~). Usted es libre de editar el contenido de Wikipedia:WikiProject Parenting durante la discusión, pero no debe eliminar la plantilla de miscelánea para eliminación de la parte superior de la página; dicha eliminación no terminará la discusión sobre la eliminación. Gracias. BrownPeludoChica (discusión) • ( contribuciones ) 01:11 29 abr 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Plantilla:WikiProject Parenting

En relación a esta plantilla de WikiProject, como comenté en la página de MfD, he creado documentación en Template:WikiProject Parenting/doc . Tengo algunas preguntas con respecto a la plantilla del banner propiamente dicha:

  1. ¿Por qué has proporcionado los parámetros |class=y |importance=con alias posicionales? Esto es muy inusual y puede provocar problemas con algunos scripts y bots.
  2. ¿Por qué está presente el parámetro |MAIN_CAT=WikiProject Women's Health articles? ¿Tenías la intención de configurarlo con otro valor?

Creo que eso es todo por ahora. -- Red rose64 🌹 ( discusión ) 19:57 29 abr 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

@ Redrose64 : ¡Gracias por agregar el documento! Ninguno de esos problemas fue intencional. Arreglé la parte de la categoría principal. Si quieres arreglarla, hazlo :). Mvolz (discusión) 17:38 1 may 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]
Vale, también he eliminado el alias . -- Red rose64 🌹 ( discusión ) 18:54 1 may 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Mayo de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo


A Wiki le encanta la comida

Arroz con cuajada
Arroz con cuajada

¡Hola! Después del exitoso programa piloto de Wikimedia India en 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) se llevará a cabo nuevamente en 2018 y este año será internacional. Para que este evento sea un gran éxito, tu dirección es clave. Regístrate aquí como voluntario para llevar toda la comida del mundo a Wikimedia. Danidamiobi ( discusión ) 20:57 6 may 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Referencias

Gracias por contribuir a Wikipedia. Recuerda que cuando añadas contenido sobre salud, utiliza únicamente fuentes fiables y de alta calidad como referencias. Normalmente utilizamos artículos de revisión , libros de texto importantes y declaraciones de posición de organizaciones nacionales o internacionales (Existen varios tipos de fuentes que tratan sobre salud: aquí se explica cómo la comunidad las clasifica y las utiliza). WP:MEDHOW te guía paso a paso en la edición. Puedes encontrar una lista de recursos para ayudarte a editar contenido sobre salud aquí . El cuadro de edición tiene una herramienta de citación integrada para formatear fácilmente las referencias según el PMID o el ISBN . También proporcionamos consejos de estilo sobre la estructura y el contenido de los artículos de enciclopedia relacionados con la medicina. La página de bienvenida es otro buen lugar para aprender sobre la edición de la enciclopedia. Si tienes alguna pregunta, no dudes en enviarme una nota. Jytdog ( discusión ) 01:15, 22 de mayo de 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Mujeres de Rojo Edición de junio

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 17:15 29 may 2018 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Julio de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

Modelos compartimentados en epidemiología

Veo que has restaurado una sección que eliminé en Compartmental models in epidemiology . ¿Has visto mis comentarios en la página de discusión? Adpete ( discusión ) 09:19 1 jul 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Agosto de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

Septiembre de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

Octubre de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

¡Prepárate para noviembre con Mujeres de Rojo!

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 18:40 14 oct 2018 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Edición de noticias #2—2018

Lea esto en otro idioma • Lista de suscripciones a este boletín multilingüe • Lista de suscripciones en la Wikipedia en inglés

¿Sabías?

¿Sabías que puedes utilizar el editor visual en un dispositivo móvil?

Captura de pantalla que muestra la ubicación del ícono del lápiz

Pulsa el icono del lápiz para empezar a editar. Probablemente la página se abrirá en el editor de wikitexto.

Verá otro icono de lápiz en la barra de herramientas. Pulse en ese icono de lápiz para cambiar entre la edición visual y la edición de wikitexto.

Barra de herramientas con menú abierto

Recuerda publicar tus cambios cuando hayas terminado.

Puede leer y ayudar a traducir la guía del usuario, que tiene más información sobre cómo utilizar el editor visual.

Desde el último boletín, el equipo de edición ha finalizado la mayor parte de su trabajo en el editor de wikitexto de 2017 y la herramienta de comparación visual. El equipo ha comenzado a investigar las necesidades de los editores que utilizan dispositivos móviles. Su panel de trabajo está disponible en Phabricator. Sus prioridades actuales son corregir errores y mejorar la edición móvil.

Cambios recientes

Trabajemos juntos

Whatamidoing (WMF) ( discusión ) 17:12 1 nov 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Mensaje para los votantes de la ArbCom en las elecciones de 2018

Hola, Mvolz. La votación para las elecciones del Comité de Arbitraje de 2018 está abierta hasta las 23:59 del domingo 3 de diciembre. Todos los usuarios que registraron una cuenta antes del domingo 28 de octubre de 2018, realizaron al menos 150 ediciones en el espacio principal antes del jueves 1 de noviembre de 2018 y no están bloqueados actualmente pueden votar. Los usuarios con cuentas alternativas solo pueden votar una vez.

El Comité de Arbitraje es el panel de editores responsable de llevar a cabo el proceso de arbitraje de Wikipedia . Tiene la autoridad de imponer soluciones vinculantes a las disputas entre editores, principalmente en el caso de disputas de conducta graves que la comunidad no ha podido resolver. Esto incluye la autoridad para imponer prohibiciones de sitios , prohibiciones de temas , restricciones de edición y otras medidas necesarias para mantener nuestro entorno de edición. La política de arbitraje describe las funciones y responsabilidades del Comité con mayor detalle.

Si desea participar en las elecciones de 2018, revise los candidatos y envíe sus opciones en la página de votación . Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 18:42 19 nov 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Editatón en Oxford

Sé que esto es un aviso de último momento (me enteré hoy), pero mañana por la tarde habrá un editathon en Oxford que podría interesarte m:Whose Knowledge?/VisibleWikiWomen/Online edit-a-thon/Oxford Editathon. Thryduulf ( discusión ) 16:26 22 nov 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Gracias por avisarme! Lamentablemente, no podré asistir, ¡por desgracia! Mvolz (discusión) 17:14 22 nov 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

mostrarContribuciones.js

Como alternativa a pegar todo en global.js, puedes utilizar la forma larga de importScript():

mw.loader.load('//es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usuario:Mvolz/displayContributions.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // Enlace de retorno: [[w:es:Usuario:Mvolz/displayContributions.js]]

Tengo que usar este formulario cada vez que quiero usar un script en varias wikis. Es muy útil. — AfroThundr ( u · t · c ) 00:16, 24 de noviembre de 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Diciembre de 2018 en Mujeres de Rojo

Relanzamiento del Proyecto de Literatura Infantil

Relanzamiento del Proyecto de Literatura Infantil Diciembre 2018

Hola, soy Barkeep49 . Recibes este mensaje porque en algún momento te inscribiste en el proyecto de literatura infantil . Si bien el proyecto ha estado en gran parte inactivo, espero que vuelva a activarse. Creo que hay muchas direcciones interesantes en las que podríamos llevar el proyecto y me encantaría que te unieras a mí agregando tu nombre nuevamente a la lista de miembros activos .

Contenido reconocido

Felicitaciones a los siguientes editores por tener contenido recientemente reconocido en noviembre y diciembre:

Únete a la discusión

¿Tienes algunas ideas de actividades para el proyecto? ¿Necesitas ayuda? Únete a la página de discusión del proyecto

A menos que te registres como miembro del proyecto, no recibirás más boletines informativos. Si deseas registrarte solo para recibir los boletines informativos o quieres ser un miembro activo pero no recibir los boletines informativos, puedes hacerlo aquí


Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 05:56 18 dic 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Enero de 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

¡Se ha revisado una página que iniciaste (Libro suave)!

Gracias por crear Softbook .

Acabo de revisar la página, como parte de nuestro proceso de curación de páginas , y observo que:

He incluido un vínculo a la categoría de Wikimedia Commons y he movido la plantilla debajo de la lista de referencias, lo que tiene un aspecto más ordenado. Espero que no haya ningún problema.

Para responder, deja un comentario aquí y antepónlo con {{Re|Blythwood}}. Y no olvides firmar tu respuesta con ~~~~.

Mensaje enviado a través de la herramienta de curación de páginas , en nombre del revisor.

Blythwood ( discusión ) 21:25 29 dic 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

Feliz Navidad (con retraso)

-- Red rose64 🌹 ( discusión ) 23:16 29 dic 2018 (UTC) [ responder ]

@ Redrose64 : ¡Gracias y tú también! No es tarde, fue el quinto día de Navidad. ¡Nos vemos en el año nuevo! Mvolz (discusión) 09:59 2 ene 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Addison's Walk (Dublín) se trasladó al espacio de borradores

Un artículo que has creado recientemente, Addison's Walk (Dublin), no tiene suficientes fuentes y citas como para seguir publicado. Necesita más citas de fuentes independientes y fiables . ( ? ) La información a la que no se pueda hacer referencia debería eliminarse ( la verificabilidad es de vital importancia en Wikipedia). He movido tu borrador a draftspace (con un prefijo " " antes del título del artículo) donde puedes incubar el artículo con una interrupción mínima. Cuando sientas que el artículo cumple con la directriz general de notabilidad de Wikipedia y, por lo tanto, está listo para el espacio principal, haz clic en el botón "¡Envía tu borrador para revisión!" en la parte superior de la página. CASSIOPEIA ( discusión ) 06:16 2 ene 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]Draft:

@ CASSIOPEIA : Gracias, pero probablemente nunca lo haga; todo esto era contenido que eliminé de Addison's Walk , que no era relevante porque se trataba de la caminata equivocada. Mvolz (discusión) 09:54 2 ene 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]
Hola Mvolz, te mando un saludo. Por favor, coloca {{ Db-g7 }} en la parte superior de la página para eliminar y coloca "solicitud de eliminación de mi autor en la edición del resumen" antes de hacer clic en guardar. Gracias. CASSIOPEIA ( discusión ) 10:01 2 ene 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Febrero de 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

Boletín de literatura infantil febrero 2019

Literatura infantil febrero 2019

¡Guau! ¿Puedes creer que hemos pasado de tener menos de 5 miembros a más de 20 en tan poco tiempo? Gracias a todos por sumarse (o reincorporarse) al proyecto y esperamos que hagamos un gran trabajo en el futuro. No dudes en compartir cualquier idea que tengas en nuestra página de discusión .

Contenido reconocido
Etiquetado de proyectos: necesitamos tu ayuda

Gracias a Earwig y su bot, algunos artículos tuvieron nuestro banner de proyecto colocado en sus páginas; esto nos permitirá monitorear y brindar un mejor soporte a estos artículos. Sin embargo, el etiquetado recibió algunas quejas sobre demasiadas etiquetas colocadas incorrectamente (ver aquí ). Se agradecería alguna ayuda para revisar las categorías que utilizará el bot. Esa lista de categorías se puede encontrar en: Usuario: The Earwig/Sandbox/Literatura infantil

Alertas de artículos

Una excelente manera de mantenerse al tanto de los artículos que requieren una atención particular es a través de la página de alertas de artículos del proyecto . Puede obtener información sobre nuevos artículos nominados a Good Article, artículos para eliminar y más. Si mira la página, incluso puede ver las nuevas incorporaciones cada noche directamente desde su lista de seguimiento.

Recibes esto porque estás registrado como miembro activo del Proyecto Wiki de literatura infantil o has elegido suscribirte al boletín. Si deseas suscribirte solo a los boletines o quieres ser un miembro activo pero no recibir los boletines, puedes hacerlo aquí


Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 18:49 13 feb 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Marzo de 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

Su envío enArtículos para la creación:Urzila CarlsonHa sido aceptado

Urzila Carlson , que usted envió a Artículos para su creación, ha sido creado.
El artículo ha sido evaluado como Start-Class , lo que se registra en la página de discusión del artículo . Es posible que desee echar un vistazo al esquema de calificación para ver cómo puede mejorar el artículo.

Te invitamos a seguir realizando contribuciones de calidad a Wikipedia . Si tu cuenta tiene más de cuatro días y has realizado al menos 10 ediciones, puedes crear artículos tú mismo sin publicar una solicitud. Sin embargo, puedes seguir enviando trabajos a Artículos para la creación si lo prefieres.

¡Gracias por ayudarnos a mejorar Wikipedia!

Missvain ( discusión ) 22:19 13 mar 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Ediciones de abril en Mujeres de Rojo

Abril 2019

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 16:00 25 mar 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

(¡Disculpe esta publicación si está duplicada!)

Boletín de literatura infantil de marzo de 2019

Literatura infantil marzo 2019

Desde nuestro último boletín, se han realizado más trabajos interesantes. Gracias a todos los miembros del proyecto por lo que hacen para apoyar la literatura infantil en Wikipedia.

Contenido recientemente reconocido
Evaluación del artículo

Con la finalización de nuestro proyecto Banner, tenemos una gran cantidad de artículos pendientes de evaluar . Calificar artículos es una excelente manera de encontrar artículos interesantes dentro del alcance de nuestro proyecto y también de encontrar artículos que fueron etiquetados incorrectamente. Esperamos que este proyecto nos permita monitorear mejor y ayudar en el desarrollo de los muchos artículos que este proyecto respalda. Gracias a Legoktm por todo su trabajo para que esto suceda.

Motor de búsqueda personalizado de Google

¿Busca información sobre un libro? Pruebe el nuevo motor de búsqueda personalizado de literatura infantil. Este motor de búsqueda personalizado de Google buscará información en sitios designados. Hasta ahora se incluyen Kirkus Reviews , School Library Journal , Horn Book y Publisher's Weekly . Si tiene ideas sobre otros sitios que deberían agregarse, inicie una discusión en nuestra página de discusión del proyecto .

Recibes esto porque estás registrado como miembro activo del WikiProject de literatura infantil o has elegido suscribirte al boletín. Si deseas suscribirte solo a los boletines o quieres ser un miembro activo pero no recibir los boletines, puedes hacerlo aquí .

Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 20:31 26 mar 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Discusión en la página de discusión de Layla Moran

Actualmente se está llevando a cabo una discusión bastante animada en Talk:Layla Moran#Violencia doméstica . Apreciaría si pudieras participar con tu punto de vista, con el fin de encontrar un consenso en un sentido u otro. Domeditrix ( discusión ) 09:52 6 abr 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Accesorio para trípode de cámara

Olvidé mencionar que tengo parte del trípode de tu cámara aquí, es la pieza que se enrosca en la parte inferior de la cámara y luego se sujeta a la parte superior del trípode. La llevaré a la próxima reunión de Oxford, el 28 de abril. -- Red rose64 🌹 ( discusión ) 15:09, 6 de abril de 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Te esperamos para los editatones de este mes de WiR!

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 16:17 27 abr 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Hola, me alegré de charlar un rato en Oxford ayer. Este es el lugar del que estaba hablando para llevar a la familia, con una amplia gama de juguetes, tanto históricos como modernos, y algunos talleres para que los niños participen. Está a unos diez minutos a pie de la estación de metro de Bethnal Green . El artículo sobre el museo también necesita un poco de trabajo, que probablemente pueda hacer tan pronto como encuentre mi gastada copia de The London Encyclopedia . Ritchie333 (discusión) (cont) 11:05, 29 de abril de 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Eventos de junio con WIR

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 17:42 22 may 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Boletín de literatura infantil abril/mayo 2019

Literatura infantil Abril/Mayo 2019

En este boletín nos embarcamos en un proyecto para crear artículos sobre temas de importancia media o alta que actualmente son enlaces rojos. Lea más y considere unirse al trabajo.

Contenido recientemente reconocido
Premios en rojo

MrLinkinPark333 señaló recientemente que en algunas de nuestras páginas de máxima importancia sobre premios de literatura infantil hay muchos enlaces rojos. Las tres páginas con estos enlaces rojos son Medalla Caldecott , Medalla Newbery y Medalla Carnegie (con 0 enlaces rojos existentes en el otro artículo de premio de máxima importancia: Premio Astrid Lindgren Memorial ). A partir de este boletín, hay 222 enlaces rojos en esos tres artículos. ¿Cuántos podemos crear como proyecto en las próximas 6 semanas? ¿Podríamos hacerlo mejor y ver si podemos crear alguno que obtenga la calificación ¿Sabías que ? o incluso que llegue al estado de Buen artículo ?

Como siempre, no dudes en visitar la página de discusión del proyecto si necesitas ayuda mientras trabajamos para convertir estas entradas notables en algunos de nuestros artículos más importantes en azules.

Recibes esto porque estás registrado como miembro activo del WikiProject de literatura infantil o has elegido suscribirte al boletín. Si deseas suscribirte solo a los boletines o quieres ser un miembro activo pero no recibir los boletines, puedes hacerlo aquí .

Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 16:20 3 jun 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Eventos de julio de Mujeres de Rojo!

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 16:40 25 jun 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Edición de noticias n.° 1: julio de 2019

Lea esto en otro idioma • Lista de suscripción a este boletín multilingüe

¿Sabías?

¿Sabías que puedes utilizar el editor visual en un dispositivo móvil?

Cada artículo tiene un icono de lápiz en la parte superior. Toca el icono de lápizpara empezar a editar.

Editar tarjetas

Barra de herramientas con menú abierto

Así lucen las nuevas Edit Cards para editar enlaces en el editor visual móvil. Puedes probar el prototipo aquí: 📲 Prueba Edit Cards.

Bienvenido nuevamente al boletín de Edición.

Desde el último boletín, el equipo ha lanzado dos nuevas funciones para el editor visual móvil y ha comenzado a desarrollar tres más. Todo este trabajo forma parte del objetivo del equipo de simplificar la edición en la web móvil.

Antes de hablar de los últimos lanzamientos del equipo, tenemos una pregunta para ti:

¿Estás dispuesto a probar una nueva forma de agregar y cambiar enlaces?

Si estás interesado, ¡apreciaremos tu opinión! Puedes probar esta nueva herramienta de enlaces en el editor visual móvil en una wiki independiente.

Sigue estas instrucciones y comparte tu experiencia:

📲 Prueba Editar Tarjetas.

Lanzamientos recientes

El editor visual para dispositivos móviles es una herramienta de edición más sencilla para teléfonos inteligentes y tabletas que utilizan el sitio móvil. El equipo de edición ha lanzado recientemente dos nuevas funciones para mejorar el editor visual para dispositivos móviles:

  1. Edición de secciones
    • El propósito es ayudar a los colaboradores a centrarse en sus ediciones.
    • El equipo estudió esto con una prueba A/B. Esta prueba mostró que los colaboradores que podían usar la edición de secciones tenían un 1 % más de probabilidades de publicar las ediciones que habían iniciado que aquellos que solo podían editar páginas completas.
  2. Cargando superposición
    • El propósito es suavizar la transición entre la lectura y la edición.

La edición de secciones y la nueva superposición de carga ahora están disponibles para todos los que usan el editor visual móvil.

Proyectos nuevos y activos

Esta es una lista de nuestros proyectos más activos. Visite estas páginas para conocer las actualizaciones de los proyectos y compartir sus comentarios sobre nuevos diseños, prototipos y resultados de investigaciones.

Mirando hacia el futuro

Aprendiendo más

El editor visual en dispositivos móviles es un buen lugar para obtener más información sobre los proyectos en los que estamos trabajando. El equipo quiere hablar contigo sobre cualquier tema relacionado con la edición. Si tienes algo que decir o preguntar, deja un mensaje en Talk:VisualEditor en dispositivos móviles.

PPelberg (WMF) (discusión) y Whatamidoing (WMF) ( discusión ) 21:25 15 jul 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Agosto de 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

-- Rosiestep ( discusión ) 06:45 29 jul 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Formas de mejorar Ischnocodia annulus

Hola, Mvolz,

¡Gracias por crear Ischnocodia annulus ! Yo también edito aquí, con el nombre de usuario Willsome429 y es un placer conocerte :-)

Quería informarle que he etiquetado la página como que tiene algunos problemas que solucionar, como parte de nuestro proceso de curación de páginas y tenga en cuenta que:

Agregue fuentes confiables para establecer la notoriedad de la página.

Usted u otro editor pueden eliminar las etiquetas una vez que se hayan solucionado los problemas que mencionan. Si tiene preguntas, deje un comentario aquí y antepóngalo con {{Re|Willsome429}}. Y no olvide firmar su respuesta con ~~~~. Para obtener ayuda con la edición más amplia, visite Teahouse .

Entregado a través de la herramienta Page Curation , en nombre del revisor.

Willsome 4 29 (¡saludaomira mis ediciones!) 13:43, 14 de agosto de 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Septiembre de 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

-- Rosiestep ( discusión ) 16:24 27 ago 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Melissa A. Wilson Sayresmovido al espacio de borrador

Un artículo que usted creó recientemente, Melissa A. Wilson Sayres , no tiene información tal como está escrita para demostrar que el tema cumple con el criterio relevante WP:PROF . Necesita citas a sus artículos científicos revisados ​​por pares reales, no solo a informes de ellos en fuentes no profesionales, e indicación de que han sido influyentes. La influencia en WP:PROF normalmente se muestra por la extensión de las citas al trabajo publicado de la persona, para lo cual la fuente más conveniente es a menudo Google Scholar. En particular, mi análisis preliminar de estos datos muestra que sus artículos más citados son aquellos en los que ella es una de los muchos coautores, a veces más de 100. En tales casos, es necesario averiguar su papel. He descubierto que el primer paso es ver si era una investigadora independiente en el momento del trabajo.

He movido tu borrador a draftspace (con un prefijo " Draft:" antes del título del artículo) donde puedes incubar el artículo con una interrupción mínima. Cuando sientas que el artículo cumple con la guía general de notabilidad de Wikipedia y, por lo tanto, está listo para el espacio principal, haz clic en el botón "¡Envía tu borrador para revisión!" en la parte superior de la página. DGG ( discusión ) 01:16 12 sep 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Uso de medios digitales y salud mentalNominación de la FA

Hola. Me di cuenta de que eras miembro de Wikiproject Parenting. Esperaba que tuvieras tiempo o interés para considerar ayudarme con una revisión de este artículo que nominé . El reciente DYK también puede ser de interés. Descargo de responsabilidad: soy tío 4 veces, pero todavía no soy padre :) -- [E.3][chat2] [me] 16:04, 12 de septiembre de 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Eventos de octubre de Mujeres de Rojo

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 17:35 23 sep 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Edición de Noticias #2 – Edición móvil y páginas de discusión – Octubre 2019

Lea esto en otro idioma • Lista de suscripción a este boletín multilingüe

En este boletín, el equipo de edición habla sobre su trabajo en el editor visual móvil, sobre el nuevo proyecto de páginas de discusión y en Wikimania 2019.

Ayuda

¿Qué interacciones de la página de discusión recuerdas? ¿Es una historia sobre cómo alguien te ayudó a aprender algo nuevo? ¿Es una historia sobre cómo alguien te ayudó a involucrarte en un grupo? ¿Algo más? ¡Cualquiera que sea tu historia, queremos escucharla!

Cuéntenos una historia sobre cómo utilizó una página de discusión. Comparta un enlace a una discusión memorable o descríbala en la página de discusión de este proyecto . El equipo valoraría sus ejemplos, ya que ayudarán a todos a desarrollar una comprensión compartida de lo que este proyecto debería apoyar y fomentar.

Páginas de discusión

La Consulta de las Páginas de Discusión fue una consulta global para definir mejores herramientas para la comunicación wiki. Desde febrero hasta junio de 2019, más de 500 voluntarios de 20 wikis, en 15 idiomas y en múltiples proyectos, se reunieron con miembros de la Fundación para crear una dirección de producto para un conjunto de herramientas de discusión. El Informe de la Fase 2 de la Consulta de las Páginas de Discusión se publicó en agosto. Resume la dirección de producto en la que el equipo ha comenzado a trabajar, sobre la que puede leer más aquí: Página del proyecto del Proyecto de Páginas de Discusión.

El equipo necesita y quiere tu ayuda en esta etapa inicial. Están empezando a desarrollar la primera idea. Agrega tu nombre a la sección "Participa" de la página del proyecto si quieres saber sobre las oportunidades de participar.

Editor visual móvil

El equipo de edición está intentando simplificar la edición en dispositivos móviles. El equipo está cambiando el editor visual en dispositivos móviles. Si tienes algo que decir sobre la edición en un dispositivo móvil, deja un mensaje en Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

Editar tarjetas

Qué sucede cuando haces clic en un enlace. La nueva tarjeta de edición es más grande y tiene más opciones para editar enlaces.

Barra de herramientas

La barra de herramientas de edición está cambiando en el editor visual móvil. El sistema anterior tenía dos barras de herramientas diferentes. Ahora, todos los botones están juntos. Cuéntale al equipo qué piensas sobre la nueva barra de herramientas.

Wikimanía

El equipo de edición asistió a Wikimania 2019 en Suecia. Dirigieron una sesión sobre el editor visual móvil y una sesión sobre el nuevo proyecto de páginas de discusión. Probaron dos nuevas funciones del editor visual móvil con los colaboradores. Puedes leer más sobre lo que hizo y aprendió el equipo en el informe del equipo sobre Wikimania 2019.

Mirando hacia el futuro

PPelberg (WMF) (discusión) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (discusión) 16:51 17 oct 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Noviembre 2019 en Mujeres de Rojo

-- Rosiestep ( discusión ) 22:58 29 oct 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Propuesta de eliminación del Módulo:Fuentes

El módulo Fuentes ha sido propuesto para su eliminación . Te invitamos a comentar la discusión en la entrada del módulo en la página Plantillas para discusión . * Pppery * ha comenzado... 16:29, 2 de noviembre de 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Reconocimiento de ITN paraJames Le Mesurier

El 12 de noviembre de 2019, In ​​the news se actualizó con un artículo que incluía el artículo James Le Mesurier , que usted actualizó. Si conoce otro artículo creado o actualizado recientemente que sea adecuado para su inclusión en ITN, sugiéralo en la página de candidatos . Black Kite (discusión) 21:00 12 noviembre 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Patricia Moreira

Hola... ¿Cómo estás? Puedes ver en mis ediciones que no soy feminista... pero creo que esto no debería eliminarse. ¿Alguna idea? Whispyhistory ( discusión ) 21:12 12 nov 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Gracias! Soy inclusivo, así que personalmente creo que cumple con los criterios, pero creo que fue ambiguo cuando se lo nominó. ¡Agregué algunas citas adicionales que podrían ayudar! Saludos, Mvolz (discusión) 11:34 13 nov 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]
Gracias @Mvolz : .... Whispyhistory ( discusión ) 11:46 13 nov 2019 (UTC ) [ responder ]

Su envío enArtículos para la creación:Melissa A. Wilson(14 de noviembre)

¡Tu reciente artículo enviado a Articles for Creation ha sido revisado! Lamentablemente, no ha sido aceptado en este momento. Las razones que dejó MurielMary fueron: El comentario que dejó el crítico fue:Revise el envío para ver si hay comentarios adicionales que haya dejado el revisor. Se recomienda editar el envío para abordar los problemas planteados y volver a enviarlo cuando se hayan resuelto .
MurielMary ( discusión ) 07:57 14 nov 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Mensaje para los votantes de la ArbCom en las elecciones de 2019

Se acerca Google Code-In 2019: ¡por favor, asesora en algunas tareas de documentación!

Hola,

En unas semanas comienza Google Code-In, un concurso organizado por Google en el que participa la Fundación Wikimedia. Este concurso tiene como objetivo introducir a los estudiantes de secundaria en el mundo del código abierto. Te envío este mensaje porque recientemente has editado una página de documentación en la Wikipedia en inglés.

Me gustaría pedirte que participes en Google Code-In como mentor. Eso significaría preparar al menos una tarea (puede estar relacionada con la documentación o algo más; las otras categorías son Código, Diseño, Control de calidad y Difusión) para los participantes y ayudar al estudiante a completarla. Regístrate en la página del concurso y envíanos la dirección de tu cuenta de Google a [email protected] para que podamos invitarte.

Según mi propia experiencia, Google Code-In puede ser divertido, puedes hacer muchos amigos nuevos, atraer nuevas personas a tu wiki y convertirlas en parte de tu comunidad.

Si tiene alguna pregunta, háganoslo saber a [email protected].

¡Gracias!

-- Usuario:Martin Urbanec ( discusión ) 21:58 23 nov 2019 (UTC) [ responder ]

Eventos de diciembre con WIR

-- Megalibrarygirl ( discusión ) 18:43 25 nov 2019 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Enero de 2020 en Mujeres de Rojo

Su envío enArtículos para la creación:Melissa A. WilsonHa sido aceptado

Se ha creado el artículo Melissa A. Wilson
que usted envió a Artículos para su creación. El artículo ha sido evaluado como Start-Class , lo que se registra en la página de discusión del artículo . Es posible que desee echar un vistazo al esquema de calificación para ver cómo puede mejorar el artículo.

Te invitamos a seguir realizando contribuciones de calidad a Wikipedia . Si tu cuenta tiene más de cuatro días y has realizado al menos 10 ediciones, puedes crear artículos tú mismo sin publicar una solicitud. Sin embargo, puedes seguir enviando trabajos a Artículos para la creación si lo prefieres.

¡Gracias por ayudarnos a mejorar Wikipedia!

Missvain ( discusión ) 05:44 19 ene 2020 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Una estrella de granero para ti!

Archivo:Korkywithrough2.jpg listado para discusión

Un archivo que has subido o modificado, File:Korkywithrough2.jpg, ha sido incluido en Wikipedia:Files for discussion . Consulta la discusión para ver por qué ha sido incluido (es posible que tengas que buscar el título de la imagen para encontrar su entrada). No dudes en añadir tu opinión sobre el tema debajo de la nominación. Gracias. Whpq ( discusión ) 13:25 25 ene 2020 (UTC) [ responder ]

¡Un cupcake para ti!

February with Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Korkywithrough2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Korkywithrough2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Li Wen Liang.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Li Wen Liang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Li Wen Liang.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Li Wen Liang.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Dear Mvolz,

Thank you very much for your e-mail message sent yesterday about my major edits of ==Menstrual Psychosis== and ==The Psychiatry of Childbearing==. I do appreciate the care that Wikipedia staff take to ensure fair play and to maintain the highest standards of Wikipedia entries – and especially because three of my 2009 entries – these two and a third on ==Postpartum Psychoses== – have been mauled by subsequent editors without any explanation that I have been able to discover. I very much want my entries to be legitimate, and that is why, when making these major changes, I spelt out the reasons in detail. Indeed, I particularly asked stewards to read these explanations when assessing my entry. These explanations are on one of the talk pages. I have attached them to an email. Please be so kind as to study them, and, I hope, replace my revised entry. I did fill in the Edit summary but perhaps not in the right format. I have downloaded the advice on that, and will study it.

Thank you also for your advice about Wikipedia references.

There does seem to be a problem with my 'talk page' entries not reaching stewards. I am at present having difficulties with my submission on ==Organic Psychoses of Childbearing== - two or three stewards have made the same adverse comments, without apparently having seen my response. How can I bring my explanations to the attention of stewards?

Many thanks again for your help.

Son of Fraser and Joyce (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Son of Fraser and JoyceSon of Fraser and Joyce (talk) Ian Brockington February 26th 2020.[reply]

April 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

Read this in another language • Subscription list

Screenshot showing what the Reply tool looks like
This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

Reply tool improved with edit tool buttons
In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Stronger Neo‐Minophagen C" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stronger Neo‐Minophagen C. Since you had some involvement with the Stronger Neo‐Minophagen C redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glycyrrhizin edits

Please be careful about overinterpreting sources and making a synthesis of results from more general studies. See WP:SYNTH. There is no direct evidence that glycyrrhizin itself affects specific receptors involved in regulation of body fluids or blood pressure. There are no WP:MEDRS sources indicating its adverse effects or role in normal physiology. Zefr (talk) 15:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused by this comment; the only edit I've made was to replace primary sources that were already in the article, with a secondary source - and to use the name of the preparation directly in the article (whereas before it wasn't mentioned by name.) I haven't edited anything at all regarding "body fluids" or blood pressure. Cheers, Mvolz (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]
With this revert of my edit, you restored a weak ref inferring a role in body fluids and blood pressure, and several side effects not supported by any good source. No worries. Zefr (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right; I was explicit in my citing of it that it was meant only to support the claim that it is used in Japan, and included that in my edit summary (and also placed the citation directly after the claim). Perhaps that claim doesn't need a citation, though. Mvolz (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology (2)

@Diannaa:Wikimedia received an inquiry at OTRS relating to recent edits of Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology

I see removal of copyvio issues and removal of an image, but no discussion on the editors talk page. I do see an edit summary, and I will point that out to te editor, but could we have a little more feedback to the editor? --S Philbrick(Talk) 12:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright content was added by user:Zvi grossnass, not Mvolz. Which editor is requesting feedback? — Diannaa (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I can give more feedback in the future. My edits were more editorial, I didn't remove anything related to copyvio. I wish we had more eyes on this page in general. I've seen a LOT of new accounts suddenly making lots of small edits to this page, particularly to the models themselves, with no citations given or reason given for the changes, so I've gotten a bit lazy about feedback. I think all the models need to have inline citations, and then also reviewed to make sure no errors have been introduced; for example I recently found that over time, defined terms were removed, and replaced with undefined terms in at least one model. I need to go through all the other ones and make sure they're okay. I've been meaning to do this for a while by my expertise is kind of limited to what I've taught first year undergrads, and no higher, and so it's labour intensive. The page really needs an expert watching it who can do this faster, which I am not, and thus far it's been kind of a free for all. Mvolz (talk) 13:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mvolz, I don't want to come across as too negative. I thought your edit summary was adequate, but my experience is that some new editors are not yet aware of edit summaries. There's more I wish I could share, but I don't yet have permission to say more. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Diannaa, Kelly222, sorry I may have read too quickly. S Philbrick(Talk) 21:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates

Read this in another language • Subscription list

Mockup of the new reply feature, showing new editing tools
The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paranthropus robustus on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editing news 2020 #3

On 16 March 2020, the 50 millionth edit was made using the visual editor on desktop.

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:CYP4F2 on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Visual dictionary of garments having different names in American and British English

Hello, Mvolz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Visual dictionary of garments having different names in American and British English".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a shame. Now nobody will ever know that vest means two totally different things. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
REdrose64 - the fate of such ventures and the lack of that allows for the ambiguities that create some bizarre situations is more the loss... JarrahTree 04:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have resurrected it! Now with citations and moved to name space. I changed it to list, but I think visual dictionary was better. Mvolz (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lek mating on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September Women in Red edithons

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editing news 2020 #4

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

The number of comments posted with the Reply Tool from March through June 2020. People used the Reply Tool to post over 7,400 comments with the tool.

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures

Next: New discussion tool

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Beulah Ream Allen on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October editathons from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Amasa Holcomb on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Purple-crowned fairywren on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

December with Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

December 2020

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an opinion - it's literally in the lede of the article on osteopathy. Couching it in neutral sounding language is false balance. Cheers. Mvolz (talk) 10:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was just slightly perturbed by the edit summary that you'd attached. The page is regarding the doctoral degree and should probably just be concentrated on the degree; osteopathy obviously goes into the actual practice of osteopathy with greater depth. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red!

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pacific Meridional Mode on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #1

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

Graph of Reply tool and full-page wikitext edit completion rates
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in this report.

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

Research notes:

New discussion tool

Screenshot of version 1.0 of the New Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[6] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gunnar Degelius on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ring chromosome 22 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Storm Fay (2020) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tag at Avon Tyrrell House

I noticed that you placed a copyright violations tag on the aforementioned article; it seems to have been edited out and I could not find a copyvio. If you think I'm mistaken, apologies on my part! However, it should be taken care of. Thanks for flagging it in the first place! Kind regards, Sennecaster (What now?) 03:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyclone Kelvin on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Gamma on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Insect flight on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wiedopterus on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Characters having different names in British and American English

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Characters having different names in British and American English, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of foods having different names in American and British English

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of foods having different names in American and British English, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Bryan Berghoef for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Berghoef is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Berghoef until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StAnselm (talk) 19:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kererū on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flame-faced tanager on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 at Women in Red

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Margaret Sibella Brown on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

December 2021 at Women in Red

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ibn al-Nafis on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 with Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:White-bellied imperial pigeon on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Coelho

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Coelho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021

Hi, I wanted to thank you for the work you put into [Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Stats/Top medical editors 2021 (en): Revision history - Wikipedia], not everyone is willing to put forward such effort as you, thank you again, happy New Year!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ozzie10aaaa, thanks for all your hard work on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine page and happy New Year too! Mvolz (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February with Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vitamin A on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Coelho

Hello, Mvolz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Coelho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bed positioning moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bed positioning, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March editathons

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Indian Space Research Organisation on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Magnetoreception on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Users that are users

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Users that are users requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May Women in Red events

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mandrill on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

New editors were more successful with this new tool.

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kelenken on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Last universal common ancestor on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bed positioning

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bed positioning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rosalie Edge on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Resource defense polygyny

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Resource defense polygyny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2022 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Graph showing 90-minute response time without the new tool and 39-minute response time with the tool
The [subscribe] button shortens response times.

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bed positioning

Hello, Mvolz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bed positioning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shannon Lucid on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manuel Foster Observatory on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Idaho pocket gopher on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Parenthood paradox

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parenthood paradox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Persea palustris on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mate guarding

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mate guarding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Module:Taxontree

Module:Taxontree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Centipede on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mate guarding

Hello, Mvolz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mate guarding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wanda Wesołowska on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2023 #1

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

  1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
  2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

Screenshot showing the talk page design changes that are currently available as beta features at all Wikimedia wikis. These features include information about the number of people and comments within each discussion.
Some of the upcoming changes

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Nicholas on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:K2-18b on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Centipede on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nerodia clarkii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Climate change and birds on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kaikaifilu on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mvolz. Thank you for your work on Paul W. Sherman. User:Shelovesneo, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Article seem to have material of primary sources. Overall, good job.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shelovesneo}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

shelovesneo (talk) 11:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Selective androgen receptor modulator on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Oak on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Placidium arboreum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Buffy-tufted marmoset on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Citoid problem

I don't know if phab:T323169#9486862 was noticed. I'd be happy to help if there's anything useful I can do for you. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum × inodorum on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Snowy albatross on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Heptamegacanthus on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1895 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carolina de Weerth

Information icon Hello, Mvolz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carolina de Weerth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pharos (crater) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Congenital varicella syndrome
added links pointing to CNS, PCR, Negative, Positive, CMV, Premature, Developmental delay, Subcutaneous, Termination and Hydrops

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dacrytherium on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2024) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Irish twins

Hello, Mvolz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Miminity and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Irish twins, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a disambiguation page, though. Not an article. I was confused when I ended up at a band's page. Mvolz (talk) 08:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this meets the criteria "sufficiently identical" but given I can't see the old version I don't know for sure. But it sounds like from the deletion discussion it was an article page, not a disambiguation page. Mvolz (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was indeed an article page, but at the time of its deletion on 23 August 2021, it was no more than a two-paragraph three-sentence stub. It did have some references and further reading, though, reproduced here in full:
  • Howland, Genevieve (28 July 2021). "What Are Irish Twins (And Is The Term Offensive?)". Mamanatural.com. Mama Natural. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  • [https://www.healthline.com/health/parenting/raising-irish-twins 9 Parenting Tips for Raising ‘Irish Twins’]
  • Everything You've Ever Wanted to Know About Irish Twins
  • Is the term 'Irish twins' offensive?
Omitting the AfD notice, cleanup banners, section headings, refs, further reading, categories and stub tags, leaves these three sentences:
Irish twins, also known as Catholic twins, are two siblings born with no more than 12 months apart from each other.
Children that were born within 12 months of each other were common during 19th century, when ethnically Irish people emigrated to the United States. Usually devout Catholics, they did not use birth control on church advisement.
It's not "substantially identical" within the meaning of WP:CSD#G4, therefore I have declined the speedy. However, I would urge you to add something to Sibling, which presently has no mention of the word "Irish". Courtesy notification to Miminity. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Seraphimblade. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Razia Jan have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per my edit note, you deleted the entire biography including the only thing that made her notable, i.e. that she founded a school for girls in Afghanistan. You also deleted basic facts like education which are included in most biographies. That's why I reverted it. It was a destructive edit. I agree the article was a bit soapboxy but you made it worse, not better, by deleting the good with the bad and leaving only tangential trivia like - once donated some blankets? Mvolz (talk) 08:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel that some parts could be put back in an appropriately neutral way and are confirmed by sources, that's fine. But you cannot put it all back. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

-- Lajmmoore ( discusión 08:06 29 septiembre 2024 (UTC) vía MassMessaging [ responder ]

Solicitud de comentarios: Nominación de buen artículo sobre ciencias naturales

Se solicita su opinión en Talk:Cirsium greimleri sobre una nominación de Buen artículo de "Ciencias naturales" . ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Usted fue seleccionado al azar para recibir esta invitación de la lista de suscriptores del Servicio de solicitud de opiniones . Si no desea recibir más estos mensajes, puede cancelar su suscripción en cualquier momento eliminando su nombre .

Mensaje enviado con cariño por Yapperbot  :) | ¿Esto es incorrecto? Contacta al operador de mi bot . | Enviado a las 23:31, 1 de octubre de 2024 (UTC) [ responder ]