¿De verdad crees que dejar más de 200 avisos de plantilla prácticamente idénticos en la página de discusión de un usuario es una buena idea? Supongo que el usuario:BD2412 es demasiado educado como para quejarse contigo, pero yo no lo soy. Todas estas ediciones están inundando mi lista de seguimiento. -- R'n'B ( llámame Russ) 02:30, 9 de diciembre de 2017 (UTC)
Hola Tiuko, gracias por tu mensaje sobre mi borrador. Cuando creé por primera vez el artículo "TDLWH" en mi borrador, era muy nuevo en Wikipedia y pensé que podía escribir lo que quisiera en mi borrador, pero después de leer las políticas y los términos, descubrí que mis pensamientos estaban equivocados. Por lo tanto, lamento mucho lo de ese artículo y gracias nuevamente por el mensaje 😊 TDLWH ( discusión ) 21:06 10 dic 2017 (UTC)
Hola. Me pregunto por qué postergaron la eliminación rápida de este artículo. No cumple con los criterios de notoriedad generalmente aceptados para los clubes de fútbol y casi con toda seguridad se eliminaría si se moviera al espacio de artículos (lo puse en la lista de seguimiento por si acaso para poder publicarlo o publicarlo en AfD). Saludos, Número 5 7 20:17, 24 de diciembre de 2017 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:33, 26 de diciembre de 2017 (UTC)
Tenga en cuenta que su firma utiliza <font>etiquetas obsoletas, que están provocando errores de pelusa de etiquetas HTML obsoletas .
Se le anima a cambiar
--'''[[User:Tikuko|<font color="black">T</font><font color="orange">K</font><font color="gray">K</font>]]'''! [[User talk:Tikuko|<small>bark with me!</small>]] :-- ¡ T K K ! ¡Ladra conmigo!a
--'''[[User:Tikuko|<span style="color: black;">T</span><span style="color: orange;">K</span><span style="color: gray;">K</span>]]'''! [[User talk:Tikuko|<small>bark with me!</small>]] :-- ¡ T K K ! ¡Ladra conmigo!— Anomalocaris ( discusión ) 05:54 28 dic 2017 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Talk:The New York Times . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:31 29 dic 2017 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:34, 2 de enero de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Discusión:Kiznaiver . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 5 ene 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:33, 9 de enero de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia discusión:Manual de estilo . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:32 16 ene 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:34, 16 de enero de 2018 (UTC)
Solo para avisarte que he rechazado la creación del artículo Borrador:Derecho de conservación, que enviaste en nombre de Usuario:Centro de Derecho de Conservación - Chile. Las razones por las que lo rechacé están en los comentarios del borrador. Mortee ( discusión ) 13:31 20 ene 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:33, 23 de enero de 2018 (UTC)
Le invitamos a continuar realizando contribuciones de calidad a Wikipedia . Tenga en cuenta que, como es un usuario registrado, puede crear artículos usted mismo y no tiene que enviar una solicitud. Sin embargo, puede continuar enviando trabajos a Artículos para la creación si lo prefiere.
¡Gracias por ayudarnos a mejorar Wikipedia!
Lee Vilenski ( discusión • contribuciones ) 10:27, 24 de enero de 2018 (UTC)Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:33, 30 de enero de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Talk:Enpass . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 10 feb 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 18:06, 21 de febrero de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:52 28 feb 2018 (UTC)
Y así termina la primera ronda de la competencia, con 4 puntos necesarios para calificar para la ronda 2. Con 53 concursantes clasificando, los grupos para la ronda 2 son ligeramente más pequeños de lo habitual, con los dos líderes de cada grupo clasificando para la ronda 3, así como los dieciséis mejores usuarios restantes.
Nuestros máximos goleadores en la primera ronda fueron:
Aoba47 lideró el campo con un artículo destacado, 8 buenos artículos y 42 GAR, dando un total de 666 puntos.
FrB.TG , un recién llegado a WikiCup, llegó después con 600 puntos, obtenidos gracias a un artículo destacado y una gran cantidad de puntos de bonificación.
Ssven2 , otro recién llegado a WikiCup, quedó en tercer lugar con 403 puntos, obtenidos de un artículo destacado, una lista destacada, un buen artículo y doce GAR. Ceranthor , Numeroso unovedante ,
Carrerera ,
Farang Rak Tham y
Los freaks de Cartoon Network obtuvieron más de 200 puntos, pero al igual que el resto de concursantes, ahora deben comenzar de nuevo desde cero. Un buen logro fueron los 193 GAR que realizaron los concursantes de WikiCup, que se comparan muy favorablemente con los 54 GA que lograron.Recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 1 pero antes del comienzo de la ronda 2 puede reclamarse en la ronda 2. Las invitaciones para trabajos de escritura colaborativa o cualquier otra discusión de trabajos potencialmente interesantes siempre son bienvenidas en la página de discusión de WikiCup. Recuerde, si dos o más competidores de WikiCup han realizado un trabajo significativo en un artículo, todos pueden reclamar puntos. Si le preocupa que su nominación, ya sea en Good Article Candidates, un proceso destacado o en cualquier otro lugar, no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews .
Si quieres ayudar con la WikiCup, ¡haz tu parte para ayudar a reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup y puedes contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si deseas comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dudes en agregarte o eliminarte de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ) y Vanamonde ( discusión ) 15:27 2 mar 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:56, 7 de marzo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 23:48, 14 de marzo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:34, 3 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas) . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:25 6 abr 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas) . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:31 9 abr 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:34, 10 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
Hola, Tikuko.
He notado que eres un revisor de AfC pero aún no tienes la bandera de Revisor de Nueva Página . ¿Podrías considerar dirigirte a PERM y solicitarla? (revisa los requisitos de la bandera AQUÍ )
Como parte de un plan más amplio para aumentar la cooperación entre New Page Patrol y Artículos para la creación, estamos tratando de conseguir que la mayor cantidad posible de revisores activos de AfC tengan la bandera de usuario NPR ( según esta discusión ). A diferencia de la lista de solicitudes de AfC, la bandera NPR no conlleva ninguna obligación de revisar nuevos artículos, por lo que no te pido que ayudes en New Page Patrol si no quieres, solo que solicites la bandera.
Por supuesto, si es algo que te interesaría, puedes echar un vistazo al tutorial de NPP . Menciona que eres un revisor activo de AfC en tu solicitud.
Saludos y gracias por ayudar en AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( o aquí ) 06:45, 11 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas) . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 13 abr 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:44, 17 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas)/RfC: Fin del sistema de portales . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:33, 19 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:38, 24 de abril de 2018 (UTC)
La segunda ronda de la WikiCup 2018 ya ha finalizado. La mayoría de los participantes que avanzaron a la siguiente ronda obtuvieron más de 100 puntos, pero dos con solo 10 puntos lograron pasar a la ronda 3. Nuestros máximos anotadores en la última ronda fueron:
Cas Liber , nuestro ganador en 2016, con tres artículos destacados.svg/1280px-Flag_of_Texas_(1839%E2%80%931879).svg.png){kind=small}
Iazyges , con nueve buenos artículos y muchos puntos extra Yashthepunisher , concursante por primera vez, con dos listas destacadas
SounderBruce , finalista el año pasado, con diecisiete buenos artículos sobre temas Nombre de usuario único , un concursante por primera vez, con catorce DYK
Muboshgu , un competidor experimentado, con tres ITN y
Courcelles , otro concursante debutante, con veintisiete GARHasta ahora, los concursantes han logrado doce artículos destacados entre ellos y un espléndido total de 124 buenos artículos. Cabe destacar que se han completado 326 GAR durante el transcurso de la WikiCup 2018, por lo que la acumulación de artículos en espera de la revisión de GA se ha reducido como resultado de las actividades de los concursantes. Al entrar en la tercera ronda, recuerda que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 2 pero antes del comienzo de la ronda 3 se puede reclamar en la ronda 3. Recuerda también que debes reclamar tus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la "obtención" de los mismos. Al realizar GAR, asegúrate de comprobar que se cumplen todos los criterios de GA; la mayoría de los GAR están bien, pero algunos han sido un poco escasos.
Si le preocupa que su nominación (ya sea en una convocatoria de buenos artículos, en un proceso de selección o en cualquier otro lugar) no reciba las críticas necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su inclusión cuando ya no sea necesaria). Las preguntas son bienvenidas en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup y los jueces están disponibles en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregar o eliminar su nombre de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ) 06:10, 1 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:45, 1 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:36, 8 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:36, 15 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
Nota: Todas las columnas de esta tabla se pueden ordenar, lo que le permite reorganizar la tabla para que los artículos que le resulten más interesantes se muestren en la parte superior. Todas las imágenes tienen ventanas emergentes con más información al pasar el mouse sobre ellas. Para obtener más información sobre las columnas y categorías, consulte la documentación y comuníquese con la página de discusión de SuggestBot si tiene alguna pregunta.
SuggestBot selecciona artículos de varias maneras en función de otros artículos que haya editado, como por ejemplo, por similitud de texto, por seguir enlaces wiki y por comparar sus patrones de edición con los de otros wikipedistas. Intenta recomendar solo artículos que otros wikipedistas han marcado como que necesitan mejoras. Agradecemos que se haya registrado para recibir sugerencias con regularidad; sus contribuciones hacen que Wikipedia sea mejor. ¡Gracias por su ayuda!
Si tiene comentarios sobre cómo mejorar SuggestBot, háganoslo saber en la página de discusión de SuggestBot . -- SuggestBot ( discusión ) 11:36, 22 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
Gracias por subir el archivo File:Orange Range logo.jpg . La página de descripción de la imagen especifica actualmente que la imagen no es libre y que solo se puede usar en Wikipedia bajo una declaración de uso legítimo . Sin embargo, la imagen no se usa actualmente en ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Si la imagen ya estaba en un artículo, ve al artículo y consulta por qué se eliminó. Puedes volver a agregarla si crees que será útil. Sin embargo, ten en cuenta que las imágenes para las que se podría crear un reemplazo no son aceptables para su uso en Wikipedia (consulta nuestra política para medios no libres ).
Tenga en cuenta que cualquier imagen que no sea libre y que no se utilice en ningún artículo se eliminará después de siete días, como se describe en la sección F5 de los criterios para la eliminación rápida . Gracias. -- B-bot ( discusión ) 18:48, 22 de mayo de 2018 (UTC)
La tercera ronda de la WikiCup 2018 ya ha llegado a su fin. Los 16 usuarios que llegaron a la cuarta ronda tenían al menos 227 puntos. Nuestros máximos anotadores en la ronda 3 fueron:
Courcelles , que participa por primera vez, con 1756 puntos, un recuento basado en gran medida en 27 GA relacionados con los Juegos Olímpicos. Cas Liber , nuestro ganador en 2016, con dos artículos destacados y tres GA sobre temas de historia natural y astronomía SounderBruce , finalista el año pasado, con una variedad de presentaciones relacionadas con el transporte en el estado de WashingtonLos concursantes consiguieron 7 artículos destacados, 4 listas destacadas, 120 buenos artículos, 1 buen tema, 124 entradas DYK, 15 entradas ITN y 132 buenas reseñas de artículos. A lo largo de la competición, los concursantes han completado 458 reseñas de GA, en comparación con los 244 buenos artículos enviados para su revisión y promoción. Al entrar en la cuarta ronda, recuerda que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 3 pero antes del inicio de la ronda 4 se puede reclamar en la ronda 4. Recuerda también que debes reclamar tus puntos dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la "obtención" de los mismos. Al realizar GAR, asegúrate de comprobar que se cumplen todos los criterios de GA. Recuerda también que todos los envíos deben cumplir con las políticas básicas de Wikipedia, independientemente del proceso de revisión; varios envíos, en particular en áreas abstrusas o técnicas, han necesitado trabajo adicional para que sean completamente verificables.
Si le preocupa que su nominación (ya sea en una convocatoria de buenos artículos, en un proceso de selección o en cualquier otro lugar) no reciba las críticas necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (recuerde eliminar su inclusión cuando ya no sea necesaria). Las preguntas son bienvenidas en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup y los jueces están disponibles en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si desea comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dude en agregar o eliminar su nombre de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) 04:55, 2 de julio de 2018 (UTC)
Soy un usuario inexperto que intenta recuperar un borrador antiguo de Sandbox que fue eliminado. ″ {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hemphill Chevrolet Buick GMC}}" ¡Ayuda, por favor! No tengo idea de lo que estoy haciendo. Gracias WhiteyChev ( discusión ) 12:34, 2 de julio de 2018 (UTC)WhiteyChev
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Discusión:Trastorno bipolar . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:27 27 jul 2018 (UTC)
En 2013, etiquetaste una versión anterior de Pasha Hawaii para eliminarla rápidamente.
He creado una nueva versión. Te invito a que la mires. Si esta versión te genera alguna inquietud, te agradecería que la expresaras en Talk:Pasha Hawaii . Geo Swan ( discusión ) 20:51 1 ago 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Fuentes confiables/Tablón de anuncios . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:31 7 ago 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia discusión:Administradores de interfaz . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:32, 17 de agosto de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas) . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 21 ago 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia discusión:WikiProject Basketball . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:28 25 ago 2018 (UTC)
La cuarta ronda de la WikiCup 2018 ya ha llegado a su fin. Los ocho usuarios que llegaron a la ronda final tuvieron que conseguir un mínimo de 422 puntos para clasificarse, siendo la puntuación máxima de la ronda 4869 puntos. Los líderes de la ronda 4 fueron:
Courcelles obtuvo unos magníficos 4869 puntos, con 92 buenos artículos sobre temas relacionados con los Juegos Olímpicos. ¡Los puntos extra de Courcelles superaron por sí solos la puntuación total de cualquiera de los otros concursantes!
Kees08 quedó en segundo lugar con 1155 puntos, incluido un artículo destacado de alto puntaje para Neil Armstrong , dos buenos temas y algunos buenos artículos relacionados con los Juegos Olímpicos. Cas Liber , con 1066 puntos, quedó en tercer lugar en esta ronda, con dos artículos destacados y un buen artículo, todos sobre temas de historia natural.
Nueva Cristallis , Yaziges , SonadorBruce , 
Kosack y Ceranthor .Durante la cuarta ronda, los participantes de WikiCup promocionaron 6 artículos destacados y 164 buenos artículos, se incluyeron 13 artículos en temas buenos y se realizaron 143 reseñas de buenos artículos. También hubo 10 contribuciones "de actualidad" en la página principal y 53 "sabías que". ¡Felicitaciones a todos los que participaron! En general, fue una ronda productiva y con puntajes altos, y creo que podemos esperar un final muy competitivo para la competencia.
Recuerda que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la ronda 4 pero antes del comienzo de la ronda 5 puede reclamarse en la ronda 5. Recuerda también que debes reclamar tus puntos dentro de los 10 días posteriores a haberlos "ganado". Si te preocupa que tu nominación no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyela en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews . Sería útil que esta lista se pudiera limpiar de cualquier elemento que ya no sea relevante. Si quieres ayudar con la WikiCup, ¡haz tu parte para reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup y los jueces están disponibles en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte y que gane el mejor editor! Si deseas comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dudes en agregarte o eliminarte de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 , Sturmvogel 66 , Vanamonde y Cwmhiraeth . Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 18:31 1 septiembre 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia discusión:Shortcut . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30, 20 de septiembre de 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia discusión:WikiProject Anime and manga . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:32 24 sep 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Talk:Chick-fil-A . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 28 septiembre 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre la discusión de Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about countyes . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:31 6 oct 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia:Bomba de agua para aldeas (propuestas) . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:30 11 oct 2018 (UTC)
El servicio de solicitud de comentarios solicita la participación en esta solicitud de comentarios sobre Wikipedia: Candidatos a artículos destacados/Revisión de fuentes de calidad destacadas RfC . Legobot ( discusión ) 04:27 18 oct 2018 (UTC)
¡La WikiCup ha terminado un año más! Nuestro campeón de este año es Courcelles ( presentaciones ), quien a lo largo de la competencia ha acumulado 147 GA, 111 GAR, 9 DYK, 4 FL y 1 ITN. Nuestros finalistas fueron los siguientes:
Courcelles ( presentaciones ) Kosack ( envíos ) Kees08 ( envíos )
SounderBruce ( envíos ) Cas Liber ( presentaciones ) Nova Crystallis ( envíos ) Iazyges ( envíos ) Ceranthor ( envíos )
Todos aquellos que lleguen a la final ganarán premios, y también habrá premios para los siguientes participantes:
Cas Liber ( envíos ) gana el premio FA por tres artículos destacados en la segunda ronda. Courcelles ( envíos ) gana el premio GA, por 92 buenos artículos en la ronda 3. Kosack ( envíos ) gana el premio FL, por cinco listas destacadas en total. Cartoon Network Freak ( envíos ) gana el premio de tema, por 30 artículos sobre buenos temas en general. Usernameunique ( envíos ) gana el premio DYK por 24 artículos del tipo ¿Sabías qué? en la ronda 3.
Zanhe ( envíos ) gana el premio ITN, por 17 en la categoría de artículos de noticias en general.
Aoba47 ( envíos ) gana el premio GAR por 43 buenas reseñas de artículos en la ronda 1.Los premios se entregarán en las próximas semanas. ¡Por favor, tengan paciencia!
Felicitaciones a todos los que participaron en la WikiCup de este año, ya sea que hayan llegado a las rondas finales o no, y felicitaciones especiales a los recién llegados a la WikiCup que han logrado mucho este año. Gracias a todos los que han participado y colaborado con la competencia.
El concurso del próximo año comienza el 1 de enero. Te invitamos a registrarte para participar ; está abierto a todos los wikipedistas, nuevos y antiguos. Los jueces de WikiCup se pondrán en contacto contigo en los próximos meses y esperamos verte a todos en el concurso de 2019. Hasta entonces, solo queda felicitar una vez más a nuestros dignos ganadores y agradecer a todos los participantes por su participación. Si deseas comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dudes en agregarte o eliminarte de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Godot13 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Cwmhiraeth ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ) y Vanamonde93 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ).
Hola, Tikuko. La votación para las elecciones del Comité de Arbitraje de 2018 está abierta hasta las 23:59 del domingo 3 de diciembre. Todos los usuarios que registraron una cuenta antes del domingo 28 de octubre de 2018, realizaron al menos 150 ediciones en el espacio principal antes del jueves 1 de noviembre de 2018 y no están bloqueados actualmente pueden votar. Los usuarios con cuentas alternativas solo pueden votar una vez.
El Comité de Arbitraje es el panel de editores responsable de llevar a cabo el proceso de arbitraje de Wikipedia . Tiene la autoridad de imponer soluciones vinculantes a las disputas entre editores, principalmente en el caso de disputas de conducta graves que la comunidad no ha podido resolver. Esto incluye la autoridad para imponer prohibiciones de sitios , prohibiciones de temas , restricciones de edición y otras medidas necesarias para mantener nuestro entorno de edición. La política de arbitraje describe las funciones y responsabilidades del Comité con mayor detalle.
Si desea participar en las elecciones de 2018, revise los candidatos y envíe sus opciones en la página de votación . Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 18:42 19 nov 2018 (UTC)
Hola y feliz año nuevo!
Bienvenidos a la WikiCup 2019, la competencia comienza hoy. Si ya se han unido, su página de envíos se puede encontrar aquí . Si aún no se han registrado, pueden agregar su nombre aquí y configuraremos su página de envíos. Una regla importante para recordar es que solo el contenido en el que hayan completado un trabajo significativo durante 2019, y que hayan nominado este año, es elegible para obtener puntos en la competencia, ¡los jueces lo verificarán! Cualquier pregunta debe dirigirse a uno de los jueces o dejarse en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup . Las inscripciones cerrarán a fines de enero y la primera ronda finalizará el 26 de febrero; los 64 puntajes más altos en ese momento pasarán a la ronda 2. ¡Buena suerte! Los jueces de la WikiCup son Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Godot13 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ), Vanamonde93 ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión · contribuciones · correo electrónico ). Entrega de mensajes de MediaWiki ( discusión ) 11:14 1 ene 2019 (UTC)
Un editor ha solicitado una discusión para abordar la redirección de Fat body . Dado que usted ha estado involucrado de alguna manera con la redirección de Fat body , es posible que desee participar en la discusión de la redirección si aún no lo ha hecho. — Yerpo Eh? 10:32, 7 de febrero de 2019 (UTC)
Y así termina la primera ronda de la competición. Todos los que obtengan una puntuación positiva pasan a la segunda ronda. Con 56 concursantes clasificados, cada grupo de la segunda ronda está formado por siete concursantes, y los dos líderes de cada grupo se clasificarán para la tercera ronda, así como los dieciséis mejores concursantes restantes.
Nuestros máximos goleadores en la Ronda 1 fueron:
L293D , un recién llegado a WikiCup, lideró el campo con diez buenos artículos sobre submarinos para un total de 357 puntos.
Adam Cuerden , un veterano de WikiCup, llegó después con 274 puntos, principalmente provenientes de ocho imágenes destacadas, restauraciones de obras de arte.
MPJ-DK , un entusiasta de la lucha libre, quedó en tercer lugar con 263 puntos, obtenidos de una lista destacada, cinco buenos artículos, dos DYK y cuatro GAR. Usernameunique llegó después, en el puesto 243, con un artículo destacado y un buen artículo, ambos sobre cascos antiguos.
Squeamish Ossifrage ocupó el quinto lugar con 224 puntos, en su mayoría obtenidos por llevar el incendio de la bóveda de Fox en 1937 al estatus de artículo destacado.
Ed! también estuvo en 224, con una sorprendente cantidad de buenas reseñas de artículos (56 en realidad).Estos concursantes, al igual que todos los demás, ahora tienen que empezar a sumar puntos desde cero. Entre todos, los concursantes completaron reseñas de 143 artículos buenos, cien más de la cantidad de artículos buenos que afirmaban haber completado, lo que supone una importante reducción de la acumulación de reseñas. ¡Bien hecho a todos!
Recuerde que cualquier contenido promocionado después del final de la Ronda 1 pero antes del comienzo de la Ronda 2 puede ser reclamado en la Ronda 2. Las invitaciones para trabajos de escritura colaborativa o cualquier otra discusión de trabajos potencialmente interesantes siempre son bienvenidas en la página de discusión de WikiCup. Recuerde, si dos o más competidores de WikiCup han hecho un trabajo significativo en un artículo, todos pueden reclamar puntos. Si le preocupa que su nominación, ya sea en buenos candidatos para artículos, un proceso destacado o en cualquier otro lugar, no reciba las revisiones necesarias, inclúyala en Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews .
Si quieres ayudar con la WikiCup, ¡haz tu parte para reducir los retrasos en las revisiones! Las preguntas son bienvenidas en Wikipedia talk:WikiCup y puedes contactar a los jueces en sus páginas de discusión o por correo electrónico. ¡Buena suerte! Si deseas comenzar o dejar de recibir este boletín, no dudes en agregarte o eliminarte de Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send . Godot13 ( discusión ), Sturmvogel 66 ( discusión ), Vanamonde ( discusión ) y Cwmhiraeth ( discusión ).
La segunda ronda de la WikiCup 2019 ya ha finalizado. Los participantes debían sumar 32 puntos para pasar a la ronda 3. Nuestros cuatro máximos anotadores de la ronda 2 obtuvieron más de 400 puntos y fueron:
Cas Liber (1210), nuestro ganador en 2016, con dos artículos destacados y tres DYK. También hizo un buen uso de los puntos de bonificación disponibles, más del doble de su puntuación al elegir artículos apropiados en los que trabajar. Kosack (750), subcampeón del año pasado, con un FA, un GA, dos FL y cinco DYK. Adam Cuerden (480), un veterano de WikiCup, con 16 imágenes destacadas, en su mayoría restauraciones..svg/1280px-Flag_of_Prussia_(1892-1918).svg.png){kind=small}
Zwerg Nase (461), un competidor experimentado, con un artículo FA, un GA y un ITN.Otras actuaciones notables fueron las de
Barkeep49 con seis GA, Ceranthor ,
Lee Vilenski y
Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topicsContestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 16:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:
Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points Casliber (submissions) with 817 points Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 pointsAll those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Casliber (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition. Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5. Yashthepunisher (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall. Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall. MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2. Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1. Ed! (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Picture of Wikipedian Tikuko at Prom.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points..svg/1280px-Royal_standard_of_England_(1406%E2%80%931603).svg.png){kind=small}
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare. Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status. L293D, 
Kingsif, Enwebb, Lee Vilenski and 
CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
It's been a bit inconvenient lately! I am trying to undelete "Draft:Let Them Eat Cake" but it's not clear if the undelete page allowed me to do this. The last I worked on it I was trying to rename it "Let Them Eat Cake (documentary)" to differentiate this title, but I must have submitted to the wrong person. I can't seem to connect with the undelete pages, no request links.
If you could help get my article back and help me rename it, I would REALLY appreciate it!!!
Sedaray (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews Lee Vilenski with 869 points, 
Hog Farm with 801, Kingsif with 719, SounderBruce with 710, Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and 
MX with 515.The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Tikuko! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service for one or both of the Good Article nomination categories "Arts" and "Everyday life".
You may have noticed that the Feedback Request Service has been inoperative for a number of months, and Yapperbot is currently in the process of taking over from Legobot in performing the requests. In that process, the subscription categories have been updated to match the current categories used by the Good Articles project, and neither "Arts" nor "Everyday life" is used anymore.
What this means is:
You are encouraged to review your FRS preferences to ensure that they match your interests; there are a number of new categories you can now opt in to additionally. To do this, you should:
{{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading, where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.Please note that any subscription preferences you had with the FRS for requests for comment have not been affected by these changes.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on Yapperbot's operator's talk page. Thank you!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 21:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC).
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Barry (2019) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ornithocheiridae on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paranthropus robustus on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charles Corydon Hall on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:John Johnson (inventor) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alexander S. Wolcott on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paranthropus aethiopicus on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Maria (2018) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Australopithecus africanus on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Otto Hahn on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Australopithecus bahrelghazali on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ureter on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Austin Church on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anatomical terms of location on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lise Meitner on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Edvard August Vainio on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Muhammad al-Qunawi on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tatenectes on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian cities on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment, and at Talk:Cyclone Owen on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2018 Pacific hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lek mating on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Percy (1990) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Teahouse on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lieselotte Templeton on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Typhoon Jebi (2018) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charles Bingham Penrose and Talk:Horace Smithy on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Air pollution in Turkey on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Louise Boursier on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Michael on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Depression Usman on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs; Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Salyut 1 on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Beulah Ream Allen on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ulcerative colitis on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Barry (2019) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charles Corydon Hall on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hurricane Dolores (2015) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Injector pen on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Transmission of COVID-19 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cumbre Vieja tsunami hazard on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Seminal vesicles on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tropical Storm Ampil on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Beaver on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 8 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Agata (dog) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gorgonopsia on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Seminal vesicles and Talk:Hurricanes in Costa Rica on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Belgian Shepherd on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daisy Yen Wu on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2017 YE5 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Purple-crowned fairywren on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition. Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4. Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall. Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5. Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall. MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2. The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2. Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall. Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyrtophora citricola, Talk:Biotin, Talk:Quantum mechanics, Talk:Sami (chimpanzee), Talk:Preening (bird), Talk:Robert Crippen, Talk:Herto Man, Talk:Kristianstad Basin, Talk:Aluminium and Talk:Aigialosuchus on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peloneustes on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gunnar Degelius on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:1892 Vacaville–Winters earthquakes on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hypericum sechmenii on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tachyon on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:17q12 microdeletion syndrome on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Joel S. Levine on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:1971 San Fernando earthquake on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths. ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points. Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items. The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs..svg/1280px-Standard_of_Oliver_Cromwell_(1653%E2%80%931659).svg.png){kind=small}
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews. Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles. Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Talk:Histone, Talk:Yuanmou Man, Talk:Galileo (spacecraft), Talk:Emmanuël Sérusiaux, Talk:Sophie Jamal, Talk:Adelolophus, Talk:Mihran Kassabian, Talk:T2K experiment and Talk:Diaphragmatic rupture on "Natural sciences" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Histamine N-methyltransferase on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Punctelia hypoleucites on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2MASS J03480772−6022270 on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:1997 Central Texas tornado outbreak on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyclone Owen on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Henry Fitz on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pentasomy X on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Skathi (moon) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shellfish allergy on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:1931 Atlantic hurricane season on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg/1280px-Quick_logo_for_QW_(cropped).jpg){kind=logo}
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.
More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs. Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points. Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths. Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews. Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews. Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations. Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Zagreb flash flood on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bengal tiger on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cyclone Kelvin on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Casparian strip on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Subtropical Storm Alpha (2020) on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mountain blackeye on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rice's whale on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tikuko! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over a year.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{Frs user|Tikuko|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you!Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs. Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points. Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died. Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles. Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tikuko! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
Thank you!Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Breed All About It Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 20 May 2022 (UTC)