This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:
Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Category:All articles lacking reliable references.
Place this template inline, {{Unreliable source?|date=July 2024}} following the questionable source. The template should be placed outside and immediately after the reference to the questionable source (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:
.svg/1280px-Test_Template_Info-Icon_-_Version_(2).svg.png){kind=icon}
<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=July 2024}} Next sentence.The template has the following optional parameters:
{{Unreliable source?|date=July 2024}}{{Unreliable source?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=July 2024}}|reason= parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example: {{Unreliable source?|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=July 2024}} NOTE: This parameter has an alias, |failed=, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like {{verify credibility}}.This template should be used to express your doubt about the credibility of a source.
This tag should not be used on unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons; if a source for such a statement is not reliable, the statement and the source should be removed immediately.
For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{More citations needed}} or {{More citations needed section}}, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.
For sources promoting fringe theories and pseudo-science, the more specific template {{Unreliable fringe source}} can be used. Even more specifically, flag improperly sourced medical claims with {{Unreliable medical source}}.
This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case, {{failed verification}} is a better template. For statements that have failed verification and have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.
TemplateData for Unreliable source?
Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
{{Better source needed}}, an alternative to {{Unreliable source?|certain=y}}; especially useful for tagging sources that are low-quality but not necessarily wrong{{Dubious}}, for questionable claims that seem unlikely to be properly sourceable{{Obsolete source}}, for when a source has been surpassed by more recent works{{Primary source inline}}, for misuse of primary source material{{Unreliable fringe source}}, for fringe sources{{Unreliable medical source}}, for fringe medical sources in particular