The lead paragraphs on this page do not represent what is on the page in a balanced way. "The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." [[1]]Red Rose 13 (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Let's go sentence by sentence. Two sentences from the lead need clarification: 1) Hnilica was part of a network of Marian apparitions around the world. 2) His organization was especially active around the promotion of the cult of the Lady of All Nations in the Netherlands.Rewriting them
1/2) - It wasn't an established organisation. Sources don't mention it as such, but as a wider anti-communist phenomenon during the late stage of Cold War. So no capital letters. Also note: "Important shrines and devotions within this network include naming a few: Amsterdam (1945), Medjugorje (1981), and Garabandal, Spain (1961).[13] ". So no, there's no Fatima in it. --Governor Sheng (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Back to the two sentences in discussion. After considering our discussion and reading the sources:
However I am not sure why we have the second sentence. It is redundant to the first one.Red Rose 13 (talk) 04:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
I suggest before you edit on a controversial page that you create a discussion on the talk page and ask other editors to make comments besides me. Otherwise, we will be in the same situation as before and not allowed to edit these pages. You just deleted this paragraph for no apparent reason from the lead. "Presently Bishop Hendriks explains that the title 'Lady of All Nations' is "in itself theologically admissible" which includes praying with the Madonna but it is not to be understood as a recognition of the supernatural nature of the phenomena." I am going to revert the edits back to just before you started. Bring what you want to change to the talk page.Red Rose 13 (talk) 18:46, 13 March 2023 (UTC)