The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
- KOMTAR Year 2016 April.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We need rewriting, a reposition of the sections, and integrate the chronology (the table) into the main article. KOMTAR is itself a complex, not the skyscraper, so simply referring KOMTAR as the KOMTAR Tower for its main headline is not suitable. I'll be trying to see what could I do, possibly a rewrite in the future.
We need images for the skyscraper though, the old ones are outdated, and the current image does not put a lot of focus on the building (the fireworks acts as a distraction).
(PenangLion (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]
UPDATE:User:PenangLion/sandboxIN THE SANDBOX CONTAINS A DRAFT FOR A POSSIBLE REVAMP OF THE PAGE
(PenangLion (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]
Update (2):
I am ranking this page as a High-importance article for WikiSkyscrapers.
Reasons are as such:
- - Tallest skyscraper in Malaysia (1985-1987);
- - First skyscraper in Malaysia to surpass 200 m (660 ft);
- - Cultural icon of Penang;
- - Was among the tallest buildings outside the Western Hemisphere (2nd in 1985-1986, 3rd in 1986-1987);
- - Important statement of Modernism in Malaysian architecture (Asian architecture would probably be an overstatement);
- - First urban complex in Penang;
- - Last project related to Buckminster Fuller in Southeast Asia.
If you have any concerns, please do reply to me, then we can make a change again.
(PenangLion (talk) 16:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC))[reply]
- After two and a half years I finished the article. Cheers, gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Komtar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: PenangLion (talk · contribs) 04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I'll be reviewing this article. 141Pr -\contribs/- 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): ![]()
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism): ![]()
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused): ![]()
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
![]()
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article seems to be stable, I don't see anything wrong with it.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): ![]()
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
![]()
Initial comments
Article looks good at a glance, I'll have a closer review in a bit. 141Pr -\contribs/- 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey...are there any further comments for this review? gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is some sandwiching going on in the construction section - there are just a lot of images in general. Consider removing some or grouping them together.